Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

PristineTrading

What is Real and What is Not in Technical Analysis

Recommended Posts

DBP - you seem to look at everything as either TA or FA.

 

There are other ways of looking at the market, especially for a day trader.

 

Take a look - traders at work. Note they have some charts in the background, but they are not the focal point of what they are looking at.....

 

I don't suppose there's any point in my saying this again, but charts are not TA. Charts are a tool. TA existed long before charts. The videos you've posted show guys following price in the context of demand and supply. That's basic TA. Your choosing to define it some other way doesn't make your definition true. At most, it makes your definition one of at least three, one of which you find useless.

 

And, yes, it's either TA or FA, even if one is following one or the other by proxy, such as a newsletter. If you've found some other way of assessing the market, please explain.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TheDude,

 

re:

"Take a look - traders at work. Note they have some charts in the background, but they are not the focal point of what they are looking at.....

 

...and

 

This guy has something to say..."

etc.

 

TA is when a trader opens a chart or other visual* representation of a tradable instrument and then makes a trade decision based upon any information they get from that representation
http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/markets/14627-what-real-what-not-technical-analysis-2.html#post165971

 

Still not clear what you're arguing about.

 

You said that.

Thx.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* or auditory... or vibratory :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the issue folks -

 

You guys seem to insist on calling *anything* TA. Even fundamental info is now TA to you folk.

 

DBP makes me laugh when he now claims reading order flow off a DOM is now also TA. I think he may be losing the credibility he spent so long building up pretty quickly saying things like this.

 

This I believe is simply because most here insist they must be right, so they move the goal posts to include *everything* to come under their umbrella of definition so they can never be called out.

 

It's like some phoney religion or cult.

 

Freud had a similar strategy: I'm right, and if you say I'm wrong, then that also shows I'm right as it really means you're in denial.

 

Nice try.

 

Please folk, do get a grip. TA is charts. TA is drawing silly lines on those charts, shapes etc. It isnt fundamental info displayed in graphic format etc.

 

If I read an e-mail with some guys opinion of the markets, that isnt TA. This post is not TA.

 

I can only assume the only reason some here want 'everything' to be included as TA is because they have realised TA doesnt work, so rather than slaughter their sacred cow, they move to something else, include that as TA so as not to lose face or something.

 

No wonder success eludes most here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definition of 'Technical Analysis'

A method of evaluating securities by analyzing statistics generated by market activity, such as past prices and volume. Technical analysts do not attempt to measure a security's intrinsic value, but instead use charts and other tools to identify patterns that can suggest future activity.

 

Read more: Technical Analysis Definition | Investopedia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the definition of Fundamental Analysis, also from Investopedia:

 

A method of evaluating a security that entails attempting to measure its intrinsic value by examining related economic, financial and other qualitative and quantitative factors. Fundamental analysts attempt to study everything that can affect the security's value, including macroeconomic factors (like the overall economy and industry conditions) and company-specific factors (like financial condition and management).

 

The end goal of performing fundamental analysis is to produce a value that an investor can compare with the security's current price, with the aim of figuring out what sort of position to take with that security (underpriced = buy, overpriced = sell or short).

 

This method of security analysis is considered to be the opposite of technical analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And the definition of Fundamental Analysis, also from Investopedia:

 

A method of evaluating a security .................................................

 

I wondered who would be first to post FA Investopedia .... it was a 50/50 call as far as I was concerned

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TheDude,

 

 

I can only assume the only reason some here want 'everything' to be included as TA is because they have realised TA doesnt work, so rather than slaughter their sacred cow, they move to something else, include that as TA so as not to lose face or something.

Thanks. I’m kinda slow but finally getting it.

To you - "TA is charts" (with maybe some extra squigglies and lines)… a rather narrowed ,neurotic (according to Sigmund :razz: ;) ) definition

To us, TA is charts - plus “other tools” , other representations (visual and beyond) of information to include ticker tapes, doms, etc etc. with which to make trading ‘decisions’…

For most I think you'll find it's more a matter of being as inclusive and realistic as possible, instead of "moving on" to protect a cow

 

If I read an e-mail with some guys opinion of the markets, that isnt TA. .

