Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I have a philosophical questions about laterals... about what is knowable and what isn't.

 

Lats are created by 3 bars. Bar 1 has a directional aspect. (Further - that direction is either dom or non-dom.)

 

Now ...the lateral will eventually and ALWAYS have a BO and that BO will either be the same or the opposite of bar 1's direction.

 

My question is this: is the BO direction ALWAYS knowable as soon as price tells us we have a lat? Or perhaps this is a CERTAIN POINT situation where we only know FOR SURE at a certain point during the formation of the lat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is the BO direction ALWAYS knowable as soon as price tells us we have a lat?

 

Yup, and without exception. Probably why I keep encouraging people to work through the process of Lateral Differentiation.

 

I designed The Lateral Formation Drill (and its follow up) to remind people to learn to differentiate ...

 

1. Context

2. Order of Events.

3. and then the thing (in this case laterals).

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yup, and without exception.

If you'd be so kind to clarify: Does it mean that when 11:00 bar (12/21) closes and the Price has formed the lateral (in the attached), one KNOWS that the price will BO that specific lateral in the upward direction and that there's no possibility that the Price may exit that specific lateral downward to finish the non-dominant sequence?

5aa70f9b19f06_lateralBOdirection.thumb.png.6dda322a873788165ee9590762246939.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you'd be so kind to clarify:

 

You already know the answer to this question.

 

Why do you already know?

 

differentiate ...

 

1. Context

2. Order of Events.

3. and then the thing

 

Now. Compare your example (11:00 area) to the examples contained in The Lateral Formation Drill. Your example is missing something present in all other examples (from the Initial Lateral Formation Drill and the Follow-up) which I posted. In other words, your (11:00) example (in its posted form) represents a different thing causing you to compare apples to oranges (instead of apples to apples).

 

In fact, you can compare this (11:00) Lateral to one annotated earlier in your chart snippet in order to easily see what is missing. For now, remain focused on the these specific Laterals shown in this specific drill (and follow up) until you can 'see' these differences in your sleep. Then move onto different types of things.

 

N.B. When I say your example, I am looking at your chart snippet.

 

Always make sure to compare apples to apples when seeking answers.

 

So, while the answer to your question is yes, it is so - not for the reasons you probably believe - but for reasons far more elementary to understanding.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

romanus - so perhaps a way of looking at the process is:

 

1) know you have a lateral and not a formation

2) know your context

3) know what comes next

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Compare your example (11:00 area) to the examples contained in The Lateral Formation Drill. Your example is missing something present in all other examples (from the Initial Lateral Formation Drill and the Follow-up) which I posted.
Upon further reflection, it seems to me that I was somewhat hasty and logically sloppy in formulating my inquiry, to put it mildly - so I can't really blame you for not understanding the answer you provided.:D

 

But, what is even more important, it's quite possible that the picture you're looking at is different from mine due to some differences in data providers. Would you be so kind to post the blank, not-annotated charts containing the laterals you referred to in the Follow-up.

 

Thank you very much for taking the time to reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But, what is even more important, it's quite possible that the picture you're looking at is different from mine due to some differences in data providers. Would you be so kind to post the blank, not-annotated charts containing the laterals you referred to in the Follow-up.

 

Thank you very much for taking the time to reply.

 

Good, I thought they were charts of the same day and the same lateral...

 

I believe the data differences are caused by your bars being formed on the local computer in real time, rather than being preprocessed on a server. If you occasionally "Reload All Historical Data" during the day the bars will be recreated according to the ticks' timestamps.

 

- become

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But, what is even more important, it's quite possible that the picture you're looking at is different from mine due to some differences in data providers. Would you be so kind to post the blank, not-annotated charts containing the laterals you referred to in the Follow-up.

 

Sure thing.

 

- Spydertrader

5aa70f9cee97b_followup.thumb.jpg.b7afbc438be913371cb3cb3f6d2834e0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a closer look at the daily chart for ES.

