Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Best Strategy Backtesting Software

Recommended Posts

Maybe in a few years it might catch up to where Trade Station is today but by then Trade Station wont still be where it is today.

.

urma, how TS is in terms of speed and ticks throttling? How would you compare to systems like XTrader and CQG ? would trust TS a system which generates 5k signals a day and the average trade life span is 10s ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what are you on about , ts is the worse. please back up your facts. neoticker , ninja trader both have far superior platforms for testing, implemenation and running algorithms.

 

TS may have one advantgae better data handling in intraday , thats all

 

Secondly i think you need to understand the difference between backtesting VS. simualtion really you need to simulate before trading NOt backtest - backtest only proofs your system basics, it doesnt allow for real life trading issues and management as such.

 

you need to read the specs on each platform and work out what you need to do with your plan.... in my exp TS is the worse for seriosu trading :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
More detail would be helpful if you are interested in learning how to make TS work for you, instead of just complaining about it. Your comment contains no information useful for troubleshooting your issues.

 

Uli,

Sorry for the long delay.

My strat uses a Hull MA's with some other filters.

It buys when a Hull MA is lower than another Hull MA which happens to be the low or close to it of the current bar at market.

It will back test from 80 percent to 100 percent win ratio. In real time it gets eaten alive by trailing stops and poor entry points.

Depending on the filters and chart ticks/shares with one contract it shows about 10K to 40K profit per month just on long entries.

As my coding skill improves so do the results in testing but I need something that works live.

As you can see from the following it tests superb but hemorrhages money live.

This is why I have a problem with TS back testing.

 

TradeStation Performance Summary

 

All Trades Long Trades Short Trades

Total Net Profit $1,200.20 $1,200.20 $0.00

Gross Profit $1,215.10 $1,215.10 $0.00

Gross Loss ($14.90) ($14.90) $0.00

Profit Factor 81.55 81.55 n/a

 

Roll Over Credit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Open Position P/L $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

 

Select Total Net Profit $1,105.00 $1,105.00 $0.00

Select Gross Profit $1,119.90 $1,119.90 $0.00

Select Gross Loss ($14.90) ($14.90) $0.00

Select Profit Factor 75.16 75.16 n/a

 

Adjusted Total Net Profit $1,015.15 $1,015.15 $0.00

Adjusted Gross Profit $1,044.95 $1,044.95 $0.00

Adjusted Gross Loss ($29.80) ($29.80) $0.00

Adjusted Profit Factor 35.07 35.07 n/a

 

Total Number of Trades 52 52 0

Percent Profitable 98.08% 98.08% 0.00%

Winning Trades 51 51 0

Losing Trades 1 1 0

Even Trades 0 0 0

 

Avg. Trade Net Profit $23.08 $23.08 $0.00

Avg. Winning Trade $23.83 $23.83 $0.00

Avg. Losing Trade ($14.90) ($14.90) $0.00

Ratio Avg. Win:Avg. Loss 1.6 1.6 n/a

Largest Winning Trade $47.60 $47.60 $0.00

Largest Losing Trade ($14.90) ($14.90) $0.00

Largest Winner as % of Gross Profit 3.92% 3.92% n/a

Largest Loser as % of Gross Loss 100.00% 100.00% n/a

 

Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 8055.03% 8055.03% n/a

Select Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 7416.11% 7416.11% n/a

Adjusted Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 6813.10% 6813.10% n/a

 

Max. Consecutive Winning Trades 26 26 0

Max. Consecutive Losing Trades 1 1 0

Avg. Bars in Total Trades 1.19 1.19 0

Avg. Bars in Winning Trades 1.18 1.18 0

Avg. Bars in Losing Trades 2 2 0

Avg. Bars in Even Trades 0 0 0

 

Max. Shares/Contracts Held 1 1 0

Total Shares/Contracts Held 52 52 0

Account Size Required $14.90 $14.90 $0.00

Total Slippage $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Commission $124.80 $124.80 $0.00

