Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I call it free money - a practically risk-free trade. You have to be present and TAKE IT when it is being offered, and as you point out, you have to be able to see that it is there being offered in the first place. With regard to the seeing part, it is aptly described by the old saying, "There is more than one way to skin a cat."

 

One last thing about the free money part: it's a sure-fire loss on the opposite side. That is to say, a risk-free trade is at the same time an extremely risky trade for unskilled participants. A few characteristics of unskilled participants: (1) they predict and bet; (2) they exit on stops; (3) they never reverse.

 

Gosu,

 

Can you expand on what you mean about exiting on stops? I understand your other 2 characteristics, but need more amplification on the exiting of stops? Could just be my mis-interpretation, but I do use stop points based upon various levels of S/R or "confluence"...

 

Thanks,

CYP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu,

 

Can you expand on what you mean about exiting on stops? I understand your other 2 characteristics, but need more amplification on the exiting of stops? Could just be my mis-interpretation, but I do use stop points based upon various levels of S/R or "confluence"...

 

Thanks,

CYP

 

What I mean is that the wash trade is not in the person's toolbox and trades that do not work out are invariably allowed to trigger stop losses. The usual operating procedure in a P&B paradigm is a person monitors for a "set up," enters the market when he sees one, puts in a stop loss and target exit, and then stops monitoring or continues to monitor but takes no action until one or the other is triggered. Hence there is an overemphasis on entries as "set ups that work" are sought oftentimes accompanied by backtesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one also traded mainly based on the news Friday, and perhaps was lucky but it paid off well. My short basis was 66.50, not quite the 68 I would have liked to have had. But I also exited most at 63s as it became clear that a massive selloff would not happen. It may be guessing, but all of it is guessing. I just couldn't see new highs with Greece looming in the background, and delta volume as well as TICK steadily declining throughout the whole consolidation, indicating the market's anticipation of it as well, I think. My news service announced the CDS trigger around 2:30 I think, and then by 2:45 it seems that most news services were picking it up more strongly, and they said it was being discussed on CNBC, and about that time the rest of the selling came in strong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you Josh....seems to me that your approach was rational and provided a decent reward based on the data....what you call guessing is for me simple estimation of the probabilities....you have to work with the tools at your disposal...you use your own, I use mine and I incorporate experience....my previous comment was simple...you can't buy experience or find it on a chart package....as you can see however you can still get to the same (or nearly the same) endpoint...

 

Today was similar...with important news on the horizon and Greece just finishing its CAC process, many participants are watching from the sidelines....I simply scale back on size and take the signals I see looking for small hits....tomorrow's another day....

 

The attached chart shows the last trade of the day....simple reversal signal occurring right in the middle of a demand node and just below value extreme....in this kind of market, where so many are taking a whipping, what you have to do is focus on a specific opportunity and keep your head in the game....I walk away from the screen right before lunch (NY time) and come back to trade the last hour....works for me.

 

Best of luck

Steve

5aa710dacc33d_lasttradeoftheday.thumb.PNG.4ee3ec534ccd41a87723ab50e621f320.PNG

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope, no crowing necessary, this isn't a big deal for me....its a day thats all

 

Basically I have two points to make....ONE, if you know now to trade events, you can pick up some easy money....you have to have an approach that works and then a way to get on board....I was taught to do it....and what I am saying is that the game is played on several levels....YOU don't have to want to play it that way....I choose to.

 

Item 2.....I know of two methods (that really work well) to "read" a market like the S&P....you can learn to read the tape (if you can find someone to show you) OR you can figure out that if you simpy read the "price action" on a minute or sub minute scale...if you try it, what you are seeing is actually a significant percentage of the order flow....in fact you are seeing enough of the order flow to make it possible to determine whether the bid holds (and when it doesn't)....Actually I have already posted in pretty good detail (in this thread) what it is that you look for in order to find a favorable entry...like all valuable skills it takes time and effort, but it works...I do it every day.

 

Bottom line, its a day like any other, except that I was prepared to trade this event....and based on the posts, I didn't see anyone else "on it". From my perspective its as though someone dropped money on the sidewalk and I walked up and saw it there.....am I gonna pick it up...yep

 

Steve, enjoyed your post. Problem is most traders cannot read price action or time and sales. they rely on patterns. By the time they act, we are out, they get stuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday may not have afforded the greatest number of trading opportunities, but as a context day it is an interesting one. It ended up very close to being an inside day at the recent upper high volume distribution. The dwindling range coming into the FOMC announcement today means any break one way or the other, could be decent in magnitude. So far overnight trading has attempted higher. However, things can end up quite different by RTH open and often do. We are sitting close to the current recent RTH high at 1371.50 with about 30mins until open. It would make sense that it opens around here for a test of 71.50 considering ES's propensity for opening at or near to test points more recently. After that we might get a move in one direction before settling into a pre-release range.

