Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

attachment.php?attachmentid=24649&stc=1&d=1305739782

 

Okay, back to business.

 

Today I would like to discuss how I use Bollinger Bands to tip me off as to when I can expect a consolidation, and therefore a subsequent breakout and trading opportunity.

 

Today's chart is a 120 minute euro chart with 3 numbers atop the price action. Notice how the market traded up to these three zones and then consolidated. These zones are located roughly at the top of the Bollinger Bands! When price approaches the top band in a downward moving market, I go on "alert status" to wait out the pending consolidation breakout with a downward bias.

 

The same thing applies at the bottom of the band. I wait for the bottoming consolidation pattern with a definite upward breakout bias (isn't this what standard deviation bands are all about?) and trade the breakout > price rejection methodology already explained earlier in this thread.

 

Does it work 100% of the time? Of course not, but its been pretty good to me so far.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

eurobands.jpg.806a9c43e24f2f4d464fbea4e90c09db.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't you people just shut up. If I was Phantom I'd already be sick of this whole thing. Here's a guy that opens a simple thread to try to teach some strategy, and before he even gets started you're questioning his methodology, his ability, his honesty, and his integrity. We're all adults here, and I don't need any of you to try to point out some kind of fraudulent activity. I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself.

 

If you people are so smart, why don't you open your own thread. I don't want to read any constructive criticism, or any criticism at all. Just let Phantom present his material, and I'll judge for myself.

 

If you people are such great traders, why are you even taking the time to visit this thread? Are you profitable? Don't bother to answer because I wouldn't believe you anyway. There, I'm questioning your honesty without knowing anything about you. How do you like it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a forum, presumably if he did not want discussion he would have chosen a different venue like a blog. It's been pretty civil on the whole anyway.

 

Back on topic, a straightforward way of using BB's. Indeed the bands are at SD's from the average. Edit (I see you use 2,20) Do you use default settings (not that it is that big of a deal)? Do you only go in one direction (in the direction of trend or momentum or something else)?

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on topic, a straightforward way of using BB's. Indeed the bands are at SD's from the average. Do you use default settings (not that it is that big of a deal)? Do you only go in one direction (in the direction of trend or momentum or something else)?

 

I ALWAYS use a 20 period sma (I prefer it to ema) and a 2 SD channel.

 

I will take a buy signal coming from the bottom of the band in a descending market. Heck, most of the time natural gas (one of my favorite markets to trade) is too hard to distinguish whether the weekly trend is up or down so I depend on the info that the bands and price rejection bars are telling me.

 

Hope this helps.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Edited by phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't exactly see the "consolidation" at point 2 in your last chart, but that might be my poor eyesight:haha:

Anyway you seem to be using the term "volatility" qualitatively rather than in the sense of a specific bar length, am I right?? Does your volatility bar cross a specific part of the BBs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've got an even "juicier" way to use the bands, and if you guys can behave yourselves from here on out, I may decide to share it with you (it's the basis for a ridiculously profitable trade entry). No promises, we'll see...

 

 

Let me guess....that "juicier" way is the Keltner/BB squeeze...?

5aa71079b22e2_EURUSD120min.jpg.37d7d3a559559ec1ca62535c38edb4a0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice guess Flex. But more important, its the price action inside the squeeze...

 

Yeah yeah...I know..."price rejection/acceptance" inside the squeeze...

 

The KeltBB signal shown in the chart bring back a lot of early trading memories... I coded this thing when I was still a rookie trading idiot (I am still an idiot...but a seasoned one nowadays). Fun to see again...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The KeltBB signal shown in the chart bring back a lot of early trading memories... I coded this thing when I was still a rookie trading idiot (I am still an idiot...but a seasoned one nowadays). Fun to see again...

 

Don't get me started on trading memories...like the time the electricity went out in my home while I had just entered the bond market after the employment #'s were released and I didn't have a (protective) stop in the market yet...maybe I'll blog on that one...who knows?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't get me started on trading memories...like the time the electricity went out in my home while I had just entered the bond market after the employment #'s were released and I didn't have a (protective) stop in the market yet...maybe I'll blog on that one...who knows?!

