Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

* * *

 

You have to find your own method in the end.

 

* * *

 

You seem unaware of blatant contradictions in what you say, but I do agree with this statement.

 

 

The point of all this learning is to be able to extract. If you can do it and don't need to ask questions of others, then that's great. I took the time to answer a person who is not at your level and threw something out there to expand his line of thinking. Evidently, my "beyond Hersheyland" phrase rankled you and probably others. It wasn't meant to step on any toes. Don't worry about what I say. Just continue with your extracting.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You seem unaware of blatant contradictions in what you say, but I do agree with this statement.

 

 

The point of all this learning is to be able to extract. If you can do it and don't need to ask questions of others, then that's great. I took the time to answer a person who is not at your level and threw something out there to expand his line of thinking. Evidently, my "beyond Hersheyland" phrase rankled you and probably others. It wasn't meant to step on any toes. Don't worry about what I say. Just continue with your extracting.

 

Cheers.

the diff probl lays in a subset of the tools and beyond the available tools.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. Let me try to explain what I mean with "You have to find your own method in the end."

 

What I mean is..you take aspects from Jack Hershey method that you like... use it, enter, exit where you are comfortable and when you like market conditions and then finally after gaining experience make it truly your own method because only then you can 100% trust your own judgement.

 

This makes sense because it's really a discretionary method. There's no 100% ruleset...what to do and when to do it. It depends on the trader and on the experience gained, interpretation, etc etc... that's why there are so many pages about it, here and on ET.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

 

 

 

You seem unaware of blatant contradictions in what you say, but I do agree with this statement.

 

 

The point of all this learning is to be able to extract. If you can do it and don't need to ask questions of others, then that's great. I took the time to answer a person who is not at your level and threw something out there to expand his line of thinking. Evidently, my "beyond Hersheyland" phrase rankled you and probably others. It wasn't meant to step on any toes. Don't worry about what I say. Just continue with your extracting.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
* * *

 

There's no 100% ruleset...what to do and when to do it. It depends on the trader and on the experience gained, interpretation, etc etc... that's why there are so many pages about it, here and on ET.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

You are just making that up. Whether or not you agree that it can be done, a complete set of rules is exactly what is intended. Maybe you aren't aware of the latest transference method: the flowcharts with n, n+1, and n+2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The method just helps to see the market. That's all. That's something else then a ruleset when to get in, when to get out etc. Stop after 3 losses, sit thru a point 2-->3, trading HVS, etc etc...These things you really decide for yourself after you understand the market.

 

Actually Spyder did give some beginner rules...enter at FTT, reverse at FTT and out at FBO I think...but really..it's up to the individual trader. How focussed do you want to be? How many trades/opportunities do you want to take? How many lines do you want to draw? Do you understand the market in every aspect? I certainly don't but I trade the things I do understand.

 

Ivo

 

 

 

 

 

You are just making that up. Whether or not you agree that it can be done, a complete set of rules is exactly what is intended. Maybe you aren't aware of the latest transference method: the flowcharts with n, n+1, and n+2.
Edited by ivob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some questions about the display of Jack's TradeNavigator platform in the attached picture.

 

(1): What are +4.75 and +0.46%?

 

(2): I understand red and green diamonds on ES price pane are bid wall and ask wall. But they are not a reflection of the walls displayed in yellow boxes in the DOM pane. May I know how the platform calculates the placement of "diamonds"?

 

(3): Why part of the background of the OTR pane is colored yellow?

 

Anyone knows? :)

5aa710add8c63_SK0Questions.thumb.jpg.a9907798ceeaa36be0eb898e96e016ac.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have some questions about the display of Jack's TradeNavigator platform in the attached picture.

 

Anyone knows? :)

 

Where did you get the picture from?

 

I don't think that is Jack's. I have only seen Jack's charts from Tradestation and Ninjatrader. Secondly none of his charts have indicators called "Spydertrader..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where did you get the picture from?

 

I don't think that is Jack's. I have only seen Jack's charts from Tradestation and Ninjatrader. Secondly none of his charts have indicators called "Spydertrader..."

it's Spyder's tool set available on Trade Navigator only. Channel line is not straight enough for me tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where did you get the picture from?

 

I don't think that is Jack's. I have only seen Jack's charts from Tradestation and Ninjatrader. Secondly none of his charts have indicators called "Spydertrader..."