 

Return on Initial Capital 1.20%

Annual Rate of Return 383.09%

Buy & Hold Return 0.81%

Return on Account 8055.03%

Avg. Monthly Return $1,200.20

Std. Deviation of Monthly Return n/a

 

Return Retracement Ratio n/a

RINA Index 161334.91

Sharpe Ratio n/a

K-Ratio n/a

 

Trading Period 1 Dy, 3 Hrs, 18 Mins

Percent of Time in the Market 2.20%

Time in the Market 36 Mins

Longest Flat Period 18 Hrs, 2 Mins

 

Max. Equity Run-up $1,237.70

Date of Max. Equity Run-up 12/24/2009 13:13

Max. Equity Run-up as % of Initial Capital 1.24%

 

Max. Drawdown (Intra-day Peak to Valley)

Value ($62.50) ($62.50) $0.00

Date 12/23/2009 10:15

as % of Initial Capital 0.06% 0.06% 0.00%

Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1920.32% 1920.32% n/a

Select Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1768.00% 1768.00% n/a

Adjusted Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1624.24% 1624.24% n/a

 

Max. Drawdown (Trade Close to Trade Close)

Value ($14.90) ($14.90) $0.00

Date 12/23/2009 13:08

as % of Initial Capital 0.01% 0.01% 0.00%

Net Profit as % of Drawdown 8055.03% 8055.03% n/a

Select Net Profit as % of Drawdown 7416.11% 7416.11% n/a

Adjusted Net Profit as % of Drawdown 6813.10% 6813.10% n/a

 

Max. Trade Drawdown ($12.50) ($12.50) $0.00

 

 

 

All Trades

 

Total Net Profit $1,200.20 Profit Factor 81.55

Gross Profit $1,215.10 Gross Loss ($14.90)

 

Roll Over Credit $0.00

Open Position Profit/Loss $0.00

 

Select Total Net Profit $1,105.00 Select Profit Factor 75.16

Select Gross Profit $1,119.90 Select Gross Loss ($14.90)

 

Adjusted Total Net Profit $1,015.15 Adjusted Profit Factor 35.07

Adjusted Gross Profit $1,044.95 Adjusted Gross Loss ($29.80)

 

Total Number of Trades 52 Percent Profitable 98.08%

Winning Trades 51 Losing Trades 1

Even Trades 0

 

Avg. Trade Net Profit $23.08 Ratio Avg. Win:Avg. Loss 1.6

Avg. Winning Trade $23.83 Avg. Losing Trade ($14.90)

Largest Winning Trade $47.60 Largest Losing Trade ($14.90)

Largest Winner as % of Gross Profit 3.92% Largest Loser as % of Gross Loss 100.00%

 

Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 8055.03%

Slct. Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 7416.11% Adj. Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 6813.10%

 

Max. Consecutive Winning Trades 26 Max. Consecutive Losing Trades 1

Avg. Bars in Winning Trades 1.18 Avg. Bars in Losing Trades 2

Avg. Bars in Total Trades 1.19

 

Max. Shares/Contracts Held 1 Account Size Required $14.90

Total Commission $124.80 Total Slippage $0.00

 

Return on Initial Capital 1.20% Annual Rate of Return 383.09%

Buy and Hold Return 0.81% Return on Account 8055.03%

Avg. Monthly Return $1,200.20 Std. Deviation of Monthly Return n/a

 

Return Retracement Ratio n/a RINA Index 161334.91

Sharpe Ratio n/a K-Ratio n/a

 

Trading Period 1 Dy, 3 Hrs, 18 Mins Percent of Time in the Market 2.20%

Time in the Market 36 Mins Longest Flat Period 18 Hrs, 2 Mins

 

Max. Equity Run-up $1,237.70

Date of Max. E. Run-up 12/24/2009 13:13 Max. E. Run-up as % of Initial Capital 1.24%

 

Max. Drawdown (Intra-day Peak to Valley) Max. Drawdown (Trade Close to Trade Close)

