Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

Comparing Obama to Hitler just shows how deranged some people are.

 

It is funny to me how they compare Hitler, a NAZI, to someone, Obama, who is generally considered to be a Socialist.

 

It is also funny to me how they criticize him for pushing us toward socialism, yet they want and use all the benefits that he is providing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
544051_458354827553341_1058149531_n.jpg

 

This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

 

-Thomas Jefferson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

 

-Thomas Jefferson

 

 

eeeer ok, I think the rest of the world has moved on a bit now though. And besides, it's another dead argument. One reason is because this statement could be interpreted by some wacko in the following ways:

1. go shoot the president if you dont like his policies

2. go march into the county traffic wardens office and shoot everyone to bits for giving me that bogus parking ticket.

3. Hey, my old school was a government body and they really fucked me up, and I'm such a failure, I'm gunna shoot everyone in there because I think they are a tyranny and it's all their fault'.

4. I've just been sacked by the tyranny of a fire department thats controlled by local government, so I'm gunna make a false call and shoot up everyone who comes to answer that call.

 

Another reason it's moronic is that the government have far better ways of controlling you now than with force of a gun - namely the media and tax policy.

Edited by TheDude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eeeer ok, I think the rest of the world has moved on a bit now though. And besides, it's another dead argument. One reason is because this statement could be interpreted by some wacko in the following ways:

1. go shoot the president if you dont like his policies

2. go march into the county traffic wardens office and shoot everyone to bits for giving me that bogus parking ticket.

3. Hey, my old school was a government body and they really fucked me up, and I'm such a failure, I'm gunna shoot everyone in there because I think they are a tyranny and it's all their fault'.

4. I've just been sacked by the tyranny of a fire department thats controlled by local government, so I'm gunna make a false call and shoot up everyone who comes to answer that call.

 

Another reason it's moronic is that the government have far better ways of controlling you now than with force of a gun - namely the media and tax policy.

 

Only a complete dumbass with a very low IQ could make assertions like those. I use to think traders had brains with analytical capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Only a complete dumbass with a very low IQ could make assertions like those. I use to think traders had brains with analytical capabilities.

 

Unfortunately there are lot of dumbass' in the world. Only a dipshit would suggest that giving a dumbass a gun is the way forward.

 

I would have assumed anyone with any common sense or analytical ability could figure that one out; trader, dumbass or dipshit.

 

And please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.

 

And dont give me any 'personal freedom' shit either. Lets face facts: Half of Americans cant even feed themselves properly without getting overweight and obese. If someone cant even eat responsibly and look after themselves, I dont think giving them a gun is the way forward do you?

 

Perhaps gun ownership if it must exist, should only be allowed if the individual:

Isn't poor (ie less likely to rob someone or have silly ideas)

Has above average IQ

Is able to eat a sensible diet and prove they are capable of looking after themselves.

Is able to point out various countries and cities on a map.

 

Only then, could they be trusted. But then again, I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

maybe the recent shooting makes perfect sense why schools need armed guards and armed teachers??:helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately there are lot of dumbass' in the world. Only a dipshit would suggest that giving a dumbass a gun is the way forward.

 

I would have assumed anyone with any common sense or analytical ability could figure that one out; trader, dumbass or dipshit.

 

And please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.

 

And dont give me any 'personal freedom' shit either. Lets face facts: Half of Americans cant even feed themselves properly without getting overweight and obese. If someone cant even eat responsibly and look after themselves, I dont think giving them a gun is the way forward do you?

 

Perhaps gun ownership if it must exist, should only be allowed if the individual:

Isn't poor (ie less likely to rob someone or have silly ideas)

Has above average IQ

Is able to eat a sensible diet and prove they are capable of looking after themselves.

Is able to point out various countries and cities on a map.

 

Only then, could they be trusted. But then again, I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!

 

:)

 

The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

oh sh$t TheDude screwed up didn't he? :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

 

Yeah - well there's always one thats going to slip through the net though. My ideas will stop a lot of crimes though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maybe the recent shooting makes perfect sense why schools need armed guards and armed teachers??:helloooo:

 

Why not just ban guns? It's much simpler. If some nut job wants to kill a load of people, he will IF he has a gun. With your idea, we'll end up with a load of dead cops in a shoot out - especially if he has an assault riffle. Great thinking!

 

Besides, would you really want your kids going to a school with armed guards everywhere - permanently reminded of the horrors of this world?

 

 

C'mon folks, it's not rocket science. Look at Europe and the civilised world. People arent allowed to carry guns and there is next to zero gun crime. The murder rate is also much lower. It doesnt take Einstein to see the correlation. Remember that across the civilised world, there are all types of government - both left and right wing, Principalities, Kingdoms, Republics, etc, so you cant draw politics or any other socio-economic circumstance in to what is so bleeding obvious to a four year old!! Geddit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

 

 

Says the person who thinks teachers should carry guns.

 

What ever next???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not just ban guns? It's much simpler. If some nut job wants to kill a load of people, he will IF he has a gun. With your idea, we'll end up with a load of dead cops in a shoot out - especially if he has an assault riffle. Great thinking!
um.. because gun bans won't stop him from getting a gun..something you can't seem to get into your peckerhead brain.
Besides, would you really want your kids going to a school with armed guards everywhere - permanently reminded of the horrors of this world?
absolutely

 

C'mon folks, it's not rocket science. Look at Europe and the civilised world. People arent allowed to carry guns and there is next to zero gun crime. The murder rate is also much lower. It doesnt take Einstein to see the correlation. Remember that across the civilised world, there are all types of government - both left and right wing, Principalities, Kingdoms, Republics, etc, so you cant draw politics or any other socio-economic circumstance in to what is so bleeding obvious to a four year old!! Geddit?/
um..me thinks you don't know sh$t about the stats..the only reason Europe exist is because of american guns:haha: :haha: :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“another dead argument” TheDude

I love crowds. How many of us serial posters in this thread have noticed … ?

that the “logic” of most arguments of the To Arm posters only holds together well if you believe in ‘guns rights’ a priori ?

that the “logic” of most arguments of the To Disarm posters only holds together well if you believe in ‘gun bans’ a priori ?

(that I'm using the word :logic: quite loosely would be an understatement ;))

 

like

“please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.”

 

… I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!"

 

This thread got started and is sustained by reactions to the acts of a criminally insane person… not a dumbass. Dude, be careful who you’re calling dumbasses. It’s “dumbasses” who are sensation based enough to want to be able to react directly in such situations … the more cerebral thinking types prefer waiting for the “dumbasses’” to show up and take care of it.

 

Re: recruiting dumbasses (and whowouldwanttorecruitsdumbasses btw?)

Government Pushes Propaganda Through Video Games | Zero Hedge

Gov't wants control of the dumbasses... dumbass 'fat' is leverage.

 

Do you know what D. Umas actually said ? He said

“…better to have a gun and not be able to get to it, than not have one and … ”

 

So until we get this ‘dumbass cleansing’ thing worked out, :logic: like

 

Law and good policy prevents insanity and crimes of insanity...

 

 

so…

 

 

outlaw guns...

 

only holds together if you believe in gun control a priori

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

 

Patuca,

 

Don't go. I appreciate your intellectual irresponsibility. Your comments are a lesson to all of the crippling power of pride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patuca,

 

Don't go. I appreciate your intellectual irresponsibility. Your comments are a lesson to all of the crippling power of pride.

:applaud: :applaud: :dito :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.