Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hi Johnw,

 

Thanks for the compliment... Yes, I developed the indicators myself (and to avoid the thought I'm trying to promote them here on this forum....they are not for sale)

 

Í'll give you a brief description what the indicators measure:

 

- Trend Filters (slow/medium/fast): These filters classify each bar with a certain degree of tolerance and measure the related swing length.

 

- Trend Index: This is the leading indicator I use for entering a trade. It measures the trend quality based on a dynamic oscilator length.

 

- Market Heartbeat: This is my version of the ADX.

 

- Market Power: Shows the gear-box of the market (same as a car).

 

very ingenious indeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flex1975, the chart is too small (and can't be enlarged) to see what indicators you are using. Would you care to tell us what indicators and settings for each, you are using? And what time frame are you using? I would like to try to examine your use of these indicators and time frames, also. Thank you.

 

Hi Ricastein,

 

Please see my reply to Johnw for a description of the indicators. The settings of the indicators are all dynamic (inside the code)...so none of the indicators have fixed input parameters.

 

I don't use time frame charts. In my opinion time related charts are way too noisy so I use an alternative chart type. Another reason for using an alternative interval is because I'm a automated trader and writing profitable automated systems on alternative charts is less complex....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the big decisions a trader must take early on in the game is to decide the frame type and size to be used.

 

Will it be a tick frame, or volume or range or a time frame

And will it be 100 tics or 5,000 contracts, or 4 tics or 5 minutes.

 

These two decisions have at great bearing on the outcome of the game.

 

And then a Trader must ask themself .."will I use the much proclaimed 89 tick frame, or will I take a huge risk and round it out to 90 ticks"

 

Once these decisions are taken, it becomes apparent that frames are synthetic interruptions to the flow of contracts through the Exchange at the Bid or at the Ask, solely at the convenience of the Trader.

 

The Close of each frame is a snapshot of the price at the regular intervals that the Trader has prescribed ... and the high and low of the frame may be untradeable depending upon the next tic, but that tic of course lies within the next frame.

 

This is the foundation that TA is built upon, and yet it invokes less discussion than TA itself ... not unlike architecture really, where the colour of the window frames is the source of much discussion, but the foundations hardly rate a mention.

 

So, let us say imagine for a moment that we are top-down Thinkers ... our primary goal of course is to make oodles and oodles of money on a weekly [ and one day on a daily] basis.

 

We repeat this mantra so many times to ourselves that it is chiseled into our DNA.

 

This is an excellent place to be in the game of Trading ... our hearts and minds are solely focused on making lots and lots of money.

 

Therefore it is perfectly consistent with our goal to ask ourselves at EVERY step of our journey .... "is this Indicator or derivative directly going to help me make big money"

 

It is a simple YES / No question ...just like our trades ... we win / we lose

 

How hard can that be ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have a few things to say about technical indicators when the timing is right, but this thread is NOT a forum to display all your favorite indicators, so please do that somewhere else. I'm trying to develop your sense of price action primarily, and I don't want to confuse readers of this thread with "the latest, greatest..."

 

'ppreciate it.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phantom,

I think what you are posting here is great. They way you trade conceptually is very similar to the way I approach the market. I can tell this thread is going to be a good one. I will be following with much interest and am looking forward to it.

Thanks

SRspider

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I promised to provide info (fodder) such that a previously clueless trader can get profitable; I never promised anyone profitability per se. That, of course, would be in violation of CFTC regs.

 

Please come here to learn, you're not invited if you're here to "stir the pot." Nes pas?

 

Au contraire you are not welcome here if you want to scam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi Phantom,

 

I have just read your narrative with respect to your posted chart.

 

All very clear indeed to the point where even a person like I can follow and clearly understand

your thought process leading into your successful trade.

 

What I struggle with, is why you refer to Bolly Bands, 20 ema, MACD, Hammers etc,

when it is obvious that you can read price behaviour so clearly.

 

My thoughts too (particularly on the 'squigglies') . One doesn't need a BB to see price tightening up. One Doesn't need an MA to detect trend or a reversion to the mean. One doesn't need a MACD to see a new low is on less momentum to the last low.

 

I wonder if they can help as 'training wheels' until you can see these things with plain price bars? I guess they can also help with quantifying the magnitude of a phenomena (for automation or whatever).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My thoughts too (particularly on the 'squigglies') . One doesn't need a BB to see price tightening up. One Doesn't need an MA to detect trend or a reversion to the mean. One doesn't need a MACD to see a new low is on less momentum to the last low.