 

Anyway, here's a chart for those who are interested.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=27907&stc=1&d=1331643812

2012-03-13.thumb.jpg.81212cff088637618aa9dea75096edd6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We haven't quite managed to take out the overnight high yet at 75.75, but failure to close that gap with responsive selling could end up fairly bullish.

 

Didn't close the gap as you mentioned, and on quite heavy selling as well.

 

N, are you running IRT C1 yet? If so, what does your profile show for the total volume (RTH or ETH doesn't matter)? Mine is way underreporting volume, says 700K when it's actually 1.1M .. I emailed Chad but curious as to what yours says.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
404k rth. Are all your DST settings correct?

 

 

I just examined the volume bars and that is correct, but for some reason my T&S is showing a lot more than that... hmm will investigate this.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is your time and sales showing?

 

My T&S and daily bar are showing 1.1M+, but a 1440m bar shows 700K+

 

N, what does a daily bar (like an actual daily bar, not a 1440m) show for total volume so far?

 

EDIT:

I compared for yesterday as well and a discrepancy there as well. Seems like I have gone down this road before, having a deja vu moment, and will simply not worry about this at the moment. I will ask IQF.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EDIT:

I compared for yesterday as well and a discrepancy there as well. Seems like I have gone down this road before, having a deja vu moment, and will simply not worry about this at the moment. I will ask IQF.

 

Let me know if you get an answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still on the older version until it gets out of Beta... been down this path before... distracting... I am looking forward to some of the new features though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys: I was holding a long which I bailed on when the Delta dropped hard around 10a cst what is your opinion on that?

 

Price stayed in a tight range... I thought it was profit taking also we had hit the GBX high & stopped... Of course we are moving on to my target but that is ok...

 

Every so often the delta goes bonkers...we dropped about 8,000 contracts in about 5 min... of course price was holding up pretty well... SO I was interpreting it as selling coming in and potentially being absorbed but with it dropping it confused me..

 

Wouldn't you think that if the selling was being offset with buying that the Delta wouldn't have dropped so hard?

 

You guys got any opinions on what was going on there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let me know if you get an answer.

 

Will let you know -- I won't compare now, but possibly they are adding some volume from the March contract since it is still receiving pretty heavy volume, presumably until expiration at the end of this week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm still on the older version until it gets out of Beta... been down this path before... distracting... I am looking forward to some of the new features though...

 

Yes but this is definitely a data question, not IRT as I originally thought...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys: I was holding a long which I bailed on when the Delta dropped hard around 10a cst what is your opinion on that?

 

Price stayed in a tight range... I thought it was profit taking also we had hit the GBX high & stopped... Of course we are moving on to my target but that is ok...

 

Every so often the delta goes bonkers...we dropped about 8,000 contracts in about 5 min... of course price was holding up pretty well... SO I was interpreting it as selling coming in and potentially being absorbed but with it dropping it confused me..

 

Wouldn't you think that if the selling was being offset with buying that the Delta wouldn't have dropped so hard?

 

You guys got any opinions on what was going on there?

 

Well I'm just armchair quarterbacking here, but you have a consolidation that broke out, and then was met by selling--pretty standard stuff. But the market only ticked down 4 ticks high to low... not exactly a strong reaction in price for such a strong wave of market selling. No reason to exit the long IMO but hey, I was flat so it's easy for me to say in hindsight.

 

I don't understand your question: "Wouldn't you think that if the selling was being offset with buying that the Delta wouldn't have dropped so hard?" ... -- ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're basically talking Buying & Selling, Cumulative, etc..

 

If the selling is higher than the buying at that time then I consider Delta divergence which I was thinking but on the other side those contracts have to be absorbed..the tip off is price holding...to me the depth of the drop was disconcerting..

 

If there is an extreme selling in relation to buying - which I think we can agree was being shown at that time...if that selling was being offset with buying - wouldn't that counterbalance the Delta.. I know it can fluctuate..the point is an 8,000 contract drop..

 

How do you interpret that? Looking for your perspectives..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imo, the market wasn't moving freely as such at that point. Meaning the bids were racheting up. Strong selling into the bids without a break lower meant exactly the opposite. Buying was strong after that failed gap close, yet showed no urgency after the initial push higher. At the point you mention, the selling just fueled a move higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...if that selling was being offset with buying - wouldn't that counterbalance the Delta.. I know it can fluctuate..the point is an 8,000 contract drop..

