Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

daedalus

How Would You Define a "Pin Bar"?

Recommended Posts

I'm really trying to focus on trading pure price action and candlestick analysis to advance my trading and one of the setups I really am trying to expand on is the "pin bar" setups.

 

Many of you know what these are... heres an example of a few...

 

pin-bars-from-trendlines-audjpy1.gif

 

My question is do any of you have set rules on what qualifies a pin bar as an actual pin bar?

 

I would like to code up a rule set in easylanguage so for backtesting I could at least see at a glance potential entries. Obviously this would just be a rough approximation but it would make things much easier.

 

But to do that I need to understand what really makes a pinbar and pinbar. They are obviously not the same as a hammer candle so for long setups High <> Close and vise versa...

 

Is there any kind of "the wick should be greater than 50% of the candle" kind of rules or anything like that?

 

Any concrete rules that I could code would be appreciated. I'd be happy to supply the completed .eld and .pla when finished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here in the CC, your 'pin' bars can be referred to as a few titles:

 

1) Hammer (one of my personal faves)

2) Doji

 

From there, you can get offshoots such as inverted hammer, gravestone, doji, etc. I could care less that we call them but wanted to get them out of the way.

 

In your example, you are basically looking to buy hammers. Easy enough in theory.

 

From there it's a matter of defining what type of trend we are in. If my analysis says we are in an uptrend, I would look to buy as many hammers as I could, as you've done here. That's contrary to the standard candlestick work out there that says hammers are reversal points. Here we are using pin bars / hammers to buy in an uptrend, which is a good idea IMO.

 

So the real question at hand is - when do we buy the pin/hammer? How is the trend going to be identified? Once you have decided that it's time to get long, then it's a matter of looking for our pin/hammer friends. We can call them PAMMERS or HINS.

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm really trying to focus on trading pure price action and candlestick analysis to advance my trading and one of the setups I really am trying to expand on is the "pin bar" setups.

 

My question is do any of you have set rules on what qualifies a pin bar as an actual pin bar?

 

Have you read trader dante's stuff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had entered all those bars you identified above using a BUY STOP 1 Tick above the high you would have avoided the stop out. Your entry method can also be helpful when trading these bars.

 

The other thing I would add is stick to trading these bars on higher timeframes as they are more evident to all traders. 5, 9 or 15 Minute charts as an example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you read trader dante's stuff?

 

Well worth a read, recommended. He was partly inspired by James16 over at FF. Some people have quite strict criteria on the 'eyes' others more lax. I think Pring coined the phrase.

 

From Martin Pring on Price Patterns by Martin J. Pring,

 

“Pinocchio bars are bars in which the bulk of the trading takes place outside the previous and subsequent trading range.”

 

“The character Pinocchio tells us when he is lying because his nose gets longer. In the case of the Pinocchio bar, it is the trading beyond the resistance or support level in question that indicates that the signal is false.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I am looking at using these in conjunction with prior s/r and db/dt's, and possibly clean swings with fib retraces.

 

Entry on the break of the high/low of the bar in the opposite direction of the wick (obviously).

 

Thanks for all the comments and help gents. I've got some massive reading to do with the dante thread.

 

I had read most of the James16 thread about a year ago before it ballooned to 2200 pages. Good stuff in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea I am looking at using these in conjunction with prior s/r and db/dt's, and possibly clean swings with fib retraces.

 

Entry on the break of the high/low of the bar in the opposite direction of the wick (obviously).

 

Thanks for all the comments and help gents. I've got some massive reading to do with the dante thread.

 

I had read most of the James16 thread about a year ago before it ballooned to 2200 pages. Good stuff in there.

 

I don't know that you need to do massive reading. Most of it is examples.

 

The dynamic here is rejection. The trick is to figure out how important is whatever it is that's being rejected. Therefore, you have to carefully define -- as you know -- whatever it is you're testing for rejection. DTs, DBs, and Fibs should be fairly easy, or at least fairly straightforward. Swing points and trendlines might be another matter entirely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ Exactly. Which is why i'm gonna avoid the swing points and trendlines. That stuff is much more subjective IMO and i'd rather just wait for solid areas on a chart to look for reactions with as little interpretation as possible.

 

Thanks again for your help gents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when you look at a pin bar-wick-doji or other name -the first thing you should realize is who made it--a pin bar located at the start of a trend is usally a bigger timeframe player coming into the mkt-by bigger timeframe player i am refering to big money traders who will probably hold overnite and will also protect their position by adding on if challenged---if a oin bar happens near the end of a trend it is usually caused by late small traders who think the trend is going to continue and the opposite side of their trade is the big guys covering--just a observation from 30 years of trading-gl on coding-i honestly will tell you that this is a thinking mans game -not a mathematicians game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.