...actually, some guys opinion is TA... it's a very small statistical sample.

 

This post is not TA.

... because it provides no information with which to make a trading 'decision'.

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wondered who would be first to post FA Investopedia .... it was a 50/50 call as far as I was concerned

 

Well, it is pretty basic Trading 101. I'm sure whatever beginners read this thread will be able to determine what has a link to reality and what does not.

 

Which I suppose brings us full circle back to the OP, more or less.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, it is pretty basic Trading 101. I'm sure whatever beginners read this thread will be able to determine what has a link to reality and what does not.

 

Which I suppose brings us full circle back to the OP, more or less.

 

Db

 

Most probably.

If each of us can devise a means of moving the uncertainty of trading in our favour then

we should call it what we want, since trading is as much about managing freedom as it is about managing uncertainty.

I call my approach 'the family pet' since it seems to offend almost nobody and induces a sense of humour ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most probably.

If each of us can devise a means of moving the uncertainty of trading in our favour then

we should call it what we want, since trading is as much about managing freedom as it is about managing uncertainty.

I call my approach 'the family pet' since it seems to offend almost nobody and induces a sense of humour ...

 

I agree, and perhaps one of the reasons why gurus tend to come up with such cutesy names for their setups (another is to give potential subscribers the impression that the setups are something new).

 

But there is also the issue of communication. I've seen threads go on for hundreds of posts without anybody ever troubling to define just what it is they're debating. But if one has no interest in communicating with anybody else, he can call what he does glommitching, and who's to argue?

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree, and perhaps one of the reasons why gurus tend to come up with such cutesy names for their setups (another is to give potential subscribers the impression that the setups are something new).

 

But there is also the issue of communication. I've seen threads go on for hundreds of posts without anybody ever troubling to define just what it is they're debating. But if one has no interest in communicating with anybody else, he can call what he does glommitching, and who's to argue?

 

Db

 

The fact that so few people have the capability to define themselves has more to do with social conditioning than stupidity IMO but there is only a very fine line of separation.

 

This being the case then all that weakness needs to be knocked out of them before they can proceed, but of course it never happens and this in turn leads to the sometimes hilarious posts that TL provides.

 

But all jokes aside, the first step in retail trading is to define and master freedom.

The first taste of freedom for most people is the freedom to become lost and rather than identify this challenge and address it, they discover the welcoming bosom of TL and all it's anonymity.

Their game is over before it has even started.

 

God, who I am convinced, has a wicked sense of humour, gave Retail Traders PCs to assist them in their daunting task, and at the same time created Trading Forums to further tilt the playing field against them without being caught red-handed in doing so..

 

The rest is history I am very much afraid ... in no time at all the Forums were ring fenced by shanty communities of Vendors all pitching their wares in the blind hope that they could eke out a living without having to go near the markets they so fear.

 

Mind you if you thing that trading is weird how about the situation facing the US.

 

US Voters chose the Candidate who they felt would treat them most kindly and gently over the next four years.

To hell with the reality facing the Country .. that sort of rational did not suit the majority and so they reshaped their rational to suit their emotional needs/desires.

Should all prove interesting to watch.

 

In defense of Trading Forums ... everything a person needs to become a successful Trader is right here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm, superstition and TA.

—Adam Smith

 

(BTW - he was talking about my definition of TA, not yours!!)

 

That is obviously your definition of Adam Smith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... In defense of Trading Forums ... everything a person needs to become a successful Trader is right here

 

nicely hidden behind everything that will make them unsuccessful. The ability to determine the difference between the 2 is the "holy grail".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was that 50-50 determined fundamentally or technically?

 

 

Fundatech .. I used Fundatech.

 

When you don't know FA about TA and when TA merges with T&A, try using Fundatech.

