Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

Comparing Obama to Hitler just shows how deranged some people are.

 

It is funny to me how they compare Hitler, a NAZI, to someone, Obama, who is generally considered to be a Socialist.

 

It is also funny to me how they criticize him for pushing us toward socialism, yet they want and use all the benefits that he is providing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
544051_458354827553341_1058149531_n.jpg

 

This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

 

-Thomas Jefferson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

 

-Thomas Jefferson

 

 

eeeer ok, I think the rest of the world has moved on a bit now though. And besides, it's another dead argument. One reason is because this statement could be interpreted by some wacko in the following ways:

1. go shoot the president if you dont like his policies

2. go march into the county traffic wardens office and shoot everyone to bits for giving me that bogus parking ticket.

3. Hey, my old school was a government body and they really fucked me up, and I'm such a failure, I'm gunna shoot everyone in there because I think they are a tyranny and it's all their fault'.

4. I've just been sacked by the tyranny of a fire department thats controlled by local government, so I'm gunna make a false call and shoot up everyone who comes to answer that call.

 

Another reason it's moronic is that the government have far better ways of controlling you now than with force of a gun - namely the media and tax policy.

Edited by TheDude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eeeer ok, I think the rest of the world has moved on a bit now though. And besides, it's another dead argument. One reason is because this statement could be interpreted by some wacko in the following ways:

1. go shoot the president if you dont like his policies

2. go march into the county traffic wardens office and shoot everyone to bits for giving me that bogus parking ticket.

3. Hey, my old school was a government body and they really fucked me up, and I'm such a failure, I'm gunna shoot everyone in there because I think they are a tyranny and it's all their fault'.

4. I've just been sacked by the tyranny of a fire department thats controlled by local government, so I'm gunna make a false call and shoot up everyone who comes to answer that call.

 

Another reason it's moronic is that the government have far better ways of controlling you now than with force of a gun - namely the media and tax policy.

 

Only a complete dumbass with a very low IQ could make assertions like those. I use to think traders had brains with analytical capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Only a complete dumbass with a very low IQ could make assertions like those. I use to think traders had brains with analytical capabilities.

 

Unfortunately there are lot of dumbass' in the world. Only a dipshit would suggest that giving a dumbass a gun is the way forward.

 

I would have assumed anyone with any common sense or analytical ability could figure that one out; trader, dumbass or dipshit.

 

And please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.

 

And dont give me any 'personal freedom' shit either. Lets face facts: Half of Americans cant even feed themselves properly without getting overweight and obese. If someone cant even eat responsibly and look after themselves, I dont think giving them a gun is the way forward do you?

 

Perhaps gun ownership if it must exist, should only be allowed if the individual:

Isn't poor (ie less likely to rob someone or have silly ideas)

Has above average IQ

Is able to eat a sensible diet and prove they are capable of looking after themselves.

Is able to point out various countries and cities on a map.

 

Only then, could they be trusted. But then again, I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

maybe the recent shooting makes perfect sense why schools need armed guards and armed teachers??:helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately there are lot of dumbass' in the world. Only a dipshit would suggest that giving a dumbass a gun is the way forward.

 

I would have assumed anyone with any common sense or analytical ability could figure that one out; trader, dumbass or dipshit.

 

And please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.

 

And dont give me any 'personal freedom' shit either. Lets face facts: Half of Americans cant even feed themselves properly without getting overweight and obese. If someone cant even eat responsibly and look after themselves, I dont think giving them a gun is the way forward do you?

 

Perhaps gun ownership if it must exist, should only be allowed if the individual:

Isn't poor (ie less likely to rob someone or have silly ideas)

Has above average IQ

Is able to eat a sensible diet and prove they are capable of looking after themselves.

Is able to point out various countries and cities on a map.

 

Only then, could they be trusted. But then again, I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!

 

:)

 

The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

oh sh$t TheDude screwed up didn't he? :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

 

Yeah - well there's always one thats going to slip through the net though. My ideas will stop a lot of crimes though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maybe the recent shooting makes perfect sense why schools need armed guards and armed teachers??:helloooo:

 

Why not just ban guns? It's much simpler. If some nut job wants to kill a load of people, he will IF he has a gun. With your idea, we'll end up with a load of dead cops in a shoot out - especially if he has an assault riffle. Great thinking!

