Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hi Blowfish

 

The idea of a vendor rejoining the community under a new username as a non vendor was for someone who wished to become a non selling member of the community in the future.

 

The community's perception of the possible/probable intentions of that vendor member would always be different from those of a non selling member as long as they stayed on as a vendor member.

 

In labeling vendors the intention is not to place them under any suspicion, as you've humorously mentioned the placement of a skull and cross bones, potentially alluding to them as thieves or cheats. The intention of labeling is to stress the possible/probable difference in intentions they may have from those of non vending members.

 

I think you'd agree this is a good thing and has been long overdue.

 

That might of been the idea but that was not what you said originally :). What you originally said had nothing to do with a vendor re-joining the community (I guess the discussion subsequently moved on). What you actually said was

You must admit it's a little strange that the website where you sell your education is easily found by googling "wrbtrader", which is your username here at TL.

For a vendor just wishing to move in and out of the forum in a non-promotional way, why don't you just change your username to be completely separate from any of your selling endeavours.

 

Are you suggesting vendors post in complete anonymity? Of course not (though I suspect the unscrupulous ones create accounts to do just that). That is completely contradictory to your (very credible) endeavour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi wrbtrader

 

Why in the world are you so concerned about wearing a vending label when that is exactly what you do? Be proud of it and see it as a business opportunity!! Perhaps the quality of your posts will bring you new found success.

 

 

I am not sure why I am getting involved, maybe it's because you are using somewhat dubious tactics in your campaign :) It is a pet peeve when people use logical fallacies or just plain bending of the truth to further their agenda. I wonder if it is intentional or that you might just have lost sight of what has been previously said? I suggest you re-read his original post. if you read that (and subsequent) posts to the thread it is crystal clear that he is not concerned with 'wearing a vending label'. Quite the reverse. You do your cause no favours by misrepresenting people.

 

As an aside I think I'll buy Marks stuff. Over the many many years that I have enjoyed his posts I did not realise that he had a paid offering, thank you for outing him (sincerely). I was genuinely unaware that he had collated his stuff into a paid package. It's something I'd like to read, price action, costs about the same as a (modest) dinner for two, and a guy who's posts are eloquent and informed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember this...we (you and I) are part of the community. If we don't get along and the same with others, there's really no community worth visiting because its just a pissing match as noted by many value members (non vendors) that no longer visit TL. Thus, it's really not about vendors that's driving away members from the community and that's an entirely different cup of tea involving non vendors in the community. :helloooo:

 

Amen - I think we've discussed this topic long enough. Once I am back from vacation the last week of Sept (on my way to Vienna then Salsburg and then Munich if anyone cares!) we are going to add the icon and then close this thread so that everyone can get back to discussing trading. :)

 

thanks,

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not sure why I am getting involved, maybe it's because you are using somewhat dubious tactics in your campaign :) It is a pet peeve when people use logical fallacies or just plain bending of the truth to further their agenda. I wonder if it is intentional or that you might just have lost sight of what has been previously said? I suggest you re-read his original post. if you read that (and subsequent) posts to the thread it is crystal clear that he is not concerned with 'wearing a vending label'. Quite the reverse. You do your cause no favours by misrepresenting people.

 

As an aside I think I'll buy Marks stuff. Over the many many years that I have enjoyed his posts I did not realise that he had a paid offering, thank you for outing him (sincerely). I was genuinely unaware that he had collated his stuff into a paid package. It's something I'd like to read, price action, costs about the same as a (modest) dinner for two, and a guy who's posts are eloquent and informed.

 

 

Hi wrbtrader

 

So, enough said! This gentleman is going to purchase your trading education!!! By becoming labeled and being informative you've found a client. I said so from the 1st or 2nd page that this could be a goldmine for a vendor who provides both good trading theory and a good product, perhaps that vendor is you!!

