Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Is 100% Mechanical Trading Possible?

Recommended Posts

I am yearning for a 100 % mechanical trading system that is profitable?. Is this possible?

Thx!

 

the short answer is: YES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of course conditions may apply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the trading process:

 

you monitor the price/volume movements,

(HH, HL? LH, LL? 50 Week High? at pivot point? reached support/resistence?, etc.,)

 

you analyze the price/volume behaviors,

(bounce off double top? break out of formed channels? stuck in congestion? volume increase with price? etc.,)

 

based on the above...

you can come to a decision on where you are in the bigger scheme of things

and what opportunities are available

(are you in the midst of a major up trend? in the midst of a minor downtrend retrace?)

 

you act on your conclusion -- how best to capitalize on the opportunity

(e.g. buy call? sell put? buy stock on margin? short ETF? enter a credit spread? long on buy stop? etc.,)

 

 

if you can quantify the above, you can mechanize your trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not seen a "system" where you can say for certain, "if price does this, then I will do that" every time and have it make money. I would venture to say that most traders who have a "system" or "plan", have, as a strong element in that plan, their own intuition.

For example, you could look at Joe Ross's 123 and RH trading, and it looks good, but if you trade it every time, you will loose money. You have to have that little extra that says, "this is a good one" or, that one doesn't look so good, I will pass". I have seen many traders say, "Look, if price does X at such and such a level, then I will do Y and over time I will be a winner". I would look at the chart and say, why not when it did just that back here, why did you pass on that one? Sometimes there is a good answer, but often the answer is, "it just didn't feel right".

This make the whole concept of a "plan" hard to grasp. A "plan" implies having a set of rules you follow every time, but I think intuition plays more of a role then even the successful traders realize.

Trader Vic, in his first book, said he mentored 35 traders. Had them in his office, gave them access to everything he had including his watchful eye and detailed advice. In the end only 5 managed to be successful.

I know there are some mechanized systems that do OK most of the time, but I think here we are talking about trading at a human level.

 

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I run two systems that I've developed that are 100% automated in TradeStation. You can make money doing this. No system or trader makes money all the time but like any other form of trading, you are putting the odds in your favor.

 

I also do discretionary trading on the side. Actually, I 'm learning discretionary trading on a simulator during the market hours. I hope to actively trade non correlated markets against my automated systems for diversification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have not seen a "system" where you can say for certain, "if price does this, then I will do that" every time and have it make money. I would venture to say that most traders who have a "system" or "plan", have, as a strong element in that plan, their own intuition.

For example, you could look at Joe Ross's 123 and RH trading, and it looks good, but if you trade it every time, you will loose money. You have to have that little extra that says, "this is a good one" or, that one doesn't look so good, I will pass". I have seen many traders say, "Look, if price does X at such and such a level, then I will do Y and over time I will be a winner". I would look at the chart and say, why not when it did just that back here, why did you pass on that one? Sometimes there is a good answer, but often the answer is, "it just didn't feel right".

This make the whole concept of a "plan" hard to grasp. A "plan" implies having a set of rules you follow every time, but I think intuition plays more of a role then even the successful traders realize.

Trader Vic, in his first book, said he mentored 35 traders. Had them in his office, gave them access to everything he had including his watchful eye and detailed advice. In the end only 5 managed to be successful.

I know there are some mechanized systems that do OK most of the time, but I think here we are talking about trading at a human level.

 

John

 

Just remember that just because you haven't seen something, or think something is not possible, does not mean that this is impossible.

 

Imho think this is a common misconception that people think successful traders are profitable because they use intuition or have some magical gift. Some probably do, but I would venture that they are in the minority. When I created a trading plan with strict rules, my trading turned around. When I don't follow the plan and follow my "intuition", my account very quickly tells me why I have a plan. I think having a solid plan provides you with much better odds to be successful than trading on intuition/gut feel/seat of your pants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I run two systems that I've developed that are 100% automated in TradeStation. You can make money doing this. No system or trader makes money all the time but like any other form of trading, you are putting the odds in your favor.

 

 

I am wondering if the systems have regular small losses or do they lose for a period of time, causing you to stop their application.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going the full mechanical route it might be wise to run a couple (or more) systems on several instruments. This approach is more robust.