 

It's not fun when that sort of things happen but there is no better learning path (in my opinion) then the school of hard knocks... :crap:

 

Sharing those stories will always make a few people a bit smarter and better prepared...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't exactly see the "consolidation" at point 2 in your last chart, but that might be my poor eyesight:haha:

Anyway you seem to be using the term "volatility" qualitatively rather than in the sense of a specific bar length, am I right?? Does your volatility bar cross a specific part of the BBs?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24670&stc=1&d=1305779698

 

Look for a mini sideways channel on the 120 chart right near the upper band at point #2 (in this case its the 2 bars at the peak of point 2) then go to a 15 or 20 minute chart to see the "expanded version" of the consolidation pattern and subsequent breakout, again, with the downward bias.

 

The volatility bar is a qualitative judgment call and no, it doesn't cross the envelope per se. I just look for the bar to be relatively larger than the consolidation bars, closing outside or very near the range extreme.

 

Hope this helps.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

eurobands.jpg.9eb4485bcf4132e949282e8d601c97a9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
attachment.php?attachmentid=24670&stc=1&d=1305779698

 

Look for a mini sideways channel on the 120 chart right near the upper band at point #2 (in this case its the 2 bars at the peak of point 2) then go to a 15 or 20 minute chart to see the "expanded version" of the consolidation pattern and subsequent breakout, again, with the downward bias.

 

The volatility bar is a qualitative judgment call and no, it doesn't cross the envelope per se. I just look for the bar to be relatively larger than the consolidation bars, closing outside or very near the range extreme.

 

 

I will take a buy signal coming from the bottom of the band in a descending market. Heck, most of the time natural gas (one of my favorite markets to trade) is too hard to distinguish whether the weekly trend is up or down so I depend on the info that the bands and price rejection bars are telling me.

 

Ok, now you even lost me... Calsprdr is right...there is no consolidation pattern on the 120 min...the 2 bars at the peak have a higher low and higher high so I am curious what your definition of an uptrend is.

 

Attached charts of the 15 min and 20 min with two consolidation boxes which are based on specific consolidation rules. These rules are not your rules so if people on this forum wants to use your setup in live trading when are they entering the trade? The first breakout down on the 15 min/20 min? The second? The third? The second down bar on the 120 min?

 

You say you look for an "volatility" bar...it's clear what you mean by that but when you take your example 2 the "volatility" bar (third bar down) closes far below the upper Bollinger band while you said that you "take" the trade coming from the band values. My point is...I assume you're already in the trade when the "volatility" bar closes. Not?

 

I only ask these questions to code a quick strategy to show people the results of your setup based on an extended period of time (2/3 years) instead of a few handpicked "big move" examples. Consistency is all what counts...

 

Maybe you don't want to share your entry/exit rules...that's no crime of course and I respect that...but then I will make my own.

5aa7107a3433a_EURUSD20min.jpg.28d46cade24c64497a714a44ef387e85.jpg

5aa7107a38a97_EURUSD15min.jpg.0800b698eb898edb6f8fb566c5c8a4a4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I am obviously not phantom but I'll have a crack at some of that to 'test' my understanding. Hope thats Ok :)

 

WE are looking for a 'mini sideways channel'. We can anticipate it because we are at/outside the top 120m band. You can pretty much guess what is 'inside' the narrow hammer bar at 2. A narrow bar on 120 will pretty much always be a mini consolidation on 15.

 

Attached charts of the 15 min and 20 min with two consolidation boxes which are based on specific consolidation rules. These rules are not your rules so if people on this forum wants to use your setup in live trading when are they entering the trade? The first breakout down on the 15 min/20 min? The second? The third? The second down bar on the 120 min?

 

You look for he consolidation on the 15 where the 120 bars have poked the BB's not anywhere on the 15 min chart. I enclose a chart, you get a 'mini range' at the top a shift in momentum, price drifts off. There are a couple of rejections that you could trigger entries on. Phantom I wonder which chart you would use for an initial stop?

 

so I am curious what your definition of an uptrend is.

 

Not sure trend is too important to him....see post 55.

 

Please correct me if I am wrong (not unusual) :)

5aa7107a3dac8_6E06-11(15Min)16_05_2011.thumb.png.575f03fdf658bfc952552120de3a8354.png

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I am obviously not phantom but I'll have a crack at some of that to 'test' my understanding. Hope thats Ok :)

 

WE are looking for a 'mini sideways channel'. We can anticipate it because we are at/outside the top 120m band. You can pretty much guess what is 'inside' the narrow hammer bar at 2. A narrow bar on 120 will pretty much always be a mini consolidation on 15.

