Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Frane

Volume Breakdown: How Much Comes from Technical Trading?

Recommended Posts

How much of the volume comes from trades done based on technical analysis? I would assume it is really hard to get any data on this, but I would be happy to hear about any studies or even educated guesses. I am mostly interested in the stock market, but also glad to hear about forex or commodities if this information is available there.

 

One reason why I am asking is that I started to wonder why most technical trading books, blogs, etc. describe the market as something only affected by information becoming available to people and psychological factors, resulting in patterns or signals that can be detected by indicators. Rarely do I hear people talking about patterns resulting from people doing technical trading, or trading systems based on assumptions of which other trading systems people are using. For example if enough people are trading according to some indicator, it would be possible to develop a system exploiting this. Why is this not so common? Is it because technical trading is so rare that it has no impact on the stock price, or is it because so many different systems are used that it averages out or becomes random noise, or is there some other reason?

 

I appreciate all help. Especially any volume breakdown information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This reminds me of this quote: "One idiot can ask more questions than ten wise men can answer." :)

 

One reason why I am asking is that I started to wonder why most technical trading books, blogs, etc. describe the market as something only affected by information becoming available to people and psychological factors, resulting in patterns or signals that can be detected by indicators. Rarely do I hear people talking about patterns resulting from people doing technical trading, or trading systems based on assumptions of which other trading systems people are using. For example if enough people are trading according to some indicator, it would be possible to develop a system exploiting this. Why is this not so common? Is it because technical trading is so rare that it has no impact on the stock price, or is it because so many different systems are used that it averages out or becomes random noise, or is there some other reason?

 

I certainly don't agree with your observations.

 

Technical trading certainly has an impact on price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answering ARTjoMS, but could you please point me into the right direction where I can find information about trading systems designed "against" other technical traders or any theory related to this topic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trading systems designed "against" to exploit other technical traders

 

I don't think there is any good theory written on this subject - it simply comes down to your level of understanding. Most of the "technical stuff'' has some idea (i.e. exploiting market inefficiencies) behind it (although that may not be stressed).

 

1) First you should broader your understanding of what technical analysis is. (because your's seem to be very short sighted)

2) Then you should understand who are participating in the market.

3) Then you should examine reasons why they open or don't open their positions.

(2 and 3 are manageable tasks.)

4) Finally the last step will be called ''doing the analysis''.

 

Hint: Focus on concepts -> don't try to exploit participants via indicator that they are using. Why? Because that will be like a drop in the ocean indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aprox 70% to 80% of volume is now by algos...hft... institutions....Bottom line is that institutions are what moves the markets. Individual retail traders have little ability to move the markets. Except in extreme cases of panic...etc.

 

All day long its a fight between the bears and the bulls..one institution pitted against the other. Both make money. Momentarily one side wins out and a trend starts. Public jumps on the trend for the ride.

 

Patterns form because of human nature and the nature of the markets. A chart from the 1950's i.e. before computers and hft..algos...etc looks much the same as charts from today You see trends..pullbacks...ranges..channels..flags.. triangles...breakouts...etc simply because it has always been that way and will always be that way regardless of the actual technical tools used to trade the markets. Whether that tool is a ticker tape machine or a complex computer or newly devised trading systems based on technical analysis. Institutions drive the markets but institutions have people behind them designing the myriad of trading systems they use. Then the retail traders devise system..indicators. As long as people devise stuff human nature will enter in.

 

Can having a strategy that gets it edge off of trading off a pattern be profitable? Sure. For instance, once a breakout has become a channel which in turn morphs into a range we know that most range trading will become the battleground of the bulls and bears for a while..usually. Many breakouts out of the range will be attempted but most will fail. Aprox 70% of the time breakouts will fail. So, if price has been in a range and goes to the top of the range one can short it knowing that the probabilities favor a breakout of the range failing and price reversing at the point of resistance. If one then actually shorts at the resistance tof the range then ones trades is, yes, contributing somewhat to the selling pressure. However, it is institutions that will drive the price back inside the range. That is, the bearish institutions. The bullish ones will let price drop to the support level in the range then they will buy driving price up. Price is always trying to break out of the range top or bottom hence it s a battle between the bulls and the bears. One can look at the price action within the range and sometimes get a fair idea which direction the breakout will take when a successful breakout does eventually occur.

