Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tams

What is NOT Price Action ?

Recommended Posts

what is NOT price action ?

 

 

Many people claim to be trading Price Action.

 

A vendor said he teaches Price Action.

 

He describes his chart set up as:

 

"...nothing on the chart except 5 min price bars and a 20 period moving average".

 

 

Do you consider him a Price Action Trader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets see Tams,

 

Good Abstract question. i thought I'd give it a go....

 

Well I guess one could say a moving average is just a function with its input as price/time and its output has the same dimension ie price/time but the result only slightly related to the actual last price/time data transaction. One can even drop time from this sentence...

 

The other ie the 5 min candle and is an accumualtion of price point displacements and hence the total displacement is captured over 5 mins.....Displacement I dont believe shows context very well....ie where price has been within that candle (this is important IMHO)

 

I would say he is teaching a variant of true Price action....

 

Well price action for me is just data points over time of where the "market" came together at offer and acceptance of Price. How this data is then manipulated and then used is open to a lot of interpretation..

 

There are many ways to slice data and of course accumulate it...Candles are just one method to aggregate(smooth) data as are moving averages ....

 

So conclusion is he is not teaching true price action but I guess he is teaching a method of smoothing/agregating the data and then applying some principle to this aggregated/smoothing data of price...to come to a conclusion about the future...

 

I guess one of the purposes to your question was to define what is price action....thinking out loud this is not very easy for me...

 

Price action is the last space/time Market transaction and it is also all the previous ones leaving a print ...can the previous ones help determine where the next one will be ? I will leave this for the smarter ones out there...

 

So in my conclusion I would say That techinically he will not be able to show where the next transaction will be in the future using those "tools" unless he has found a method that shows where in the future price has its true highest probability of being next with them...maybe there is something he is not telling us....

 

Best

John

 

sorry I rambled a bit here..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One guy also claims to be a "successful" Price Action Trader.

 

One day he posted his chart... but forgotten to remove the pivot point.

...and disqualified himself as a Price Action Trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I consider myself to be someone whose trading decisions are based primarily upon price action. The majority of my trading is composed of day trading individual stock issues. Most of my trades are based on simple support and resistance breaks. As such, it is undeniable that I trade price action.

 

However, when I day trade stocks, I use a 5 minute chart, and I do keep a 20ema on that chart. Whether I like it or not, it is an undeniable fact, and one that I can prove empirically each and every day, that when a stock is trending strongly from the open on a 5 minute chart, price tends to find buyers in an uptrend and sellers in a downtrend when price pulls back to that 20 ema. Is that the same as "trading price action?" If it is to be considered trading price action, then it is so only derivitively. Does that mean that someone who uses such an indicator is not a price action trader? It means nothing of the sort. After all, if the majority of his or her trading decisions are based primarily on support and resistance, what else would that trader be?

 

You mentioned pivots (and I assume you mean floor trader pivots and not pivots in, say, the Livergood sense). I have a good friend who trades foreign exchange exclusively. No stocks, no options, no e-minis, no bonds - just spot currencies and currency futures (he may use options on currency futures, come to think of it,but not as a primary trading vehicle). He trades one basic price action "set-up." I consider him to be a consummate price action trader. But you should see his chart!

 

He has ema's, fibonacci's, pivots, mid-pivots, trend channels, cci, volume, some other thing I do not even know what it is. But, he trades one "set up" only, and it is entirely a price action, support and resistance based set-up.

 

Now, does the fact that he also uses 27 or so of his favorite indicators disqualify him as price action trader? I would say no. I think he is absolutley a price action trader (I also happen to think he could do away with every last one of his indicators and still trade his set up well, but who am I to argue with a guy whom I know to pull in five figures from his trading per week, week after week from the comfort of his sofa).

 

I think one can distinguish between someone who uses indicators to help support a price action based trading approach, and one who uses indicators as a trading approach. In other words, using indicators is not itself an indicator of whether or not someone is trading price action. What makes the difference is whether someone is using the indicators to support his or her reading of price action, or is the trader using the indicators to make trading decisions independently from any attempt to determine the immediate trend from price action itself.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, when I day trade stocks, I use a 5 minute chart, and I do keep a 20ema on that chart. Whether I like it or not, it is an undeniable fact, and one that I can prove empirically each and every day, that when a stock is trending strongly from the open on a 5 minute chart, price tends to find buyers in an uptrend and sellers in a downtrend when price pulls back to that 20 ema. ....

 

He has ema's, fibonacci's, pivots, mid-pivots, trend channels, cci, volume, some other thing I do not even know what it is. But, he trades one "set up" only, and it is entirely a price action, support and resistance based set-up.

 

Now, does the fact that he also uses 27 or so of his favorite indicators disqualify him as price action trader? I would say no. I think he is absolutely a price action trader (I also happen to think he could do away with every last one of his indicators and still trade his set up well, but who am I to argue with a guy whom I know to pull in five figures from his trading per week, week after week from the comfort of his sofa).

...

