Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Institutional Selling

Recommended Posts

A week or two ago, MrPaul brought up an interesting chart comparing the major indices with the Insitutional Holdings Index. While the major indices were at new highs and a magnificent uptrend, the Insitutional Holdings Index showed a complete rangebound market. The original thread was posted on Feb. 17, 2007 here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f38/overall-market-health-1214.html

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=902&stc=1&d=1172795870

 

This rangebound indicated that the insitutional funds were no longer buying. On top of this information, the major indices were showing high volume pullbacks with low volume rallies. A warning sign? Clearly. The charts were telling us that a potential top was in place with clear hints of a uptrend losing steam.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=903&stc=1&d=1172796072

 

 

On Feb. 27, 2007 the Dow crashed 500pts along with the entire market. Now do we blame it on China and the Shanghai Index dropping 9% overnight? I dont think so. A smart trader/investor would of known what was to be expected. Alot of the traders in the trading chat room were fully aware of the potential top in place.

institutionalindex.jpg.74cdf12e346f9f499a5a6fb5fa0b3f1b.jpg

indicesmajor.thumb.jpg.b5b2541596d037da07699873cbd01f86.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If its not to much work, could we see an actual daily chart of the Institutional Holding Index ? I think I dont have it on esignal... would apreciate that, also is it posible to see a 5 min chart of the same compared to YM 5min.... thanks in advance.... Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly does the Insitutional Holdings Index measure? It has a very grand sounding name but that counts for nothing unless it measures something worthwhile. It's the nature of institutional traders not to make their positions available to the general public so I'd be surprised if any meaningful information was available just by looking at this index.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

notouch: I would suggest you look at the very first post of this thread and evaluate for yourself if this index doesnt has a valuable information.... by the way found it on esignal symbol is : $XII thanks Soul for help. cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amex Institutional Index

The Amex Institutional Index (XII) is a capitalization weighted index of 75 stocks most widely held as equity investments among institutional equity portfolios. The index is designed to reflect the performance of core stock holdings of institutions. The XII Index was established with a base value of 250.00 as of June 24, 1986. (The index value was later split 2-for-1 on May 19, 1998.)

 

 

I understand you can see what bigbrother is doing... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Amex Institutional Index is completely different from the Institutional Holdings Index. Both of them are sort of interesting but they don't really tell us what "big brother" is up to. Google, for example, is in the Institutional Holdings Index but is also very popular with retail investors. So if retail investors started dumping their Google stocks this would have a negative impact on the Institutional Holdings Index but the institutions could be buying what retail is selling. Also we don't know who these "institutions" are. They probably include pension and mutual funds who are usually classified as "dumb money". Trading syndicates on the other hand are not institutions even though they are definitely smart money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one of john carter's "thangs" is to watch MER (merrill lynch) and the brokerdealers (XBD) and the Banks (BKX) indexes to at least get somewhat of a hint of what institutions are doing.

 

i think this is a decent proxy. i do find that when BKX and XBD are diverging from the dow, one or the other will give. it's also a rare to see a real rally sustain itself without heavily green XBD and BKX and the opposite for a selloff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Amex Institutional Index is completely different from the Institutional Holdings Index. Both of them are sort of interesting but they don't really tell us what "big brother" is up to. Google, for example, is in the Institutional Holdings Index but is also very popular with retail investors. So if retail investors started dumping their Google stocks this would have a negative impact on the Institutional Holdings Index but the institutions could be buying what retail is selling. Also we don't know who these "institutions" are. They probably include pension and mutual funds who are usually classified as "dumb money". Trading syndicates on the other hand are not institutions even though they are definitely smart money.

 

 

XII.X is the symbol used in this thread, happens to be the Amex Institutional Index, how can we determine what is smart money can become a very subjective topic and beyond this thread spirit, the divergence shown before the 2/27 fall was clear... If its smart, dumb, idiot money I dont know... but its clear that the "institutional" sector was not bullish anymore on does dates previous to the fall.... I dont think this indexes are there for nothing, they have been built to be monitored, Notouch : If you dont believe in them, just dont use them... simple, like any other techniques been thought here, it is a little faith sometimes what puts you in action, being so pesimistic will keep you on a closed actitude too some things that can be of very good help...

cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This may help clear things up. I originally mentioned the core holdings index after looking through a stocktiming.com report on China/the S&P/ and the core holdings index

 

Stock Timing - Daily Update

 

In hindsight they were spot on...

 

The point was divergence and non-accumulation, not so much this leads that etc.

 

Hope that helps :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article MrPaul but I think it contains a lot of flawed thinking. For a start it only contains one example. Obviously you'd need to see it repeated many times before drawing any conclusions. It also makes the mistake of thinking that just because one of these institutional indices are not going up this represents institutional selling but that isn't necessarily so. It just means some common stocks that are held by some institutions (as well as the general public) are underperforming compared to the S&P 500. I don't think you can jump to the conclusion from that that every time these institutional indices diverge from the S&P 500 then the market is about to crash.

 

That XII index contains all the DJIA stocks plus 45 others. For example while the DJIA only contains Coca-Cola, XII also contains Pepsi. I doubt it will prove as useful on a long-term basis as some here seem to be believe.

 

^XII: Components for AMEX INSTITUTIONAL INDEX - Yahoo! Finance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, in this case it did crash... lol.:( notouch: you should take into acct that sometimes some concepts do not need a cientific backtesting... the core concept is there.... by no means one index will represent the entire institutional holdings, but there is an old saying in my country that says "para muestra basta un boton"... one example is enogh to know whats inside the entire box... that means that that index could be representing a lot more... example the dow index is build with just 30 stocks... but its says a lot and it speeks for the entire nyse... openes of mind can be very helpfull on the interpretation of this indexes... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember the postman delivered my mail early the day before the crash. Does this mean the market will crash every time the postman delivers my mail early? There's a saying in my country "hard cases make bad law". I think trying to draw conclusions based on things that happened before a freak 500 point crash is not going to help your trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I remember the postman delivered my mail early the day before the crash. Does this mean the market will crash every time the postman delivers my mail early? There's a saying in my country "hard cases make bad law". I think trying to draw conclusions based on things that happened before a freak 500 point crash is not going to help your trading.

 

You cant take one piece of information in the markets and conclude. In this case, the Insititutional Holdings Index showed a consolidation prior to the correction on Feb 27. You combine that with the lower volume rallies and higher volume selloffs on the index futures. This information would of showed clear warning signals for longer term and short term traders and would of helped any trader from establishing a long position if he was aware of this. I personally tried to short the markets and was looking into options a few days before the correction. Although I did not get in, I have a few friends in Tokyo who got hammered on that correction.

 

If the information provided does not make any sense to a trader, why bother using it? If it helps, I am sure the information will be of tremendous help to the trader. Traders make money by being aware and selling it to those who are less aware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Price and volume on the index futures and indices themselves gave us all the information we needed to know. I can't see how adding another 45 stocks to the DJIA is going to help us spot institutional selling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.