 

So..a range is a pattern. Devising a trading system off of such a pattern can be profitible and in itself will contribute to the pattern being formed. It can be automated or discretionary. It can be software driven or simply visual. It can be accomplished trading off a computer screen or handmade charts. It doesn't matter. Trends in the form of breakouts and channels....with pullbacks...pennants..triangles...will always be there. Ranges will always be there....with wedges..micro channels.. pullbacks nested in the ranges. These patterns form because of human nature and the nature of the markets and the insuing battles between the bearish and bullish institutions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Patuca. Are you saying that the 70-80% of the volume coming from institutions are pure technical trading? Would you guess that the share of fundamental trading is 20-30% then? Even though most mutual-funds and big players invest fundamentally, they most likely do very few trades compared to technical traders and especially HFT. But I also have heard that some of the algorithmic trading is just big players buying or selling based on fundamental analysis, but they use algorithmic trading systems to be able to buy/sell optimally without affecting the price to much, isn't that true?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Patuca. Are you saying that the 70-80% of the volume coming from institutions are pure technical trading? Would you guess that the share of fundamental trading is 20-30% then? Even though most mutual-funds and big players invest fundamentally, they most likely do very few trades compared to technical traders and especially HFT. But I also have heard that some of the algorithmic trading is just big players buying or selling based on fundamental analysis, but they use algorithmic trading systems to be able to buy/sell optimally without affecting the price to much, isn't that true?

I would say about 70% of trading volume is algo ..hft ...many, if not most of these being institutions. That is, this 70 percent are daily fighting it out in the market trying to grab their slice of the pie in tiny profits but lots of volume. Millions of shares...contracts..turning over daily. The other 25% of the volume is institutions...fundamental and technical..etc. The last 5% of the volume is generated by pipsqueaks like you and me all most other traders on these forums...the gamut of retail traders..etc.

 

The 70% don't actually give much direction to markets. They are going for tiny 1..2..3... ticks profit on piles of contracts...pennies on shares over and over all day long via algo...numerous hft programs back and forth..back and forth....

 

The other 25% do move the markets and give it direction. The 5% basically give little to no direction to the market.

 

I may be off on the percentages but i think pretty close. It could be 75..20..5..

 

That is why i don't worry about hft. Many institutions are not going to mess around with hft. Alot of others will. My only concern for hft is a program going rogue ...i.e. Like what happened to knight here a while back and the flash crash a few years back. Otherwise, hft may actualy be helping pipsqueak traders by providing liquidity....like we really need it...whatever...

 

Yes, I am sure some fundamental firms use algos too..they would be in the 25% and yes they would be market movers.

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frane,

 

Admirable questions. In case you haven't 'settled this yet, I’ll add more. We’ll show “"One idiot can ask more questions than ten wise men can answer."” how it’s done. :rofl: Seriously, it was a good idea for ARTjoMS to challenge your underlying assumptions, constructs, paradigms, models…There are no other objective tests / easy places to look that will substitute for sustained self exploration to discover the salient operational characteristics of your ‘marketDNA’. Questions questions questions…

 

Like.. Have you really looked to see if the two categories - technical and fundamental - provide an adequate categorization framework for you?

For example: Fundamental and technical traders seek truth. Between/around them are hoards of traders and algos who will accept, even seek, the current STORY/lie for their information… and there are multiple categories within those hoards…Anyways, in pure form, fundamental traders seek to discover true value regardless of the string of stories that emerges. In pure form, technical traders also seek to exclude the story from their choice making. They really want their decisions made sans the Story’s influence.

Truthseekers don’t deny the story (ie exclusion is not the same as denial). They just seek an information system that doesn’t rely on the content of the current story.

