Welcome to the Traders Laboratory.

Technical Analysis The technical discussion forum for traders.

Like Tree33Likes
Reply
Old 05-23-2012, 12:38 PM   #1

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 66
Ignore this user

Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts

TA Debunked

The cult of technical analysis and day trading seems to grow and grow. The Web is crawling with technical analysis (TA). Tax changes have created a boom in spread betting, and hundreds of courses have sprung up to teach traders to read short term 'technical' chart set ups. All of this - coupled with the ongoing use of the terminology by market commentators and practitioners - may make you wonder whether technical trading rules are profitable and worth using in your own investing? Given its popularity, is there something to all this TA, basically?

Rest at:
http://www.stockopedia.co.uk/content...harting-63806/
equtrader is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 01:42 PM   #2
Sky Blocks Champion

SIUYA's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: a city of canals
Posts: 2,215
Ignore this user

Thanks: 603
Thanked 922 Times in 637 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

All interesting .....but its a bit of a tired old argument (like passive v active investing, EMH) with each side pushing their barrow.
It rather simple IMHO - you use the best tools - and thats all they are, that are available to you at the time. Whether its fundamental analysis, or technical analysis, or quant analysis.

FA is debunked a lot as well, especially when it comes to most people, as they dont have the resources, time, knowledge, patience, funding, ability to tell if the accounts and management are lying etc; etc.

I have not got any on me, but there are plenty of reports to show if you look at the fundamental calls most research analysts make they are pretty much similar to technicians - win some loose some.

There is more to this game than analysis, and number crunching.
mitsubishi and 4EverMaAT like this.
__________________
Context is king - and patience is more than a virtue, it is profitable.
SIUYA is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SIUYA For This Useful Post:
SunTrader (05-24-2012)
Old 05-23-2012, 02:06 PM   #3

mitsubishi's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beyond
Posts: 1,623
Ignore this user

Thanks: 185
Thanked 356 Times in 256 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

Might not work if your analysis looks like this (from the comments under the op's link
Attached Thumbnails
TA Debunked-canvas.gif  
__________________
Everything to the left on your chart is free information
mitsubishi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 04:44 PM   #4

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 473
Ignore this user

Thanks: 73
Thanked 81 Times in 50 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

The funny thing is, in the final section of the text the author admits that TA works, as it will help with "timing of investments" and "understanding why a stock moves"... well, that's enough reason for me to use mainly TA

Also, it is not true that empirical evidence for TA is negligible. There are many well-known equity market anomalies which are recognized by efficient market theorists (that's why these are called "anomalies").

Though, I agree that the right, i.e. profitable, application of TA is more art than science. Hence, it is difficult for some to grasp.

By the way, in the first Market Wizards book there was - as far as I recall - only one pure FA guy (J. Rogers) and he had such a long investment horizon that timing was almost irrelevant (> 2 years in most cases). The rest were all TA focused guys. That says also a lot.
4EverMaAT likes this.
karoshiman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 07:51 AM   #5

4EverMaAT's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Ignore this user

Thanks: 29
Thanked 62 Times in 42 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

Just different sides of a coin really. Focusing and choosing to prefer once side over the other helps to get at the very root of what deludes most traders. Isn't the ultimate goal to figure out the core (fundamental) aspects of what drives the market, then see what entries and exits (technical) can allow us to best extract profits?

We assert preferences to the market, and attach ourselves very heavily to these preferences. As long as you get to the end goal, and can duplicate the results, does it matter what adjective we use to describe the process.

edit: see new post

Last edited by 4EverMaAT; 05-24-2012 at 08:11 AM.
4EverMaAT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 08:01 AM   #6

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 45
Ignore this user

Thanks: 24
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

This is an age old argument but I would take TA on a monthly and weekly chart over any crap most fundy analysts come out with.

Get the bias from those high time frames trade the m15 using that bias.
xkr1962 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 08:11 AM   #7

4EverMaAT's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Ignore this user

Thanks: 29
Thanked 62 Times in 42 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

followup: the article point number 2 (Reason 2: Empirical evidence for TA is negligible) confirms what former Turtle Trader Curtis Faith emphasized that, besides ensuring the entire process of trading was mechanical (and therefore objective, testable, measurable, etc), position sizing is the most important aspect that the user has under their control. Not spending countless hours on predicting the best point of entry.

I eventually got the hang of this, and developed a spreadsheet to assist in formulating a proper money management strategy; one that can handle all market conditions according to the size of my trading account.
4EverMaAT is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 4EverMaAT For This Useful Post:
bobcollett (05-24-2012), SIUYA (05-24-2012)
Old 05-24-2012, 09:11 AM   #8

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 933
Ignore this user

Thanks: 117
Thanked 85 Times in 76 Posts

Re: TA Debunked

"But if there is, it's escaped the attention of any rigorous academic study on the topic that we've come across, especially for stocks."

Didn't bother reading beyond this line.

Academics don't live in the real world. If they can't measure and quantify something, in their minds it doesn't exist.

My trading account says otherwise. Many others as well.
SunTrader is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Help Others By Rating This Thread
Help Others By Rating This Thread:

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CS to VB integration by DeskLancer
2006-2011 Traders Laboratory, All Rights Reserved.