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi Thales,

 

Thank-you for this well thought out post.

 

You highlight a very strong point.

 

Your forex friend makes 5 figures a week consistently. I feel this is very important - he has results. If indicators help support and or clarify his thoughts on price action, then they are helpful aids to his decision-making process.

 

Indicators are derived from price and and sometimes volume information by investors who wanted to see it there was additional insights provided by the indicators to improve their results. (Or in some cases had no results and wanted to write a book or sell their system, though this can apply equally to price action only traders.)

 

I have noticed that some individuals use indicators in ways that may not have been intended by theorists or even the indicators originators and sometimes in junction. That is they may really be using 3 indicators as one composite indicator. However, from their actual trading experience, this was helpful in making profits.

 

Though "price action" purists may say any chart that has any indicator on it invalidates the trader from being a price action trader - they do speak strongly of support and resistance levels and "the action the market takes at those points".

 

If floor traders and market makers use a 20 bar EMA on a 5 minute chart (for example), and if their actions are a major part of "the action the market takes at those points", then their trading using this indicator is an important, and perhaps key part of the "price action".

 

So the feedback loop closes.

 

So I do not believe: Any chart that has any indicator on it invalidates the trader from being a price action trader.

 

For myself, the essential thing is to develop a reliable system that consistently makes profits and hopefully one I can back-test to know when I can apply or not apply that system.

 

Ian

 

(PS I have not read enough of the thread on "price action only" to know what the terms means - in the context of this board.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my own trading I frequently use what I consider to be price action (have not read the threads that define it).

 

The speed of a move, the speed of the pullback, how quickly it moves for or against me all help me decide whether or not I will stick with the trade for a larger gain or a minute one.

 

I use many timeframes and non-timeframe specific charts along with a ma, used to use a macd but I am moving away from it. (thanks Thales)

 

To me what I described above is trading price action as I am trading based on the action of price.:2c:

 

P.S. I have read many threads where traders extol the virtues of PA thinking when they master this they will be successful, on other boards it has taken on a somewhat mystical nature. Those who claim to be PA traders are regarded highly on this argumentative board.

Edited by bathrobe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an interesting question.

 

I suspect that, if trading in a non-automated manner, most traders move from lots of indicators to few or no indicators. With automated trading, defining some visible price behaviours sufficiently well becomes nearly impossible so indicators because they simplify price or price and volume become more important again.

 

I'm automating some things currently and I have found that I can automate (imperfectly) price pattern recognition but some elements are very difficult.

 

I think that's why people who have moved a long way on the path still like one or two mas or maybe keltners, bollingers, or vwaps. Or perhaps they use market profile. All these tools provide an additional view of "value" and "extension from value." Those views complement Support and Resistance in providing a basis to determine when price action is meaningful. Just as a pin bar becomes relevant at S&R but not in the wide open spaces between, the same relevance may occur at VWAP, the 20 ema, or the edge of the value area.

 

So, personally I prefer to minimize the use of indicators, but the presence of an ema or a vwap doesn't mean you're not trading price action - it just means that you get useful information from a derivative of said price action as well.

 

However, if one wants to claim pure price action trading, then they should only have price (bars or whatever) and volume on their charts. No channels. No trendlines. Nothing else --- because a trendline is no less a derivative of price than a ma or keltner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just as a pin bar becomes relevant at S&R but not in the wide open spaces between, the same relevance may occur at VWAP, the 20 ema, or the edge of the value area.

 

Not to take away from the rest of your fine post, Kiwi, but the above quote is an excellent point that deserves to be highlighted.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice post.

 

However, if one wants to claim pure price action trading, then they should only have price (bars or whatever) and volume on their charts. No channels. No trendlines. Nothing else --- because a trendline is no less a derivative of price than a ma or keltner.

Couldn't you take it as far as one [pure PA trader] having to only use a single tick chart. Anything more is wrapping price into a nice little summarization just like channels, trendlines, etc. Also, going back to the thread title of "what is NOT Price Action"...volume. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

Good question

The topic question is basically “how much latitude is in the collective’s definition of PA?” and the answer is “as much as you can tolerate or get away with in your current PA conversation”. You’ll be in PA conversations where the illustrations are filled with indicators. You’ll be in conversations where the other disavows anything but a certain type of PA but a little bit later you start perceiving he’s running uncharted fuzzy wet ware indicators outside his own awareness… :roll eyes:

 

No one gets away from patterns

On one extreme, they may be patterns restricted to just a chart - a line chart, a bar chart, a candle chart, a renko chart, a profile chart…

In the other extreme, they may be indicators only.

Most traders use some combination.