 

NO ONE can avoid patterns. Each trader’s marketDNA predisposes what patterns s/he can readily include and which ones will be ignored or excluded - sometimes even to the point of opposing (except on trading forums of course - where no one has ever discounted / trashed someone else’s marketDNA or slammed stochastics or…). Some deny they utilize patterns… not realizing their brains are just using patterns that have been anointed as NOT Patterns. And briefly…

every hft algo attempts to replicate what the marketDNA of its progenitors would do at their best.

…to the “volume” questions...

 

“market movers.” … Will it work for you to see certain groups or categories and percentages as what ‘moves’ the market? Would knowing the aggregate percentages really be useful to/in your marketDNA? Even if you knew the absolute tendencies of those percentages you ask about, is the variance in those percentages across a session, a week, a season, an epoch extremely high?

 

 

…10000 shares this second is not the same as 10000 shares in the same or next second. ‘Volume’, even HUGE volume, that accepts the bid or ask does not move the market. Influxes of volume willing to buy above the bid (or sell below the ask) is what moves the market.

 

Re:

“…enough people are trading according to some indicator, it would be possible to develop a system exploiting this. Why is this not so common? Is it because technical trading is so rare that it has no impact on the stock price, or is it because so many different systems are used that it averages out or becomes random noise, or is there some other reason?”

Those were perfect questions for traders from ~ 1979 to ~ 1995. Then, “a system exploiting this” really was ‘common’ . During that time groups of floor and near floor traders knew what technical traders were looking for and more importantly they knew what limited subset of timeframes their ‘patterns ‘ were being found on. Ie way back when, a portion of floor traders had the marketDNA to know what patterns were being watched by the outside and which time frames were being utilized. (the term ‘timeframes’ being used here much the same way as James Dalton used it) AND they could engineer sufficient influxes of volume willing to buy above the bid (or sell below the ask) to fade a “technical” pattern PLUS they were privy to timely information about whether the ‘campaign’ was working or not and could quickly bail if not… now that’s an Edge ;) No more. A geometric explosion in the quantity of possible timeframes made it to “like a drop in the ocean indeed” and has largely eliminated theEdge available in fading the ‘technical’ patterns of that day.

So, the old technical patterns multiplied themselves out of usefulness - except for a few with exceptional marketDNA for it. But are the same ‘fading games’ still being run on the Story of the day - like they used to run on the ‘technical of the day’? Do far more have marketDNA for running these fadegames on the Story of the day than ever had the marketDNA to ‘exploit’/fade ‘technicals”. Has fadegame on the Story subsided at all?

Not that we’re running low on idiot questions - but here’s another one…

Have you studied ‘old-school’ VSA? (the ‘story’ part - not the ‘volume pattern’ part)

 

btw in case I didn’t say it before - You are asking excellent questions.

 

I don’t have time to continue… or fill in the ...'s

... would love to post some references … but alas, they are not allowed in here. (especially if they challenge Story/lie in any way)

… TL has become a perfect example of what happens to exchange in an over-regulated environment.

 

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say about 70% of trading volume is algo ..hft ...many, if not most of these being institutions. That is, this 70 percent are daily fighting it out in the market trying to grab their slice of the pie in tiny profits but lots of volume. Millions of shares...contracts..turning over daily. The other 25% of the volume is institutions...fundamental and technical..etc. The last 5% of the volume is generated by pipsqueaks like you and me all most other traders on these forums...the gamut of retail traders..etc.

 

The 70% don't actually give much direction to markets. They are going for tiny 1..2..3... ticks profit on piles of contracts...pennies on shares over and over all day long via algo...numerous hft programs back and forth..back and forth....

 

The other 25% do move the markets and give it direction. The 5% basically give little to no direction to the market.

 

I may be off on the percentages but i think pretty close. It could be 75..20..5..

 

That is why i don't worry about hft. Many institutions are not going to mess around with hft. Alot of others will. My only concern for hft is a program going rogue ...i.e. Like what happened to knight here a while back and the flash crash a few years back. Otherwise, hft may actualy be helping pipsqueak traders by providing liquidity....like we really need it...whatever...

