Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tams

An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg

Recommended Posts

An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg

 

An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg About Why It Doesn’t Matter Where You List Your Stock

 

facebook.jpg

 

 

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,

 

Congratulations on your IPO filing. We understand that you are faced with a difficult decision soon on where to list your stock. You have probably heard from your bankers that the NASDAQ exchange is for tech savvy companies like Google and Apple and the NYSE is where the blue chip companies like GE and Caterpillar choose to list. You may think that the NASDAQ market is more of an electronic exchange where dealers place competing bids and offers to help facilitate institutional client trades. You may look at financial television and see scenes from the NYSE and think that the NYSE market is more of a floor based auction model where your stock would trade at a “post” on the exchange. You may be thinking that regardless of which exchange you pick, your stock will help investors create wealth for themselves by investing in your company for the long-term.

 

We hate to break the bad news to you but the fact is....

 

 

 

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/02/an-open-letter-to-mark-zuckerberg-about-why-it-doesn%E2%80%99t-matter-where-you-list-your-stock/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to share " An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg" website link here. I read full article and want to say NYSE or NASDAQ does not big matter for Facebook founder. Traders are interested to buy their share not interested to know where it is listed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks to share " An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg" website link here. I read full article and want to say NYSE or NASDAQ does not big matter for Facebook founder. Traders are interested to buy their share not interested to know where it is listed.

 

You clearly didnt READ THE LINK - else in your hurry to supply a clever answer you wouldn't have missed the point of a rhetorical question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tams for posting, but a little pet peeve-- it's really appropriate to start a post like this with:

 

"From Themis Trading and written by ... :"

 

It makes it look like YOU wrote the open letter, and unless someone clicks the link they would never know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You clearly didnt READ THE LINK - else in your hurry to supply a clever answer you wouldn't have missed the point of a rhetorical question.

 

Hi ValueTrader, I think you are in hurry to comment in my reply. I read complete article. When someone go for buying share of a company they concentrate on company's profile not thing more about where it is listed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi ValueTrader, I think you are in hurry to comment in my reply. I read complete article. When someone go for buying share of a company they concentrate on company's profile not thing more about where it is listed.

 

I agree with this too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi ValueTrader, I think you are in hurry to comment in my reply. I read complete article. When someone go for buying share of a company they concentrate on company's profile not thing more about where it is listed.

 

Poor Henry! You clearly DON'T understand rhetoric.

 

The article clearly states it doesn't mater where its listed because

 

" We hate to break the bad news to you but the fact is, in today’s market, it doesn’t matter where you list. Your stock is about to become one of the biggest casino chips on Wall Street. Ever hear the terms rebate arbitrage or latency arbitrage? Ever hear of colocation? Do you know what an exchange private data feed is? How about an actionable IOI or a dark pool? We bet you have probably never heard of these terms (maybe you have been too busy coding lately or ducking those Winklevoss twins). These terms are really what stock trading is all about nowadays."

 

(courtesy of: An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg About Why It Doesn)

 

So the message of the article is "When someone go for buying share of a company" as you so eloquently put it, the fundamentals of the company and related COMPANY PROFILE really don't matter as High Frequency trading, Arbitrage etc are going to be what drives the price. Therefore the average buy and hold investor will get chopped up.

 

The author of the article is lamenting the fact that modern ultra high frequency trading is skewing company share prices thus making traditional investing obsolete.

 

He's not musing on which exchange the shares should be traded on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah funny 'letter' shame that some seemed to miss the rather bitter (but broadly true) pokes at HFT, dark pools, real liquidity even speculation in general. :)

 

I think I have read these guys before, certainly they have an axe to grind but still broadly call it how it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Poor Henry! You clearly DON'T understand rhetoric.

 

So the message of the article is "When someone go for buying share of a company" as you so eloquently put it, the fundamentals of the company and related COMPANY PROFILE really don't matter as High Frequency trading, Arbitrage etc are going to be what drives the price. Therefore the average buy and hold investor will get chopped up.

 

 

Hi ValueTrader, Why do you think that all traders who buy share of a particular company don't think about its profile. Do you know that in 2008 recession, IT industry was most affected by it but some IT companies have less impact while some have more. What was the reason behind share value of some companies going down while some stable? "company profile". If you will ask traders who are in trading for long time how they decide to buy share of a company then will get replies "We check company profile first, etc"

 

Reason: If market is going up it means is not that all companies listed in it going up therefore company profile does matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Seems pretty easy to me to define what HFT is. A "normal" human trade cycle of open and close will take no less than half of a second. Do some research perhaps, and determine some basic human limitation for speed of execution. Anything beneath that is HFT. Perhaps it's closer to 0.1 seconds for humans.

 

It would be like determining a normal human reflex or response time for something like moving out of the way of an incoming object. Do the same for trading, and it will work if they then want to do something with HFT activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you define something you put yourself in the position of having to then cover all bases for where it does not fit your definition but you still need to have the ability to regulate it - the regulators dilemma.....however yes - a working definition of varying degrees (VHFT, HFT, Maket Makers, automatic traders, day traders, weekly traders, phone in and chat private bankers) would at least be a good start.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.