Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

2012trader

Do You Use The Elliott Wave To Trade?

Recommended Posts

...very interesting … 20 + days since op and not a single peep…

 

Understandable, in so far as for over a decade now the stock market continues in corrective waves, instead of in impulse waves, … and as Glenn Neely so accurately put it… the work / test of ew traders is in how well they count and trade corrective patterns…

 

…this low response rate in TL, may be indicative of a whole generation where ew is a lost art…

 

…tangent

[social Mood Watch] Summit 2011 Video: Bob Prechter Explains How Investors Herd

 

Also understandable, in that most ew counts will still be done on dollar unadjusted charts… and are subsequently skewed, screwed, or just plain old suck…

 

 

in contrary mode I’m thinking now may a good time for noobs to explore it and for experienced traders to dust off the ew books again

- not that the corrective period is over yet… but if you know how to trade ending or ended corrective phases, the impulse waves, when they come again will be ‘easy’

- and not that I espouse ew or recommend 'everyone' learn ew… I have all kinds of issues with it... 1) summation of cycles 'explains' how so many ew's can turn out not like they are 'supposed' to and has taken me much further in projecting possible outcomes than even the very best ew analyses ( btw, though, I don't regret any of the long hours I put into trading EW long ago 2) and, (yes disturbingly) for me, the "ew's" of one time frame are not 'fractals' of larger timeframe ElliottWaves' s as the traditional and consensus models posit... etc. etc...

 

Still...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prechter is a stupid man.To be a permabear in a bull market ...

 

I don't track Prechter's market calls at all.

:Curious:

...How long has he been a permabear?

(... and how long has it been a bull market ? )

 

 

“Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished.” - Lao Tzu

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused:

 

...As usual i will be completely ignoring convention

hey mitsu, this is confusing … celebrating your own inner innovator…while denigrating Ralph, et al, who on many levels, personified and were shining examples of “ignoring convention” in their day…

 

 

 

 

“...pushing measurement very far gets you to weird things” Alder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused:

:helloooo:

 

… are we (completely) identifying Elliott Wave and / with Robert Prechtor yet?

 

… are we mixing messages yet?

 

"It is the same with all things. What starts out being sincere usually ends up being deceitful. What was simple in the beginning acquires monstrous proportions in the end." Chuang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still :confused :)

 

 

:confused:

 

incongruencies btwn...

 

...get a songbook...

?

or

...writing a song...

?

 

 

... my confusion is maybe just from the tone of your first posts about Robert, permabear, bull market, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck Mitsubishi - if you take something - like EW - and try and improve it, etc; then if you go down the path of trying to create a model that explains everything and becomes a model that the market has to fit I think you will struggle.....now I know you are probably not saying this :)

and while Precter may be a fanatical devotee - so are many other perma bulls, bears and they usually have their day in the sun. Often its better to be nown for something than being a flipper with no conviction - it makes for good tv.

 

For my :2c:

Elliot wave theory is a good generalist theory of how the markets work/swing/move - in waves.

Now those waves might as often be seen in a series of 5 and 3 wave counts.

Period.

 

Personally - if I see something that in the context of other things - eg; support, resistance, 50% retracement in an existing trend - AND - I can clearly see 5 waves or I can see that a 3 wave retracement would also co-incide with a 100% of the A wave to C waves then it gives me a higher conviction for the trade. I am interested in counting the interior waves to try and then predict what is going to happen in the future - no.

 

(much like Tom Demark - 9-13-9 counts, they are indications and a general theory of how markets appear to move) -

are they predictive? Only if you want to be frustrated and proved wrong like so many of our predictions :) ---- as opposed to anticipations of possibilities/probabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EW is like any technique. Works some of the time, some of the times not.

 

The fanatics believe there is always a wave count present.

 

Just a matter of finding it and labeling it.:doh:

 

Mystery X and Y waves, and elaborate 5 wave corrections.

 

Prector will believe this going to the end of his own personal 5th wave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EW is like any technique. Works some of the time, some of the times not.

 

The fanatics believe there is always a wave count present.

 

Just a matter of finding it and labeling it.:doh:

 

Mystery X and Y waves, and elaborate 5 wave corrections.

