Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

:doh:

 

LOL. It could be much worse.

 

After all, you could have looked at a chart posted by Mktr, responded to a question posted by a different poster (you), then apologized to a third poster for misunderstanding his question (emac) - all while not realizing you were speaking to three different people (something I only noticed just now).

 

ROFL.

 

That'll teach me not to look at who posted when responding. :doh:

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spyder,

 

Here's my first attempt at tapes. I've read a fair amount of the thread so far, over and over again and I feel I've got a fairly decent idea of how to apply the tape pair (or more for lats). In the attached pic I've noted tape pairs that are not either long or short pairings. Only found one lateral, no hitches. This chart is today's. Comments?

 

Wanting to learn to crawl before walking.

 

Thanks!

5aa7102aed0f3_Picture1.png.d2e5bfb8ed040f0adf100746e86d5289.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I am thoroughly confused. Let's start with something simple: Can you have a sequence like b2b 2r2b 2r2b2r2b? If not, why? 'Nature' a fair answer for me if not.

 

Are all sequences either of the form b2b 2r2b or r2r 2b2r? If so, which is the correct view of the interchange between sequences b2b 2r2(b2b) 2r2b (that is an overlapping uptrend where the paranthetical b2b represents the end of the first uptrend and the beginning of the new uptrend) or would the correct sequence be two separate uptrends meaning b2b 2r2b (2) b2b 2r2b? Does that make sense?

 

Hopefully someone can clear my head, please direct me to a post elsewhere in this thread if this has been covered already. TIA!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Draw your RTL first (except in cases where you cannot), and then add the LTL.

 

- Spydertrader

 

When you say RTL and LTL are you now talking about merging the individual tape pairings into trends or are you simply saying when drawing in the tapes for individual pairs to start with the RTL tape first and then move on to the LTL tape?

 

If I might show my ignorance could I also ask how the LTL is to be formed? Is it simply following what one would do for the RTL (connect the bottoms/tops) or is the LTL formed by duplicating the RTL and placing it at the opposite end so they are parallel to each other?

 

Much appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you say RTL and LTL are you now talking about merging the individual tape pairings into trends or are you simply saying when drawing in the tapes for individual pairs to start with the RTL tape first and then move on to the LTL tape?

 

All containers have two trend lines - a right trend line (RTL) and a left trend line (LTL). Price annotations begin with an RTL, and end with an LTL. For each case (A - J on page one of this thread), you must annotate an RTL and an LTL. When combining these cases, you must annotate an RTL and an LTL. When annotating the slower fractals (traverses, channels), you must annotate an RTL and an LTL. Every container you build must have an RTL and an LTL. In addition, your Volume Pane must contain the Gaussian annotation which match the Price containers.

 

If I might show my ignorance could I also ask how the LTL is to be formed? Is it simply following what one would do for the RTL (connect the bottoms/tops) or is the LTL formed by duplicating the RTL and placing it at the opposite end so they are parallel to each other?

 

We all started out a bit lost and unsure of the road ahead. Over time, the feeling of being overwhelmed will subside as you gain knowledge, skills and experience. To answer your question: Choice B.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My eyes are beginning to see the gaussians. :shocked: FWIW I think I'm able to see the traverses and channels better right now, a third is hard to see, I can make two work. I can make out parts of the tapes but haven't figured out how to piece them together quite yet. The volume hangs me up a bit.

 

I've been able to go back through my charts of equities with this approach and using gaussian volume sequences I can now see why some of my trend lines that I had drawn in the past failed. It's really not about price, it's about volume! Volume will dictate the price you could say; and until the volume resolves itself the price is going to follow. <-- This is why some of my trend lines that I thought should hold did not, the volume was not there to support it! Very helpful.

 

Thanks Spyder and many others who I've been able to watch and learn a little portion of this idea from. I'll keep refining; think I'm on the right path. :beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OB at open today said (to me) "you jumped"

 

Making my Orange Traverse was just a tape and making PT3 of traverse 15:45 ET.