 

Simply put, the bids were dominating. Buyers were choosing to bid, instead of pay up. The buying came in the passive form, instead of the active. And the delta is just reflecting that. Market selling was NOT being offset with market buying; instead, buyers were bidding.

 

And sellers, after that failed push which gave you the big delta drop, simply were not sitting on the offer as they realized it was going higher, hence, not a strong delta on the subsequent move back up.

 

This is why delta is no magic -- price can rise quite happily with falling delta, though it will not usually do so as freely as when buyers are paying up, indicating their urgency to be in the market, and chasing the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, Delta works pretty good for me... probably over 98%..but from time to time I see these anomolyies (sp?) and I get fooled... When I get confused, I tend to exit... sometimes, like today it means getting off the train just before it leaves the station... :doh:

 

BTW: A long set up pretty nice..There was GBX Support 71.25 down to a Single at 70.25... LOD.RTH..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW: A long set up pretty nice..There was GBX Support 71.25 down to a Single at 70.25... LOD.RTH..

 

I think N referred to this, but the double top two weeks ago was the location of the buying this morning. I took a +1.5 on a short this morning and was hoping for a near fill to 69, but should have had my eye out for a long due to location.

5aa710db3491e_3-13-20121-33-08PM.thumb.png.7fbf13541790f178d6c0f4a371cab731.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • $VKTX Viking Therapeutics stock attempting to move higher off the 64.24 support area, volume 47% above normal, https://stockconsultant.com/?VKTX
    • Date: 26th April 2024. Alphabet Easily Beat Earnings Predictions But Focus Shifts to Today’s PCE Data. Microsoft and Alphabet’s earnings reports beat expectations pushing the NASDAQ to the top of the charts. The Bank of Japan keep interest rates unchanged applying pressure on the Japanese Yen. The Yen Index declines 0.36% and is down 40% against the USD over the past 5 years. The US GDP growth rate falls below its 2.5% expectations, reading 1.6%, but economists advise the Fed may only cut once in 2024! The market turns its attention to the Core PCE Price Index which analysts expect to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. USA100 – Alphabet Easily Beat Analysts’ Earnings Predictions and Sees its P/E Ratio Fall! The price of the NASDAQ ended the day higher and rose to a slightly higher high. As a result, the index is close to forming a traditional bullish trend and making Wednesday’s decline a retracement or medium-term correction. In terms technical analysis, indicators are mainly indicating a reverting price condition where the asset cannot maintain longer term momentum. However, momentum indications provide a slight bullish bias. The upward price movement is being driven by earnings reports from Microsoft and Alphabet which beat earnings expectations. Microsoft is the most influential stock for the NASDAQ while Alphabet is the third most influential. Alphabet’s earnings beat expectations by 21.61% and revenue rose more than $6 billion. As a result, the price of the stock rose 11.56% after market close. Furthermore, Microsoft’s Earnings Per Share beat Wall Street’s expectations by 3.40% and revenue by 1.50%. The stock rose by 4.30% after market close and is close to trading at the all-time high. However, investors should note that from the “magnificent 7”, Alphabet and Meta have the lowest Price to Earnings ratio. Meaning these stocks are the most likely to be trading below their intrinsic value. However, investors should note that negatives for the stock market in general remain. This also supports the bias shown by technical analysis. The GDP growth rate fell considerably below expectations while inflation data continues to show signs of rising prices. Investors will closely be monitoring today’s Core PCE Price Index which is the most watched index by the Federal Reserve. Analysts expect the Core PCE Price Index to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. If the index reads more than 0.3%, a rate cut will become unlikely making stocks less attractive. Whereas, if the PCE Price Index is not as high as expectations, Bond Yields will likely decline, as will the US Dollar and a rate cut will be put back on the table. As a result, investors may look to take advantage of the strong earnings and continue purchasing stocks. USDJPY – BOJ Hold Interest Rates Unchanged! The price of the USDJPY exchange rate again rose to an all-time recent high after increasing in value for 3 consecutive days. Trend and momentum-based indicators point towards a higher price. However, the exchange rate is trading within the overbought range of most oscillators and is also showing a divergence pattern. Both are known to indicate a decline, but not necessarily a complete change of trend. The Bank of Japan’s statement from earlier this morning was largely “dovish” and gave no clear indication that the central bank wishes to keep rising interest rates. However, shortly the Governor will answer questions from journalists and may give a more hawkish tone. Either way, investors are mainly concentrating on if the Federal Government will again opt to intervene within the currency market. Most economists believe the intervention will only come if the USD continues to rise and it will not be before the Core PCE Price Index. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.