Value ($62.50) Value ($14.90)

Date 12/23/2009 10:15 Date 12/23/2009 13:08

as % of Initial Capital 0.06% as % of Initial Capital 0.01%

Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1920.32% Net Profit as % of Drawdown 8055.03%

Slct. Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1768.00% Slct. Net Profit as % of Drawdown 7416.11%

Adj. Net Prof as % of Drawdown 1624.24% Adj. Net Profit as % of Drawdown 6813.10%

 

Max. Trade Drawdown ($12.50)

 

Long Trades

 

Total Net Profit $1,200.20 Profit Factor 81.55

Gross Profit $1,215.10 Gross Loss ($14.90)

 

Roll Over Credit $0.00

Open Position Profit/Loss $0.00

 

Select Total Net Profit $1,105.00 Select Profit Factor 75.16

Select Gross Profit $1,119.90 Select Gross Loss ($14.90)

 

Adjusted Total Net Profit $1,015.15 Adjusted Profit Factor 35.07

Adjusted Gross Profit $1,044.95 Adjusted Gross Loss ($29.80)

 

Total Number of Trades 52 Percent Profitable 98.08%

Winning Trades 51 Losing Trades 1

Even Trades 0

 

Avg. Trade Net Profit $23.08 Ratio Avg. Win:Avg. Loss 1.6

Avg. Winning Trade $23.83 Avg. Losing Trade ($14.90)

Largest Winning Trade $47.60 Largest Losing Trade ($14.90)

Largest Winner as % of Gross Profit 3.92% Largest Loser as % of Gross Loss 100.00%

 

Max. Consecutive Winning Trades 26 Max. Consecutive Losing Trades 1

Avg. Bars in Winning Trades 1.18 Avg. Bars in Losing Trades 2

Avg. Bars in Total Trades 1.19

 

Max. Shares/Contracts Held 1 Account Size Required $14.90

Total Commission $124.80 Total Slippage $0.00

 

Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 8055.03%

Slct. Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 7416.11% Adj. Net Profit as % of Largest Loss 6813.10%

 

Max. Drawdown (Intra-day Peak to Valley) Max. Drawdown (Trade Close to Trade Close)

Value ($62.50) Value ($14.90)

as % of Initial Capital 0.06% as % of Initial Capital 0.01%

Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1920.32% Net Profit as % of Drawdown 8055.03%

Slct. Net Profit as % of Drawdown 1768.00% Slct. Net Profit as % of Drawdown 7416.11%

Adj. Net Prof as % of Drawdown 1624.24% Adj. Net Profit as % of Drawdown 7416.11%

 

Max. Trade Drawdown ($12.50)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Estate1997

 

Where do I begin? First of all, a couple very important things:

 

1. Your backtest period is only a little over a day of data

2. Backtesting should always account for slippage, you have none

 

What market are you trading?

What type of charts are you using? Tick, time, momentum, range?

What chart intervals?

Do you understand the difference between optimization and curve-fitting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
every person in the world tried MA crossover system when 5 yo.... Why do you think not all of them are rich?

 

What a joke. Try horses betting.

 

 

This thread is about backtest, not the strategy.

I won't discount any effort, even a MA cross.

 

What you said can can be applied to backtest as well...

Naive assumptions (e.g. a simple MA cross) will net you predictable naive results,

erroneous methodology (eg. a poorly applied backtest) will net you predictable errors.

 

 

 

p.s. there is a method to everything.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To backtest properly and profitably (I use TS), can you tell me sites, articles, books to learn how to do and why today my backtest highly profitable materialize by systematic loss ...

Thank you in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To backtest properly and profitably (I use TS), can you tell me sites, articles, books to learn how to do and why today my backtest highly profitable materialize by systematic loss ...

Thank you in advance!

 

 

because... your backtest is blank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To backtest properly and profitably (I use TS), can you tell me sites, articles, books to learn how to do and why today my backtest highly profitable materialize by systematic loss ...