 

Prector will believe this going to the end of his own personal 5th wave.

 

I found it interesting to learn about the "young" Elliott who only knew about 3s and 5s. There were no inviolate rules or even Fibonacci stuff. Then, as you say, the need to explain every wiggle set in and with it the infamous X wave, etc. For me, I'm young at heart and travel in young Elliott's footsteps especially when they mesh with other indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You want a simple life don't you zdo?.

No, I only go “simple” when I’m forced to by low coping or mental energy,… I naturally tend to complexity.

 

…ever wonder what happened to our OP?

…wonder why he asked the OP ? ?

…wonder why only one of us, Obsidian, has categorically answered his YN question. The rest of us have hem hawed around with it...

 

I thought your basic point is that many have abandoned EW but maybe there are people trying to adapt the basic idea..if i am,there are probably others

My basic point was to answer OP’s question. An answer of quality would have been a straight up “No” – but I went off with some “quality BS” ( re “quality BS”:), see http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/money-management/12243-drawdown-2.html#post141015 ...TL would be much better off, imo, if we all put our quality here and put all our BS and “quality BS” over on ET or some place… me, included… I estimate less than 10% of my posts are really of quality… and even that estimate may be generous self delusion)

 

The fanatics believe there is always a wave count present

not just “fanatics” … all bonafide Elliotticians ‘believe’ a wave count is present…

during pure impulse monowaves where they obviously 'know', of course, but also even in complicated corrections when they can't definitively come up with more than 2 or 3 alternative counts. Dedicated Ellioticians must be prepared for impulse waves so they must delve into the complexities. To a ‘true’ Elliottician - EW is “working” all of the time...

 

Along those lines, is it really helpful to dabble?

… to use EW “when they mesh with other indicators” ?

… to have a trade supported when “see something that [agrees] in the context of other things”, but not counting the ”inner waves”?

… to “adapt the basic idea” ?

... to accomodate superficial 'EW' as an ancilliary construct ?

just wondering ???? On some levels this is a confusing thread...

 

more at http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/9763-advice-all-stop-fighting-trend-3.html

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knowing the 'right' sets of beliefs to hold is never easy, but it is especially difficult at large turning points because, by definition, most people are holding onto old beliefs. Running against the crowd is difficult for everyone and impossible for many...

The tricky part is that our beliefs are usually hidden from us. Without conscious examination, they escape notice: lurking, shaping, and coloring our daily lives. Worse, beliefs quite often are not ‘ours’ in the sense that we create them by our individual thoughts and experiences. Instead, they are gifted to us by…

 

Dangerous Ideas - Blogs at Chris Martenson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I studies EW and actually used Tom Joseph's Software Advanced GET for a year about 12 years ago. As EW users know (I assume) EW is always clear in the rearview mirror... You don't know what wave your in until it unfolds & whether it is a minor or Major, etc... based on your timeframe...

 

I could not trade with it but it did help me see market structure a bit better, if only in hindsight and as another poster said it gave me a frame of reference for aligning retracements... If we have a flag developing on say a 15m and the pole of the flag would be a wave 3 then the retracement wave 4 would be where I would add or enter for the wave 5... of course is it wave 5 of the minor wave or are you entering at the 5th wave of bigger wave 3? If you know what I mean... I really see the same thing in a bar/candle chart and (for me) I do not worry about FIB Projections though I know some use them.. A deadend for me...

 

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Results of the survey are in!

Here are the stats for the TL sample ;) (for those who are face reading impaired, that was a :wink; )

 

73,978 Do not use Elliott Wave

4 Use Elliott Wave in a supplementary, confirmational, etc. role

0 Use Elliott Wave exclusively

 

"Nothing comes to a standstill sooner than movements that are brought about by so many people" Arnold Schoenberg

 

 

For the 4 :)

Which Method Can Traders Use to Confirm an Elliott Wave Count? | Elliott Wave International | Safehaven.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Life and trading would be so easy if only I could convince other traders to coordinate price movement to form a channel more often especially when counting current waves. And not by looking at historical data.

 

EWI is great at theory.

 

And even they sometimes botch it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is interesting and probably not surprising that the original source is the best place to start any investigations.Do you (or anyone else) have any links you can post here?

