Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback,ย get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

exbryan

Why You Say Indicators Fail and Price Action Always Works ?

Recommended Posts

Why you say indicators fail and price action always works ?

This is a different thread to my previous thread called "with and without trading indicators". Recently I followed a price action course at 2ndskiesforex after reviewing forex peace army reviews. Actually that was great experience with Chris and I realized that price action powerful and always works. I spent thousnads of dolors on indicators and systems and finally down to free Moving averages with price action.

Would like to listen to similar stories here.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, price action is the only way to go for being constantly profitable in all the market conditions.

I personally switched from indicators to pure price action trading after I joined the DnB price action war room, where they offer an excellent course consisting of an actual trading protocol with all the details about the various price action setups, how to enter, where to put the stoploss as well as the target profit. Since I apply the DnB protocol (quite a few months now), I am constantly profitable in the market. The price action can be applied to all the market conditions, and this is the main difference between indicators and price action trading.

When I was trading using indicators, such as MACD, RSI, and/or Stocastic, I used to have several good weeks of constant profit, and then all of a sudden those profits got canceled by few weeks full of disasters. Obviously the market conditions changed, and my indicator based methods were not profitable anymore for some reason.

I do recommend the price action approach to whoever wants to succeed in the trading business, and I would love to hear also the opinions from other profitable traders that are using indicators instead of price action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with shills is pretty obvious to folks who have been here a while.....one post and just by coincidence he is here to help the original poster (who is probably his/her partner)....

ย 

The "problem" with indicators doesn't exist....indicators are tools....no different than if one uses power tools like drills or circular saws to make furniture or cabinetry....in the hands of a skilled person, these tools produce a good result, in the hands of inexperienced persons, the result is often quite different...

ย 

Yes I teach folks (4 people several times a year), and understandably some are skeptical of me as well.....frankly I couldn't care less....

ย 

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason 'systems' don't always work, is because they are designed to work in certain conditions and when conditions change - the system doesn't work as well. Price action is learning the repeating and predictable patterns of the market - and learning to take those trades which statistically have the best survival rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like 2018 will be the year where AI takes the crazy pigeon programming project to dizzying new heights of service to this 'community'.

ย 

Don't worry, I am not programmed either. I really do not think I should use the fkuchaed word in my any Post.

ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

.

ย 

mits, I still think you keep beating on the wrong fkuchaed :grin:

ย 

There is an inherent self-limiting function in AI. It uses, accesses, collates, and calculates with, false information. Not just here and there or now and then, but on a continuous basis.

ย 

ย 

Think about all the entrenched institutions and monopolies in our society. Each one of them proliferates false information in cascades.

ย 

No machine can correct that. Indeed, AI machines are victims to it. They in turn emanate more falsities based on the information they are utilizing.

ย 

Each and every false datum generates a wider and wider stream of lies, and the streams, becoming rivers, overlap and produce oceans of contaminated information.

ย 

The oceans of false information that circulate in this worldโ€”and are loaded into the super-computerโ€”would be yours. The best model I can think of for THAT isโ€ฆ

ย 

Mainstream news.

ย 

The Fatal Flaw in the Brain-Computerย Interface

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mits,

ย 

What chance is there for a return to the 'glory days' if stoopidity is allowed to flourish, let alone be nurtured, as you seem to insist on?

Insist? I let it go long ago... and just thank the lord I donโ€™t need this place. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media'>https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media

My audience here is miniscule and I only need to do a better job with them...

ย 

As far as damage goes...and โ€œWhat chance is there for a return to the 'glory days'โ€ etc - imo, the intolerance of the smart posters edges out damaging TL more than the bot echo chamber dumb posters do across the years. And neither are ultimately to blame. Weโ€™re looking at multiple generations now of dumbed down... and the results are starting to show.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media

ย 

Re:AI

" never spoken" / โ€œswear at the fukcreโ€ - Thatโ€™s funny, mits :). To get passed off to a human quickly, I like to mumble

ย 

Luvn AI .... dystopi

ย 

Why You Say Indicators Fail and Price Action Always Works ? ...esp when AI uses indicators to 'create' PA

ย 

shine on you crazy diamond

ย 

zdo

ย 

ย 

ps CrzyCzry is the ultimate generalist... :rofl:

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mits,

ย 

ย 

Insist? I let it go long ago... and just thank the lord I donโ€™t need this place. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media'>https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media

My audience here is miniscule and I only need to do a better job with them...

