Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

The purpose of the Constitution is not to arm whacked out freaks with firearms.

 

When the time comes to rise up against your government, all sorts of weapons and explosives will be available to those willing to take part in the cause.

 

Don't be concerned if laws are passed to help reduce some of the needless violence. If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

 

299574_473187932716246_1082744035_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...... If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

 

I think the large, blaring font and wingnut replies answers that question. Wonder if his preference is for girly men in pink, frilly panties too like patuey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We’ve had some posters (in the last 90 pages or so :) ) who find it easy to reject out of hand 2nd amendment arguments in this situation. … their primary arguments are idealist variations of “wouldn’t it be better if ?” … to them, 2nd amendment arguments are distractions in the To Arm or To Disarm debate.

 

Do these people have exceptional trust in government? Are they not at all threatened by trends of the ptb, of trends in society, of trends in ‘civilian deaths’ in wars, etc. Do they think they have nothing to fear… that all is well, we won’t have any SHTF… or that they might be “just lucky I guess” when and if the SdidHTF… etc etc.

… ie it is seamless for them to denigrate or redirect any arguments that guns should not be banned because of liberty or mistrust of govt.

 

These posters are intelligent, metro people. They are ahead of the curve. They understand how there’s no need for “fear” and alarmism… They know things you don’t know. This link will help you stupid gun nuts to understand what they understand.

Articles: Good News: You May Be Spared Execution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We’ve had some posters (in the last 90 pages or so :) ) who find it easy to reject out of hand 2nd amendment arguments in this situation. … their primary arguments are idealist variations of “wouldn’t it be better if ?” … to them, 2nd amendment arguments are distractions in the To Arm or To Disarm debate.

 

Do these people have exceptional trust in government? Are they not at all threatened by trends of the ptb, of trends in society, of trends in ‘civilian deaths’ in wars, etc. Do they think they have nothing to fear… that all is well, we won’t have any SHTF… or that they might be “just lucky I guess” when and if the SdidHTF… etc etc.

… ie it is seamless for them to denigrate or redirect any arguments that guns should not be banned because of liberty or mistrust of govt.

 

These posters are intelligent, metro people. They are ahead of the curve. They understand how there’s no need for “fear” and alarmism… They know things you don’t know. This link will help you stupid gun nuts to understand what they understand.

Articles: Good News: You May Be Spared Execution

 

Question.....Is this is the ultimate defense of those who dont agree with you or dont share your same fears, or even if they do have a different strategy or take on it than you do.?....... that you are clearly a brainwashed sheep/communist.

 

if the crux of the argument is about government, control and power v individual rights then let that debate occur. Properly.

 

It can also be carried out by those who really want change arguing for real change - lets go for the anarchist model - and not some other bastardised variation that involves substituting one set of moral codes for another......or is it wrong to prefer a what if, non violent society?

 

That debate can also be carried out without guns, violence, fear of homosexuals, those who disagree, women, muslims or any others........or do you propose that as opposed to the communists killing of those who disagree with them, its those who disagree with them killing of the communists?

collective maya occurs in many forms.

 

I would suggest that many fear that those so vehemently opposed to the government want to implement their own set of rules in their own sheepish ways.

 

fuel for fire. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deaths in 2011 - What Is The Cause?

 

75375_4234638866639_336386510_n.jpg

 

 

so you oppose bans on drink drivers, poor medical practices and such?

or are you just opposed to anything Obama does and trying to link everything together?

 

 

Zdo - even the 'enlightend' ones are often not enlightened enough :roll eyes:

You at least make a rational case for being prepared if the SHTF, even if people might not agree with you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so you oppose bans on drink drivers, poor medical practices and such?

or are you just opposed to anything Obama does and trying to link everything together?

 

 

Zdo - even the 'enlightend' ones are often not enlightened enough :roll eyes:

You at least make a rational case for being prepared if the SHTF, even if people might not agree with you

 

 

Lighten up man! Oh mighty King Obama!

 

Have a laugh...

 

165063_500068213377528_2019424688_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how 195,000 died from medical malpractice and Obamacare gets mentioned when it has yet to be implemented.

 

They did retroactively I suppose.

 

He probably caused the deaths from all previous wars and auto accidents too. :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smmatrix - i am plenty light except in the weight department (Christmas was a cruel but tasty mistress)....I thought we were getting in trouble by Zdo for not taking it (ie; the end of the world) seriously enough!

 

Cant win if you go long or short it seems.

 

My point is though - there seems to be a lot of one sided government haters if you get my drift. Too often you wonder what else they hate, and what else they want to change....are you swapping one bad for another bad.