Not a great chart but you get the idea.

It is from October until now. I have also re-attached the Monthy ES that I posted the other day for ease in comparing the charts.

5aa70f9dcc378_escloserlookondailyjan82010.thumb.jpg.045340b1b35a335d326d67bc713c9778.jpg

5aa70f9dd34d3_esmonthlyjan62010.thumb.jpg.23ed28ba808dd6695b9aad9f260016af.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a closer look at the daily chart for ES.

Not a great chart but you get the idea.

It is from October until now. I have also re-attached the Monthy ES that I posted the other day for ease in comparing the charts.

 

Interesting how the volume is dropping on this up leg on the monthly. The daily looks the same way. Hmmm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you'd be so kind to clarify: Does it mean that when 11:00 bar (12/21) closes and the Price has formed the lateral (in the attached), one KNOWS that the price will BO that specific lateral in the upward direction and that there's no possibility that the Price may exit that specific lateral downward to finish the non-dominant sequence?

 

I find it helpful to annotate the traverse. Then, by comparing the results of the sym-lateral which occurs at point 3 confirmation of tape 1, tape 2and tape 3 of the traverse, the difference is apparent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wednesday 13 January 2010

 

Hi rs5

 

Thank you for your persistently posting ES charts. I am wondering why you didn't mark Bar55, 67 and 79 respectively as the first bar of each SYM Lateral. Could you explain it?

 

Everyone is welcome to participate in this SYM Lateral discussion. TIA

5aa70fa355c0a_rs5_SYMLateral.gif.18d22dafde831b1d37947fc3a76edf09.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am wondering why you didn't mark Bar55, 67 and 79 respectively as the first bar of each SYM Lateral. Could you explain it?

 

Each example within The Lateral Formation Drill (as well as the follow up) differs greatly from the examples you have picked from the chart posted by rs5.

 

In other words, you should be able to place all these Laterals into two distinct piles. One pile should contain The Lateral Formation Drill (and follow up) examples, and the other pile, should contain the examples you pointed out in your post.

 

Locate that which makes the two piles different, and you'll have the answer to your question.

 

I'm not trying to stifle discussion with my response to your query. However, I am attempting to get you to see the importance of the process of learning to differentiate that which you believe you see, from that which actually exists.

 

You see all (The Lateral Formation Drill [and Follow Up] along with those you pointed out in your post) examples as the same. I do not. More importantly, the market says they are not all the same.

 

Subtle differences. They really do make all the difference in the world.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words, you should be able to place all these Laterals into two distinct piles. One pile should contain The Lateral Formation Drill (and follow up) examples, and the other pile, should contain the examples you pointed out in your post.

 

Locate that which makes the two piles different, and you'll have the answer to your question.

 

 

- Spydertrader

 

 

Spyder, are you suggesting that there are only two piles for all laterals or two piles for laterals under discussion? TIA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spyder, are you suggesting that there are only two piles for all laterals or two piles for laterals under discussion? TIA.

 

Two piles for the laterals currently under discussion. To be absolutely clear, everyone should have the ability to locate two examples from yesterday which conform to the examples of laterals provided in The Lateral Formation Drill (and follow up). These represent the types of Lateral Formations which need differentiation first. Then, and only then, should one move onto other types of laterals.

 

- Spydertrader

Edited by Spydertrader
Clarification

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Two piles for the laterals currently under discussion. To be absolutely clear, everyone should have the ability to locate two examples from yesterday which conform to the examples of laterals provided in The Lateral Formation Drill (and follow up). These represent the types of Lateral Formations which need differentiation first. Then, and only then, should one move onto other types of laterals.

 

- Spydertrader

 

Would the laterals in green be the ones similar to the drill? The orange being the others mentioned.