 

You look for he consolidation on the 15 where the 120 bars have poked the BB's not anywhere on the 15 min chart. I enclose a chart, you get a 'mini range' at the top a shift in momentum, price drifts off. There are a couple of rejections that you could trigger entries on. Phantom I wonder which chart you would use for an initial stop?

 

Not sure trend is too important to him....see post 55.

 

Please correct me if I am wrong (not unusual) :)

 

You're always free to crack my thinking... The way I see the markets is far from perfect so I never have a problem when someone tells me my brain needs an upgrade...

 

But what you wrote is very good because you made a rule... A narrow (inverted) hammer bar at/above the upper BB band is a 'mini sideways channel'.

Ok, next step... define the rejection rules to trigger permission to enter the market and attach an entry value.

 

As said before...I am not pissing off the setup...but it only has a shot when the frame of the setup has been clearly defined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not so much a rule as an observation. My reply was to test my understanding of phantoms approach. I don't really want to go too far down my road as that would be impolite!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Phantom,

 

You are employing the pullback in a trend routine.

 

Excellent, excellent thinking it is a most reliable entry technique with

a small easily managed stop loss in my opinion.

 

In fact it is the only technique I use, although I DO NOT use any indicators

and I am looking for different qualities and timing.

 

Never the less ...it is what it is.

"A pullback in a trend"

 

Push on Phantom ..push on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
attachment.php?attachmentid=24649&stc=1&d=1305739782

 

Okay, back to business.

 

Today I would like to discuss how I use Bollinger Bands to tip me off as to when I can expect a consolidation, and therefore a subsequent breakout and trading opportunity.

 

Today's chart is a 120 minute euro chart with 3 numbers atop the price action. Notice how the market traded up to these three zones and then consolidated. These zones are located roughly at the top of the Bollinger Bands! When price approaches the top band in a downward moving market, I go on "alert status" to wait out the pending consolidation breakout with a downward bias.

 

The same thing applies at the bottom of the band. I wait for the bottoming consolidation pattern with a definite upward breakout bias (isn't this what standard deviation bands are all about?) and trade the breakout > price rejection methodology already explained earlier in this thread.

 

Does it work 100% of the time? Of course not, but its been pretty good to me so far.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

You will be better served by getting clues from price to determine when the bollinger bands will be turning rather than looking for consolidation patterns in price with a breakout bias, but who cares which way the BB's go.

 

If you test the data you will see that a consolidation pattern that touches a BB is just as likely break out and continue out of the band and change the direction of the band as it is to brush against the band and return to the lower band. Price is leading. Why not just trade price in this instance?

 

It makes for a great picture in color or black and white but the particular method provides the same information that flipping a fair coin would.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If you test the data you will see that a consolidation pattern that touches a BB is just as likely break out and continue out of the band and change the direction of the band as it is to brush against the band and return to the lower band.

 

Sure. In that case you will be very unlikely to get consolidation -> momentum in the new direction -> test/price rejection on the lower time frame. (or the higher time frame for that matter). It's not about forecasting turns it's more about 'good' trade location. EDIT: + price confirming that the bulls/bears are no longer in control.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

WE are looking for a 'mini sideways channel'. We can anticipate it because we are at/outside the top 120m band. You can pretty much guess what is 'inside' the narrow hammer bar at 2. A narrow bar on 120 will pretty much always be a mini consolidation on 15.

 

You look for the consolidation on the 15 where the 120 bars have poked the BB's not anywhere on the 15 min chart. I enclose a chart, you get a 'mini range' at the top a shift in momentum, price drifts off. There are a couple of rejections that you could trigger entries on. Phantom I wonder which chart you would use for an initial stop?

 

Please correct me if I am wrong (not unusual) :)

 

BlowFish, you seem to have nailed it with just a few added notes:

 

I'm not too concerned whether the 120 BB has in fact been penetrated; I'm looking for ballpark here.

 

The BB on the 15 minute chart acts as my trend identifier, ie the 20 period sma.

