Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Enigmatics

Psychology of Managing Trades for an Income

Recommended Posts

I was just sitting here ruminating over a non-decision I made today with a certain stock that pulled back slightly on me as I tend to get very OCD sometimes about decisions I "should've" made. I'm up pretty nicely for the month on 4 other trades though. It's the largest month I've had ever. I could've been up about 5 times what I've made though ...... but I chose to take profits on two stocks that hadn't hit my targets yet. The mental relationship to being up the most I've ever been in a month was just too strong and overtook my ability to stick with my analysis/convictions.

 

Alas, the stock today was reacting stubbornly from a mix of OPEX shenanigans, shorts trying to hold the last line of defense, and profit taking from last week's big move. I had multiple opportunities to exit the stock at or slightly above break-even ...... but as the ego would have it, I couldn't get myself to pull the plug. Clearly there was some fear-based decision factoring "Well what if it starts to move". The irony is, what is the worst that can happen? I can always re-enter. Not quite sure why that was such a tough conclusion to come to and execute.

 

At any rate. For those of you who trade for income ..... how do you juggle expectancy in terms of targets with the necessity of needing to also book profit every month? Some of you are well beyond that stage because you've padded the account so much that you have now afforded yourselves the "patience" required to sit back and let the trade attempt to fulfill your analysis. I might even be answering my own question with that last part in a sense that I am not at that level where my account is padded in such a way.

 

I'm constantly waffling over whether it's better to stack compound gains or stick to my longer targets though. I feel like part of the reason I held that stock today was because of the profits I missed by selling two previous stocks prematurely. So I've gone from "Damn, I sold those too early" to "I should've taken profit". I feel it's in my best interest to get this mentally flip-flopping under control.

Edited by Enigmatics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:2c: make of it what you will as it is completely subjective......

 

What you have is not unusual.....and is at the core of one of the great trade offs in trading.

The trade off between taking profits and letting them run and compound. The aim for consistency v capturing those extra profits if they appear. (even hedge fund types have this dilemma - the trade off between steady positive but small returns v setting the world on fire)

and when doing it as a portfolio of different stocks you were influencing one set of trades over another thinking it makes a difference, leaning on a trade based on what happened elsewhere......dangerous.

 

IMHO....If you need to actually get income from it and you are being focused with the ability to get back on, with little worry, and good entries etc....then stick to that. Dont start thinking 'could of, should of would of' - it will likely stuff up what you are doing well.

Dont lean on one trade based on previous different trading decisions and outcomes.

 

You reached the best conclusion when wavering - exit - as you can always get back in.

 

If you wish to let things run, then treat it as a separate strategy, separate account, separate pool of money - i was never able to chop and change between the two strategies at will in the same accounts - exactly because of the flip flopping you are having.

 

(I have also only seen one person do it well, but he had a big account, lots of stocks and arguably some inside info where he really made his money - whoops I mean enhanced information flow. While other traders I know who require the income find they trade best when they just keep chipping away at taking profits and they best spend their time waiting for opportunities. They have the same issue, but find various solutions )

 

Combining Long term and short term in the same accounts will probably also lead you to self deception in records and mindset - Only by separation can you accurately measure what works for you , what feels comfortable, what you want to actually do, and which is likely most profitable. You might need to build enough of an account for this....but if the short term trading is good - leverage it a bit more for extra kick????

 

You need to find a trick/a measure to work out when out are flip flopping and a solution - exit, separate accounts, more leverage and reward the extra PL by using a different strategy - or you will likely hurt what you do well rather than improve what you do badly.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can earn a year's profit in one month or week. Why try to book profit every day or so, as if it were a per hour job? Anxiety?

 

As for the "you can always get back in" part, I 've always found very easier said than done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can earn a year's profit in one month or week. Why try to book profit every day or so, as if it were a per hour job? Anxiety?

 

As for the "you can always get back in" part, I 've always found very easier said than done.

 

You can .... but are you "guaranteed"? Obviously never. My point was if you don't have a lot of cushion in the account and you have to trade for income, sometimes it gets tougher to sit there and let the position do its thing as the clock is ticking for you to book profit to make ends meet.