Thank you in advance!

 

I would start by getting up to speed on probability and statistics..Probability Without Tears and Statistics Without Tears are great places to start for non math geeks. ...most retail backtesting software and concepts are just a marketting con, bringing a butter knife to a statistical/machine learning nuclear war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just bactest a strategy that runs on the intraday forex unit time 15 minutes.

Without optimization, this strategy shows a profit factor of 5 over the period tested.

I optimized one of the parameters, which improved the profit factor to 7.

I then tested this set of parameters on a new period of data, which confirmed the return.

Finally, I turn left the strategy on a demo account and then the strategy burn the account ...

 

Therefore I would like to know what it is like books and literature on the issue of backtest ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just bactest a strategy that runs on the intraday forex unit time 15 minutes.

Without optimization, this strategy shows a profit factor of 5 over the period tested.

I optimized one of the parameters, which improved the profit factor to 7.

I then tested this set of parameters on a new period of data, which confirmed the return.

Finally, I turn left the strategy on a demo account and then the strategy burn the account ...

 

Therefore I would like to know what it is like books and literature on the issue of backtest ...

 

 

you are telling us what happened to the result,

but you have not said anything about the backtest you've done.

 

from a distance... without knowing the detail, I can tell you there is a missing link between your back test and forward test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just bactest a strategy that runs on the intraday forex unit time 15 minutes.

Without optimization, this strategy shows a profit factor of 5 over the period tested.

I optimized one of the parameters, which improved the profit factor to 7.

 

ok, you have really got mixed up here ... wtf is profit factor 5 ot 7 ? explain

 

most backtests are prototype ! not real systems to trade with, you have to understand this you cannot rely on a backtest to determone real life simulation - i have a backtest that produces a 700% return but its limited by other factors which when "simulated " as real only gives 15% return - pa ( per annum) you have to explain yourself and detials on the backtest. you must know , risk, contract/shares , stops, alocation , money management etc... basically the concept is to work out how to test your system by understanding the losses , dont focus on just profits

 

you must understand what brings a backtest togther to form a simualtion , a simulation allows you to test in a real life scenerio and give you a real look at the system your using, also theonly thing you cant really measure is slippage , yes you can estimate but its only when you actually trade then and only then can say i have _ve slippage or +ve slipage and i loose xxx per trade or i gain xxxx

 

what time frames new period of data? , what did u did with changes ?

 

books well there are some books but its difficult to understadn what you want to do vs. what book to advise you on

 

u need to go simple 1st like a backtest on MA above and below - then ull see the problems with stops and testing it in real life ....

 

anyway add some detials and exlain what your doing so ppl canhelp or at least try

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We use both Tradestation and MultiCharts. Both have their positives and negatives as many people mentioned in their posts above. It just really depends on what you need.

 

On key feature that we use in MultiCharts is their Portfolio Testing which is extremely helpful. Unfortunately Tradestation lacks this type of testing which can make back testing strategies such as Pair Trading really difficult.

 

Although if you have Tradestation and want to keep this platform you can use TS Add-On tools such as Rina and/or Portfolio Merge in order to conduct Portfolio Testing. Although note that you have pay for these systems in addition to your Tradestation Cost.

 

Both MultiCharts and Portfolio Merge offer free trials so you can at least try out their software to see if it meets your needs. Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a side note - regards portfolio testing - I am not sure how each system actually manages their portfolio backtesting - but if a system is not doing it correctly then portfolio backtesting is useless.

 

I define correctly as "in a manner that actually replicates real life as close as possible"

 

If you are testing a portfolio system then you need to separate the trade triggers from the portfolio construction and this needs to occur on a daily basis, everytime the system checks the triggers for stops and entries, it then needs to run through and adjust the portfolio based on separate rules.

If the backtesting system does not do it in this manner, and instead uses a lazy way of just adding positions on a day by day basis, then I would suggest you dont use it as it will not give a true representation of what will occur in real life.