 

The 1 or 2 inside bars on the 120 chart tell me to look at the 15 minute chart. At this point, I no longer care about the 120 chart per se

 

Once the market breaks down from the trading range on the 15 minute chart, I wait for any identifiable price rejection. On your 15 minute chart, a breakdown below the low of the 13:45 bar is a "false breakout-reversal" because the market broke above the previous 9 bars, closing near the high (false breakout phase), then proceeded to break down below the 13:45 bar 3 bars later (reversal phase).

 

Since the breakdown occurs under the 15 minute chart's 20 period ma, we have trend filter okay on this setup.

 

Once the market breaks out, I would place my stop above the false breakout bar (13:45 bar)

 

My definition of an uptrend is 15 minute bars closing above the 20 period ma. (Downtrend is vice versa).

 

There you have it. Hope this clarifies things a little bit.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, next step... define the rejection rules to trigger permission to enter the market and attach an entry value.

 

Flex, I've never had any success with trying to codify this method because the variables are never fixed. This is really one of those setups that is better seen than automated...

 

But if you come up with something tangible, I'd love to be the first to know!

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You will be better served by getting clues from price to determine when the bollinger bands will be turning rather than looking for consolidation patterns in price with a breakout bias

 

MM, I've been served just fine the way things are described.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You will be better served by getting clues from price to determine when the bollinger bands will be turning rather than looking for consolidation patterns in price with a breakout bias, but who cares which way the BB's go.

 

If you test the data you will see that a consolidation pattern that touches a BB is just as likely break out and continue out of the band and change the direction of the band as it is to brush against the band and return to the lower band. Price is leading. Why not just trade price in this instance?

 

It makes for a great picture in color or black and white but the particular method provides the same information that flipping a fair coin would.

 

True!!! Phantom, have you ever backtested your setups based on a continuous dataset of say 24 to 36 months? You use NinjaTrader so you have the right software....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flex, I've never had any success with trying to codify this method because the variables are never fixed. This is really one of those setups that is better seen than automated...

 

But if you come up with something tangible, I'd love to be the first to know!

 

 

 

You already answered my previous post...my apologies. You don't have to automate your setups but coding your setups as an alert or indicator to highlight the appearances in your historical data is crucial. That way you can develop better ways to filter the best trades... Just a tip...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By David Carter
      My broker (Jones Mutual) advised me to use candlesticks when CFD trading, as the simple line graph option does not give you enough information - is this correct?
    • By inthemoneystocks
      One of the most important reasons why traders take big losses is because they often fail to recognize when a trade has gone wrong. You see, stopping out of a trade is probably the biggest fault of traders and investors. Often, this happens to young and inexperienced traders and investors, but I know many veteran traders and investors that struggle with this as well. Early in my own career I struggled with stopping out of a bad trade myself, so I can sympathize with this problem. 

      The problem with taking a loss is really two fold. First, the trader has to admit that he is wrong. As you all know, as human beings we all hate to be wrong. The ego simply gets in the way and we all want to always be right all the time. The first secret in this business is to check the ego at the door. The market does not care about your the color of your skin, religion or anything else. It will move in the direction of the money and that is the bottom line. Once a trader or investor goes into what I call 'hope mode' the trade is over. I'm sure everyone has been in this position at one time or another. Simply put there is no room for ego or hope in the stock market. The market is always right and there is no reason to fight it. 

      Here is the second problem with taking a loss, it hurts. Pain and pleasure are the two reasons why humans do anything at all. As a human being, we are always looking to have pleasure and avoid pain. Well, losing money is painful and many people would rather simply hold a losing equity than lock in a small loss and move on. I cannot tell you how often I see a trader hold a losing trade only to see the position move further out of the money. Many years ago I watched a day trader blow up a $200,000 account in a single day averaging in on a bad day trade. To this day I can remember the look on his face as his money vanished in thin air. Believe it or not, this trader could have exited the position with a $500.00 loss, but instead he kept averaging in and fighting the position until he was wiped out. As a rule, once you have your full position you should never average in on a trade. At that point, it is critical to know where your max loss is going to be and stop out if that level is breached.

      Now when should we stop out? The answer to this question is not that simple, but here is what I personally do. I always place my stop loss below an important breakout or pivot on the chart. You see, prior breakout or pivot levels are usually defended when retested. After all, this is usually an area where institutional traders and investors got involved, that is why there is a pivot low or high on the chart to begin with. If that level is breached on a closing basis then I will move out of the position. So If I took a trade based on a daily chart pattern then I will usually check the daily and weekly chart levels. If there is a major pivot on the weekly chart then I will use a week chart close as my stop out level. While this method may not be perfect, it has saved me from much bigger losses when I have been wrong.



