Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

Bespoke Leverage

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was wondering whether anyone who has a wider knowledge of the derivatives universe than I do could suggest any instrument that offers a moderate amount of leverage?

 

As far as I am aware there is a complete jump from the x3 ETFs to the Futures that are 50:1. The ETFs are obviously geared towards Buy-and-Hold, and the Futures towards very short term traders with smaller accounts or longer term traders with lots of capital.

 

Is there anything in the gap between these?

 

Thanks,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because the leverage is there does not mean you have to use it, hence anything with 50 to 1 means that its just the maximum.

It is up to you to have determine what leverage you want 'in between' and while providers may offer instruments, I dont know if there is much of a market for them to be offering too many varying structures/products just because.....

Plus dont forget the various futures leverage does change depending on volatility and exchange margins.

Brokers also may offer various leverage in different accounts - sometimes they offer portfolio accounts with more leverage based on offsetting positions (one long one short) or simply cash accounts that need to be fully funded.

Basically - there are already enough options available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just because the leverage is there does not mean you have to use it, hence anything with 50 to 1 means that its just the maximum.

It is up to you to have determine what leverage you want 'in between' and while providers may offer instruments, I dont know if there is much of a market for them to be offering too many varying structures/products just because.....

Plus dont forget the various futures leverage does change depending on volatility and exchange margins.

Brokers also may offer various leverage in different accounts - sometimes they offer portfolio accounts with more leverage based on offsetting positions (one long one short) or simply cash accounts that need to be fully funded.

Basically - there are already enough options available.

 

Hi SIUYA,

 

Thanks for your reply. I'm confused . . . :confused:

 

I understand that you don't have to use the leverage, but trading an ES contract with a $12.5 tick value means that (as I write) you'd need about $76,000 in the account not to require any leverage. A single share of the SPY ETF (also un-leveraged) is currently about $152. What lies between the two in terms of borrowed funding, anything?

 

Or to put it another way, if my worst drawdown using a 3:1 ETF is 15% and I'm happy to weather a 30% drawdown, how can I get 6:1 leverage? To get that on a single ES contract requires $13,000 deposited, but if I want to hold a portfolio of 10 similar instruments then that's $130,000 - a bit more than I can afford!

 

Any suggestions are much appreciated.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe i am confused.

 

For the ES - if no leverage is requiring $76,000 in an account BUT you only have to have (I dont trade the ES so i am guessing at $5000).... $5000 per contract so you can have a wide range of leverage options if you have the full $76,000 (between 1 to 76/5=15 contracts)

So you can have anywhere between 1-15 times in this example here.

If you want 6 times, then deposit only $35000 to trade 6 contracts, and leave the rest in a separate bank account maybe?

 

For your example of getting 6:1 from a 3:1 instrument - well either a broker allows you to buy on margin, OR you borrow twice as much externally and deposit twice the amount more money. No different - look at total exposure.

 

If you are then talking about holding 10 similar instruments well then you will effectively be holding 10 times 1 instrument. Thats a lot of leverage - some brokers offer portfolio margin accounts that use offsets, but even then they still usually dont offer too much leverage - they have limits. A 30% drawdown if you are leveraged three times will see your account pretty much gone!

I reckon you are correct that one way of viewing it is how much can you borrow separate to the broker - this is not the easiest way, but a way of looking at it.

 

Whats to stop you borrowing 100k against a house that worth 500k with house equity of 400k then leveraging that up 10 times and trading like you have 1 mil....do you have 10 times leverage, or not???

or do you only have 400k leveraged to 1mil.

With 100k in an account you can probably manage to control that pretty easily. Make 10% a year on a mil, but its 100k on the account - sell that to someone!

 

(I am conservative and look at over all exposure - not just how many contracts can I trade, but everyone is different)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maybe i am confused.

 

For the ES - if no leverage is requiring $76,000 in an account BUT you only have to have (I dont trade the ES so i am guessing at $5000).... $5000 per contract so you can have a wide range of leverage options if you have the full $76,000 (between 1 to 76/5=15 contracts)

So you can have anywhere between 1-15 times in this example here.

If you want 6 times, then deposit only $35000 to trade 6 contracts, and leave the rest in a separate bank account maybe?

 

For your example of getting 6:1 from a 3:1 instrument - well either a broker allows you to buy on margin, OR you borrow twice as much externally and deposit twice the amount more money. No different - look at total exposure.