 

I am considering offering it for sale.

I owe it all to DbP when he mentioned "give a system a cutesy name" and it is as good as money in the bank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nicely hidden behind everything that will make them unsuccessful. The ability to determine the difference between the 2 is the "holy grail".

 

Yes ... I think that People should learn market structure to begin and then there is a chance, just a vague chance, that they may realise that price did not begin as a graph, let alone a candle or a bar.

 

This may just help them appreciate all the decisions they must undertake before they load the pretty red line onto a candle, bar, line, tic, vol, range chart ... and all this assumes they have decided to trade from graphs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Diverging? In what way.

 

some of the quants that have used prices in their analysis distancing themselves from TA, and while the article points out that its about the 'golden mean' the basis for most of the data they all use is the same. .....neither uses FA, and each of them will argue there is value in their analysis..... that is all. Personally I have a broad definition of TA and most quant stuff seems to fit into that IMHO. I was put onto the article from another forum that found the distancing (maybe diverging was the wrong word) interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“One of the strengths of technical analysis is that it captures sentiment,” says Lo

 

I can relate to this, but I must admit I have never had much luck with fixed inputs such as fibs, 4 or 9 or 18 ..... but I do believe in 50% of a significant channel, because I see it several times every day.

I can't help but wonder if 38.2 and 61.8 are nothing more than an over-run of the 50% line.

As for the 200 day line and the 50 day line, they are too large for me to take an interest in.

 

Our minds are always seeking relativity and we need to be aware of this.... many is the time that we identify relationships that may be close, but they do not stand up to accuracy tests ... fractals in time frames being a classic IMO .... the relationship between TFs may be almost fractal, but that is as close as it gets.

 

The golden ratio may well occur in nature and we may very well carry it forward into architecture because it proves to be both structural and pleasing on the eye, but I cannot make the leap from this into Trading.

 

However the litmus test as always is ... are they making good consistent money from their trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
some of the quants that have used prices in their analysis distancing themselves from TA, and while the article points out that its about the 'golden mean' the basis for most of the data they all use is the same. .....neither uses FA, and each of them will argue there is value in their analysis..... that is all. Personally I have a broad definition of TA and most quant stuff seems to fit into that IMHO. I was put onto the article from another forum that found the distancing (maybe diverging was the wrong word) interesting.
Ok I see what you mean.

 

I read this originally on Bloomberg and posted it, in defense of Tom DeMark and his techniques, on Elite Trader. Not tht he needs defending nor cares what some troll on ET

says though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The golden ratio may well occur in nature and we may very well carry it forward into architecture because it proves to be both structural and pleasing on the eye, but I cannot make the leap from this into Trading.

 

I can, often .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thread but I see a lot of references to insights, beliefs and opinions about TA. What about actual testing? It seems to me that if you discover a valid technical pattern (one that repeats and is predictive) than it MUST work, by definition. If things are not working out for you, perhaps you are relying on false, untested patterns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting thread but I see a lot of references to insights, beliefs and opinions about TA. What about actual testing? It seems to me that if you discover a valid technical pattern (one that repeats and is predictive) than it MUST work, by definition. If things are not working out for you, perhaps you are relying on false, untested patterns.

 

This is one of the key issues - but here in lies a lot of context.....not all patterns are the same, and often if you are too selective costs and slippage will kill you.

A breakout from a range to the upside is not the same when a market is in a downtrend, an uptrend, a range, at the end of a trend, middle, just before an economic release, just after a big spike, (and then how do you define this).

A lot then has to do with measuring losses v how much you expect to get out of it.

 

The one thing that keeps repeating itself for me and it appears others (apologies if name against ideas is general) is context - it might be because of momentum, hinges, cycles, elliot, DeMark ( - who i also like but am not an avid user - for Suntrader and i got that article off a trend following site ), Heavy Metal (thanks Mitsubishi), MA, no charts, support and resistance, a trend line, swings, pullbacks, wide range bars, correlations, news items, long term trend.....etc etc.

