Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I bet that was before 'clean page' time. You got 3 channels there just eliminate one of them.

 

Are you saying all of Spyders drawings on elite forum (these go right up to the end of his teachings and even includes the last image posted by Spyder) that were done before the 'clean pages' are wrong?

 

When were the 'clean pages' released? I really think this needs to be resolved.

 

Where is the actual tread with the 'clean pages'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you saying all of Spyders drawings on elite forum (these go right up to the end of his teachings and even includes the last image posted by Spyder) that were done before the 'clean pages' are wrong?

 

When were the 'clean pages' released? I really think this needs to be resolved.

 

Where is the actual tread with the 'clean pages'?

 

such a blanket statement but I already anticipate it by saying 3 channels thus he still got 2 channels right. The last time I posted a ET link it got deleted, didn't last even for one night, didn't see that happen with other's ET link post tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's wrong. "Clean Page 4" describe ideal situation.

 

Hi Stepan,

 

If I understand correctly, you mean:

 

1) In ideal case, the point 2 of a container is OUTSIDE the prior container's RTL.

 

2) In some cases, the point 2 of a container CAN BE inside the prior container's RTL.

 

 

If the above 2 statements are correct, these do apply to all fractals. Am I right?

 

Where can I find the relevant information?

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Ki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's wrong. "Clean Page 4" describe ideal situation.

 

Just not true. Don't trade certainty for mud.

 

Think about how sub-fractals are introduced.

 

Forums - SnakeEYE`s handicaps

 

10-24-11 03:37 PM

 

Quote from BenzMercedesSL: The point 2 of the trading fractal can be inside the prior parallelogram of the same fractal. I saw this in many annotated charts from Jack Hershey's students.

 

 

 

Students are encouraged to make mistakes. You are making one as well.

 

If you were being helpful (I'm not), you would have posted clean page four which contradicts you stated mistaken belief. So go get clean page four and reason through your error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Stepan,

 

If I understand correctly, you mean:

 

1) In ideal case, the point 2 of a container is OUTSIDE the prior container's RTL.

 

2) In some cases, the point 2 of a container CAN BE inside the prior container's RTL.

 

 

If the above 2 statements are correct, these do apply to all fractals. Am I right?

 

Where can I find the relevant information?

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Ki

 

no. see attached. p2 and p3 geen channel inside red channel

5aa710afebf2b_ES12-11(5Min)10_26_2011.thumb.gif.fd482e7292d44701c4a8ec31198ef7fb.gif

Edited by stepan7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's safer to stick to that Spydertrader outlines here in this thread.

It's more practical and profitable.

 

Agreed and Spyder has pt 2 inside the the same fractal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go and re-read the first pages of this thread, and pay attention to spydertrader's drawings!

 

If the through of the B2B or R2R is where the price crosses the old RTL, it means that the point 2 of the new traverse has to be outside the old traverse. If you're tempted to annotate a point 2 inside the old traverse, resist it: either you have an annotation error, or you're about to jump fractals.

 

I suggest to look at all the ET information in historical perspective, and to try not to "interpret" it, or as Jack says: don't invent anything! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Jacks clean page #4, you can have pt2 inside the channel, check out the yellow highlighted area.

 

"2.To the right of RTL or in yellow and"

 

I think the yellow area refers to location of pt 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pay attention to spydertrader's drawings! Excellent advice.I have drawn in some of the more important carryover container info on the attached post.This is why it's so important to have the carryover rtl's extended to the right of your screens(degapping very helpful also) and to use different levels of thickness to show which container each rtl applies to.I also circled the pt 2's of the different container levels that have been previously annotated by spyder.Notice that spyder uses a thicker larger number 2 for the traverse level PT 2.hth

threefractals.jpg.e0a17f2c0fc9aa19430eee0a814e6a82.jpg

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Jacks clean page #4, you can have pt2 inside the channel, check out the yellow highlighted area.

 

"2.To the right of RTL or in yellow and"

 

Read jack's comments very carefully."Region for pt3 of the forming channel: 1.After FTT and 2.To the right of the RTL or in the yellow".Now look at jack's comments on the "Region for pt2 of the forming channel:1.After FTT and 2.To the right of the RTL".Notice what jack left out in his comments on the Region for pt2(hint its colored yellow).hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another video. Just to illustrate how important it is to have the channels correct. If you don't have the channels correct you simply miss things because you don't look for them.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsxHX-7qd9k]channel / trendline trading forex - YouTube[/ame]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ivob,

 

Thank you very very much for your videos, I love them. I'm having problems with the second video, at 10:54 the second video just stops playing. Is anyone else having this issue also?

 

I'm very interested to hone in my skills with channel line drawings for better execution of trades and understanding volume proceed price action, 'Always".

 

Many thanks

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Ivob,

 

Thank you very very much for your videos, I love them. I'm having problems with the second video, at 10:54 the second video just stops playing. Is anyone else having this issue also?

 

I'm very interested to hone in my skills with channel line drawings for better execution of trades and understanding volume proceed price action, 'Always".

 

Many thanks

 

David

try to play directly on youtube also try playing with diff browser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, youtube directly should work. This was actually a very small move/trade. Volatility has been excellent today (100 pip moves) after 2 days of chop. Traders waited for the eurotop to be over before placing their trade. Even up to this moment the moves are great and price behaves textbook JHM. (wait for VE, next bar FTT)

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

 

 

Hi Ivob,

 

Thank you very very much for your videos, I love them. I'm having problems with the second video, at 10:54 the second video just stops playing. Is anyone else having this issue also?

 

I'm very interested to hone in my skills with channel line drawings for better execution of trades and understanding volume proceed price action, 'Always".