 

Yes, I am sure some fundamental firms use algos too..they would be in the 25% and yes they would be market movers.

 

All players are important in the market. Large and small. Short or long in terms of both direction and time in the market.

 

HFT or algos, or whatever you would like to refer to them as, are the trading idiots. Idiot in the sense that they trade with a finite set of rules.

 

You don't have do be brilliant to make money in the market. Even an idiot can exploit an arbitrage opportunity while it exists with the right set of instructions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All players are important in the market. Large and small. Short or long in terms of both direction and time in the market.

 

HFT or algos, or whatever you would like to refer to them as, are the trading idiots. Idiot in the sense that they trade with a finite set of rules.

 

You don't have do be brilliant to make money in the market. Even an idiot can exploit an arbitrage opportunity while it exists with the right set of instructions.

 

I wouldn't go so far as to say... "idiots". These "things" are designed to trade against each other... some do it with a great deal of success, and I would say that there are some brilliant people behind the effort.

 

This is my take on it (and it is agreed that I am an idiot): There is no way that anyone other than "god almighty" can understand fully what goes on in the market. It's so complex, and there are so many variables... who could comprehend such things? It's like asking why each leaf on a tree is different from one to the next. The retail trader need only concern him/her self with who is winning the struggle in what ever time frame you have chosen to trade in. It's a struggle that goes on everyday. And to MM's post... "you don't have to be brilliant".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the good answers. I have done some research on my own as well. Just to mention some, I have come across a book "Trade The Trader", which is about the same topic and watched the videos by Martin Cole (Market Makers Method) on youtube. I am surprised why there is so little information about this kind of stuff compared to the millions of books and websites teaching the same old patterns and indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By FMIND5
      Hello traders,
      I am interested in order flow trading and I will post some trades and predictions, some articles and ideology of a bit different understanding how price moves and why. May be this forum will be the right place. So, for the start I have  couple of charts of recent trade on oil. Also I did some comparison of two different software. Would be great to meet some traders who use order flow too. Lets see. I have a lots ideas and strategies to share. I don't use any traditional indicators, because just numbers are important for me.
       
       
       