 

You are incorrect about the picture and indicators. Look harder in ET, you will find more of them, from Jack personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does anybody here have a good understanding of the flowchart Jack created in this thread? Having a hard time understanding it, some of the terms are defined different in different places etc...anybody ever made a clearer version of this Flowchart?

 

Thanks,

 

Vienna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does anybody here have a good understanding of the flowchart Jack created in this thread? Having a hard time understanding it' date=' some of the terms are defined different in different places etc...anybody ever made a clearer version of this Flowchart?

 

Thanks,

 

Vienna[/quote']

 

I agree I cannot also make head or tails of the flow chart, please could someone post a clearer version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I agree I cannot also make head or tails of the flow chart, please could someone post a clearer version.

 

I am creating one, but I need some input here from the old hands that actually understand it... if there are any:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have some questions about the display of Jack's TradeNavigator platform in the attached picture.

 

(1): What are +4.75 and +0.46%?

 

(2): I understand red and green diamonds on ES price pane are bid wall and ask wall. But they are not a reflection of the walls displayed in yellow boxes in the DOM pane. May I know how the platform calculates the placement of "diamonds"?

 

(3): Why part of the background of the OTR pane is colored yellow?

 

Anyone knows? :)

 

1. Points and % up/down since previous days close.

 

2. They were coded wrong, TN fixed it, you might prefer the boxes or arrows for a more accurate reading. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2689724

In the latest update TradeNavigator finally fixed their Dom Wall symbol locations. Now price can bounce between the blocks or arrows. Previously the ask symbol was below the actual wall level.

 

3. It's a division of time shading, pretty sure it was 5 minute periods, so you'd know where it lined up with the start/end of a 5 min bar.

 

Regards,

 

EZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yesterday, EOD.

Had to stop around 1:30, so anything after that is hindsight :)

 

HTH, Vienna

 

Hi Vienna,

 

In your 6 Oct 2001 ES chart posted in #3106 (http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-78.html#post129421), why was the green point 2 of the green up traverse(bar 52 - 61) inside the previous red down traverse? (The pink circle in the attached chart.)

 

I found several source of information mentions: "The point 2 must be outside the RTL of the previous container in the same fractal." Is there something I missed?

 

Here is one of the information:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-55.html#post104466

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Ki

5aa710af30f6e_ViennaOCT6EOD.thumb.gif.4631abf0169db12154ad874358714bad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here a video I created a few days ago with 2 live trades, one small loser, found myself on the wrong side and a quick correction. I added some comments what I was thinking at that moment. Also some examples of "What wasn't that" which was the reason to hold. If anyone finds it useful, let me know and I post some more with comments. It was produced twice the normal speed.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARGQuHP2Rs0]video[/ame]

Edited by ivob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Vienna,

 

In your 6 Oct 2001 ES chart posted in #3106 (http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-78.html#post129421), why was the green point 2 of the green up traverse(bar 52 - 61) inside the previous red down traverse? (The pink circle in the attached chart.)

 

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Ki

 

Ki,

 

I think you are right...that looks like just a tape..annotation error. Thanks, :)

 

Vienna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here a video I created a few days ago with 2 live trades, one small loser, found myself on the wrong side and a quick correction. I added some comments what I was thinking at that moment. Also some examples of "What wasn't that" which was the reason to hold. If anyone finds it useful, let me know and I post some more with comments. It was produced twice the normal speed.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

ivo, the video is awesome!

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Ki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, it's fun to make and forces me to review the day better so will make some more. Of course this is not an average trade as price went quite far so maybe I should record some more (whole day). But anyway, it's the thinking (what wasn't that) that matters because it leads to the correct decission (hold, exit, reverse).

 

Ivo

 

 

ivo, the video is awesome!

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Ki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ki,

 

I think you are right...that looks like just a tape..annotation error. Thanks, :)

 

Vienna

 

Sorry to bring this up, this stumped me and I did not see a reason why a 2 cannot be inside the channel on the same fractal. If you have identified an FTT there is no reason why it cannot be. I went back to the "tapes" (elite trader forum) Spyders old drawings and there are plenty on examples of the above. I have attached one for your review.

04-24-2007-es-5min.thumb.jpg.be8e05d396594758c456791afccda101.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry to bring this up, this stumped me and I did not see a reason why a 2 cannot be inside the channel on the same fractal. If you have identified an FTT there is no reason why it cannot be. I went back to the "tapes" (elite trader forum) Spyders old drawings and there are plenty on examples of the above. I have attached one for your review.

I bet that was before 'clean page' time. You got 3 channels there just eliminate one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.