A simple portfolio approach whereby the portfolio is not adjusted on a daily basis on separate rules, assumes too many things such as correlation risk, capital restrictions and concentration risks.....in other words not a great measure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PTL Builder looks interesting for MQL4 and EasyLanguage back-testing, but I would be interested in hearing about alternative products...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For multi chart users, how you guys back test intra bar order for day trading strategies? I tried those methods like checking intrabar generation also used within code etc but it never worked for me. Ex. In backtest MC should reflect exact Buy price at the market when high of the current bar > previous high. Strangely unlike market delta, MC doesnt facilitate simple buy order like buy this bar at variable # x where as variable # x holds the value of high of current bar > previous high. Am i missing something obvious in MC ? It restricts market order on next bar only not present bar. :pullhair:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For multi chart users, how you guys back test intra bar order for day trading strategies? I tried those methods like checking intrabar generation also used within code etc but it never worked for me. Ex. In backtest MC should reflect exact Buy price at the market when high of the current bar > previous high. Strangely unlike market delta, MC doesnt facilitate simple buy order like buy this bar at variable # x where as variable # x holds the value of high of current bar > previous high. Am i missing something obvious in MC ? It restricts market order on next bar only not present bar. :pullhair:

 

yes, you are missing something.

as a matter of fact, you are missing a lot.

 

press the [F1] key to get the MultiCharts User Guide.

Look up

MultiCharts > Strategy Trading > Backtesting

 

pay particular attention to

Bar Magnifier

Understanding Precise Back Testing

 

 

good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yes, you are missing something.

as a matter of fact, you are missing a lot.

 

press the [F1] key to get the MultiCharts User Guide.

Look up

MultiCharts > Strategy Trading > Backtesting

 

pay particular attention to

Bar Magnifier

Understanding Precise Back Testing

 

 

good luck

 

thanks Tams, i think i need to rephrase my question, i did enable bar magnifier under formating my strategy properties but that only helping for solving entry first or exit first on same bar. Where i stuck is how to tell MC to exit at the exact price when my condition becomes true not on close of this bar? Limit order only possible for next bar where as present bar met the condition, i did try to putting value of present bar on next bar but it gave error. Example to make it more clear - say the code is // (intrabarordergeneration = true) condition1 = ( time > 1000 and time <= 1500) and high >= newhd[1] ; if condition1 then buy this bar at close ; // time frame of the chart is say 15 minute, now if value1 = high >= newhd[1] then, how to write the code when condition1 then buy at value1 ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry if this has been said before - or if it seems obvious....

In order to be able to trade intra day you must have the correct intra day data. (Ideally down to the tick data)

Unfortunately the systems dont have a measure to be able to buy within a bar unless you can further subdivide the bar you are working on into smaller time frame bars.

you need to be able to see the sequence of trades that make up the bar. ie; which came first the high, or the low.

(I used MC for a while and initially missed this point myself when first looking at it). The only other way to do it is via a fudge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry if this has been said before - or if it seems obvious....

In order to be able to trade intra day you must have the correct intra day data. (Ideally down to the tick data)

Unfortunately the systems dont have a measure to be able to buy within a bar unless you can further subdivide the bar you are working on into smaller time frame bars.

you need to be able to see the sequence of trades that make up the bar. ie; which came first the high, or the low.

(I used MC for a while and initially missed this point myself when first looking at it). The only other way to do it is via a fudge.

thanks for the reply, yes aware of this fact, not with MC but i believe no any software could detect what happened first within bar using historical data, you see, in MarketDelta you can assign value by using variable# and make a code like, when condition is true then buy at variable# . I am sure there must be some way in MC otherwise how one can backtest intraday strategies effectively?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I maybe wrong here, as they may have upgraded MC. However when I used it the answer was no. you could only do as you suggested which was reference the bars parameters (OHLC) and you could not say something such as "buy at this value"

It was one of the reasons I stopped using MC, as I found this a limiting factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.