Is it the restriction of abuse of government power, or abolition of the government.....or do you just want a government that fits a certain criteria - even if you might be the minority to then impose your beliefs on others - the very thing you might fear.

 

Thats the point of a discussion.

 

I did like the picture of the Michelin man. :) thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question.....Is this is the ultimate defense of those who dont agree with you or dont share your same fears, or even if they do have a different strategy or take on it than you do.?....... that you are clearly a brainwashed sheep/communist.

 

if the crux of the argument is about government, control and power v individual rights then let that debate occur. Properly.

 

It can also be carried out by those who really want change arguing for real change - lets go for the anarchist model - and not some other bastardised variation that involves substituting one set of moral codes for another......or is it wrong to prefer a what if, non violent society?

 

...

 

I would suggest that many fear that those so vehemently opposed to the government want to implement their own set of rules in their own sheepish ways.

 

fuel for fire. :)

 

SIUYA,

 

I don’t really know what the “crux” of this argument is.

 

It does include ‘collective vs individual’,etc. elements which I have attempted to take account of in some of my posts – in increasingly cycnically, disrespectfully, satirically fashion though.

ie I’m really not trying to convince anyone or change anyone’s mind on this…

If you believe in ‘doable anarchy’, then you do.

If you don’t believe ‘doable anarchy’ is possible, I understand and am making no attempt to change your mind...

It may help you to paint me in your post as someone who thinks I know what is best for others… but, fwiw, I don’t really live my life that way... (and good grief I would also assert that my 'way' has a slightly ;), by millions and millions of souls, better historical record of tolerance and of not killing 'communists' than statists have of killing 'non communists' ;) ... )

 

Realistically, we live on a violent planet. And unfortunately violence and repression and ‘darkness’ is still increasingly at this time. Even the ‘developed’ societies are far far less 'sustainable' and stable than they appear. Practically, making guns less legal / available is an ‘allopathic’ solution to the types of ‘flag’ incidents that triggered this debate and thread. To Disarm is a very ineffective ‘solution’- except for those among us who need ‘authority’ to do something/anything to help their emotions to settle…

 

Via a quote of Tolle that I posted many pages back , I made my main point that no external changes toward the ideals we would “prefer”, like “non violent societies”, or functional national ‘centralization’, etc, etc, etc. are really sustainable without an authentic quorum of internal “awakening of awareness” first…

our ‘arguments’ about who and how To Disarm are thus pointless…

 

you go ahead and help “fuel the fire” . but, realistically, there are too many ‘hidden pink panties’ in here to do any of this debate “properly”.:rofl:

 

zdo

 

 

 

Further reading:

...from

Where Does The Hatred Of Constitutionalism Come From?

 

Collectivists understand one thing very clearly; an America without the Constitution is destined to become a centralized country.

 

They will, of course, claim this is a gross exaggeration. They will claim that this time will be different. That the collectivist experiments of the past, which produced nothing but destruction and genocide of their own populations, are nothing similar to what they are espousing. They will pretend as if their vision is new, progressive, and far more practical than the vision of the Founding Fathers. In the end though, all they are promoting is a system as old as history; the feudal kingdom. The mercantile oligarchy. The militarized state.

 

Note: even though this was probably written in the last few days, it is definitely already ‘dated’ … this country (and most countries) are already “centralized” past point of ‘normal’ / politically directed rebalancing… example…Amid Federal Land Grab in Brazil, Whole Towns Evicted at Gunpoint - BlackListedNews.com etc etc

 

… and to those leaning ‘progressive’ among us, don't waste your time attempting to tightly bind me to the present ‘constitution’. I personally think it’s time for another ‘revolution’ and constitutional convention… correcting the vulnerabilities in the present one to the ‘statism’ that is still ascending…the ‘left’ and ‘right’, 'progressives' and 'conservatives' , (label and olabels) etc. are engineered, false dichotomies and are equally guilty in hypocrisy, betrayal, and exploitation of ‘useful idiots’ and …

 

 

... and since no one has made any To Arm posts yet :cool:

It’s disappointing, but not unexpected, to witness another intellectual mob calling for prohibition of the one tool that holds tyranny at bay.
Guest Post: Guns, Like Washing Machines, Don't Act - People Do | Zero Hedge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SIUYA,

 

I don’t really know what the “crux” of this argument is.

 

It does include ‘collective vs individual’,etc. elements which I have attempted to take account of in some of my posts – in increasingly cycnically, disrespectfully, satirically fashion though.

ie I’m really not trying to convince anyone or change anyone’s mind on this…

If you believe in ‘doable anarchy’, then you do.

