Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Frane

Volume Breakdown: How Much Comes from Technical Trading?

Recommended Posts

How much of the volume comes from trades done based on technical analysis? I would assume it is really hard to get any data on this, but I would be happy to hear about any studies or even educated guesses. I am mostly interested in the stock market, but also glad to hear about forex or commodities if this information is available there.

 

One reason why I am asking is that I started to wonder why most technical trading books, blogs, etc. describe the market as something only affected by information becoming available to people and psychological factors, resulting in patterns or signals that can be detected by indicators. Rarely do I hear people talking about patterns resulting from people doing technical trading, or trading systems based on assumptions of which other trading systems people are using. For example if enough people are trading according to some indicator, it would be possible to develop a system exploiting this. Why is this not so common? Is it because technical trading is so rare that it has no impact on the stock price, or is it because so many different systems are used that it averages out or becomes random noise, or is there some other reason?

 

I appreciate all help. Especially any volume breakdown information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This reminds me of this quote: "One idiot can ask more questions than ten wise men can answer." :)

 

One reason why I am asking is that I started to wonder why most technical trading books, blogs, etc. describe the market as something only affected by information becoming available to people and psychological factors, resulting in patterns or signals that can be detected by indicators. Rarely do I hear people talking about patterns resulting from people doing technical trading, or trading systems based on assumptions of which other trading systems people are using. For example if enough people are trading according to some indicator, it would be possible to develop a system exploiting this. Why is this not so common? Is it because technical trading is so rare that it has no impact on the stock price, or is it because so many different systems are used that it averages out or becomes random noise, or is there some other reason?

 

I certainly don't agree with your observations.

 

Technical trading certainly has an impact on price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answering ARTjoMS, but could you please point me into the right direction where I can find information about trading systems designed "against" other technical traders or any theory related to this topic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trading systems designed "against" to exploit other technical traders

 

I don't think there is any good theory written on this subject - it simply comes down to your level of understanding. Most of the "technical stuff'' has some idea (i.e. exploiting market inefficiencies) behind it (although that may not be stressed).

 

1) First you should broader your understanding of what technical analysis is. (because your's seem to be very short sighted)

2) Then you should understand who are participating in the market.

3) Then you should examine reasons why they open or don't open their positions.

(2 and 3 are manageable tasks.)

4) Finally the last step will be called ''doing the analysis''.

 

Hint: Focus on concepts -> don't try to exploit participants via indicator that they are using. Why? Because that will be like a drop in the ocean indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aprox 70% to 80% of volume is now by algos...hft... institutions....Bottom line is that institutions are what moves the markets. Individual retail traders have little ability to move the markets. Except in extreme cases of panic...etc.

 

All day long its a fight between the bears and the bulls..one institution pitted against the other. Both make money. Momentarily one side wins out and a trend starts. Public jumps on the trend for the ride.

 

Patterns form because of human nature and the nature of the markets. A chart from the 1950's i.e. before computers and hft..algos...etc looks much the same as charts from today You see trends..pullbacks...ranges..channels..flags.. triangles...breakouts...etc simply because it has always been that way and will always be that way regardless of the actual technical tools used to trade the markets. Whether that tool is a ticker tape machine or a complex computer or newly devised trading systems based on technical analysis. Institutions drive the markets but institutions have people behind them designing the myriad of trading systems they use. Then the retail traders devise system..indicators. As long as people devise stuff human nature will enter in.

 

Can having a strategy that gets it edge off of trading off a pattern be profitable? Sure. For instance, once a breakout has become a channel which in turn morphs into a range we know that most range trading will become the battleground of the bulls and bears for a while..usually. Many breakouts out of the range will be attempted but most will fail. Aprox 70% of the time breakouts will fail. So, if price has been in a range and goes to the top of the range one can short it knowing that the probabilities favor a breakout of the range failing and price reversing at the point of resistance. If one then actually shorts at the resistance tof the range then ones trades is, yes, contributing somewhat to the selling pressure. However, it is institutions that will drive the price back inside the range. That is, the bearish institutions. The bullish ones will let price drop to the support level in the range then they will buy driving price up. Price is always trying to break out of the range top or bottom hence it s a battle between the bulls and the bears. One can look at the price action within the range and sometimes get a fair idea which direction the breakout will take when a successful breakout does eventually occur.