 

Besides, would you really want your kids going to a school with armed guards everywhere - permanently reminded of the horrors of this world?

 

 

C'mon folks, it's not rocket science. Look at Europe and the civilised world. People arent allowed to carry guns and there is next to zero gun crime. The murder rate is also much lower. It doesnt take Einstein to see the correlation. Remember that across the civilised world, there are all types of government - both left and right wing, Principalities, Kingdoms, Republics, etc, so you cant draw politics or any other socio-economic circumstance in to what is so bleeding obvious to a four year old!! Geddit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

 

 

Says the person who thinks teachers should carry guns.

 

What ever next???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not just ban guns? It's much simpler. If some nut job wants to kill a load of people, he will IF he has a gun. With your idea, we'll end up with a load of dead cops in a shoot out - especially if he has an assault riffle. Great thinking!
um.. because gun bans won't stop him from getting a gun..something you can't seem to get into your peckerhead brain.
Besides, would you really want your kids going to a school with armed guards everywhere - permanently reminded of the horrors of this world?
absolutely

 

C'mon folks, it's not rocket science. Look at Europe and the civilised world. People arent allowed to carry guns and there is next to zero gun crime. The murder rate is also much lower. It doesnt take Einstein to see the correlation. Remember that across the civilised world, there are all types of government - both left and right wing, Principalities, Kingdoms, Republics, etc, so you cant draw politics or any other socio-economic circumstance in to what is so bleeding obvious to a four year old!! Geddit?/
um..me thinks you don't know sh$t about the stats..the only reason Europe exist is because of american guns:haha: :haha: :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“another dead argument” TheDude

I love crowds. How many of us serial posters in this thread have noticed … ?

that the “logic” of most arguments of the To Arm posters only holds together well if you believe in ‘guns rights’ a priori ?

that the “logic” of most arguments of the To Disarm posters only holds together well if you believe in ‘gun bans’ a priori ?

(that I'm using the word :logic: quite loosely would be an understatement ;))

 

like

“please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.”

 

… I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!"

 

This thread got started and is sustained by reactions to the acts of a criminally insane person… not a dumbass. Dude, be careful who you’re calling dumbasses. It’s “dumbasses” who are sensation based enough to want to be able to react directly in such situations … the more cerebral thinking types prefer waiting for the “dumbasses’” to show up and take care of it.

 

Re: recruiting dumbasses (and whowouldwanttorecruitsdumbasses btw?)

Government Pushes Propaganda Through Video Games | Zero Hedge

Gov't wants control of the dumbasses... dumbass 'fat' is leverage.

 

Do you know what D. Umas actually said ? He said

“…better to have a gun and not be able to get to it, than not have one and … ”

 

So until we get this ‘dumbass cleansing’ thing worked out, :logic: like

 

Law and good policy prevents insanity and crimes of insanity...

 

 

so…

 

 

outlaw guns...

 

only holds together if you believe in gun control a priori

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

 

Patuca,

 

Don't go. I appreciate your intellectual irresponsibility. Your comments are a lesson to all of the crippling power of pride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patuca,

 

Don't go. I appreciate your intellectual irresponsibility. Your comments are a lesson to all of the crippling power of pride.