 

One also doesn't need color to watch a movie (as opposed to b&w) but it sure makes the movie more enjoyable...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Au contraire you are not welcome here if you want to scam.

 

If I ever intend on selling anything, I'll be sure to exclude you from the offer...that way, you won't feel scammed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One also doesn't need color to watch a movie (as opposed to b&w) but it sure makes the movie more enjoyable...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

Well assuming price is what we are actually interested in watching it through inidcators is akin to watching a movie through time lapse photography that transforms the image as well :) Anyway I don't want to derail your thread and will be interested to hear about these crash rails later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I ever intend on selling anything, I'll be sure to exclude you from the offer...that way, you won't feel scammed.

 

And there they are...the true intentions! Why not being honest from the beginning? All you had to say was...."Hello, I am Phantom and I am offering a paid coaching service for beginning traders. This is wat you will learn.........(and you make a reliable case of all information nuggets you're selling)".

 

Clear and honest...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi Phantom,

 

I have just read your narrative with respect to your posted chart.

 

All very clear indeed to the point where even a person like I can follow and clearly understand

your thought process leading into your successful trade.

 

What I struggle with, is why you refer to Bolly Bands, 20 ema, MACD, Hammers etc,

when it is obvious that you can read price behaviour so clearly.

 

Hi Phantom,

 

I made this post because I am interested to know why a person with your understanding of price behaviour, employs Indicators that are clearly derivatives of the price itself

... I am not including hammers because they are just name given to price within a certain frame... a descriptive name I will grant you, but never the less it is just a name.

I say this because if you were to rename "hammer" to say zebra, it would have absolutely no influence over the movement of the next tic.

 

And the movement of the next tic and the after that and the one after that is what we trade ...it is the game we call trading ...n'est-ce pas

 

As I say, I am looking forward with interest to your post concerning "guard rails" although I still cannot imagine how a person who can describe price behaviour so clearly as you, needs a derivative in any shape or form.

 

This is your thread of course Phantom and it must not be derailed, but I have come to learn along the journey, that anything that distracts a Trader from following price is in fact just that ......a distraction.

 

I know Indicators can be regarded as "training wheels" to be discarded at some later date,

but that is akin to giving up drinking tomorrow .... as the song says "tomorrow never comes"

 

I can tell from your subsequent posts that you are very passionate about this subject, which makes me anticipate the "guard rails" even more.

Edited by johnw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well assuming price is what we are actually interested in watching it through indcators is akin to watching a movie through time lapse photography that transforms the image as well :)

 

I, for one, couldn't care less about price...I'm only concerned with price direction, volatility and liquidity.

 

The indicators I use serve the function of amplifying price bar subtleties, when they exist, so I can more easily decide whether or not a market is doing what I want it to do prior to my entry. I don't necessarily use the indicators on every trade, but they are there for when I consult them.

 

Hope that clarifies things. If indicators don't work for you, so be it. I never said I was a "purist."

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The indicators I use serve the function of amplifying price bar subtleties

 

Please explain in detail what your definition of price bar subtleties are and how Bollinger Bands, an EMA or MACD are capable to highlight these "subtleties"...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dearest Flex, Mighty Mouse, and anyone else who only visits my thread only to look for inconsistencies and spread quasi-malicious comments,

 

My posts are fully intended to be didactic in nature.

 

If, for whatever reason, my posts offend you, you are all certainly invited to refrain from coming here. I can tell by the sheer numbers of visits that some of the folks who frequent my thread are actually interested in learning something.

 

I just hope that the folks who are well intended are not put off by your comments because I intend to continue teaching in spite of all your off-color comments.

 

Furthermore, I will teach on indicators when I am ready, and refuse to be pushed around by the few of you who don't have the patience to wait, and don't know a good thing when you have it right in your hands.

 

Now go do something constructive with your time and leave us alone if you can't behave yourselves...

 

 

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And there they are...the true intentions! Why not being honest from the beginning? All you had to say was...."Hello, I am Phantom and I am offering a paid coaching service for beginning traders. This is wat you will learn.........(and you make a reliable case of all information nuggets you're selling)".

 

Clear and honest...