 

For someone who's up considerably in their account (let's say 6months reserves, etc) they can just sit back patiently letting the trade attempt to fulfill the determined targets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can .... but are you "guaranteed"? Obviously never. My point was if you don't have a lot of cushion in the account and you have to trade for income, sometimes it gets tougher to sit there and let the position do its thing as the clock is ticking for you to book profit to make ends meet.

 

For someone who's up considerably in their account (let's say 6months reserves, etc) they can just sit back patiently letting the trade attempt to fulfill the determined targets.

 

Even if you dont need to book the income - the issue will remain - which is why you need to work out a trick/method (?) to get around this.

 

Kuokam has a point, but that is exactly it - if you get out and cant get back in, there are probably other issues. Once again it goes back to strategy and sticking to it - whatever it is. Everything in trading is easier said than done, so do more of the the things that work and are easy, and less of the things that are hard and dont work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even if you dont need to book the income - the issue will remain - which is why you need to work out a trick/method (?) to get around this.

 

Kuokam has a point, but that is exactly it - if you get out and cant get back in, there are probably other issues. Once again it goes back to strategy and sticking to it - whatever it is. Everything in trading is easier said than done, so do more of the the things that work and are easy, and less of the things that are hard and dont work.

 

I can only speak for myself personally, but it would appear when I don't have bills in the back of my mind, I trade better ..... I'm more willing to sit back and let my trade attempt to fulfill my analysis. I know that sounds ironic given that I'm trading for income.

 

The issue with getting out and getting back in, again has to do with my analysis of the position at the time as it is doing it's thing. My perception of the "I need to pay bills" often does get in the middle of things and start casting doubt over the viability of hitting the target by the end of the month. It then grabs the trading wheel and takes the profit, eliminating that uncomfortable moment when you acknowledge uncertainty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that your primary role as a trader is to manage risk. Use these emotions as an indicator to tell you when to scale out a bit, I find locking in profits while maintaining a position to be a confidence booster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can only speak for myself personally, but it would appear when I don't have bills in the back of my mind, I trade better ..... I'm more willing to sit back and let my trade attempt to fulfill my analysis. I know that sounds ironic given that I'm trading for income.

 

The issue with getting out and getting back in, again has to do with my analysis of the position at the time as it is doing it's thing. My perception of the "I need to pay bills" often does get in the middle of things and start casting doubt over the viability of hitting the target by the end of the month. It then grabs the trading wheel and takes the profit, eliminating that uncomfortable moment when you acknowledge uncertainty.

 

It sounds like you are really reinforcing an aspect of that old saying - "only trade with money you can afford to lose."

 

It happens when other motivations influence the mind as well. Which is why I think the idea of a set strategy, set of rules, mandate etc is important.

Prop traders will alter their behaviour if they are paid a percentage of their income in much the same way if there are caps, time limits etc. When bonus structures change their mindset it will be the same result. They will hollow log, fudge numbers, deny, or sit on their hands pretending to be busy.

Hedge fund managers even have similar issues - a small up months every month are more highly rewarded by investors than big wins and extra PL volatility - even if on a risk reward basis one way makes more money and has a better risk reward profile....it still affects the mindset.

In all sorts of ways these affect people with various amounts of money or motivations. So dont feel like you are alone in this.

You need to know and understand - and either incorporate feelings into the strategy methodically or ignore them.....a half half approach probably wont work IMHO.

 

Another trick is to look only at % - it standardizes the amounts.

If you are thinking in terms of - this trade cost/made me a nice dinner/car/holiday/house then you will always mind f..k yourself. If you think in % you will be able to say, normally this type of trade makes x%, we are now at X+y% which normallysays I should lighten off its easier to quantify.

 

(War story fade in fade out. I was sitting at a desk when two guys running a very dodgy fund - they had no real strategy and were essentially salesmen. They were discussing what to do. They had 4 macro positions on that all went their way in one day they made 7% over about 2 days when their yearly target was only about 12% and they did not know what to do......I pointed out the obvious above simple maths, and then added - you can always put the trades back on the next day/week/month, but you should lock it in as that is your job/aim/mandate.....after another 30mins discussion they exited their positions.