 

You're welcome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not sure why I am getting involved, maybe it's because you are using somewhat dubious tactics in your campaign :) It is a pet peeve when people use logical fallacies or just plain bending of the truth to further their agenda. I wonder if it is intentional or that you might just have lost sight of what has been previously said? I suggest you re-read his original post. if you read that (and subsequent) posts to the thread it is crystal clear that he is not concerned with 'wearing a vending label'. Quite the reverse. You do your cause no favours by misrepresenting people.

 

As an aside I think I'll buy Marks stuff. Over the many many years that I have enjoyed his posts I did not realise that he had a paid offering, thank you for outing him (sincerely). I was genuinely unaware that he had collated his stuff into a paid package. It's something I'd like to read, price action, costs about the same as a (modest) dinner for two, and a guy who's posts are eloquent and informed.

 

Hi Blowfish

 

With all of the efforts put forward to make this change, your concern is about 1. my use of dubious tactics; 2.my use of logical fallacies 3. my bending of the truth 4. the furthering of my agenda and 5. my misrepresentation of people.

 

You must make for a very high maintenance relationship. Get your head out of the clouds and just say, thanks!! The change which a lot of us, including you, have been wanting is about to come. It's not "my cause" it's for the good of this community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing exclusive in this search to identify vendors. All members are welcome to help. Please let us know if you've found a TL member attempting to sell you or others anything on or off this site.

 

 

Our vendor list with names product and price:

 

alleyb / trading site mentorship / $800 per year

asiaforexmentor / trading education / $399 course $8497 personal coaching

Dbphoenix / ebook / $30

Dionysus Toast / indicator package / $249

doubletop11 / indicator package / $1000 per year

Eiger / mentorship courses / $69 - $1199

electroniclocal / 3 day seminar / $5000

Fulcrum Trader /training & chatroom /$97 per month chat & $397 - $697 training

Lil Miss Markets / sector specific trade alerts / unknown, through email only

Logic / manual / $750

lrushing / trading education / $37.00 per month

nhallett / 5 hour course / $297

NihabaAshi & wrbtrader / training / $193 - $473

Plugger / trading program / $1997

Predictor / manual and mentorship / unknown, through email add only

Rande Howell / multi media courses + 10 personal sessions / $ 2997

RicyBS / trading program / unknown, through email only

steve46 / daily coaching / $200 per month

swisstrader / multicharts package/ free - $9990

TheRumpledOne / indicators / $50

thetradingdoctor / coaching/ $250.00 per 50 min

Tim Racette / ebook / $49.95

tjnoon / trading system / unknown, through email only

tradingadvantagetm / training / unknown, through email add only

Urma Blume / tradestation inducator package addon / $1400 per year

windsurfer / trading program / $50 per month

xkr1962 / training & mentorship / $8000 - $16,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

I will post the others after discovering what they are trying to sell and for how much. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blowfish

 

With all of the efforts put forward to make this change, your concern is about 1. my use of dubious tactics; 2.my use of logical fallacies 3. my bending of the truth 4. the furthering of my agenda and 5. my misrepresentation of people.

 

You must make for a very high maintenance relationship. Get your head out of the clouds and just say, thanks!! The change which a lot of us, including you, have been wanting is about to come. It's not "my cause" it's for the good of this community.

 

So it's OK to completely mis represent someone? The ends justify the means right?

 

You use more fallacy in your reply. You choose to attack me (head in the clouds, high maintenance). Rather than comment on my point. Look up ad hominem, essentially you attack the arguer rather than the argument. You also choose to use 'the efforts' to justify your misrepresentation (tacitly taking credit for the upcoming change).

 

Let be quite clear. - You where dishonest -. Whether that is to further your agenda or a genuine mistake only you know. I find the latter increasingly unlikely seeing how active you have been in this thread, also the fact that you choose to go to war (attack me, defend your statements) rather than simply apologise or acknowledging an error further supports the premise that this dishonesty was intentional.

 

You want my thanks? No. You have my sympathy, in my experience unless one is logically scrupulous and brutally honest with oneself it makes it hard to do well at the retail end of this business.

