Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Gabe this is how I see it.

 

[ATTACH]15642[/ATTACH]

 

This is exactly the reason I have a problem with this stuff.

Eventhough my markings would have worked, yours would have worked as well.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Folks,

 

Here is a 60 minute Crude from the last few weeks. One of our silent readers tells me that he has been using our little approach on the hourly crude. He didn't send me a chart, and as he has not responded to my request to post his chart here, I have reconstructed his trades based upon is identification of the times of the Highs, Lows, and triggers. He is using a simple 1.62% fib extension of the primary swing for his profit target. He has a $1 disaster stop, and adjusts it "quickly" to the high/low of the trigger bar.

 

Any thoughts? Comments?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

I know you reconstructed this, so just a few hindsight observations based on this.

 

The swing point type entry, sometimes they occur in the 'chop zone' and we might want to wait to take the entry out of the initial balance set by the chop zone. Or maybe a pattern that occurs right @ the edge of the chop zone.

 

I think the questions on the chart should make sense.

ChoppinItUp.thumb.jpg.83a4d9e6610d5d8b3b1dc6a77a7c96b8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ive been thinking on how I trade and how thales trades.

[ATTACH]15643[/ATTACH]

 

Don,

 

We've all seen fractals/3bar entries used before.

 

I've never figured out when to take them. How are you selected your entries? Are they based on general S/R?

 

Or like in the picture you posted, the first entry all the way on the left, are you anticipating what could be the LH and an entry based on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gabe this is how I see it.

 

[ATTACH]15642[/ATTACH]

 

Where you say his LH shouldn't be there, I have to say, at the time it was happening, it looked good enough to me to trade.

 

Short EURJPY at 132.49

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don,

 

We've all seen fractals/3bar entries used before.

 

I've never figured out when to take them. How are you selected your entries? Are they based on general S/R?

 

Or like in the picture you posted, the first entry all the way on the left, are you anticipating what could be the LH and an entry based on that?

 

I personally use 5 bars because fractals cant become fractals on 3 bars alone. But I can see where you get 3 bar entries. But I use 5.

Yes, I believe that S/R on is the same as fractals and fractals is the same as S/R.

Yes that is exactly what I do.

I know it is confusing because it is confusing to explain.

 

eurusd1.thumb.jpg.8d24d10906cf451f1b9dae96d4e2735c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know you reconstructed this, so just a few hindsight observations based on this.

 

The swing point type entry, sometimes they occur in the 'chop zone' and we might want to wait to take the entry out of the initial balance set by the chop zone. Or maybe a pattern that occurs right @ the edge of the chop zone.

 

I think the questions on the chart should make sense.

 

Hi Forrst,

 

In the first instance, I tend to agree with you. Crudetrader's (not his name, but that's what we'll call him until he shows up) entry meant that he was interpreting that range as a chop zone. I may have been tempted to take a long, and then a short where you place a possible short entry.

 

In the second instance, however, I do not see a chop zone. Doesn't the low and the initial rally produce a L-H, and then the pullback a HL, with the HH trigger generated by the gap higher? It looks clean to me.

 

Now, the real question this: Will Soldier Field be a chop zone tonight? Tonight's game may as well be a play off for both of our teams, because it is hard to see how either make the playoffs if each adds another loss to their season.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f66317a5_60MinuteCrudeforForrest1.thumb.jpg.aa8c593848bcae96b3050ef3bc5aab96.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my first (public anyway) attempt at S/R analysis of spot FX. Right now, a few hours before the Sydney open, EURJPY is in a range with no clear direction (131.83 - 132.26). For a reasonable R/R I would like to see some determination in any movement before entering. The lines on my chart are not actual trades, they are hindsight annotations.

 

I trade mech systems and usually I don't look at charts at all. Consequently I've never really used indicators. But seeing and anticipating price movement is still not easy. Might have something to do with me being a tad older than 9.

 

Thalestrader - thank you for starting this great thread.

EURJPY-2009-11-20.png.9d07e5dc4d75541b2daf72d98c57a19e.png

Edited by TrueBalance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gabe this is how I see it.

 

[ATTACH]15642[/ATTACH]

 

That LH after the double top is a beautiful setup...Risk less than reward...slight pullback after a pretty powerful drop. Hindsight gives you the ability to say that it was not where you would have considered a LH...even though it clearly was...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Forrst,

 

In the first instance, I tend to agree with you. Crudetrader's (not his name, but that's what we'll call him until he shows up) entry meant that he was interpreting that range as a chop zone. I may have been tempted to take a long, and then a short where you place a possible short entry.

 

In the second instance, however, I do not see a chop zone. Doesn't the low and the initial rally produce a L-H, and then the pullback a HL, with the HH trigger generated by the gap higher? It looks clean to me.

 

Now, the real question this: Will Soldier Field be a chop zone tonight? Tonight's game may as well be a play off for both of our teams, because it is hard to see how either make the playoffs if each adds another loss to their season.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

So about the Chop Zone.......

 

The chop zone, we see that as an area where price makes an attempt to move, but stalls? For example, where price comes down to support, puts in a L-H-LH, but then fails to put in that HH for the breakout correct? At that point we are in the chop zone.

 

Does the picture I've attached illustrate how the chop zone sets up, and a logical way to structure trades around it?

 

Also, the "must win" term is probably the most over used term in football. Sometimes it seems like I hear it in the first 3 games of the season. But I think you would be justified in making such a claim in this case. WE are in 3rd in our division, and there are 6 teams in front of us for the wild card birth. And you guys, if you lose today you MUST win your next 6 games.,..... So hopefully we will remain buddies after tonight ;)

 

4hours,25 minutes till kickoff!

choppinItUp2.jpg.d6e9a1535ed1262a1e1f588df622a4a7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"That LH after the double top is a beautiful setup...Risk less than reward...slight pullback after a pretty powerful drop. Hindsight gives you the ability to say that it was not where you would have considered a LH...even though it clearly was..."