 

One thing that you might have to do - and this is slow, tedious and most often not done properly - is test the pattern by hand.

Its easy to get a computer to test certain patterns - but how do you get it to test patterns in context. Is a MA cross over valid to the downside, when the market is in a big uptrend and has just pulled back but not yet made a lower high, or had some consolidation.

 

Now maybe this goes back to the heart of defining TA etc.and getting something that works for you.....even if you dont take every trade. (Are you better taking trades selectively if it improves your bank account as opposed to being a purist and taking every trade but loosing money?)

 

I also dont think because of context that each pattern is exactly the same - the setup might differ, the ultimate trigger might be the same, but the possibilities differ a lot - something beyond most our our computing skills maybe. When do you know when to chase, when not to chase, when to wait, or panic. etc; etc. Plus if you chase, do you cut quickly or take profits because you managed to catch a move that happened super quick....all of this is hard to test.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why over 1.5 million live accounts have been opened with HotForex? Established as a worldwide broker of choice we pride ourselves on our superior trading services. Today we are giving you all the reasons why we do so. The financial markets never rest – trade with the 24/5 support of a trusted broker. Simply deposit and let your forex journey start today! Terms and Conditions Apply Kind regards,  The HotForex Team
    • Renko Full Throttle PRO Indicator ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EURUSD 4H Chart: Success rate is 85% in the last 6 years    _______________________________________________________________________________________________
    • Date : 16th December 2019. Events to Look Out For Next Week 16th December 2019.Following a busy week ending with a Conservative victory in the UK election and rising hopes of a potential trade deal between UK and China, attention turns to the BoJ, PBoC and BoE monetary policy meetings next week. However, the developments on the US-China trade front will remain front and centre.Monday – 16 December 2019 Manufacturing PMI (EUR, GMT 08-30-09:00) – The prel. November manufacturing PMI was revised up to 46.9 from 46.6, despite the signs that the weakness in manufacturing is starting to spread. The European PMI for December meanwhile is expected to released at 47.4. Manufacturing PMI (GBP, GMT 09:30) – The UK PMI is expected to register an upwards reading to 50.7 after the upwards revision last week at 48.9. Tuesday – 17 December 2019 RBA Meeting’s Minutes (AUD, GMT 00:30) – The RBA minutes provides a detailed assessment of the bank’s most recent policy-setting meeting, containing in-depth insights into the economic conditions that influenced the rate decision. They are usually a cause for FX turbulence. Employment and Earnings (GBP, 09:30) – Average earnings are expected to have increased by 3.8% in October, above the 3.6% the previous month. The ILO unemployment rate (3M) for October could rise at 3.9% from 3.8%. Wednesday – 18 December 2019 German IFO (EUR, GMT 09:00) – The German Business Sentiment Index released by the CESifo Group is closely watched as an early indicator of current conditions and business expectations in Germany. December’s numbers are expected unchanged. Consumer Price Index (GBP, GMT 09:30) – The UK inflation is seen unchanged to the downside in December, at 1.5% y/y, the lowest rate seen since November 2016 and after 1.7% in September. The core should be steady as well at 1.7%. Consumer Price Index (EUR, GMT 10:00) – Prices are expected to have eased slightly in December, with overall inflation expected to remain at 1% y/y, while core inflation at 1.3% y/y. Consumer Price Index (CAD, GMT 13:30) – The overall Canadian CPI and core should hold close to target, while the November Core outcome is expected to slip to -0.2% following the 0.4% jump in October. Thursday – 19 December 2019 Interest Rate Decision and Conference (JPY, GMT 03:00) – In the last meeting, BoJ kept its short-term interest rate target at -0.1% and its pledge to guide 10-year JGB yields around 0% while maintaining its asset buying program. The central bank signaled its commitment to keep interest rates at current levels “for an extended period of time, at least through around spring 2020”. BoJ Governor said in his statement that cutting rates further are a possible policy option, adding that he doesn’t think that Japan is near the reversal rate. He also said that he doesn’t think the BoJ needs to change the forward guidance now. Hence this is likely to remain the scenario in this