 

You want honesty and transparency from vendors, I would like to see that from all posters.

 

 

 

 

edit: PS good job on maintaining the list. that was never in question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So it's OK to completely mis represent someone? The ends justify the means right?

 

You use more fallacy in your reply. You choose to attack me (head in the clouds, high maintenance). Rather than comment on my point. Look up ad hominem, essentially you attack the arguer rather than the argument. You also choose to use 'the efforts' to justify your misrepresentation (tacitly taking credit for the upcoming change).

 

Let be quite clear. - You where dishonest -. Whether that is to further your agenda or a genuine mistake only you know. I find the latter increasingly unlikely seeing how active you have been in this thread, also the fact that you choose to go to war (attack me, defend your statements) rather than simply apologise or acknowledging an error further supports the premise that this dishonesty was intentional.

 

You want my thanks? No. You have my sympathy, in my experience unless one is logically scrupulous and brutally honest with oneself it makes it hard to do well at the retail end of this business.

 

You want honesty and transparency from vendors, I would like to see that from all posters.

 

 

 

 

edit: PS good job on maintaining the list. that was never in question.

 

Hi Blowfish,

 

Fair enough, I'll argue with your argument and not you. I have certainly not completely misrepresented our vendor friend, wrbtrader. He is a vendor who wishes to be labeled as a "non selling vendor" and who desires that other vendors who have been proven to be sellers to be labeled as "selling vendors" as per post #241. To him this distinction seems of great importance, to me it is not. His argument should be with the moderator and not with me.

 

By being labeled at all he has found a new client in you and I hope that you enjoy what he offers and that he appreciates what you give him in return!

 

The "ends" you speak of were already accomplished before our vendor friend and myself continued to disagree with / misunderstand one another. No one had anything else to prove, so our disagreement could go forward as an honest one with no "ends" in sight.

 

Your character assessment of me concerns the following 1. my use of dubious tactics; 2.my use of logical fallacies 3. my bending of the truth 4. the furthering of my agenda 5. my misrepresentation of people and 6.my intentional dishonesty. Please tell me how I have shown each of these and I will in turn reply to your charges.

 

In your post # 252 & #260 you saw fit to attack my character without specificity, I would appreciate it if you would now take the time to attempt to prove these charges as being true.

 

Blowfish, I neither want your thanks or your sympathy. By nature this community is a laboratory, good arguments will stand and poor ones won't, that's the nature of good science. Put forward your argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I guess we should leave it at that, we have both stated our positions and anyone who cares (no one I imagine!!) can see exactly what was said and what was not. Keep up the good work on the list. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I guess we should leave it at that, we have both stated our positions and anyone who cares (no one I imagine!!) can see exactly what was said and what was not. Keep up the good work on the list. :)

 

Hi Blowfish,

 

There's no need to malign and run. Sit down, stay awhile, put your feet up and just start typing away. I certainly care what you think. See me as a party of one who is deeply interested in why you consider me to be a liar!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His first post to thread is here http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/general-discussion/10633-vendors-vendors-vendors-16.html#post126583 Seems pretty clear to me that he has absolutely no problem whatsoever being identified as 'a vendor' not what you say in later posts. QED.

 

Lets leave it, really it serves no purpose bickering and I don't have the time or inclination to go through quote by quote. The marvels of the interweb means anyone can see who said what and when. I'll continue in PM's if you like but reserve the right to agree to disagree and duck out!! Edit; btw I was very careful to not use the L word it is pretty emotive.

 

As an aside, two or three posts later you thank him for "being so transparent" in that same short post you also say " It's a strange thing when even a vendor wants identification on the site. " That is a telling statement to me, it seems like you attach stigma to any sort of vendor and it would imply that you do not simply want to name but to name and shame. I may be wrong but it seems like you have a negative view of all vendors?