 

So..a range is a pattern. Devising a trading system off of such a pattern can be profitible and in itself will contribute to the pattern being formed. It can be automated or discretionary. It can be software driven or simply visual. It can be accomplished trading off a computer screen or handmade charts. It doesn't matter. Trends in the form of breakouts and channels....with pullbacks...pennants..triangles...will always be there. Ranges will always be there....with wedges..micro channels.. pullbacks nested in the ranges. These patterns form because of human nature and the nature of the markets and the insuing battles between the bearish and bullish institutions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Patuca. Are you saying that the 70-80% of the volume coming from institutions are pure technical trading? Would you guess that the share of fundamental trading is 20-30% then? Even though most mutual-funds and big players invest fundamentally, they most likely do very few trades compared to technical traders and especially HFT. But I also have heard that some of the algorithmic trading is just big players buying or selling based on fundamental analysis, but they use algorithmic trading systems to be able to buy/sell optimally without affecting the price to much, isn't that true?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Patuca. Are you saying that the 70-80% of the volume coming from institutions are pure technical trading? Would you guess that the share of fundamental trading is 20-30% then? Even though most mutual-funds and big players invest fundamentally, they most likely do very few trades compared to technical traders and especially HFT. But I also have heard that some of the algorithmic trading is just big players buying or selling based on fundamental analysis, but they use algorithmic trading systems to be able to buy/sell optimally without affecting the price to much, isn't that true?

I would say about 70% of trading volume is algo ..hft ...many, if not most of these being institutions. That is, this 70 percent are daily fighting it out in the market trying to grab their slice of the pie in tiny profits but lots of volume. Millions of shares...contracts..turning over daily. The other 25% of the volume is institutions...fundamental and technical..etc. The last 5% of the volume is generated by pipsqueaks like you and me all most other traders on these forums...the gamut of retail traders..etc.

 

The 70% don't actually give much direction to markets. They are going for tiny 1..2..3... ticks profit on piles of contracts...pennies on shares over and over all day long via algo...numerous hft programs back and forth..back and forth....

 

The other 25% do move the markets and give it direction. The 5% basically give little to no direction to the market.

 

I may be off on the percentages but i think pretty close. It could be 75..20..5..

 

That is why i don't worry about hft. Many institutions are not going to mess around with hft. Alot of others will. My only concern for hft is a program going rogue ...i.e. Like what happened to knight here a while back and the flash crash a few years back. Otherwise, hft may actualy be helping pipsqueak traders by providing liquidity....like we really need it...whatever...

 

Yes, I am sure some fundamental firms use algos too..they would be in the 25% and yes they would be market movers.

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frane,

 

Admirable questions. In case you haven't 'settled this yet, I’ll add more. We’ll show “"One idiot can ask more questions than ten wise men can answer."” how it’s done. :rofl: Seriously, it was a good idea for ARTjoMS to challenge your underlying assumptions, constructs, paradigms, models…There are no other objective tests / easy places to look that will substitute for sustained self exploration to discover the salient operational characteristics of your ‘marketDNA’. Questions questions questions…

 

Like.. Have you really looked to see if the two categories - technical and fundamental - provide an adequate categorization framework for you?

For example: Fundamental and technical traders seek truth. Between/around them are hoards of traders and algos who will accept, even seek, the current STORY/lie for their information… and there are multiple categories within those hoards…Anyways, in pure form, fundamental traders seek to discover true value regardless of the string of stories that emerges. In pure form, technical traders also seek to exclude the story from their choice making. They really want their decisions made sans the Story’s influence.

Truthseekers don’t deny the story (ie exclusion is not the same as denial). They just seek an information system that doesn’t rely on the content of the current story.

 

NO ONE can avoid patterns. Each trader’s marketDNA predisposes what patterns s/he can readily include and which ones will be ignored or excluded - sometimes even to the point of opposing (except on trading forums of course - where no one has ever discounted / trashed someone else’s marketDNA or slammed stochastics or…). Some deny they utilize patterns… not realizing their brains are just using patterns that have been anointed as NOT Patterns. And briefly…

every hft algo attempts to replicate what the marketDNA of its progenitors would do at their best.

…to the “volume” questions...

 

“market movers.” … Will it work for you to see certain groups or categories and percentages as what ‘moves’ the market? Would knowing the aggregate percentages really be useful to/in your marketDNA? Even if you knew the absolute tendencies of those percentages you ask about, is the variance in those percentages across a session, a week, a season, an epoch extremely high?

 

 

…10000 shares this second is not the same as 10000 shares in the same or next second. ‘Volume’, even HUGE volume, that accepts the bid or ask does not move the market. Influxes of volume willing to buy above the bid (or sell below the ask) is what moves the market.