The next day it all reversed, they would have lost half the gains....they were busy patting themselves on the back about how smart they were...:doh: --- their fund is now down about 30% over the last 4 years. To anyone watching what they were doing as an outsider it seemed obvious, but they were blinded by the lights like the bunnies/muppets they were (I have a history with these f,,,wits)) but I am sure you get the point.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I wondered whether it might be useful for you to try to distinguish whether the issue is:

 

a) a psychological/disciplinary issue to do with following a strategy?

 

b) an issue of what the best parameters for the strategy would actually be, based on your need to generate relatively steady income?

 

Hope that's helpful . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not taken a single trade since August 13th and I've only conducted 5 trades the entire month. My total profit output is twice that of what I need for my monthly bills and is the largest month I've ever had. In the past it would've taken me 25+ trades to hit my monthly numbers. The results are not surprising to me though. I finally stopped trading options full-time. I have focused my efforts on trading the actual stock and I've backed out of the smaller/noisier intervals (2min/5min) in favor of the longer ones.

 

That being said, it's kind of strange. There have been 4 prime opportunities (each fit all my criteria) that I passed on since August 13th, simply because I'm happy with the month I've had and do not want to do anything to jeopardize it. Clearly that is not a T/A-related decision, moreso a "relationship to money" one. I'm just trying to get to the point where I'm not second guessing myself for not taking those extra trades. It's inevitable that I'm going to have to get back on the horse again at some point. But I know from my experience with my method, there will be enough opportunity in the following month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it were me I would still be trading because I prefer to limit losses, not wins.

 

Per day/week/month.

 

Precisely...

 

 

Enigmatics,

 

a "relationship to money" one

is one of the ways of keeping yourself just inside the cusp of ‘pack membership in the mean’, etc, etc, or etc. or ... pick your way of describing choking, folks … regardless of how good your method always is “next month”...

 

mark my words – you will ultimately need any and all those outsized gains foregone via “Psychology of Managing Trades for an Income...”, or however they are foregone ...

 

In another thread someone mentioned learning from Larry Williams. Instead of oops bullsht, a much more important ‘thang’ to learn from Larry Williams is to press your runs hard... (and no, before you think this is all gamblee jankee - that doesn’t mean going reckless in sizing, mm, etc. at all!... )

 

Wishing you all the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe this is the month you could have earned a year's profit. But if you have a method that make all months equal, then I understand you acting as you did. But I thought you were expressing some dissatisfaction?

 

 

I have not taken a single trade since August 13th and I've only conducted 5 trades the entire month. My total profit output is twice that of what I need for my monthly bills and is the largest month I've ever had. In the past it would've taken me 25+ trades to hit my monthly numbers. The results are not surprising to me though. I finally stopped trading options full-time. I have focused my efforts on trading the actual stock and I've backed out of the smaller/noisier intervals (2min/5min) in favor of the longer ones.

 

That being said, it's kind of strange. There have been 4 prime opportunities (each fit all my criteria) that I passed on since August 13th, simply because I'm happy with the month I've had and do not want to do anything to jeopardize it. Clearly that is not a T/A-related decision, moreso a "relationship to money" one. I'm just trying to get to the point where I'm not second guessing myself for not taking those extra trades. It's inevitable that I'm going to have to get back on the horse again at some point. But I know from my experience with my method, there will be enough opportunity in the following month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it were me I would still be trading because I prefer to limit losses, not wins.

 

Per day/week/month.

 

 

,

is one of the ways of keeping yourself just inside the cusp of ‘pack membership in the mean’, etc, etc, or etc. or ... pick your way of describing choking, folks … regardless of how good your method always is “next month”...

 

mark my words – you will ultimately need any and all those outsized gains foregone via “Psychology of Managing Trades for an Income...”, or however they are foregone ...