:applaud: :applaud: :dito :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals stock low volume pullback to 9.77 support area, watch for local breakout above 10.5, https://stockconsultant.com/?INO
    • GOOG Alphabet stock good trend, top of range breakout watch above 180.55, https://stockconsultant.com/?GOOG
    • Date: 7th June 2024. ECB closer look: All options open for the second half of the year! ECB officials continue to dampen rate cut speculation, following on from Lagarde’s hawkish comments yesterday. Officials have been out in force this morning to continue stressing that the inflation outlook remains uncertain and that the central bank is not committing to a particular rate path for the rest of the year. The ECB cut rates by 25 basis points, but as we expected it was a “hawkish” cut that left all options open for the second half of the year. Lagarde repeatedly stressed that future decisions will be data dependent, and even refused to confirm that yesterday’s move was the first step of an easing cycle. Rate cuts in September and December are still a possibility, but not cast in stone. Simkus admitted that there may be more than one rate cut this year, but on the whole, the comments were designed to keep a lid on speculation that the central bank kicked off a rate cut cycle yesterday. Austria’s central bank head Holzmann went on record yesterday to confirm that he was the sole dissenter objecting to a cut yesterday, and so far the doves have been quiet, which is helping to affirm Lagarde’s hawkish message yesterday.   Details of the Rate Cut The ECB delivered the first rate cut in five years and lowered key rates by 25 basis points. The deposit rate is now at 3.75% and the main refinancing rate at 4.25%. It was a “hawkish cut,” as near term inflation forecasts were revised higher, and Lagarde flagged that domestic inflation remains high. The statement stressed that the ECB is not pre-committing to a particular rate path, and the comments leave all options on the table for the second half of the year.   Economic Activity and Forecasts  The ECB noted the improvement in economic activity through the first quarter of the year. Lagarde also highlighted that manufacturing is showing signs of stabilization, with stronger exports expected to support growth in coming quarters. At the same time, monetary policy should be less of a drag on demand over time, according to the ECB. The new set of forecasts show GDP rising 0.9% this year, which is more than the 0.6% expected back in March. The forecast for 2025 has been revised slightly down to 1.4% from 1.5% previously, and the ECB still expects a slight acceleration to 1.6% for 2026. The inflation forecast for this year was raised to 2.5% from 2.3%, and the projection for 2025 was hiked to 2.2% from 2.0%. As such, inflation will fall toward the target later than previously anticipated, though the forecast for 2026 was left unchanged at 1.9%. This means the headline rate is still expected to fall below the target at the end of the forecast horizon.   Upside Risks to Inflation The statement noted upside risks to the inflation outlook from wages and profits, which could be higher than currently anticipated. Geopolitical tensions and extreme weather events could also push up prices once again, according to the ECB. At the same time, the ECB acknowledged that inflation could come in lower than anticipated if monetary restrictions have more of a dampening effect than currently anticipated, or if global growth weakens more than projected.   The press conference was mainly dedicated to driving home the point that future decisions will depend on data available at the time of the respective meeting. Lagarde even refused to confirm that the central bank has effectively kicked off an easing cycle, and said in response to a question that she wouldn’t necessarily say that the ECB started a “dialing-back process”. She suggested it is likely, but refused to confirm it, which in theory means rates could actually go up again. This seems unlikely, given that this move was a near unanimous decision, but its makes clear that the ECB will not cut rates at every meeting and that the outlook for the rest of the year is still very much open. The ECB still thinks that monetary policy needs to remain restrictive for the foreseeable future against the backdrop of high domestic inflation. However, as chief economist Lane suggested recently, officials will have to debate at every meeting whether the data allows the central bank to dial back the degree of restrictiveness.   Employment and Inflation Dynamics Wage growth, profits, and services price inflation will remain the key numbers to watch through the rest of the year. Lagarde pointed to data on the compensation of employees, due to be released tomorrow, but also flagged that current wage agreements are often still backward looking, as they reflect attempts to compensate for the sharp rise in prices since the start of the Ukraine war. As we flagged previously, the multi-year wage agreements in Germany are a prime example of that. However, as Lagarde highlighted, the deals on the table so far show sharp increases for this year, but also imply a slowdown in wage growth in coming years. However, unemployment is at a record low and the number of vacancies has dropped only slightly. At the same time, service price inflation remains stubbornly high, which suggests that companies have sufficient room to pass on higher labor costs. With real disposable income rising, thanks to lower inflation and higher wages, companies could find it even easier to hike prices in the second half of the year, and yesterday’s rate cut is also likely to boost demand. In the current situation, this could add to domestic price pressures. Looking ahead, the only thing that is clear is that Lagarde did her best to keep expectations of back-to-back cuts under control. The chances still are that the ECB will deliver two more 25 basis point cuts in September and December, but at this point, nothing is cast in stone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • TRGP Targa Resources stock narrow range breakout watch above 119.02, https://stockconsultant.com/?TRGP
    • ROOT stock, short term downtrend break, bullish stats , https://stockconsultant.com/?ROOT
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.