Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Harmonic Trading Patterns – The Gartley

Recommended Posts

Harold Gartley ran a stock market advisory firm in the 1930s that was one of the first advisory services to use technical chart analysis in its position trades. Gartley looked at stock market behavior in a way that revolutionized the way chart analysis is conducted and his research led to the development of what we now call harmonic trading. Gartley’s analysis did not actually use Fibonacci relationships to identify reversal points but the overall structure of Gartley’s patterns provided a basis for later traders to improve on his research and create higher probability trade setups.

 

Gartley’s trading structures, it was soon discovered, could be applied to any asset market and in the years since there have been many books, periodicals, trading applications and even new patterns that have been created. What this essentially means is that these patterns should not be viewed as static structures but instead as charting tools that can be researched and built upon.

 

The Gartley Structure

 

The Gartley pattern is a visually based geometric price pattern that uses both price and time to identify four consecutive price swings (a series of trend changes) that form structures that resemble “M” and “W” formations on a price chart. The “M” patters signal a bullish pattern is forming, where a “W” pattern signals a bearish pattern is forming. The overall structures relies on the development of an ABCD pattern (discussed previously) and this is preceded by a substantial price movement (the X point).

 

In practice, the Gartley pattern is a leading indicator that can help to forecast significant reversal points. Bearish patterns help to identify when short positions can be established of when long positions should be closed. In contrast, bullish Gartley patterns signal buy entries and closures in short positions.

 

Bullish Gartley

 

Bull-1.png

 

Bearish Gartley

 

Bear-1.png

 

Additional Characteristics

 

The Gartley pattern can be used in a variety of trading strategies, for example in intraday, position, or swing trades. Fibonacci retracements converge with Fibonacci extensions at the D point, which is the reversal level and trade entry. Ideally, the direction of X to A should match the direction of the larger trend. The move in total from A to D is representative of smaller correction within the larger trend. When the pattern develops on smaller time frames and matches the direction of the trend seen on larger time frames, probabilities are higher as well.

 

Pattern Calculations

 

The Gartley pattern becomes valid when the reversal points (the X, A, B, C, and D points) will come at a significant high or low within the time frame. These price swings comprise a series of 4 pattern legs that are essentially miniature moves within the larger structure. In the pattern movement from A to D, price should retrace 61.8% or 78.6% of the move from X to A. Without a properly structured ABCD pattern within the ABCD move, the Gartly structure becomes invalid.

 

Additionally, the time duration from the X to A move should match the move from A to D, in both proportion and ratio. The time duration of the A to D move tends to be seen at 61.8% or 161.8% of the X to A move. In some cases, the ABCD structure will finish at the 100% measurement of the double top created by the X to A move. When this occurs, the time duration of X to A should also match the previous move. Instances of pattern failure occur when prices surpass the X point, and this indicates that a much stronger trend is actually in place. When this happens, prices are generally seen continuing to the 127.2% or 161.8% extension of the move from X to A.

Bull.png.9665069a76409a3e828a0bea593e600f.png

Bear.png.34a658587a34e24c418ff9b990796999.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best book that I have found regarding the Gartley is Beck's "Gartley Trading Method". He incorporates research that he has done on various standard and non-standard ratios and discusses things that Pesavento does not, including the importance of the pattern before the Gartley forms. Worth the read, imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ole, I haven't read Beck's book, but it sounds pretty good. Pesavento, in hind sight, could have and should have done more, which he knows, but many other books have come out since that have certainly expanded on the subject. ironically, i've never really had much success using the gartley, but I do like the butterfly pattern with the Fib 127 ext. You typically get a bounce or reversal at that point or at the 1.618. Lots of different names have also come out for different formations. Not sure how well they all work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I pay very much attention the price patterns and they give very nice trading opportunities.

 

just an advice to those who want to trade according to gartley, wolfe etc, patterns: do not make any assumptions before the pattern is there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the US , is this the most “important” election ever or the least important election ever? Donald, is this what happens when you don’t keep your promises - like to drain the swamp? And  https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-adults-in-the-room-with-trump-werent-adults-at-all/ and he declassifies all kinds of stuff and they still won't let it out... and ... ...  swamp ain't drained     Of course, if he did drain the swamp, then would we get to see the deep state dirt below it in action ?... like a mostly fake plandemic engineered a to accelerate plans to remake the world economy by burning it down... while up here on TL it seems we quietly don’t care who’s behind all that...   Have a great weekend all
    • Ruthless plagiarisms just for you  We do have a pandemic, but it’a plandemic  of fear - based on ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased fact. Here’s a list of equally valid ‘factualizations’ , with many items from the CDC itself, that paint a very different picture from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting citizens. 1) The PCR test is practically useless 2) A positive test is NOT a CASE 3) The Centers for Disease Control dramatically lowered the Covid-19 Death Count 4) CDC reports Covid-19 Survival Rate over 99% 5) CDC reveals 85% of Positive Covid cases wore face masks Always or Often 6) There are inexpensive, proven therapies for Covid-19 7) The US Death Rate is NOT spiking 😎 Most Covid-19 Deaths Occur at the End of a normal Lifespan 9) CDC Data Shows Minimal Covid Risk to Children and Young Adults In other words - wake the fuck up people!  
    • Long long ago I worked in the brokerage business and for a time was a principle in a brokerage where I networked with and recruited  from brokerage firms of all sizes and types... I can categorically state that if you trust your broker you are a rube at best.  If you have all you funds at one broker or even two diff brokers, you're an idiot.  Brokerages and the people they attract from the top to the bottom are everything fiduciary is not.   While it's perfectly fine to be satisfied with the costs, fills, and service you receive from a brokerage... it is not perfectly fine to let that cross the line into 'trust'.  As a client, you need to stay vigilant and ALWAYS be ready to jerk your money at the very first hint of trouble.     as vaguely as possible, zdo
    • "The whole point is that the press loses its way when it cares more about who benefits from information than whether it's true." https://greenwald.substack.com/p/article-on-joe-and-hunter-biden-censored  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.