Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Enigmatics

Is It Better to Trade a Basket of Stocks or Individual?

Recommended Posts

Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately you will then walk into another problem by having more instruments....that of correlation when you are wrong.

I dont know if there is one correct answer.

Previously I preferred to have multiple stocks - for largely the same reason you suggest - diversification.....however I also found it worth while putting a limit on how many of these you a....scanned and looked at and

b...hold or trade at any one time (I often found I had too many open and had to limit myself)

 

Alternatively a friend went the opposite way and he went a bit harder at the one he liked the most, and just kept plugging away at improving his "choosing" skills.....and had to just satisfy himself often he choose poorly.

(ultimately he still had more than one trade on at once usually but he preferred to concentrate)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

 

 

Best way is to trade a large folio of ETFs and use the cointegrations for hedging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the sounds of it, you should trade more than one stock. If you can't do it economically, then you are better off trading an index instead of trying to call a market with 1 stock.

 

An index won't give you the benefit you might get from selecting weak stocks. However, your weak stocks don't have to go down in a weak market either. Your experience with 1 stock will be duplicated with multiple stocks from time to time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on how you trade obviously. However, a decent scalper can make a living off just one good stock like GOOG, AAPL, PCLN, AMZN, NFLX, and many others. I did it for many years before switching to fiutures in 2008; I know other traders that are doing it right now. I think it is far easier to trade just one instrument, but most aspiring traders love to complicate what should be a simple task. Which is just one of the reasons for the high failure rate among active retail traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends on how you trade obviously. However, a decent scalper can make a living off just one good stock like GOOG, AAPL, PCLN, AMZN, NFLX, and many others. I did it for many years before switching to fiutures in 2008; I know other traders that are doing it right now. I think it is far easier to trade just one instrument, but most aspiring traders love to complicate what should be a simple task. Which is just one of the reasons for the high failure rate among active retail traders.

 

I believe much of what you're saying as well. Some of the guys I've bounced ideas off of over the last few years have moved entirely into futures. They find technical analysis to be much more reliable in that market.

 

The leverage scares me a little though with $50 a point on the /ES (which is what they trade).

 

But if I'm not in futures, then I'm trying to finally figure out the best thing to do here. Some days I feel like it's spreading my risk. Other days it seems sticking to AAPL options would be the way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason futures seem risky, is that to a large extent you can determine your own level of risk and leverage, much more so than with equities. Just because many futures firms offer $400 intraday margins on ES contracts, does not mean you should take advantage of it. They are attempting to attract the next group of low budget amatuers with those margins; they count on these under funded wanna be traders for business. I believe you should have at least 4k per ES contract that you want to trade. Even if you are an experienced trader, if only for psychological reasons. Look at this way, 1 point on the ES is $50 as you know. There are 4 ticks that make up that point, each worth $12.50. When I used to trade the ES, I knew that I needed 8 ticks to make my living each day. That's all you really need to be able to do each day. Trading 5 contracts you can pay your bills, trading 10 contracts, you are comfortable. Notice that I said contracts, I see a lot of pretend traders on the internet calling them cars. I have never known any full time futures trader who called a contract-----a car. It makes me laugh when I read this stuff. I have been a member here for a while, but I admit that I mostly come here for the comedy.

 

Here is something to consider. I have been trading full time since 1996. I know many people in the industry, many floor traders, etc. I have never met a single person who trades options for a living who is not on the floor, not a single one. I doubt there is a single person who trades options for a living on the retail end that can prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience has been that trading a single stock works best for me... several reasons:

 

1. The ATR, volatility, and liquidity mates up well with my trading system... once I have found that proper fit I'm going to trade it well consistently. Why trade anything else?

 

2. Trading the same stock day-in-day-out helps to develop a sense of "feel" for the way it trades. I notice that when I choose to trade something else that I will struggle for a few days until I pickup that "feel" again.

 

3. I may trade the same stock for weeks or even months. This cuts down on the amount of maintenance involved with trading from a basket... it's easier.

 

Trading from a basket can put you into the hot mover for the day or week... I had some success with trading this way, but my earnings were streaky. I'm far more consistent and my trading is more relaxed... like carrying on a conversation with someone I know and like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just trade the futures but I've been interested in trading a basket of stocks. For example, sorta like you're saying.. I can predict the entire market direction -- that's strategy but then there are "tactics". So, there is strategy and tactics.

 

Tactics is how we implement the strategy.. One idea with tactics is to minimize the cost of being wrong. There are a lot of possibilities in stocks that I don't have in just trading the futures.

 

You might pick the 5 strongest stocks to go long based on fundamentals or relative strength.

 

A lot of possibilities.. I think the line of thinking you are on has promise.

 

 

Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the OP, I recently came across (and signed up for) what seems like a legit new way of trading a basket of similar stocks at single issue prices. Both crazy, absurdly common sense, actually a "Why didn't I thing of that?" new idea, it would seem to provide a superior way to trade a basket of 30 stocks. Commis. of .33 an issue, $9.99 per basket, I mean duh! Anyone got any counter-arguemen after examining their offering?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Strategy is somewhat different bt less risky (atleast for me)..

It involves trading with 2 accounts . One is a Current account (Marginless and only for going long) , the other is the Margin account for only going short..

I go long only with my marginless account and put a sell limit order on the stocks (no matter how much time it takes to trigger the sell limit since there is going to be no margin call) while i short highly inflated stocks in my margin account and give them a buy-limit order (bt in this case i do have a stop-loss as there could be a margin call )..

I trade a bundle of stocks on both sides which kinda makes it a little bit of a hedging (though not much) and works well....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

 

I would rather say its always better to trade a basket of securities rather than an individual stock if you are risk aversion investor / trader because the risk is diversified in basket of securities and you can easily earn above average return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Best way is to trade a large folio of ETFs and use the cointegrations for hedging.

 

Rare to see someone say "Cointegration" on this board. Happy to see it

 

How do you calculate Cointegration Tommaso ?

 

or do you just trade the spreads according to the ETF as the peg?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

 

I wouldn't trade a stock in isolation, period. All things are correlated to one another. The real money is in determining leads and lags. How would you determine leads and lags for your chosen basket... By performing a backtest.

 

Could you share with us what stocks are currently in your basket?

 

Happy to see your looking into this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rare to see someone say "Cointegration" on this board. Happy to see it

 

How do you calculate Cointegration Tommaso ?

 

or do you just trade the spreads according to the ETF as the peg?

 

 

I use the SCX index

 

See here:

Metrics for Algorithmic Trading by Tom Gastaldi

 

and also here:

G-Bot Algorithmic Trading Project - Strategies

 

 

You need to invest in "essentially different" price moves. Or else you are just "overloading" the same investment (and can easily blow up without even realizing it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.