5aa70fa4efc95_1-13-2010Laterals.thumb.png.459b6ee885060421960b01c8daabd785.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • $CHWY Chewy stock breakdown watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?CHWY
    • $PYXS Pyxis Oncology stock low volume pullback to 4.32 support area, high trade quality, https://stockconsultant.com/?PYXS
    • $EVER EverQuote stock strong day, breakout, https://stockconsultant.com/?EVER
    • Date: 1st May 2024. Understanding the Implications of the FOMC Meeting. The FOMC will issue its post-meeting statement at 18:00 GMT tonight. “High-for-longer” is the expected outcome (but not higher) given more indications that progress on bringing inflation sustainably down to the 2% target has stalled out. With no new quarterly forecasts, it will be all about Chair Powell’s press conference when the Fed announces its policy stance tonight.   It is unlikely to be any more hawkish than what the markets are pricing in. Indeed, Chair Powell will have to acknowledge that the data are going the wrong way and he may even pre-empt the likely first question out of the box, “is a rate hike in the cards?” Meanwhile, Fed funds futures have not only fully priced out chances for a rate cut for this meeting and for June, but July as well. Risk for a reduction in September fell to below 50-50 on the initial spike in implied rates on the ECI news. The November contract reflects 20 bps in cuts, with a full quarter point easing now not seen until December. The FOMC is also expected to announce a slowing in Treasury runoff for June.   Economic Projections & Market Interpretation: The March update of the SEP revealed notable adjustments in key economic indicators. GDP forecasts for 2024 experienced a substantial upward revision, reflecting a more optimistic outlook with a growth rate of 2.1%, up from 1.4% in December. Similarly, projections for 2025 saw improvements, with the median jobless rate forecasts showing mixed trends but generally aligning with recent patterns. Expectations for headline and core PCE chain price indices also witnessed slight adjustments, indicating potential shifts in inflation dynamics. During the March meeting, the “dot plot” estimates hinted at a dovish stance by Fed members, with no indications of further rate hikes and median estimates suggesting potential rate cuts in 2024. This interpretation led markets to anticipate the initiation of quarterly rate cuts starting in June. As investors await the June SEP update, there is speculation about further adjustments in GDP estimates, PCE chain price indices, and the potential revision of rate cut expectations.   Analyzing the labor market reveals a complex picture of recovery and ongoing challenges. Payrolls have shown resilience in 2024, surpassing the previous year’s averages, albeit with variations across sectors. Despite improvements, the jobless rate remains a focal point, with fluctuations reflecting broader economic conditions. Additionally, metrics like the U-6 rate and wage growth provide insights into the labor market’s health and potential inflationary pressures.   Inflation Trends and Consumption Patterns: Inflation dynamics have been closely monitored, particularly amid recent fluctuations in commodity prices and supply chain disruptions. While recent CPI and PCE chain price measures suggest some moderation in inflationary pressures, concerns linger about the sustainability of these trends. The Fed’s attention to inflation remains paramount, shaping expectations for future policy actions. Consumer spending, a key driver of economic growth, has exhibited resilience despite ongoing uncertainties. Real personal consumption expenditures (PCE) have maintained positive growth rates, contributing to overall GDP expansion. However, shifts in consumption patterns and potential impacts on future economic performance warrant careful observation.   Market Expectations and Implications: As the FOMC meeting approaches, market participants are closely monitoring economic indicators and policy developments for insights into future market dynamics. The verbiage of the Fed statement and subsequent press briefing will be scrutinized for any hints regarding the timing of potential policy adjustments. Investors should remain vigilant and adaptable, considering the evolving economic landscape and its implications for investment strategies. The upcoming FOMC meeting holds significant implications for investors and economic stakeholders. Understanding recent economic developments, market expectations, and potential policy shifts is essential for navigating the dynamic financial environment. By staying informed and proactive, investors can position themselves to capitalize on emerging opportunities while managing risks effectively. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • $MRO Marathon Oil stock moving higher off the 27.57 support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?MRO
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.