 

In another thread someone mentioned learning from Larry Williams. Instead of oops bullsht, a much more important ‘thang’ to learn from Larry Williams is to press your runs hard... (and no, before you think this is all gamblee jankee - that doesn’t mean going reckless in sizing, mm, etc. at all!... )

 

Wishing you all the best,

 

zdo

 

Trust me, I understand everything the two of you are saying. That is another step I'll inevitably need to take. It's why I'm sitting here questioning my decision to sit tight til the end of the month. I mean today I had a nice 90 tick opportunity in a stock that I follow closey, but I just couldn't get myself to pull the trigger. That little internal voice was yelling at me "Don't screw up the month you're having!"

 

Maybe this is the month you could have earned a year's profit. But if you have a method that make all months equal, then I understand you acting as you did. But I thought you were expressing some dissatisfaction?

 

Can't remember if I previously mentioned it in this thread, but I had two positions at the beginning of the month that I bailed prematurely on before my targets were hit. I did it simply because I had never been up that much so early in the month. Had I held, we're talking five months worth of cushion.

 

I definitely trust in the fact that based on my methodology there is enough opportunity every month ..... but yes, I am experiencing some dissatisfaction with my decision to sit tight due to my pragmatic mindset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trust me, I understand everything the two of you are saying. That is another step I'll inevitably need to take. It's why I'm sitting here questioning my decision to sit tight til the end of the month. I mean today I had a nice 90 tick opportunity in a stock that I follow closey, but I just couldn't get myself to pull the trigger. That little internal voice was yelling at me "Don't screw up the month you're having!"

 

 

 

Can't remember if I previously mentioned it in this thread, but I had two positions at the beginning of the month that I bailed prematurely on before my targets were hit. I did it simply because I had never been up that much so early in the month. Had I held, we're talking five months worth of cushion.

 

I definitely trust in the fact that based on my methodology there is enough opportunity every month ..... but yes, I am experiencing some dissatisfaction with my decision to sit tight due to my pragmatic mindset.

 

FWIW - I also agree with Sun trader and Zdo, but I think you are also doing the right thing for you at present.

You need to get comfortable and be able to make a decision which strategy to follow or have tactics to know when to push, and the belief/knowledge/trust that your system will produce enough opportunity every month is a good thing as it allows you patience.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, and I can equally imagine you writing another thread where the opposite occurred - ie; you wanted to push and let things run and yet they all reversed, what then would the mindset and advice be??? This profession is a continual trade off, work out the trade off and then stop meddling.

 

Dont sit and just question what if (if you are getting nervous about pulling the trigger this sounds like what is happening) - design what you would have done differently, how you might profit more next time, what scenarios might have occurred especially while its fresh in your mind, how to keep going and not sitting on the past trades. This will be a very handy reference when you choose to push trades next time or not.

We delude ourselves and referencing past ideas to put things in perspective is a pretty humbling tool. This is the opportunity to do this, not when the moment has passed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Had I held, we're talking five months worth of cushion...

 

 

Did you get out when you should have stayed in? If so, then was it because of a lack of nerve or a misread of the market? Or, do you wish you had stayed in, but there was no reasonable and objective reason for you to stay in, given your methodology?

 

Another question: given your behavior for the month, would you typically have done the same thing if you had 2 losses? In other words, do you quit trading when you have losses too or do you continue trading, but only stop trading when you have decent wins?

 

You don't have to answer these questions publicly, but you do have to have decent answers to these questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you get out when you should have stayed in? If so, then was it because of a lack of nerve or a misread of the market? Or, do you wish you had stayed in, but there was no reasonable and objective reason for you to stay in, given your methodology?

 

With the first two trades I conducted this month, I exited prematurely simply because of how much I was up. It was a sizable amount and gave me some breathing room. My methodology had not given me any reason to exit the trade though.

 

Another question: given your behavior for the month, would you typically have done the same thing if you had 2 losses? In other words, do you quit trading when you have losses too or do you continue trading, but only stop trading when you have decent wins?

 

You don't have to answer these questions publicly, but you do have to have decent answers to these questions.

 

It's a very fair question and I'll be the first to admit that there are times when I continue to trade. Since I do it for a living and do not have large reserves, if I'm down on the month I have to continue to try to make money. However, I do have a daily loss limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.