 

Take a look at the Whyckoff section here, It is probably the best resource on his work bar none (including expensive courses). It is possible one of the best bodies of work on any single coherent trading approach. That would simply not exist if DB had been hounded out for being the vendor of a $40 ebook. (He has previously left other venues for less). WRBTraders posts I have enjoyed for what must be a decade (I guess), I honestly (you can believe me or not) did not know that he offered paid for material. I guess all I am saying is all vendors are not equal, they are certainly not all 'bad' and it would be foolish to discount pearls of wisdom they have given away just because they sell something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His first post to thread is here http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/general-discussion/10633-vendors-vendors-vendors-16.html#post126583 Seems pretty clear to me that he has absolutely no problem whatsoever being identified as 'a vendor' not what you say in later posts. QED.

 

Lets leave it, really it serves no purpose bickering and I don't have the time or inclination to go through quote by quote. The marvels of the interweb means anyone can see who said what and when. I'll continue in PM's if you like but reserve the right to agree to disagree and duck out!! Edit; btw I was very careful to not use the L word it is pretty emotive.

 

As an aside, two or three posts later you thank him for "being so transparent" in that same short post you also say " It's a strange thing when even a vendor wants identification on the site. " That is a telling statement to me, it seems like you attach stigma to any sort of vendor and it would imply that you do not simply want to name but to name and shame. I may be wrong but it seems like you have a negative view of all vendors?

 

Take a look at the Whyckoff section here, It is probably the best resource on his work bar none (including expensive courses). It is possible one of the best bodies of work on any single coherent trading approach. That would simply not exist if DB had been hounded out for being the vendor of a $40 ebook. (He has previously left other venues for less). WRBTraders posts I have enjoyed for what must be a decade (I guess), I honestly (you can believe me or not) did not know that he offered paid for material. I guess all I am saying is all vendors are not equal, they are certainly not all 'bad' and it would be foolish to discount pearls of wisdom they have given away just because they sell something.

 

How nice for you to make public allegations against another mans character and then to decide it would be best to continue forward using PM. Perhaps your allegations should have been made through PM.

 

You obviously had the time it took to publicly define me as a liar through my alleged 1. use of dubious tactics; 2. use of logical fallacies 3. bending of the truth 4. furthering of my agenda 5. misrepresentation of people and 6.intentional dishonesty. Please tell me how I have shown each of these and I will in turn reply to your charges.

 

In this case bickering will serve a purpose, my own defense!! Explain the reasons for your allegations or apologize publicly.

Edited by clmacdougall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you two are just hung up on semantics.

 

Both of you have stated your feelings/position at least once. We can carry on without repeating them again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EasyTrader_I

 

EasyLanguage programming service - $30/hr

 

he used to have his ad on the status line

he also stated this in one of his posts... don't have the link at the moment, but I am sure it is there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you two are just hung up on semantics.

 

Both of you have stated your feelings/position at least once. We can carry on without repeating them again.

 

Thanks Tams, maybe your right. Although somehow I think I've heard those wise words somewhere before!;)

 

It always took my older brother to drag me out of stupid fights I would get into. I appreciate your efforts!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you see a lemonade stand, please call police.

 

If it was your lemonade stand, I probably would. ;) Just kidding zdo. I appreciate the abstract sense of defining education and learning which you offer, it helps me to see things in a new light. Forgive me for taking myself too seriously at times.

 

What I wouldn't give to see a list of your favorite trading related books. Oh well I've tried before to no avail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you see a lemonade stand, please call police.

 

This actually happened in USA a few times;

the police fined the kids for having a lemonade stand without license.

It was on CNN.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing exclusive in this search to identify vendors. All members are welcome to help. Please let us know if you've found a TL member attempting to sell you or others anything on or off this site.