 

How's this for clarity and honesty: my "coaching program" is unfolding right before your eyes, and its free of charge!

 

Pretty good deal, huh?

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

P.S. I do actually intend on getting back on subject soon. Sometimes a little housekeeping is necessary when running a project of this magnitude...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I, for one, couldn't care less about price...I'm only concerned with price direction, volatility and liquidity.

 

The indicators I use serve the function of amplifying price bar subtleties, when they exist, so I can more easily decide whether or not a market is doing what I want it to do prior to my entry. I don't necessarily use the indicators on every trade, but they are there for when I consult them.

 

Hope that clarifies things. If indicators don't work for you, so be it. I never said I was a "purist."

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

Quite so. Whatever helps one make consistent decisions at the hard right edge. Your thread your rules :)

 

Don't tell anyone but I usually have an indicator or two on my charts, often ones I have written. Anything that 'frames' price like VWAP & SD bands or gives a proxy for order flow like cumulative delta or trade intensity. sshhh just don't tell.

 

Here is a chart of the DAX from this morning the VWAP SD lines frame price beautifully, great when I am feeling too lazy to hand draw S/R. Of course you still need to look to see what price is telling you at these levels but indicator it is.

picture3.png.8fc680bea3cc1b11253ad6e43259224e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How's this for clarity and honesty: my "coaching program" is unfolding right before your eyes, and its free of charge!

 

Pretty good deal, huh?

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

P.S. I do actually intend on getting back on subject soon.

.

 

Yes please ... at the risk of putting you under pressure, it are the "guard rails" that interest me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How's this for clarity and honesty: my "coaching program" is unfolding right before your eyes, and its free of charge!

 

Pretty good deal, huh?

 

 

 

True and fair point...when it's free...a reader cannot complain about the quality...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True and fair point...when it's free...a reader cannot complain about the quality...

 

Sure you can. Constructive criticism is no bad thing. Of course it would be his prerogative to ignore it. Mind you this is the first mention of 'quality'. Seems to be simply and clearly presented to me. What phantom is presenting is a pretty straight forward approach that is based on 'price action' that demonstrably 'works'. Sure you need some money management and it might be an idea to filter trades (times of the day when you can expect volatility to pick up for example), but at the end of the day its solid TA. Simple concept clearly presented?

 

I was going to comment on your first post. It seems that your approach is pretty radically different from phantoms. (of course I may be wrong) It would certainly seem to merit it's own thread if that is the case? I wonder if any 'criticism' is not really criticism, it's just you do stuff differently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really been someone who spent much time in forums in the past... fact is that this is the first traders' website I've ever become involved with.

 

My background is in nuclear engineering but I've been day trading for a living since 1999.

 

I browse around the various topics and see a whole lot of information being passed that, at least to me, and I'm not the biggest rock on the planet, is very difficult to assimilate.

 

I devoted some of my time to this website and to you fellow traders because after breaking every trading rule in the bag MULTIPLE TIMES I had to create trading methods that were so easy that even a lazy, detached, bored, etc,, etc. guy like me could make money.

 

Please don't be fooled by the simplicity of my approach to trading the futures markets. The simplicity in my methods is paramount to my own ability to make big money, week in, week out. I've got 5 mouths to feed and not much patience for a losing trading program.

 

My hope is that at least some of you traders can relate...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never really been someone who spent much time in forums in the past... fact is that this is the first traders' website I've ever become involved with.

 

My background is in nuclear engineering but I've been day trading for a living since 1999.

 

I browse around the various topics and see a whole lot of information being passed that, at least to me, and I'm not the biggest rock on the planet, is very difficult to assimilate.

 

I devoted some of my time to this website and to you fellow traders because after breaking every trading rule in the bag MULTIPLE TIMES I had to create trading methods that were so easy that even a lazy, detached, bored, etc,, etc. guy like me could make money.

 

Please don't be fooled by the simplicity of my approach to trading the futures markets. The simplicity in my methods is paramount to my own ability to make big money, week in, week out. I've got 5 mouths to feed and not much patience for a losing trading program.

 

My hope is that at least some of you traders can relate...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

Hi Phantom,

 

Why not just stay with your original intent and do not allow yourself to be distracted.