        Nicholas Santiago
    • By LindsayBev
      Hello!  I am new to this forum.  I am interested in learning about candlestick reading.  I would appreciate hearing from any that will answer this post WHICH book you found the most helpful?  
    • By trading4life
      Hello, My name is trading4life.
      I just joined this forum.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date : 12th December 2019. Lagarde prepares ECB debut – 12th December 2019.   Policy unchanged Projections unlikely to change much Clues about review sought Style in focus Presiding over her first presser of the European Central Bank today, Lagarde is expected to confirm once again the current policy setting, giving time to ECB to focus on the planned review of its overall policy framework.Final Eurozone GDP and PMI readings broadly supported this neutral picture, while the confidence that a deep recession can be avoided is strengthening (Figure 1) despite the fact that German manufacturing and production numbers still look weak. The exports and the overall trade are actually holding up much better than expected, which together with still strong labour markets is underpinning hopes the net exports and consumption will continue to support growth not just in Germany.Figure 1 : December German ZEW investor confidence outcome, end the year firmly in positive territory at the highest level since February 2018.As there is nothing in the data really to challenge the ECB’s overall policy stance, the focus firstly turns into the tone and presentation style that President Lagarde will have. The “risk” is that the presser will be equally uneventful as her testimony before the European Parliament. Lagarde’s team building exercise seems to have worked and at least in public there has been a pretty consistent message since she took over, which is very likely to be confirmed today. Additionally it will be interesting to see whether she will back fully Draghi’s package.Citi Bank: All key interest rates will likely be left unchanged, and the forward guidance reaffirmed. The main interest at this meeting will be the new Eurosystem staff projections, extended to 2022, to gauge whether the September package will be sufficient to bring inflation back into line with the ECB’s target over the forecast horizon. If not, investors’ attention will quickly turn to the ECB’s toolbox and what instruments the Governing Council would be willing to use and when, in order to defend its credibility in the absence of large fiscal support. The upcoming strategic review of monetary policy will also likely be the focus of many questions.Hence as reported by Citi, other than Lagarde’s style, ECB projections could also monopolize the attention. Even though, the ECB remains ready to act again and tweak all its measures if necessary, it has already done a lot and now needs to keep an eye on the side effects of the very expansionary monetary policy, while politicians need to do their bit to support the economy.The central bank won’t be reducing the degree of stimulus any time soon with many analysts supporting that this will continue until mid-2020 unless there is a major change in circumstance.Central bankers will be conducting a comprehensive review of the policy framework, however, with a special focus on the inflation target. A more symmetric definition, which stresses that the ECB can see through lengthy inflation overshoots as well as periods of too low headline rates is likely to come in the first quarter of next year. The inclusion of owner-occupied housing costs into the HICP number also remains a challenge especially as house prices are rising rapidly in some centres, also thanks to the low interest rate environment.Bund yields have nudged higher over the past week, but the German 10-year so far failed to move lastingly above -0.3%. Uncertainty on trade and Brexit are keeping a lid on yields, although there is the risk that if things go the way markets want and a phase one trade deal is confirmed and in the UK PM Johnson gets his majority, there could be a sharp rise in yields, if markets price out further easing and start to look ahead to central banks removing some of the stimulus.However this is far away for now, while central bankers are not looking eager to add further easing.Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • USDJPY Remains Biased To The Downside   USDJPY faces further price weakness despite its price hesitation on Tuesday. On the upside, resistance comes in at 109.00 level. Above this level will turn attention to the 109.50 level. Further out, we expect a possible move towards the 110.00 level on a break of that area, A cut through here will open the door for more gain towards the 110.50. On the downside, support lies at the 108.00 level where a break will target the 107.50 level. Below that level will turn focus to the 107.00 level and then lower towards the 106.50 level. On the whole, USDJPY faces further downside threats.        