 

Many thanks

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ivob,

 

Again, thank you for the shared videos. I'm still working my way through this thread! I've only just jumped onto this thread like yesterday and I'm trying to move through all that is taught in each post as quickly as possible.

 

I have a question because I am left a little confused after watching your videos. It seems like your trading style doesn't appear to be taking into account volume or the sequence of volume movements to alert you of a price action change.

 

It appears that you are only using price action, am I correct in my analysis of your trading style or what you are conveying in your videos?

 

There are also a few acronyms that during your presentation that I could not figure out and I've re-read the posts at the beginning of this thread to find out what they are. I am hoping that I can ask you what they are in my next post?

 

Very much appreciated, with many thanks

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I trade forex and forex does not have volume data. (although I could use tick volume)

 

In general big bars are high volume. Small bars are low volume. Also I just watch how the ticks go inside the bar.. (does it move nervous..a lot of ticks..or gradually..etc)

 

Of course you can ask whatever you want...

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

 

Hi Ivob,

 

Again, thank you for the shared videos. I'm still working my way through this thread! I've only just jumped onto this thread like yesterday and I'm trying to move through all that is taught in each post as quickly as possible.

 

I have a question because I am left a little confused after watching your videos. It seems like your trading style doesn't appear to be taking into account volume or the sequence of volume movements to alert you of a price action change.

 

It appears that you are only using price action, am I correct in my analysis of your trading style or what you are conveying in your videos?

 

There are also a few acronyms that during your presentation that I could not figure out and I've re-read the posts at the beginning of this thread to find out what they are. I am hoping that I can ask you what they are in my next post?

 

Very much appreciated, with many thanks

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ivob, very much appreciated your openness. I will review your video again and will make some notes. Thank you for your answer regarding the volume, I suppose (as to my understanding of tick data) on Forex (I trade Futures) tick volume wouldn't be too much help as this is not a true representation of true volume.

 

Again to my understanding, Tick or Last, is only a representation of the Last traded price, even though there could have been 10,000 contracts traded at that price, or 100,000. The tick data would just show up as 1 tick which is hardly going to be indicative of true volume.

 

I am wondering, from the subject matter of this thread, regarding Volume Precedes Price always, I am wondering if you have noticed this pattern of B2B 2R 2B etc... with dominant and non-dominant waves and if this has affected your trading strategy in any way.

 

I ask because it seems very clear from your videos that you have a complete and superior grasp of trading with price action, e.g. the annotations of tapes, traverses and trend lines so I therefore wonder if you see any relation or merit in the volume patterns also because maybe, at the risk of sounding like a total noob, I've not been able to see this pattern of Volume Precedes Price always yet. I am just wondering if I am looking at this from the wrong angle and need to adjust my perspective like really hone in my skills to become a Jedi with chart annotating before being able to notice these Volume patterns which supports or precedes price action?

 

Many thanks for reading my ramblings... it's 3:30 am in the morning!

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Tams, I am not sure if you have this for the HSI, I quickly extracted it from Bloomberg. It is 1min data, I have used the past 2234 data points.

 

Hi xioxxio:

 

Would you have a current table for ES 5 min?

 

TIA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David,

 

I wrote before, some weeks ago, that I don't care very much about volume and that I have found it deceptive. Sometimes I was holding on to positions because volume told me so...yeah right... in the meantime price was not going the right way. I am sorry (@ Spyder) but I find price just a little more important than volume because (changes) in price give me profits.

 

Sure...it probably works. You expect a certain volume with a certain bar size but in the forex market when I see a small bar (depending on the context of course...not somewhere mid-range) and price ticking a lot, very nervously, obviously something is "different"... (small bar...high volume) and the same when I see a big bar moving just a littlebit to "easily"...

 

Of course I still have enough issues to deal with. I still find the RTL and FBO troublesome. I tend to just take profits at RTL...unless price shoots through so fast that it screams BO!

 

If you annotate well....you know what's going on at all times. And remember to "think" upside down....

- price will go up...if it cannot go down anymore and vice versa.

- What wasn't that? By exluding you find the answer.

- make sure you don't lose... --> then you win.

 

One thing that took me a long time was taking market structure in consideration.. what kind of day is it? choppy: look to sell above, buy below. Change happens in the middle. look for FBO..and channels becoming wider and wider... change comes very quickly...(directly after PT3)... Of course the opposite for trending days. On trending days I tend to ignore certain FTT's.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you ivob, very much appreciated your openness. I will review your video again and will make some notes. Thank you for your answer regarding the volume, I suppose (as to my understanding of tick data) on Forex (I trade Futures) tick volume wouldn't be too much help as this is not a true representation of true volume.

 

Again to my understanding, Tick or Last, is only a representation of the Last traded price, even though there could have been 10,000 contracts traded at that price, or 100,000. The tick data would just show up as 1 tick which is hardly going to be indicative of true volume.

 

I am wondering, from the subject matter of this thread, regarding Volume Precedes Price always, I am wondering if you have noticed this pattern of B2B 2R 2B etc... with dominant and non-dominant waves and if this has affected your trading strategy in any way.

 

I ask because it seems very clear from your videos that you have a complete and superior grasp of trading with price action, e.g. the annotations of tapes, traverses and trend lines so I therefore wonder if you see any relation or merit in the volume patterns also because maybe, at the risk of sounding like a total noob, I've not been able to see this pattern of Volume Precedes Price always yet. I am just wondering if I am looking at this from the wrong angle and need to adjust my perspective like really hone in my skills to become a Jedi with chart annotating before being able to notice these Volume patterns which supports or precedes price action?

 

Many thanks for reading my ramblings... it's 3:30 am in the morning!

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.