If you don’t believe ‘doable anarchy’ is possible, I understand and am making no attempt to change your mind...

It may help you to paint me in your post as someone who thinks I know what is best for others… but, fwiw, I don’t really live my life that way... (and good grief I would also assert that my 'way' has a slightly ;), by millions and millions of souls, better historical record of tolerance and of not killing 'communists' than statists have of killing 'non communists' ;) ... )

 

Zdo - i appreciate your ideas/thoughts - it has actually been a good voice that has had me reading a few things i never thought i would. If i indicated a hint of painting - sorry - more naughty than unintended.

One thing i guess i do find surprising/disappointing/unsurprising is the lack of extra questions, thoughts and ideas from others.

maybe people of sick of it, maybe they dont care, maybe they dont want to think any more of it......maybe they do have pink panties, and the fire needs to be fueled either way.

 

for all that i personally thank you - sincerely.

 

Realistically, we live on a violent planet. And unfortunately violence and repression and ‘darkness’ is still increasingly at this time. Even the ‘developed’ societies are far far less 'sustainable' and stable than they appear. Practically, making guns less legal / available is an ‘allopathic’ solution to the types of ‘flag’ incidents that triggered this debate and thread. To Disarm is a very ineffective ‘solution’- except for those among us who need ‘authority’ to do something/anything to help their emotions to settle…

 

because i have been lucky, my views are different - we live in a violent place - i think decreasingly so, the weapons might be more efficient...., but i would hope we can set examples and move beyond that.....blindless optimism maybe. I might not subscribe to Ingots version, but I would like to hope anyone and everyone would prefer to subscribe to that, and maybe it has to start somewhere.

.......disarming, across the world might be a good place - maybe it might even help the awakening.

 

 

I personally think it’s time for another ‘revolution’ and constitutional convention… correcting the vulnerabilities in the present one to the ‘statism’ that is still ascending…the ‘left’ and ‘right’, 'progressives' and 'conservatives' , (label and olabels) etc. are engineered, false dichotomies and are equally guilty in hypocrisy, betrayal, and exploitation of ‘useful idiots’ and …

 

interesting - and so the question remains - a revolution, a re writing of the constitution.....with what model, with what ideas? Could all agree that most revolutions just swap one form of tyranny with another?

(this to me is the crux - if you are not long what is the alternative, short? - for the obligatory trading analogy :))

 

I agree the whole left right label and conservative v liberal think was something most people get turned off by in such debates.....you can probably be a socially leaning, politically conservative, economically right wing, minianarchist.....go figure.

Maybe thats why too often many dont want to participate in such debates or ideas.....its too easy to be bombarded with continuous pictures and slogans and name callings.

 

anyways....thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey looks like congress or Mr. Joe Biden is really going to crack down on guns. I heard that gun sales increased 800% or something like that. Well I found a little video for you folks to watch. I watched it and it inspired me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30i_6awxEG4

 

The AR lower blanks are 90 bucks. And yes you can buy more then 1. With my mechanical background I will have no problem putting these together just in time for the zombie apocalypse. All I need is some of the 30 round mags and a couple of the adjustable stocks and maybe a bump stock. Who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey looks like congress or Mr. Joe Biden is really going to crack down on guns. I heard that gun sales increased 800% or something like that. Well I found a little video for you folks to watch. I watched it and it inspired me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30i_6awxEG4

 

The AR lower blanks are 90 bucks. And yes you can buy more then 1. With my mechanical background I will have no problem putting these together just in time for the zombie apocalypse. All I need is some of the 30 round mags and a couple of the adjustable stocks and maybe a bump stock. Who knows.

 

Ha ha, Yes, that is it isn't it? It's the apocalypse the ardent nra supporters are waiting for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question - can the constitution - the rights, the freedoms from tyranny, and collectivization (socialism, communism, facism) survive and thrive without what seems to be the associated links to god and the other conspiracy theories about the illuminati? or even the idea that if you are not a believer in the constitution its because you are somehow brainwashed or stupid and below intelligence?

 

please dont see this as an attack.

 

also i thought some might like this Ghandi quote i stumbled on - i dont know if its true - i have no accurate source for it.....