week’s Monetary Policy Statement. Interest Rate Decision (GBP, GMT 12:00) – BoE should remain on hold until Brexit has been resolved. Thus, consensus forecasts suggest no change in the policy rate in this meeting, however an uTwo of the nine-member MPC dissented in favour of cutting the repo rate by 25 bps Friday – 20 December 2019 Gross Domestic Product (USD, GMT 13:30) – A Q3 GDP growth is expected up to 2.2% from 2.1%, with a -$1 bln trimming for factory inventories alongside a $4 bln hike for construction. The Q4 GDP growth estimate sits at 2.4%, with support from recent reports indicating a -4% Q4 drop in imports that adds to GDP, likely firmness in government purchases, a rebounding residential investment sector, and an expected bounce in equipment spending. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date : 12th December 2019. Lagarde prepares ECB debut – 12th December 2019.   Policy unchanged Projections unlikely to change much Clues about review sought Style in focus Presiding over her first presser of the European Central Bank today, Lagarde is expected to confirm once again the current policy setting, giving time to ECB to focus on the planned review of its overall policy framework.Final Eurozone GDP and PMI readings broadly supported this neutral picture, while the confidence that a deep recession can be avoided is strengthening (Figure 1) despite the fact that German manufacturing and production numbers still look weak. The exports and the overall trade are actually holding up much better than expected, which together with still strong labour markets is underpinning hopes the net exports and consumption will continue to support growth not just in Germany.Figure 1 : December German ZEW investor confidence outcome, end the year firmly in positive territory at the highest level since February 2018.As there is nothing in the data really to challenge the ECB’s overall policy stance, the focus firstly turns into the tone and presentation style that President Lagarde will have. The “risk” is that the presser will be equally uneventful as her testimony before the European Parliament. Lagarde’s team building exercise seems to have worked and at least in public there has been a pretty consistent message since she took over, which is very likely to be confirmed today. Additionally it will be interesting to see whether she will back fully Draghi’s package.Citi Bank: All key interest rates will likely be left unchanged, and the forward guidance reaffirmed. The main interest at this meeting will be the new Eurosystem staff projections, extended to 2022, to gauge whether the September package will be sufficient to bring inflation back into line with the ECB’s target over the forecast horizon. If not, investors’ attention will quickly turn to the ECB’s toolbox and what instruments the Governing Council would be willing to use and when, in order to defend its credibility in the absence of large fiscal support. The upcoming strategic review of monetary policy will also likely be the focus of many questions.Hence as reported by Citi, other than Lagarde’s style, ECB projections could also monopolize the attention. Even though, the ECB remains ready to act again and tweak all its measures if necessary, it has already done a lot and now needs to keep an eye on the side effects of the very expansionary monetary policy, while politicians need to do their bit to support the economy.The central bank won’t be reducing the degree of stimulus any time soon with many analysts supporting that this will continue until mid-2020 unless there is a major change in circumstance.Central bankers will be conducting a comprehensive review of the policy framework, however, with a special focus on the inflation target. A more symmetric definition, which stresses that the ECB can see through lengthy inflation overshoots as well as periods of too low headline rates is likely to come in the first quarter of next year. The inclusion of owner-occupied housing costs into the HICP number also remains a challenge especially as house prices are rising rapidly in some centres, also thanks to the low interest rate environment.Bund yields have nudged higher over the past week, but the German 10-year so far failed to move lastingly above -0.3%. Uncertainty on trade and Brexit are keeping a lid on yields, although there is the risk that if things go the way markets want and a phase one trade deal is confirmed and in the UK PM Johnson gets his majority, there could be a sharp rise in yields, if markets price out further easing and start to look ahead to central banks removing some of the stimulus.However this is far away for now, while central bankers are not looking eager to add further easing.Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.