ย 

As far as damage goes...and โ€œWhat chance is there for a return to the 'glory days'โ€ etc - imo, the intolerance of the smart posters edges out damaging TL more than the bot echo chamber dumb posters do across the years. And neither are ultimately to blame. Weโ€™re looking at multiple generations now of dumbed down... and the results are starting to show.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media

ย 

Re:AI

ย 

" never spoken" / โ€œswear at the fukcreโ€ - Thatโ€™s funny, mits :). To get passed off to a human quickly, I like to mumble

ย 

Luvn AI .... dystopi

ย 

Why You Say Indicators Fail and Price Action Always Works ? ...esp when AI uses indicators to 'create' PA

ย 

shine on you crazy diamond

ย 

zdo

ย 

ย 

ps CrzyCzry is the ultimate generalist... :rofl:

ย 

That is so funny If being active is the tagline for ultimate generalist then sure I am an ultimate generalist. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/16/2013 at 6:29 AM, exbryan said:

Why you say indicators fail and price action always works ?

ย 

This is a different thread to my previous thread called "with and without trading indicators". Recently I followed a price action course at 2ndskiesforex after reviewing forex peace army reviews. Actually that was great experience with Chris and I realized that price action powerful and always works. I spent thousnads of dolors on indicators and systems and finally down to free Moving averages with price action.

ย 

ย 

Would like to listen to similar stories here.........

Leaving aside the "always", indicators are based on price and / or volume, so as derivatives they filter out some information, and inherently include some delay relatively to price and volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing which works every time and that includes price action trading also. With price action trading it's easier to navigate on your chart because you have a clean chart without indicators. It depends on your style if you prefer indicators or price action trading. I learned price action trading from learntotradethemarkets.com and the course was very detailed, structured and understood how this type of trading works. I also heard that in the long run price action trading can be very profitable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Youย realizeย that those who sell trading classes can't make their money from trading ... If they taughtย from the goodness of their heartsย they would do it for free, not for theย exorbitant prices they charge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't agree with you. Trading full time is one thing, just as working at a job. But then trading will never be a fixed income. To play smart and always have an income, selling products that you make or made in the past can definitely give you some extra. And since you are already spending most of your time on that, why not write it down and sell it to people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:offtopic:


The weakness of most indicators is that the same โ€˜visualโ€™ indicator travel /pattern can be produced by as many as 20 different chart/price travel /patterns. ย If a trader cannot type the auction, indicators alone barely bump his probabilities up. ย Big woop bcse meanwhile show me a price action trader who canโ€™t type the auction and Iโ€™ll show you a failing price action trader too. ย 

Ie Consciously reading context is the only way you can know what to do when... a price action trader who inadequately or unconsciously reads context (ie doesnโ€™t know what auction types heโ€™s puny at detecting, etc.) may slightly outperform an indicator trader whoย inadequately or unconsciously reads context at the same skill level , but that will not be enough to get him over the threshold to consistent profitability either.

Ie I can say with pretty high certainty that any noob who is questioning / bouncing around btwn pa and inds actually needs to drop them both and learn conscious โ€˜contextingโ€™ first

sell
ย 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In thisย tradingย strategy, We combine theย RSI indicatorย with the MACD. First, enter the market whenever theย RSIย gives an overbought or oversold signal which is supported by a MACD signal line crossing. And then close the position if eitherindicatorย provides an exit signal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ๐Ÿ“ Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division. ย  ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India: 1,533 million ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China: 771 million ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria: 546 million ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan: 487 million ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Congo: 431 million ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US: 394 million ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น Ethiopia: 323 million ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia: 297 million ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania: 244 million ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt: 205 million ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil: 185 million ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines: 180 million ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh: 177 million ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช Niger: 166 million ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan: 142 million ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola: 133 million ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda: 132 million ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico: 116 million ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya: 113 million ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia: 112 million ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq: 111 million ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan: 110 million ย  @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ย  ย 
    • โ€œIf the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it wonโ€™t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It wonโ€™t be because we werenโ€™t smart enough or didnโ€™t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts donโ€™t share with us: fear of AI. ย  The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us. ย  In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans." ย  This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services. ย  The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation. ย  While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete. ย  Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.โ€ โ€“ Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ย 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?ย  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
ร—
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.