 

Thoughts; A Pennant BO (1 bar) on IV does not constitute a return to DOM on 5M tape.

 

So adjust and pick up the routine.

 

Who can complain at this volatility. Makes the working days a bit shorter.

 

Have a nice weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spyder - a question about your personal trading style...

 

If I am not mistaken you only monitor and annotate the 5 minute ES - is that correct?

 

What other charts/time frames do you look at (if any)?

 

Roughly how many trades per day do you make (on a day when you trade through a whole day)?

 

Do you employ an SCT style where you always have a position open?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spyder - a question about your personal trading style...

If I am not mistaken you only monitor and annotate the 5 minute ES - is that correct?

 

For the vast majority of trading days, yes.

 

What other charts/time frames do you look at (if any)?

 

For the vast majority of trading days, none. While I have the ability to use a 'medium' or 'fine' toolset, I simply don't feel like working that hard. As such, I put away the YM (one less chart to annotate[less work]), I no longer need The STR-SQU (I'd much rather chat on the phone than trade within laterals and Outside Bars), and I have put away the OTR charts (I don't feel like trading within internal formations - again, too much work).

 

I do have the DOM up, but for Order Entry purposes only. If i get board, I'll monitor the DOM Walls for a spell - watching them move back and forth while big money plays its games - but again, I'm only watching because I am board and I need something to keep me busy.

 

Roughly how many trades per day do you make (on a day when you trade through a whole day)?

 

The number of trades varies depending on the type of market. For example, an 'M' or 'W' day provides far more opportunity (more trades) than a trending day. I've entered the market long at the Open of Bar One and held until 4:00 PM Eastern time quite frequently, but on other days, I've reversed direction every 30 minutes to an hour. As such, my 'range' of trades falls between 1 and 12 on any day with a mode of 5 -6.

 

Do you employ an SCT style where you always have a position open?

 

If I trade on any given day (and plan to trade the entire day), I have a position on for the entire day. I enter at the open of Bar One and I am always flat at 4:00 PM eastern time (close of bar).

 

I may exit the market early on any given day if the market signals it has reached a Point Two within 20 minutes of 4:00 PM.

 

I also rarely trade the entire day in the summertime. I'd rather be fishing.;)

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - this is very very helpful!

 

I am transitioning from enter-hold-exit to SCT. Seeing what works is useful.

 

So if you were trading today and not fishing :) ... I am guessing that today you had:

 

enter at open

2 rev around 10:10

3 rev around 11:30 (or 12:30 depending on how you saw it)

4 rev around 13:20

exit close

 

All times close of EST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm joining in learning to monitor and annotate. Attached is today's chart of Hang Seng Futures.

I have a confusion in marking the part circled in blue, whether it was a "2B 2R B2B" or "B2B". Would anyone help me in pointing any errors? Any comments is greatly appreciated. Thanks. :)

5aa7102c747a6_HSI2010_08_30.thumb.png.0133802a8eb1e2922e31e555cf970669.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's HSI Futures. Trying to find where I missed the 2B 2R traverse sequence circled in blue. Any help is greatly appreciated. Will start to monitor ES tomorrow when I get the data.

5aa7102ca70e1_HSI2010_08_31.thumb.png.518d1180ee9c00c26a3cae96b11a0dbb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today's HSI Futures. Trying to find where I missed the 2B 2R traverse sequence circled in blue. Any help is greatly appreciated. Will start to monitor ES tomorrow when I get the data.
I added my gaussians to your chart.

5aa7102d209d6_windsHSI2010_08_31mygaussians.thumb.png.3ce3f56c2345a4ac1c98442c76f8e554.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I added my gaussians to your chart.

 

Thanks cnms2. I see now how I missed the traverse sequence. I jumped fractal on the previous day, annotating tape as traverse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
very interesting thursday(9/2) and friday(9/3) both ended with sym laterals but with subtle differences.
This seems a potentially instructive discussion. Maybe somebody can start it ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.