Also, the trader may be using a lot of past action in the scans for pattern or virtually none. Examples: an Elliott waver needs ~100 bars to differentiate pattern, some tape readers need sub 12 seconds of data

All traders are using their own (hopefully unique) admixture of all of the above…

 

other related, possibly important, questions …

what patterns am I most attracted to?

what patterns am I naturally good at seeing?

what is the best (visual in most cases) representation of market auctions to facilitate me to stay in flow.

what patterns would I like to get better at seeing?

what blocks me from seeing certain patterns real time that I would like to trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As we pointed out repeatedly in the links I provided earlier, it's all price action since everything is derived from price movement. But then one must decide just how many filters he wants and how far from the source -- or the "territory" -- he wants to be. I've found greater success by focusing on the continuous tick by tick movement of price, but others may prefer to be further separated from that, either by using summary bars or candles 5m, 15m, 244 tick, CVB, etc) or by using indicators or by focusing on patterns or by some other means.

 

So is someone who's trading 15m candles with an 8p EMA trading price action? Yes. Is he seeing the same thing as one who is following the continuous tick by tick movement of price? No. Most of the latter is in fact invisible to him.

 

Trader's choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice post.

 

 

Couldn't you take it as far as one [pure PA trader] having to only use a single tick chart. Anything more is wrapping price into a nice little summarization just like channels, trendlines, etc. Also, going back to the thread title of "what is NOT Price Action"...volume. ;)

 

I was thinking the same thing though just looking at time and sales (or the tape if you like). By plotting bars you are embarking on a data sampling exercise.

 

Practically, anyone who uses 'price' to make trading decisions is a PA trader, so what if they like to have a 20ema VWAP floor pivot or PoC to remind them which way up they are.

 

Good thread title it is often clear what is not PA trading (like just trading from the CCI :) ) more debatable what is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Practically, anyone who uses 'price' to make trading decisions is a PA trader, so what if they like to have a 20ema VWAP floor pivot or PoC to remind them which way up they are...

 

I would have to disagree with this BlowFish.

 

...I think one can distinguish between someone who uses indicators to help support a price action based trading approach, and one who uses indicators as a trading approach...

 

Any definition of price action trading would take into account the use of price and possibly volume in the 1st order. In other words price and volume in and of themselves. MA's, RSIs and other indicators are 2nd order as they are derivatives of price.

 

Take a look at the below chart. Can anyone using this chart truly be considered a price action trader?

 

This method uses Momentum and momentum is a 2nd order derivate of price (and time). Even the pivot points (green lines) are defined by changes in momentum and not price itself. Although they do a good job of visually accentuating these price points, they are a function of price and not price itself. Thus can one accurately say they are based on Price Action?

 

True price action traders don't have 15 different indicators on their charts. Price action trading is about getting closer to price, not further way from it. Indicators move you further away.

RapidBust1.thumb.png.297907b77417f63a9dfd1bc802ede463.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a look at the below chart. Can anyone using this chart truly be considered a price action trader?

 

Discussing what kind of trader someone is by looking at their chart convinces me that we are way too focused on surface details. This is like figuring out what kind of cook someone is by looking in their pantry. At best you can paint broad strokes, you know?

 

I think this (imho) misplaced indicators-or-not focus hurts newbies, who often come away from these religious discussions thinking that cleaning up their charts will somehow make them profitable. Every time I see them chanting the "indicators are not the answer" mantra, I sigh, because I know that a bare chart isn't the answer, either.

 

Too often, we're diverting attention from the central issue of being a winning trader. That is, a trader needs an understanding about the way the market works which gives him an edge, and he needs to find opportunities to exploit that understanding. Whether he spots his opportunities with raw data or derived data isn't very important compared to the concepts behind the trade.

 

I recognize that it's good to warn newbies about the pitfalls of indicators, because they are so attracted to silly recipes like "set it on 14 and buy when the squiggly line crosses -50." But, I've also seen folks proudly remove their indicators, only to proudly drain their account spotting faux "support" and "resistance" all over the place. What's missing in both cases is a working understanding of what the market is trying to tell them. Imagine how much more helpful it would be to keep the focus on that!

 

Just my two cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a 5 minute ES chart consolidated from June 16.

There are containers for price, and some horizontal zones marked from previous price congestion areas and end points.

Would this chart be considered price action, or do the addition of trendlines change that ?

5aa70f090d156_5minuteesprice.thumb.png.b3a23596e52e671d828dc312b5089615.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiki,

 

Its easily overdone. If you make a trade because of what price is doing it is price action.

 

That's different from making a trade because (say) the RSI turns up.

 

Horizontal and diagonal forms of support and resistance indication (trendlines, channels, horizontal zones, mas, vwmas, vol@price, and market profile) help you to figure out where people might perceive value. Perceived value makes price action that might not be relevant in the wide open space between areas of perceived value worth trading.

 

Eg. at the trendline you get an inside bar and then a bullish engulfing bar ... so the probability of the entry resulting in an up move rises. The pa also defines when you are wrong (stop under the beob) nicely so you can define risk reward as well as knowing probability is higher.

 

So, if you trade because price (ticks, bars, candles, etc etc) is doing x rather than derivative (ma xover, rsi, stoch turn up) is doing y then you trade price action. The fuzzy argument tends to be around the question of this S&R vs that S&R (horizontal only is most pure :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.