 

You can find a few pages about the "young" Elliott in "Dynamic Trader" by R. Miner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some freebies available at

 

Elliott Wave International: Expert Market Forecasting using the Elliott Wave Principle

 

It is a free membership and has a tab called Free stuff - It even has a 280 pages book free that you can read online.

 

 

Currently I believe (I am not an expert)

I believe that EUR/USD as I write is in a corrective wave

and I am long with a target of 1.3110

I still believe the EUR/USD will go to 1.3150 but I want to play safe and

I shall post a jpeg tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW - Just thought of this as a current example....and it was not too hard to see in real time, as the last two days down have been severe in recent comparative daily moves.

 

Not to count waves etc, but when you see something like this forming, and has 5 waves down

now you can either do nothing. (This was my choice as I had shorted this morning got shaken out for a small gain, and headed out to do some chores, plus I am meeting someone this afternoon - lame, and a bugger but hey thats trading)

 

or

.....if its probably still worth a short if you can get in at a reasonable point BUT, - it tells me if the move down does not continue - get out ASAP, as the reversal will be severe.

or

.....look to get on the reversal - punting the bottom in some manner.

 

point is - this is how i use elliot waves when they seem to just show themselves, and I can then adjust for what I think I will do. Choices to cut or enter were many depending on what you like....the overall context is the important element for me.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=28827&stc=1&d=1336050630

ElliotWaveExampleGIF.thumb.jpg.0ce540d900cd1735521d3fd244dec7f3.jpg

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re ""Do You Use The Elliott Wave To Trade?""

 

... just for subversive snicks ;) (not) :)

 

The Golden Ratio is the founding lie of the West…
Drew Hempel

 

:missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....

Drew Hempel

Who he?

 

And yes the benefit of EW counting (the roughly 50% of the time it is actually present) is to say not only a reversal is likely but at a minimum the trend is likely to be over soon and odds are against a new position taken in the direction of current trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not a trader... That's obvious :rofl:

 

re: "...the roughly 50% of the time it is actually present"

How could 'it' ever not be present ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He's not a trader... That's obvious :rofl:

 

re: "...the roughly 50% of the time it is actually present"

How could 'it' ever not be present ?

Because sometimes price just doesn't "get the memo" and cooperate with a logical count.

 

That is when the EWers, who always follow the rules, label everything with X's and Y's

and who knows what else.

 

If a five wave EW pattern has a wave 4 that overlaps wave 1 slightly is it not a 5 wave EW pattern. The unbending rule followers say no it is not. I analyse my trades but don't call me an anal-yst. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Because sometimes price just doesn't "get the memo"...

 

...

 

 

 

I like that one :)

 

It's comical how people sometimes try to make sense of the markets... I have to admit I've never seriously analyzed the EW theory, and hence, should not judge it superficially... but it never made sense to me why markets should have such predictable patterns (hence, my lack of motivation to analyze it).

 

I put Fibonacci numbers into the same category... but that's for another thread, I guess.

 

I hope that I don't get killed now by all the profitable traders out there who trade successfully based on EW or fibs... :stick out tongue:

 

Everyone should use what works for them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like that one :)

 

... but it never made sense to me why markets should have such predictable patterns (hence, my lack of motivation to analyze it).

 

I put Fibonacci numbers into the same category... but that's for another thread, I guess.

 

I hope that I don't get killed now by all the profitable traders out there who trade successfully based on EW or fibs... :stick out tongue:

 

Everyone should use what works for them...

 

Its not predictable, its often just a value bet.....both for Fib and for waves, and prices are just as predictable as the humans who create them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not predictable, its often just a value bet.....both for Fib and for waves, and prices are just as predictable as the humans who create them.

 

Hi Siuya,

 

What do you mean by "value bet" in this context?

 

I know this term only from poker, where you know you have the winning hand (or pretend to have it, which is a more sophisticated bluff) and bet an amount small enough for your opponent to call (giving him or her good odds) in order to extract extra money.

 

Do you mean betting a smaller amount on Fib or EW theories, as these are less likely to win (as opposed to my poker example)?

 

Regards,

k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.