Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hi Ezzy,

 

Thanks a lot for posting the videos and far more important, in keeping them all this time.

 

Can you just briefly mention what's the difference between this set and the earlier set that you posted. Were both of the 2 sets made around the same time with the same group of people ?

 

Btw, I found that downloading each one at a time is more stable than trying to download a few all at once.

 

TQVM.

 

The first set posted were recorded over a weekend in Tucson, Jan '07 with Jack and Spyder, except for the "Putting the Pieces Together" which was from an '06 Meetup. The Meetups were an IBD type group that Jack ran for a short while. (Do something, Learn something, Share something, Change something - Meetup.com)

 

The above set is the rest of the '07 Meetups that were posted at the time, plus a couple older videos on channels. When I finish sorting through the '06 Meetups, I'll post the relevant ones, not all of them were Hershey meetings.

 

Regards,

 

EZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is the series of Meetups recorded in 2006. They are mostly on stocks and using indicators.

 

There is also an audio of Spydertrader from the Jan 25, 2007 Tucson Meeetup

 

The last two are documents everyone should have already read, if not this is where you start. If you haven't read them before and don't understand what the "scoring" is, some of the information presented in the videos won't make any sense.

 

Note: The "Putting the Pieces Together" Camtasia posted for Oddi on the 26th (last one in the group) belongs with this 2006 series. It was done on 6-22-2006.

 

The 2006 Meetups:

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-04-13

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-04-27

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-05-26

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-06-08

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-07-27generalmarketenvironment

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-08-10spydertrader

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-08-24bmbw

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-09-14chartwalkthruat1hour

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2006-10-12batting

 

 

Spydertrader Audio from Jan 25, 2007 Tucson Meeetup

 

http://www.filedropper.com/meetup2007-01-25spydertrader

 

 

Documents: Building Minds for Building Wealth and Channels for Building Wealth

 

http://www.filedropper.com/buildingmindsforbuildingwealthv22

 

http://www.filedropper.com/channelsforbwv22

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My middle fractal gaussians ...

 

I am wondering why your middle fractals do not match the original gaussians you have drawn ? Appreciate if you comment further.

 

Thanks for posting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am wondering why your middle fractals do not match the original gaussians you have drawn ? Appreciate if you comment further.

 

Thanks for posting.

That volume snippet (first post) was taken from MKTr's chart with no modification, and I wanted to show that just looking at volume the gaussians he's drawn don't quite match the volume picture. The second post shows for comparison his gaussians and mine. This is why they don't match. I should've been more explicit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to analyze the daily ES chart. Could someone help me out and explain which one of these possible choices is in effect - and WHY???

 

the LOW of today (7/20) is:

 

- a pt3 of a long (pt1 on 7/6)

 

- a pt2 of a short( pt1 on 7/15)

 

OR

 

- a pt1 of a new long (also FTT of a short)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

- a pt1 of a new long (also FTT of a short)

 

On my charts, the market creates the low of 7-20-2010 on bar one (9:35 AM Eastern Time [and close of ES 5 minute Bar]). If your charts show the same, you might consider rephrasing your question. Also, if you choose to rephrase, consider adding context (tape point one, traverse point one, channel point one), else you might receive a yes answer to your questions, but interpret the yes answer in a way not entirely intended.

 

FYI: The why portion will be, "because the order of events of the specific fractal in question reached completion, and provided a signal for change."

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
- a pt1 of a new long (also FTT of a short)
On my charts, the market creates the low of 7-20-2010 on bar one (9:35 AM Eastern Time [and close of ES 5 minute Bar]). If your charts show the same, you might consider rephrasing your question. Also, if you choose to rephrase, consider adding context (tape point one, traverse point one, channel point one), else you might receive a yes answer to your questions, but interpret the yes answer in a way not entirely intended.

 

FYI: The why portion will be, "because the order of events of the specific fractal in question reached completion, and provided a signal for change."

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

Spydertrader's nice call . Edited by cnms2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback. I was on the fence about that period (and many others on yesterday's chart!) but in particular those bars, changed my mind several times :)

 

I wasn't entirely convinced with the mode of those bars:

 

15:35 [close of] : decreasing red volume , mode: long

15:40 : increasing red volume -- but lower volatility (almost half the bar size). mode: long

15:45 : increasing red volume -- but bar is in flat bottom pennant : mode long

15:50 : increasing red volume -- but bar is outside bar, bar closes inside prev bar. mode: long

15:55 : increasing red volume -- but end of day effects starting, also closes inside prev bar, also almost spike bar -- mode: long

 

That said, totally agree, focusing at the volume it is clearly increasing red, and maybe after several bars of that it is enough to be more of a factor than whether bars are closing inside the previous bar etc. Sounds like my test for dominance is a bit too strict. thx :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... I was on the fence about that period (and many others on yesterday's chart!) but in particular those bars, changed my mind several times :) ...
Fractals at work .

