Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dinerotrader

Increasing Your Position Size Over Time

Recommended Posts

so far all this discussion has centered on trade to account risk.

 

what about the dynamics of the trade based on the system once the "trade to account ratio" method is adopted, whatever it may be.

 

if a trader uses 2 lots and does well by scaling out (helping to create a smoother equity curve), does that trader then go to 3 lots at a certain level; or wait until the level that would allow 4 lots. the 4 lots would obviously keep the multiple the same. with a different multiple the system changes and there are now several ways to scale out rather than 1: 2/3 then 1/3, 1/3 then 2/3, or 1/3, 1/3, 1/3

 

this isn't an argument about the merits of scaling out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i do not advocate the numbers directly, but the scale. or maybe the process is a better term. it is something that i found early on and is given to me by a bond futures trader. its % of capital based on a risk

 

$5k to $7500 = 10% or $500

$7500 to $12500 = 7.5% or $600

$12500 to $20k = 5% or $625

$20k to $32500 = 3% or $600

$32500 to $50k = 2% or $650

$50K + = 1% or

 

Are these per trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is always a great question to discuss. While there are many ways to increase your position size over time I like to take a very basic approach. I'm willing to risk no more than 3% of my account per trade. I will add size to my trading as I continue to build my account size.

 

It's important to know you market as well. As you continue to build size, you need to make sure you are trading a liquid market. Trading 5 contracts on CL is no problem but trading 25 contracts could lead to some issues. So obviously you will need to put in a cap at some point.

 

Bottom line is I have to keep things simple for myself. Sure you can use other methods out there that can get pretty deep into the numbers but I have to constantly remind myself of the KISS method. If I don't keep it simple I start to lose focus of executing my trade plan. This also means for most of my trading I'm all in and all out. I don't scale in or out of a position. It just makes it too difficult for me on the execution side of things. Not saying this is the best method by any meand. Just what fits my style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep to stats - growth is just a percentage of capital

 

if system says setup wins > 85% of the time it will risk 30%

> 70% < 85% risk 20%

> 50% < 70% risk 10%

 

of course profit is all about exits

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An experience I had early on as a trader comes to mind on this topic. A trader who had been very successful while being backed by an arcade was now trading at the same firm where I worked but was now a client. I was quite privileged in this sense as I knew and socialised with some really good traders. Having done very well as a client, he had reached a plateau seemingly and actually I was trading bigger size than him(I was actually made to - it wasn't my choice!!). He asked me how I dealt with it. I can't remember exactly what I said as a young cocky(not too cocky!) trader, but it was something along the lines of I try not to look at size in any way other than mechanically whether it affects my ability to enter and exit the market. I trade the same way as I traded a 1 lot. This wasn't strictly true as it got to a point where I was pushed to do too much size and a couple of 'bad beat' trades affected me for a while. The client actually upped his size and carried on doing pretty well just with bigger size.

 

So my idea is to correctly size your trades is to have a thorough money management plan but also understand how you deal with the fluctuations psychologically. For me, they are symbiotic.

 

Sorry for the ramble!

 

TheNegotiator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The correct formula for position sizing is as follow:

Units = 1% of account/Dollar market volatility

Dollar market volatility = ATR(20) x Dollar value per point

 

So lets say you have a 50k account:

 

Dollar market volatility = 10 (rounded for SPX) x $50 (ES point) = $500

Units = $500 (1% of 50k) / $500 (DMV) = 1 UNIT you should be trading on ES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I start each day trading small size in CL and if I get a few winners, I will risk a great deal more on the next trade. To borrow a gambling term. I try to "parlay" my win to a bigger win. If I lose, I am still ahead for the day ( and pissed as all hell that I gave some back. I am human). To stay at the higher amounts, you are going to need to win at the higher amounts. In short, you need a lucky break. You really need to fight to get to higher levels and fight to stay there. We are trading traders who want your money as badly as we want theirs. One day you have to step up to the plate with more risk. And there is a good possibility that you are going to start losing a losing streak when you decide to step up.

 

Reading Market Wizards, you will see that most of those guys did have a lucky break. Chances are that had they not had that lucky break when they had it, they may never have made it into that book. One bond trader who is a scalper, his name slips my mind, tells his story of one day taking 100 contracts. Before that the most he had done was 50.According to the story he started 6 months earlier with 25k. Subsequently he traded as many as 2000 contacts in tbonds. The point is that he went from 50-100 and he won with 100 and never looked back. Had he lost, he might have become a clerk at the CBOT.

 

Personally I have gone from trading qm to trading cl, but have not been able to build enough yet to increase the starting size of my trades in CL.

 

I see this as the quickest way. I suppose you can do it more gradually, but that could take a very long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, this is the one I teach my students. It comes with the territory.

 

What territory is that? :D

 

I guess you are being deliberately obtuse? Let me spell it out for you, unless you are a sponsor it is frowned upon to use the forums to solicit business. Referencing people to your paid for product (whether you buy the product outright or it's part of some sort of 'education') is soliciting.

 

Vendors are made very welcome here if they contribute. 'Check out my site chock full of dubious products and services' is not contributing. Oh and before you take umbrage at 'dubious' I have always held a low regard for people that sell indicators and studies that are available in the public domain. Some of yours fall into that category.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So my idea is to correctly size your trades is to have a thorough money management plan but also understand how you deal with the fluctuations psychologically. For me, they are symbiotic.

 

Sorry for the ramble!

 

TheNegotiator.

 

Absolutely agreed. Rules of MM are rules and changing or ignoring them can lead to high consequences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.