If you quite correctly believe that simplicity is the key and yet you incorporate TA

on some sort of ad hoc basis, then I am as curious to follow your posts as I am to learn of "guard rails"

 

Just push on ahead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple does not mean easy as the old cliché goes. Mind you if one can't make simple work the chances of making complex work are pretty slim. I don't think the problem is just assimilation, if there are too many variables and parameters involved it is much harder to be consistent at trigger time.

 

Edit: Yeah as JohnW says push on...I guess I am as guilty as anyone as decreasing the signal to noise ratio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure you can. Constructive criticism is no bad thing. Of course it would be his prerogative to ignore it. Mind you this is the first mention of 'quality'. Seems to be simply and clearly presented to me. What phantom is presenting is a pretty straight forward approach that is based on 'price action' that demonstrably 'works'. Sure you need some money management and it might be an idea to filter trades (times of the day when you can expect volatility to pick up for example), but at the end of the day its solid TA. Simple concept clearly presented?

 

I was going to comment on your first post. It seems that your approach is pretty radically different from phantoms. (of course I may be wrong) It would certainly seem to merit it's own thread if that is the case? I wonder if any 'criticism' is not really criticism, it's just you do stuff differently?

 

Hi Blowfish,

 

You're right...my approach is radically different but I also respect the approach of Phantom. The only thing that is important (in my opinion) when you choose to present an trading approach on a forum like this is to specify the conditions when you take the trade or don't trade.

 

For example....Phantom says he looks at volatility...is ATR, standard devation or something else leading...are there minimum volatilty values required....is there a minimum length (in bars, price or time) regarding the breakout before the hammer etc etc.... Only then you have a valid trade setup and that's something a lot of (newbie) traders simply do not understand...

 

If the trade rules are clear I can code a "Phantom strategy" and provide some test results for those who are interested...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By David Carter
      My broker (Jones Mutual) advised me to use candlesticks when CFD trading, as the simple line graph option does not give you enough information - is this correct?
    • By inthemoneystocks
      One of the most important reasons why traders take big losses is because they often fail to recognize when a trade has gone wrong. You see, stopping out of a trade is probably the biggest fault of traders and investors. Often, this happens to young and inexperienced traders and investors, but I know many veteran traders and investors that struggle with this as well. Early in my own career I struggled with stopping out of a bad trade myself, so I can sympathize with this problem. 

      The problem with taking a loss is really two fold. First, the trader has to admit that he is wrong. As you all know, as human beings we all hate to be wrong. The ego simply gets in the way and we all want to always be right all the time. The first secret in this business is to check the ego at the door. The market does not care about your the color of your skin, religion or anything else. It will move in the direction of the money and that is the bottom line. Once a trader or investor goes into what I call 'hope mode' the trade is over. I'm sure everyone has been in this position at one time or another. Simply put there is no room for ego or hope in the stock market. The market is always right and there is no reason to fight it. 

      Here is the second problem with taking a loss, it hurts. Pain and pleasure are the two reasons why humans do anything at all. As a human being, we are always looking to have pleasure and avoid pain. Well, losing money is painful and many people would rather simply hold a losing equity than lock in a small loss and move on. I cannot tell you how often I see a trader hold a losing trade only to see the position move further out of the money. Many years ago I watched a day trader blow up a $200,000 account in a single day averaging in on a bad day trade. To this day I can remember the look on his face as his money vanished in thin air. Believe it or not, this trader could have exited the position with a $500.00 loss, but instead he kept averaging in and fighting the position until he was wiped out. As a rule, once you have your full position you should never average in on a trade. At that point, it is critical to know where your max loss is going to be and stop out if that level is breached.

      Now when should we stop out? The answer to this question is not that simple, but here is what I personally do. I always place my stop loss below an important breakout or pivot on the chart. You see, prior breakout or pivot levels are usually defended when retested. After all, this is usually an area where institutional traders and investors got involved, that is why there is a pivot low or high on the chart to begin with. If that level is breached on a closing basis then I will move out of the position. So If I took a trade based on a daily chart pattern then I will usually check the daily and weekly chart levels. If there is a major pivot on the weekly chart then I will use a week chart close as my stop out level. While this method may not be perfect, it has saved me from much bigger losses when I have been wrong.



        Nicholas Santiago
    • By LindsayBev
      Hello!  I am new to this forum.  I am interested in learning about candlestick reading.  I would appreciate hearing from any that will answer this post WHICH book you found the most helpful?  
    • By trading4life
      Hello, My name is trading4life.
      I just joined this forum.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.