    • By trading4life
      Hello, My name is trading4life.
      I just joined this forum.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date : 26th June 2019. MACRO EVENTS & NEWS OF 26th June 2019.FX News Today A less than dovish comment from Fed dove Bullard, with the Chairman Powell soothed a bit, and along with the usual trade uncertainty and US-Iran concerns, all combined with softer US data to take Wall Street and Treasury yields lower overnight. Hence in Asia session, the rally on bond markets run out of steam and stocks struggled as optimism on an immediate rate cut from the Fed and a breakthrough in US-Sino trade talk fades. Fed Chair Powell repeated the phrase the Fed is “closely monitoring“. He highlighted downside risks to the economy again, but didn’t go beyond last week’s guidance on rates. Presidents Trump and Xi are likely to meet on Saturday, where they may agree to reopen trade talks. Source stories meanwhile suggest that the US is willing to suspend the next round of China tariffs if trade talks resume, but Trump and Xi Jinping are not expected to agree on a detailed trade deal at the G-20 meeting. Against that background stock markets struggled during the Asian session. Topix and Nikkei corrected -0.71% and -0.70% respectively The RBNZ kept rates at record lows, but said further cuts may be needed. The WTI future is trading at $59.10 per barrel amid US-Iran tensions. German consumer confidence deteriorates. It fell back to 9.8 in the advance July reading. This is the lowest number since April 2017. Charts of the DayTechnician’s Corner EURCHF has found a footing into 1.10 area after coming under significant pressure last week, in the wake of ECB President Draghi’s eyebrow raising dovish shift, which has been the most notable of a growing chorus of dovish voices on the central bank’s governing council. Assuming the ECB remains on the path of further monetary policy easing ,the EURCHF is expected to retain a declining bias. The SNB’s -0.75% deposit rate and threat of tactical intervention hasn’t been sufficient to arrest recent appreciation of the Franc. Main Macro Events Today   ECB’s Mersch speech (EUR, GMT 08:00) BoE’s Governor Carney speech (GBP, GMT 09:00) Durable Goods (USD, GMT 12:30) – Durable goods orders are expected to be flat in May, after a -2.1% figure in April. Transportation orders should fall -0.5%. Boeing orders fell to just zero from a dismal 4 in April, with the hit from problems with the Boeing 737 Max that prompted buyers to delay new purchase commitments. Support and Resistance levels Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date : 25th June 2019. MACRO EVENTS & NEWS OF 25th June 2019.FX News Today Treasury yields extended declines in a quiet and cautious Monday action. The front end and belly of the curve mostly led the way on safe haven flows and as the FOMC’s more dovish than expected twist last Wednesday continued to support. Equities were little changed after a narrow, range bound trade. Tensions with Iran continued to drive cash into the safety of Treasuries, especially after President Trump announced he was placing more sanctions against its supreme leader and other top Iran officials has closed the path to a diplomatic solution (on the Ayatollah Khamenei, personally). US futures are down -0.2-0.5% as traders await Powell’s speech today. TheWTI future saw a high of $57.98 per barrel before pulling back slightly to now $57.45. Wall Street was in a more wait-and-see mode on the geopolitical risks, and as global markets await the U.S.-China trade talks at the G20 later in the week. Charts of the DayTechnician’s Corner EURUSD printed fresh 3-month highs just over 1.1411, up from 1.1380 lows at the open. The Euro moved to session highs after the weaker Dallas Fed index. The pairing ran into sellers at 1.1400, seeing a pullback to 1.1386 lows. Prospects for a July Fed rate cut continue to weigh on the Dollar, though soft EU data are likely to push the ECB toward further stimulus over the next few months, largely offsetting potential Fed policy easing. The March 20 high of 1.1448 is the next resistance level. Gold has printed five-plus year highs of $1,439.11, up from opening lows of $1,418.17. US/Iran tensions, along with potential for a Fed rate cut in July, and a weaker Dollar have all combined to put a bid under gold prices. The contract can be expected to remain in buy-the-dip mode for the foreseeable future, and continue to benefit from safe-haven flows on any fresh clashes in the Mideast. Main Macro Events Today NO OPEC Meeting in June –The dates of the separate OPEC ministerial meeting and of OPEC and its allies, known as OPEC+, have been changed to July 1-2, from June 25-26. CB Consumer Confidence (USD, GMT 14:00) – The Consumer Confidence is expected to slip to 133.5 in June from 134.1 in May, versus a 16-month low of 121.7 as recently as January and an 18-year high of 137.9 in October. Overall, confidence measures remain historically high. Fed’s Chair Powell speech (USD, GMT 17:00) Support and Resistance levels Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Yep, it's really uncomfortable to trade from tablet or Android. But for whom how
    • Ethereum Price Prediction: Long-term (ETH) Value Forecast – June 22   ETH/USD Long-term Trend: Ranging   ·         Resistance Levels: $300, $320, $340 ·         Support Levels: $280, $260, $240   The ETH/USD pair is now in a bullish trend. In the last one month, the price of Ethereum had been trading between the levels of $220 and $280. The bulls had made several attempts to break out this range but to no avail. On June 21, the bulls broke the $280 upper price range and reached the previous high of $315 price level.   The 12-day EMA and the 26-day EMA are trending  northward indicating an uptrend. A trend line has been drawn to determine the duration of the bullish trend. If a bullish trend is ongoing, the candlestick will test the trend line and make an upward move to the previous highs or new highs.   eETH/USD pair is still in a bullish trend. However, if price breaks the trend line and another candlestick closes on the opposite of it; the bullish trend is said to be terminated. The ETH price is expected to reach a high of $340 price level. Meanwhile, the MACD line and the signal line are above the zero line which indicates a buy signal.     The views and opinions expressed here do not reflect that of BitcoinExchangeGuide.com and do not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research.                                                                                                                   Top of Form                             Source: www.bitcoinexchangeguide.com     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.