 

Re:

“…enough people are trading according to some indicator, it would be possible to develop a system exploiting this. Why is this not so common? Is it because technical trading is so rare that it has no impact on the stock price, or is it because so many different systems are used that it averages out or becomes random noise, or is there some other reason?”

Those were perfect questions for traders from ~ 1979 to ~ 1995. Then, “a system exploiting this” really was ‘common’ . During that time groups of floor and near floor traders knew what technical traders were looking for and more importantly they knew what limited subset of timeframes their ‘patterns ‘ were being found on. Ie way back when, a portion of floor traders had the marketDNA to know what patterns were being watched by the outside and which time frames were being utilized. (the term ‘timeframes’ being used here much the same way as James Dalton used it) AND they could engineer sufficient influxes of volume willing to buy above the bid (or sell below the ask) to fade a “technical” pattern PLUS they were privy to timely information about whether the ‘campaign’ was working or not and could quickly bail if not… now that’s an Edge ;) No more. A geometric explosion in the quantity of possible timeframes made it to “like a drop in the ocean indeed” and has largely eliminated theEdge available in fading the ‘technical’ patterns of that day.

So, the old technical patterns multiplied themselves out of usefulness - except for a few with exceptional marketDNA for it. But are the same ‘fading games’ still being run on the Story of the day - like they used to run on the ‘technical of the day’? Do far more have marketDNA for running these fadegames on the Story of the day than ever had the marketDNA to ‘exploit’/fade ‘technicals”. Has fadegame on the Story subsided at all?

Not that we’re running low on idiot questions - but here’s another one…

Have you studied ‘old-school’ VSA? (the ‘story’ part - not the ‘volume pattern’ part)

 

btw in case I didn’t say it before - You are asking excellent questions.

 

I don’t have time to continue… or fill in the ...'s

... would love to post some references … but alas, they are not allowed in here. (especially if they challenge Story/lie in any way)

… TL has become a perfect example of what happens to exchange in an over-regulated environment.

 

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say about 70% of trading volume is algo ..hft ...many, if not most of these being institutions. That is, this 70 percent are daily fighting it out in the market trying to grab their slice of the pie in tiny profits but lots of volume. Millions of shares...contracts..turning over daily. The other 25% of the volume is institutions...fundamental and technical..etc. The last 5% of the volume is generated by pipsqueaks like you and me all most other traders on these forums...the gamut of retail traders..etc.

 

The 70% don't actually give much direction to markets. They are going for tiny 1..2..3... ticks profit on piles of contracts...pennies on shares over and over all day long via algo...numerous hft programs back and forth..back and forth....

 

The other 25% do move the markets and give it direction. The 5% basically give little to no direction to the market.

 

I may be off on the percentages but i think pretty close. It could be 75..20..5..

 

That is why i don't worry about hft. Many institutions are not going to mess around with hft. Alot of others will. My only concern for hft is a program going rogue ...i.e. Like what happened to knight here a while back and the flash crash a few years back. Otherwise, hft may actualy be helping pipsqueak traders by providing liquidity....like we really need it...whatever...

 

Yes, I am sure some fundamental firms use algos too..they would be in the 25% and yes they would be market movers.

 

All players are important in the market. Large and small. Short or long in terms of both direction and time in the market.

 

HFT or algos, or whatever you would like to refer to them as, are the trading idiots. Idiot in the sense that they trade with a finite set of rules.

 

You don't have do be brilliant to make money in the market. Even an idiot can exploit an arbitrage opportunity while it exists with the right set of instructions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All players are important in the market. Large and small. Short or long in terms of both direction and time in the market.

 

HFT or algos, or whatever you would like to refer to them as, are the trading idiots. Idiot in the sense that they trade with a finite set of rules.

 

You don't have do be brilliant to make money in the market. Even an idiot can exploit an arbitrage opportunity while it exists with the right set of instructions.

 

I wouldn't go so far as to say... "idiots". These "things" are designed to trade against each other... some do it with a great deal of success, and I would say that there are some brilliant people behind the effort.

 

This is my take on it (and it is agreed that I am an idiot): There is no way that anyone other than "god almighty" can understand fully what goes on in the market. It's so complex, and there are so many variables... who could comprehend such things? It's like asking why each leaf on a tree is different from one to the next. The retail trader need only concern him/her self with who is winning the struggle in what ever time frame you have chosen to trade in. It's a struggle that goes on everyday. And to MM's post... "you don't have to be brilliant".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the good answers. I have done some research on my own as well. Just to mention some, I have come across a book "Trade The Trader", which is about the same topic and watched the videos by Martin Cole (Market Makers Method) on youtube. I am surprised why there is so little information about this kind of stuff compared to the millions of books and websites teaching the same old patterns and indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By FMIND5
      Hello traders,
      I am interested in order flow trading and I will post some trades and predictions, some articles and ideology of a bit different understanding how price moves and why. May be this forum will be the right place. So, for the start I have  couple of charts of recent trade on oil. Also I did some comparison of two different software. Would be great to meet some traders who use order flow too. Lets see. I have a lots ideas and strategies to share. I don't use any traditional indicators, because just numbers are important for me.
       