 

There is a bit of an art (so I am told) knowing when a system needs tweaking when it needs a rest (some stop working then start again) or when it needs retiring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am wondering if the systems have regular small losses or do they lose for a period of time, causing you to stop their application.

 

My best system has losses like any other trading method. I would say it's regular small losses.

 

My other system I stopped trading recently because the results for the past year have been more-or-less a wash. I would like to refine it more or move on to another concept.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My best system has losses like any other trading method. I would say it's regular small losses.

 

My other system I stopped trading recently because the results for the past year have been more-or-less a wash. I would like to refine it more or move on to another concept.

 

 

Thanks for that.. I am new to mechanical trading, am trying to get a feel for what the reality may be.....

 

Thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for that.. I am new to mechanical trading, am trying to get a feel for what the reality may be.....

 

Thanks again

 

Glad to help.

 

I’m relatively new as well. I started writing EL code for automated systems on January of 2008. Since then I’ve developed and tested dozens of ideas. To this day I have one system that has excellent results. I’m confident with it and I have no problem trading my money with it.

 

My word of advice is this: My successful system is basic, so keep your ideas simple. At its core it’s only a few lines of code. I don’t think it’s a mistake that my best system is simple.

 

I’m also finding value in my discretionary day trading. I’m starting to form an opinion that to develop good automated trading systems you must also understand discretionary trading. That may be an overstatement, but I found my discretionary trading to help a lot.

 

In short, if I spend a year testing ideas I might get one good system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I run an automated system that for the first six months of this year has returned 450% (trading Russell 2000 index futures using $2k margin per contract) This strategy wins about 55% of the trades that it takes. At times, when I see a trade that will trigger, and it 'just doesn't look right' I let the system take the trade anyway. I know that over time the parameters that I've defined will ensure that each trade taken will be in my best interest.

 

The only reason that any trader can make money is because there are patterns that repeat over time, and specifying these patterns is known as 'defining your edge.' If you don't have an edge defined, you are just gambling. Hope is not a strategy.

 

I would recommend Mark Douglas' book "Trading In The Zone" if the concept of the probabilistic mindset is not familiar to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mechanical trading is very possible, more than possible -common.

 

Possible on the scalping level and on daily, even weekly- why not?

 

On whatever level, I think you have to be there overseeing it, I do and glad I was today.

 

If you are asking essentially is are there exploitable patterns can be defined with code (so that a computer can execute them). The answer is yes.

 

Discretionary traders will tell you that successful trading can be done better by a human. Yes that's true too, since computers are not able to evaluate, have no intuition, have a hard time adapting, etc.

 

But computers don't make mistakes! They only do what they are told.

 

This thread needs more depth and runs the risk of taking us back to "disretionary vs. mechanical" argument - danger....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I run two systems that I've developed that are 100% automated in TradeStation. You can make money doing this. No system or trader makes money all the time but like any other form of trading, you are putting the odds in your favor.

 

I also do discretionary trading on the side. Actually, I 'm learning discretionary trading on a simulator during the market hours. I hope to actively trade non correlated markets against my automated systems for diversification.

 

You pay Tradestations fees and you still make money? Imagine if you went to an honest broker you could double your returns!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You pay Tradestations fees and you still make money? Imagine if you went to an honest broker you could double your returns!

 

if you trade enough rt's or shares all fees exept marketdata is waived,

if one would trade stocks only your only fee would be 3usd each month for amex nasdaq nyse data

 

your statement is noncense,

most likely a failed and/or frustradet tradestation user ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I used to trade Forex with Tradestation back in the day. Their fees were outrageous. I have heard their stock platform is more reasonable.

 

I am curious then why you would be making statements like below about the honesty of a broker if you haven't used them since "back in the day" and rest is heresay? What experience do you really have with TS?

 

You pay Tradestations fees and you still make money? Imagine if you went to an honest broker you could double your returns!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am curious then why you would be making statements like below about the honesty of a broker if you haven't used them since "back in the day" and rest is heresay? What experience do you really have with TS?

 

Someone is a little touchy. It was simply a comment based on my trials and tribulations. If you want a real platform for forex there is simply no alternative to Metatrader. Tradestation simply does not compare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.