5aa710210750e_2010-07-27fractalsatwork.png.0c9c1bed6014878c2680c7a95a73d6d0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to download some of the videos on pages 196 and 198, but I couldn't get to the

download page. Does anyone know if those files are still availabe on FileDropper?

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried to download some of the videos on pages 196 and 198, but I couldn't get to the

download page. Does anyone know if those files are still availabe on FileDropper?

Thanks.

 

It does look like they're going away. If you don't mind a slow download, I've created a torrent of the files. I've attached the .torrent file in a .zip. This will take some time because it's over 5.1 gigabytes and I throttle my uploads to 50 KB/sec. But it should work and if anyone else participates, it should work better. When you get it, you should seed it so others can get it too. Please, let me know if you have any problems. I've never actually tried this before. :)

ezzy-files.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried to download some of the videos on pages 196 and 198, but I couldn't get to the

download page. Does anyone know if those files are still availabe on FileDropper?

Thanks.

Looks like they already took them down. If/when I get it resolved I'll let everyone know.

 

- EZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, I have a chart and some thoughts I was hoping to get some advice/opinions on if anyone is willing. :)

 

Lately I have been doing fairly decent (still a long journey ahead) at my MADA. At times, several days or even a week or two can go by with each gap-adjusted day flowing right into the next as expected. Of course it remains to be seen if this is actually improvement or just strings of luck where my mistakes are not obviously proven wrong by the market lol.

 

Then there are the times where a string of days is working perfectly followed by something that invalidates some or all of the previous days. Monday 8/2 ended the most recent string. :crap:

 

So, I thought to post a chart of Friday 7/30 with my thoughts at the time of what the market was building and what was to come.

 

I had thought the market was building a down channel starting on 7/28 bar 2. The first Traverse of this channel had several VE/Zone/Acc which I know are generally what lead to my MADA failing. But anyway, I ended the first Traverse on 7/30 bar 2/3. At this point I am building a non-dominant Traverse headed to Pt 2 of the down channel. This seemed to work out well through EOD 7/30, but of course 8/2 makes a gap-adjusted new high over my Channel Pt 1.

 

Possible places I went wrong:

 

1. There was no down Channel starting on 7/28.

 

2. There was a Channel there and I screwed the Traverses during all the VE's causing the Channel/Traverses to end sooner than I expected.

 

3. The market was doing something compeletly different and through luck of multiple errors I ended up with something that just "looked" right. Failure is always an option!

 

Please feel free to give advice on where I screwed up these last few days. I really hope the point of failure can be pinpointed (if my MADA was anywhere close) so that I can go about working out the "whys" with some surety I am in the ballpark.

 

Attached is a chart of Friday, as this was the last day everything seemed to fit perhaps the error lies here?

 

Ugh, re-reading this it seems to ramble.

 

To be specific with my questions: Do you think that a down Channel started 7/28? Do you think 7/30 was an up Traverse?

 

Thanks very much for any guidance you can give!

ES073010.thumb.png.cd87dfa39cf725fd57307a1e5161dff8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... I had thought the market was building a down channel starting on 7/28 bar 2. ... To be specific with my questions: Do you think that a down Channel started 7/28? Do you think 7/30 was an up Traverse?

 

Thanks very much for any guidance you can give!

Have you looked at a de-gapped chart for the last ~10 days, or at least starting with 7/26?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you looked at a de-gapped chart for the last ~10 days, or at least starting with 7/26?

 

Yes, and starting the down Channel on the peak of the 26th would fit nicely. I had the 26th as pt2 of an up Channel and I have looked at that up Channel several times and it seemed correct...but it never occurred to me that my mistake might be further back than that :doh:

 

I guess the reason I didn't want to look beyond the 28th for the mistake was that everything from 7/16 onwards just "worked". Bad case of tunnel-vision.

 

I will work my way backwards tonight, hopefully without the blinders on.

 

Thank you very much for the tip!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.