       
       


    • By trading4life
      Hello, My name is trading4life.
      I just joined this forum.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 22nd February 2024. In-Depth Analysis – AUDUSD – Investors Expect Fed to Cut First! AUDUSD – Economists Do Not Expect the RBA to Cut Until 2024’s Third Quarter.   The Aussie Dollar increases 0.67% and sees its strongest gain this week so far. The exchange rate trades at its highest price since February 2nd. The FOMC’s Meeting Minutes indicate the Federal Reserve is not yet willing to cut interest rates. FOMC Members are cautious about cutting rates too fast. Australia’s Wage Price Index for the latest quarter continues to read higher than where the RBA would like to see it. The Reserve Bank of Australia advise the regulator would not consider cutting interest rates until the second half of 2024. The Australian Economy weakens but not enough to pressure the RBA! Inflation remains moderately higher than the US! AUDUSD – Technical Analysis The AUDUSD is witnessing one of the lowest spreads amongst the major currency pairs and is seeing higher levels of volatility. The Australian Dollar has been rising against the USD for seven consecutive days, similar to the NZD and the Euro. However, the AUD is performing better than the GBP, JPY and CHF against the Dollar. However, investors should note that the bullish price movement is largely being driven by the weakness in the Dollar. The US Dollar Index has fallen 0.50% this week and trades at a 3-week low. The Australian Dollar on the other hand is witnessing mainly bullish price movements depending on the currency pair. The Australian Dollar is increasing against the GBP, Euro, Yen, and the CHF but is declining against the NZD. So here we can see there are no major conflicts between the two individual currencies. However, investors will need to continue monitoring the US Dollar Index and price condition of the AUD against other major currencies. The AUDUSD is trading above the 75-Bar Exponential Moving Average and above the “Neutral” level on the RSI as well as the Bollinger Bands. These three factors indicate a further bullish trend as the asset is yet to be read “overbought” on most oscillators. In addition to this, the asset has managed to break above the resistance level and the previous high, meaning the continuation of the traditional wave pattern. The only negative indication when evaluating technical analysis is the measurements of the previous 4 impulse waves. The average bullish wave size is 0.87% and the largest has been 0.92%. The current impulse wave reads 0.87%. Therefore, if the pattern is to continue the price may retrace soon, even if it is going to continue rising thereafter. However, this cannot be known for sure. AUDUSD – Fundamental Analysis In the Meeting Minutes, representatives stated more fear about the remaining risks of a premature decline in rates than about a persistent period of high interest rates. Against this background, markets are reconsidering the timing of a possible easing of the regulator’s position in May and June. According to the CME Groups FedWatch Tool, the likelihood of a May adjustment is currently anticipated at 30-35%. A strong possibility is considered anything above 70%. Next week’s Core PCE Price Index will be key for the Dollar as this will be the last inflation reading for the month and short-term future. If the PCE Price Index is also higher, this means all 5 inflation readings beat expectations. As a result, the Dollar may rise. However, the Dollar’s issue is that the market’s risk profile is high, and many expect the Fed to cut first. Therefore, the Dollar may continue to struggle unless other central banks become more dovish. Even though the Reserve Bank of Australia’s interest rate is lower than the Fed’s, analysts expect the Fed to cut first. Even though GDP Growth in Australia is weakening, the economy is still performing better than Europe and the UK. In addition to this, inflation is still above 4.00%, which is extremely high for the Aussie and the Unemployment Rate has risen to 4.1% which is still manageable according to analysts there. Therefore, most analysts believe the RBA will cut in the third quarter and after the Fed. Therefore, fundamental analysis is slightly in the Aussie’s favor here, but technical analysis will need to continue signalling a rise. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • $GOOG Alphabet stock back to 143.09 triple+ support area with bullish stats, $GOOGL , see https://stockconsultant.com/?GOOG
    • $PI Impinj stock back to 100.02 support area with bullisdh stats , see https://stockconsultant.com/?PI
    • $AAPL Apple stock back to 182.72 support area , see https://stockconsultant.com/?AAPL
    • $AMZN Amazon stock flat top breakout watch , see https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.