 

 

I am only here to help with what I know, I will not argue with anybody. But it doesnt add up with my entry rules. So no I would not have taken that trade. Does that make me right and Gabe and you wrong. No, because Gabe was right and I was wrong. But I still wouldnt have entered the trade.

 

eurjpy.jpg.c195badab6666b176dff660e21b86057.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For a reasonable R/R I would like a movement with some momentum before entering

 

Hi TrueBalance,

 

I see that you edited your post, but I thought your comment about momentum appropriate. I too like to see the market do some "swingin'" before I decide to participate in a particular opportunity.

 

You look like your trades would have worked out well. Thank you for sharing.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am only here to help with what I know, I will not argue with anybody. But it doesn't add up with my entry rules.

 

I know I am not alone in saying that I appreciate your contributions to this thread.

 

I don't think John is looking for an argument either. We are all free to debate and disagree here, and a spirited response from anyone of us from time to time is to be expected.

 

That being said, we all know that once you hit the "Submit Reply" button that we have no control over the emotional response or interpretation that our own words with induce in our interlocutors. Perhaps we all (and I include myself in this) would serve ourselves well if before posting a response that takes issue with another's views we give it a quick read to see if we worded it so as to minimize the possibility that our spiritedness is not taken for being mean-spirited. We are attracting a good group of folks here, and we wouldn't want to lose anyone over a difference of opinion.

 

By the way, I wasn't looking to argue with you, and I certainly should not be interpreted as suggesting that you were wrong. I was only noting that as price presented itself at that point, it seemed to me to pointing to immediately lower prices. For me it was an opportunity to take a short entry. I fully understand that your entries are based on different criteria than mine. No problem. I am here both to teach and to learn from others. I am not trying to create an homogeneous bunch of unthinking Thales-clones.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I personally use 5 bars because fractals cant become fractals on 3 bars alone. But I can see where you get 3 bar entries. But I use 5.

Yes, I believe that S/R on is the same as fractals and fractals is the same as S/R.

Yes that is exactly what I do.

I know it is confusing because it is confusing to explain.

 

[ATTACH]15645[/ATTACH]

 

I think that one picture you posted with the comparison between the two different entries cleared up what your are doing quite a bit, initially I was confused.

 

I see I was way off on what I thought a fractal was though, and I still dont get it. I thoguht the fractal was basically seeing when a 'pivot' was formed. But don't worry about it, I will figure out what they are as you continue to post your charts.

 

I see you had a 15m candle overlay on your 5 minute chart. Your entries are based soley on the 5min chart though right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So about the Chop Zone.......

 

Does the picture I've attached illustrate how the chop zone sets up, and a logical way to structure trades around it?

 

Also, the "must win" term is probably the most over used term in football. Sometimes it seems like I hear it in the first 3 games of the season. But I think you would be justified in making such a claim in this case. WE are in 3rd in our division, and there are 6 teams in front of us for the wild card birth. And you guys, if you lose today you MUST win your next 6 games.,..... So hopefully we will remain buddies after tonight ;)

 

4hours,25 minutes till kickoff!

 

I think your picture adequately captures the notion of what I consider to be a chop zone. Do you still think that trade number 2 on the crude chart was chop zone?

 

And yes, "must win," is over used in football. But as you note, whoever loses tonight will have long odds against a play off berth, and will likely require the help of other teams to get there. But win or lose, we'll still be buddies. Unless the Eagles lose. Win or lose.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that one picture you posted with the comparison between the two different entries cleared up what your are doing quite a bit, initially I was confused.

 

I see I was way off on what I thought a fractal was though, and I still dont get it. I thoguht the fractal was basically seeing when a 'pivot' was formed. But don't worry about it, I will figure out what they are as you continue to post your charts.

 

I see you had a 15m candle overlay on your 5 minute chart. Your entries are based soley on the 5min chart though right?

 

No, that was 5m overlay on a 1 minute chart. I would highly recommend everyone to open up a MT4 account even if they dont trade it. And watch price the way it moves between the overlay and the real chart!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ive been thinking on how I trade and how thales trades.

[ATTACH]15643[/ATTACH]

 

Hi Don,

 

I still don't fully understand what you are doing. If it is just anticipated fractals (previous bars h/l broken??) then you would certainly be getting many many more trades per day than Thales would - wouldn't you? For example, on that chart you posted here, how many trades does that give you? I know the thermal imaging sensing hindsight goggles are on, just answer the best you can though.

 

With thanks,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Don,

 

I still don't fully understand what you are doing. If it is just anticipated fractals (previous bars h/l broken??) then you would certainly be getting many many more trades per day than Thales would - wouldn't you? For example, on that chart you posted here, how many trades does that give you? I know the thermal imaging sensing hindsight goggles are on, just answer the best you can though.

 

With thanks,

MK

 

Yes, as I said in that post I would. Is what you are wanting, is for me to tell you how many signals I would have had in that chart? Hmm, I dont understand. Sorry!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, as I said in that post I would. Is what you are wanting, is for me to tell you how many signals I would have had in that chart? Hmm, I dont understand. Sorry!!!

 

Aloha Don,

 

I guess what I was trying to establish was if your way of trading is higher frequency. I don't really understand what you are doing yet, but if I understand these fractal things right, then it looks like a higher frequency style - which of course is fine. I'm just trying to establish the differences between what you are doing and what Thales is doing.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.