 

If you are then talking about holding 10 similar instruments well then you will effectively be holding 10 times 1 instrument. Thats a lot of leverage - some brokers offer portfolio margin accounts that use offsets, but even then they still usually dont offer too much leverage - they have limits. A 30% drawdown if you are leveraged three times will see your account pretty much gone!

I reckon you are correct that one way of viewing it is how much can you borrow separate to the broker - this is not the easiest way, but a way of looking at it.

 

Whats to stop you borrowing 100k against a house that worth 500k with house equity of 400k then leveraging that up 10 times and trading like you have 1 mil....do you have 10 times leverage, or not???

or do you only have 400k leveraged to 1mil.

With 100k in an account you can probably manage to control that pretty easily. Make 10% a year on a mil, but its 100k on the account - sell that to someone!

 

(I am conservative and look at over all exposure - not just how many contracts can I trade, but everyone is different)

 

Hi SIUYA,

 

I think that's pretty much the answer I was expecting, but it's useful to compare my understanding - leverage is the sort of "boring" thing that books like to skip over.

 

I've been looking at a long-only trend-following type strategy with ETFs that ought to be suitable for a retirement account. The average yearly return in testing is about 8% but the drawdowns are relatively small (and unlike a stock, I can't see an ETF tracking all commodities or world real estate etc falling to zero), so I was wondering whether it is possible to get more juice out of it with a little leverage. But clearly the increased return is going to be hit by the cost of borrowing (wherever that's from).

 

Thanks for your help!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SIUYA,

 

I think that's pretty much the answer I was expecting, but it's useful to compare my understanding - leverage is the sort of "boring" thing that books like to skip over.

 

I've been looking at a long-only trend-following type strategy with ETFs that ought to be suitable for a retirement account. The average yearly return in testing is about 8% but the drawdowns are relatively small (and unlike a stock, I can't see an ETF tracking all commodities or world real estate etc falling to zero), so I was wondering whether it is possible to get more juice out of it with a little leverage. But clearly the increased return is going to be hit by the cost of borrowing (wherever that's from).

 

Thanks for your help!

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

The other great miss use of leverage is in quoting returns as well - today i made 500% - tomorrow I lost the lot!

Its boring and skipped over because often its a tough one to explain to people as everyone has their idea about what is safe, whats not, what is leverage, what not.....try telling people how to use lots of leverage using options with little exposure these days - they think you are selling sub prime, even if you are not.

 

The only book I know of that will help you do exactly what you are describing is this one

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Practical-Guide-ETF-Trading-Systems/dp/1906659273

 

(There may be others) I have not read this but have seen enough reviews from people who I know trade like this that it has some relevant information to be worthwhile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The other great miss use of leverage is in quoting returns as well - today i made 500% - tomorrow I lost the lot!

Its boring and skipped over because often its a tough one to explain to people as everyone has their idea about what is safe, whats not, what is leverage, what not.....try telling people how to use lots of leverage using options with little exposure these days - they think you are selling sub prime, even if you are not.

 

The only book I know of that will help you do exactly what you are describing is this one

A Practical Guide to ETF Trading Systems: A systematic approach to trading exchange-traded funds: Amazon.co.uk: Anthony Garner: Books

 

(There may be others) I have not read this but have seen enough reviews from people who I know trade like this that it has some relevant information to be worthwhile.

 

 

 

Thanks for the recommendation - that looks good! Amazon are listing it alongside the Ivy Portfolio which is one of the other good books I've read on this topic.

 

Cheers!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

I was wondering whether anyone who has a wider knowledge of the derivatives universe than I do could suggest any instrument that offers a moderate amount of leverage?

 

As far as I am aware there is a complete jump from the x3 ETFs to the Futures that are 50:1. The ETFs are obviously geared towards Buy-and-Hold, and the Futures towards very short term traders with smaller accounts or longer term traders with lots of capital.

 

Is there anything in the gap between these?

 

Thanks,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

The more is supposed period of holding the asset (and the more is amount of investment) the less is leverage. Standard rule of investment game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The more is supposed period of holding the asset (and the more is amount of investment) the less is leverage. Standard rule of investment game.

 

I guess investing in any avenue is always associated with certain risks so it is good to understand those risks while investing in any where.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.