 

"What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, weather the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th June 2024. ECB closer look: All options open for the second half of the year! ECB officials continue to dampen rate cut speculation, following on from Lagarde’s hawkish comments yesterday. Officials have been out in force this morning to continue stressing that the inflation outlook remains uncertain and that the central bank is not committing to a particular rate path for the rest of the year. The ECB cut rates by 25 basis points, but as we expected it was a “hawkish” cut that left all options open for the second half of the year. Lagarde repeatedly stressed that future decisions will be data dependent, and even refused to confirm that yesterday’s move was the first step of an easing cycle. Rate cuts in September and December are still a possibility, but not cast in stone. Simkus admitted that there may be more than one rate cut this year, but on the whole, the comments were designed to keep a lid on speculation that the central bank kicked off a rate cut cycle yesterday. Austria’s central bank head Holzmann went on record yesterday to confirm that he was the sole dissenter objecting to a cut yesterday, and so far the doves have been quiet, which is helping to affirm Lagarde’s hawkish message yesterday.   Details of the Rate Cut The ECB delivered the first rate cut in five years and lowered key rates by 25 basis points. The deposit rate is now at 3.75% and the main refinancing rate at 4.25%. It was a “hawkish cut,” as near term inflation forecasts were revised higher, and Lagarde flagged that domestic inflation remains high. The statement stressed that the ECB is not pre-committing to a particular rate path, and the comments leave all options on the table for the second half of the year.   Economic Activity and Forecasts  The ECB noted the improvement in economic activity through the first quarter of the year. Lagarde also highlighted that manufacturing is showing signs of stabilization, with stronger exports expected to support growth in coming quarters. At the same time, monetary policy should be less of a drag on demand over time, according to the ECB. The new set of forecasts show GDP rising 0.9% this year, which is more than the 0.6% expected back in March. The forecast for 2025 has been revised slightly down to 1.4% from 1.5% previously, and the ECB still expects a slight acceleration to 1.6% for 2026. The inflation forecast for this year was raised to 2.5% from 2.3%, and the projection for 2025 was hiked to 2.2% from 2.0%. As such, inflation will fall toward the target later than previously anticipated, though the forecast for 2026 was left unchanged at 1.9%. This means the headline rate is still expected to fall below the target at the end of the forecast horizon.   Upside Risks to Inflation The statement noted upside risks to the inflation outlook from wages and profits, which could be higher than currently anticipated. Geopolitical tensions and extreme weather events could also push up prices once again, according to the ECB. At the same time, the ECB acknowledged that inflation could come in lower than anticipated if monetary restrictions have more of a dampening effect than currently anticipated, or if global growth weakens more than projected.   The press conference was mainly dedicated to driving home the point that future decisions will depend on data available at the time of the respective meeting. Lagarde even refused to confirm that the central bank has effectively kicked off an easing cycle, and said in response to a question that she wouldn’t necessarily say that the ECB started a “dialing-back process”. She suggested it is likely, but refused to confirm it, which in theory means rates could actually go up again. This seems unlikely, given that this move was a near unanimous decision, but its makes clear that the ECB will not cut rates at every meeting and that the outlook for the rest of the year is still very much open. The ECB still thinks that monetary policy needs to remain restrictive for the foreseeable future against the backdrop of high domestic inflation. However, as chief economist Lane suggested recently, officials will have to debate at every meeting whether the data allows the central bank to dial back the degree of restrictiveness.   Employment and Inflation Dynamics Wage growth, profits, and services price inflation will remain the key numbers to watch through the rest of the year. Lagarde pointed to data on the compensation of employees, due to be released tomorrow, but also flagged that current wage agreements are often still backward looking, as they reflect attempts to compensate for the sharp rise in prices since the start of the Ukraine war. As we flagged previously, the multi-year wage agreements in Germany are a prime example of that. However, as Lagarde highlighted, the deals on the table so far show sharp increases for this year, but also imply a slowdown in wage growth in coming years. However, unemployment is at a record low and the number of vacancies has dropped only slightly. At the same time, service price inflation remains stubbornly high, which suggests that companies have sufficient room to pass on higher labor costs. With real disposable income rising, thanks to lower inflation and higher wages, companies could find it even easier to hike prices in the second half of the year, and yesterday’s rate cut is also likely to boost demand. In the current situation, this could add to domestic price pressures. Looking ahead, the only thing that is clear is that Lagarde did her best to keep expectations of back-to-back cuts under control. The chances still are that the ECB will deliver two more 25 basis point cuts in September and December, but at this point, nothing is cast in stone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • TRGP Targa Resources stock narrow range breakout watch above 119.02, https://stockconsultant.com/?TRGP
    • ROOT stock, short term downtrend break, bullish stats , https://stockconsultant.com/?ROOT
    • CVNA Carvana stock great setup at 101.16 support area, high trade quality, target 128-136, https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • IBM stock attempting to move higher off lower support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?IBM
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.