    • Sterling Advances Barely Hours To UK Elections As Latest Poll Predicts Conservatives Win In just two days from now, a major event that will set the trend for the currency market for the year 2020, the UK elections will be held. In the face of a Brexit extension, UK prime minister had pushed for an earlier election in the hopes of having a majority conservatives win in the parliament which will make the Brexit deal pass through easily. As the clock ticks, with barely less than 48 hours to this epochal event, the newest poll by Survation conducted for ITV’s good morning Britain show predicts a Boris Johnson win by 14 pts. ahead of Jeremy Corbyn‘s Labour party. The Brexit deal seemed to give the conservatives an edge as it accounted for 32% of the vote decision while NHS gave Labour party a slight edge. On the overall, a majority vote of 42% was predicted for the conservatives while Labour had 28%. Market Reaction as the Clock Ticks Optimism looms in the market as the prediction of a conservatives win will ease Britain’s exit from Europe by January 31 deadline. The EUR/GBP pair continued to fall till the early hours of today breaking the 0.8411 trend line targeting the 0.8149 resistance level. GBP/USD pair rebounded to consolidate briefly targeting 1.3381 resistance levels. Technical analysis within a 4-hour MACD shows that both pairs may likely touch down. CAD edged slightly higher advanced by USMCA news but yet to consolidate gains. The USD against a basket of five major currencies held steady awaiting FOMC’s minutes due out tomorrow. Against a basket of currencies, NZD’s dominance is the highest. Sterling also gained momentum firmed up by approaching UK elections. The safe-haven, the Japanese yen, and Swiss franc remain pressured as major events that will shape the market for 2020 are been anticipated. On the Asia side, significant market activity wasn’t recorded as most currency pairs held steady within a day’s range. In the Asian stock market, not so much activity was recorded being weakened by recently released Chinese PMI numbers. Most of the indexes closed a little lower while US stocks rose swiftly after Friday’s release of US non-farm payroll reports. The outcome of the December 15 deadline set by the US for the signing of a preliminary trade pact will determine the week’s direction and even further into the year 2020. Also due out later in the week is UK GDP figures and ZEW released out of Germany.
    • Date : 11th December 2019. FOMC Preview – 11th December 2019. FOMC Preview No policy changes or surprises are expected with today’s announcement (19:00 GMT) and Chair Powell’s press conference 30 minutes later. It will be interesting to see if, as expected, the voting is unanimous this time round. The FOMC members have expressed significant differences of opinion during 2019 as three rate cuts were implemented.  The apparent paradox of low unemployment and low inflation, the new “norm”. The two-digit unemployment rate (U-3) in November edged down to 3.53% from 3.56% in October, and a 3.52% cycle-low in September, all below the 3.58% prior cycle-low in April and a 4.00% rate at the beginning of the year. Current readings remain much lower than the 4.2% long-run unemployment rate projection noted in the September SEP, it is expected that this estimate will be trimmed today. Headline CPI rose 0.4% in October while the core index rose by 0.2%, for respective y/y gains of 1.8% and 2.3%, versus September figures of 1.7% and 2.4%. Today the November headline is expected to fall again to 0.2% and the core remains flat at 0.2% too. The Fed’s favoured inflation gauge, the PCE chain price measure, rose 1.3% y/y in October and expectations are for an uptick to 1.4% in November. The core PCE chain price measure rose 1.6% y/y in November, versus 1.7% in September, and expectations are for the pace to hold at 1.6% in November. The FOMC’s latest median estimates for 2019 inflation are 1.5% for the headline and 1.8% for the core. Hence, the focus will be on the Fed’s new quarterly forecasts, with expectations raised and likely to be mostly bullish results with a bump up in the median growth projection and a drop in the median dot to reflect a steady stance through 2020. However, the individual dots are likely to show both, forecasts for cuts and hikes. Chair Powell is expected to reiterate the US economy and policy are in a “good place,” (a phrase he has used a number of times lately) and could sound a little more upbeat after the strong jobs report. But, he will continue to warn of downside risks. The FOMC isn’t likely to announce any new measures on reserve management operations (QE?) or a repo facility. All steady into 2020 and beyond. USDIndex remains biased to the down side but has support around 97.40 and the 200-day moving average. A breach of this key support zone brings in 97.00 and the October low of 96.85. A break over 97.80 (the confluence of the 20 and 50-day moving averages) and 98.00 would be required before a re-test of the recent high at 98.50 could be considered. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Stuart Cowell Head Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.