 

 

Our vendor list with names product and price:

 

alleyb / trading site mentorship / $800 per year

asiaforexmentor / trading education / $399 course $8497 personal coaching

Dbphoenix / ebook / $30

Dionysus Toast / indicator package / $249

doubletop11 / indicator package / $1000 per year

EasyTrader_I / programming service / $30 per hour

Eiger / mentorship courses / $69 - $1199

electroniclocal / 3 day seminar / $5000

Fulcrum Trader /training & chatroom /$97 per month chat & $397 - $697 training

Lil Miss Markets / sector specific trade alerts / unknown, through email only

Logic / manual / $750

lrushing / trading education / $37 per month

nhallett / 5 hour course / $297

NihabaAshi & wrbtrader / training / $193 - $473

Plugger / trading program / $1997

Predictor / manual and mentorship / unknown, through email add only

Rande Howell / multi media courses + 10 personal sessions / $ 2997

RicyBS / trading program / unknown, through email only

steve46 / daily coaching / $200 per month

swisstrader / multicharts package/ free - $9990

TheRumpledOne / indicators / $50

thetradingdoctor / coaching/ $250 per 50 min

Tim Racette / ebook / $49

tjnoon / trading system / unknown, through email only

tradingadvantagetm / training / unknown, through email add only

Urma Blume / tradestation inducator package addon / $1400 per year

windsurfer / trading program / $50 per month

xkr1962 / training & mentorship / $8000 - $16,000

 

 

 

I will post the others after discovering what they are trying to sell and for how much. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How nice for you to make public allegations against another mans character and then to decide it would be best to continue forward using PM. Perhaps your allegations should have been made through PM.

 

You obviously had the time it took to publicly define me as a liar through my alleged 1. use of dubious tactics; 2. use of logical fallacies 3. bending of the truth 4. furthering of my agenda 5. misrepresentation of people and 6.intentional dishonesty. Please tell me how I have shown each of these and I will in turn reply to your charges.

 

In this case bickering will serve a purpose, my own defense!! Explain the reasons for your allegations or apologize publicly.

 

If I didn't know anything about what had occurred in this thread and had saw your post above as the very second read to someone's opening statement in a thread about vendors...I would have thought you were a vendor with that statement and that blowfish was the vendor basher. :rofl:

 

...I will also be moving offending posts here so people can continue those discussions outside of the main thread.

 

thanks!

MMS

 

Also, the above quote from the thread starter/moderator MadMarketScientist reveals many things about nature or character of this thread which leads me to say that it's threads like this that eventually becomes an eye sore for the community considering an "Official List" can easily be maintained by TL management itself (not by a member) that doesn't allows replies...similar to other forums. Simply, names can easily be added to the list via members sending private messages to MMS with proof that a user name is a vendor.

 

Thus, the community gets its transparency without the bickering and pissing competitions like this that slowly drives away away members to other places online. I've now made my recommendations publicly and privately to MMS...he now has the ball and I'm curious to see what he does to fix things that's obviously still problematic for all members.

 

Take care all and my last post in this thread. Good trading to all.

Edited by wrbtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 3 types of non-sponsor vendors who frequent discussion forums like this one:

 

The first type are the snake oil salemen, scammer, also known as spammers.

 

they would make innocent looking posts like this:

 

Can anybody recommend a good forex EA?

(next post some 1st timer puts up an URL with raving review)

 

ABC newsletter makes very accurate calls. Last week they made $XXXXX !!!

 

My friend bought XYZ system and he is making a killing

 

Second type of vendors, although they are non-sponsors, made it known that they are vending, because they have their business name in the tag line, or somewhere easily identifiable.

 

Third type of vendors are stealth vendors. They hide the fact that they are vending. They post fancy charts to entice you, or to discuss their method in great length, but without really disclosing their method. It is when you are hooked, then they would say,

... my software is available for $1,400 per year, or

... I am starting a new class next month, or

... you can come to my blog.

 

 

The first type of vendors' posts get deleted almost immediately; you seldom see them.

 

The second type is not my business; MMM can do whatever he wants.

 

It is the third type that is most disturbing to us.

 

 

 

if you are not doing any of the above, you are not a "non-sponsoring vendor" in my eyes.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.