Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

khamore1

Why the Majority of Traders Lose?

Recommended Posts

Does it make sense?

 

I was always told by my trading instructor: “do something different than everybody else”. Because 95% of traders lose money

 

Maybe someone here will help me solve the puzzle.

 

If I’m part of this 95% of traders it also means that we are the majority of traders who decided to enter a trade in a certain direction, so how come we lose? Isn’t the market move to the direction where the majority of contract entered? So why we lose?

 

Here are a couple of answers I received which caused me more confusion

 

1. Goldman Sucks equals 10,000 traders , with the same breath they say “the market can’t be manipulated”

 

Here is my confusion, if the Goldman can go against 95% of traders and succeed than in my opinion they can own the world. Which they don’t. So why we lose?

 

Based on this information I come to the conclusion that 95% of traders are making money and only 5% are losing, Since I’m part of this 5% of losers I decided to switch the buttons on my computer. Now the “SELL” button is the “BUY” and vice versa.

 

What do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you will probably still loose by switching the buy and sell buttons..... as it is also argued that its more about trade management than anything else. :)

 

who knows.

The one thing that I think a lot of people miss is this. The vast, vast majority of trades in a market today are not actually done by traders - it is done by benchmarking institutions, arbitragers, market makers, portfolio adjustments......their measures of win loose might be different to yours/mine/ours as pure speculators to them. (dont you love it when you mutual fund says we outperformed and only lost 15% when the market was down 15.5%)

 

Often when someone says they are a trader and they work at a bank/institution they are actually an operator of orders or a market maker of some sort. Maybe this site and others should be called Speculators laboratory.

 

Anyway :2c: for how/why this might change the numbers slightly and put a different perspective on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 95% traders losing statement is false, inaccurate and misleading that was perpetrated by internet chatter in the late 1990s.

 

In contrast, there were research by the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission), NASAA (North American Securities Administrators Association) and other market government agencies did their own research between 1998 - 2002 of stock traders that show 60% losing, 30% profitable and 10% marginal profitable arise after a research analysis of brokerage accounts of "retail" (those individuals doing their own trading and investing).

 

There's also research by the NASAA of one particular stock brokerage firm that 70% of public traders (retail traders) lost "everything" in their accounts.

 

In contrast, a pssst off employee of a futures broker released confidential data at a discussion forum of retail trading clients of all the clients of that one particular broker he/she had worked for back in 2008 for the prior year of 2007. The data showed 89% losing, 7% profitable and 4% marginal profitable. If I remember correctly, there weren't more than 500 names (clients) in that data.

 

Although the above info is just a "small sample size"...I do not believe (I could be wrong) there has actually been an extensive research of most brokers on this planet that would represent most retail traders on this planet. Also, as to comparing the profitability of retail traders (you and I) versus the profitability of traders on the floor, banks, institutions and others...it's comparing apples to oranges.

 

The other point I'm making...the 95% is a myth perpetrated by those that have a strong bias against day trading back in the late 1990s. Further, in today's markets, depending upon what you trade / country / broker...profitability of day traders can dramatically change. In addition, those that were not day trader such as those that didn't open and close positions in the same day...their profitability level was very similar. Thus, it's also a myth that swing traders outperforms day traders.

 

It doesn't really matter if its 55%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or whatever number someone post on the internet that represents losing traders. The fact remains that most retail traders will lose regardless if you're scalping, day trading, swing trading, position trading or longer term trading.

Edited by wrbtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does it make sense?

 

I was always told by my trading instructor: “do something different than everybody else”. Because 95% of traders lose money

 

Maybe someone here will help me solve the puzzle.

 

If I’m part of this 95% of traders it also means that we are the majority of traders who decided to enter a trade in a certain direction, so how come we lose? Isn’t the market move to the direction where the majority of contract entered? So why we lose?

 

Here are a couple of answers I received which caused me more confusion

 

1. Goldman Sucks equals 10,000 traders , with the same breath they say “the market can’t be manipulated”

 

Here is my confusion, if the Goldman can go against 95% of traders and succeed than in my opinion they can own the world. Which they don’t. So why we lose?

 

Based on this information I come to the conclusion that 95% of traders are making money and only 5% are losing, Since I’m part of this 5% of losers I decided to switch the buttons on my computer. Now the “SELL” button is the “BUY” and vice versa.

 

What do you think?

 

Hi khamore1

Your idea has some merit. You just need to place the BUY and SELL buttons in right place

Heres an idea

Select a chart with about 5 days data.

Draw a horizantal line at the LOW and at the HIGH

Thats the 5 day range.

Now divide that range into 4 horizontal sectors.

You use the BUY button in the bottom sector

You use the Sell button in the top sector

When the price in in the middle sectors you water the potplants.

If the price stays in the middle you cant trade, and this could last awhile.

And maybe thats why 95% of traders loose. Trading in the middle

But you are not part of the 95% losers AND your potplant flourish.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi khamore1

Heres some more.

You need more than one market to buy low and sell high

Go to "How much weight should one put on market direction."

Post 18 by Blowfish

Voted best post of 2011 (One voter)

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi khamore1

Your idea has some merit. You just need to place the BUY and SELL buttons in right place

Heres an idea

Select a chart with about 5 days data.

Draw a horizantal line at the LOW and at the HIGH

Thats the 5 day range.

Now divide that range into 4 horizontal sectors.

You use the BUY button in the bottom sector

You use the Sell button in the top sector

When the price in in the middle sectors you water the potplants.

If the price stays in the middle you cant trade, and this could last awhile.

And maybe thats why 95% of traders loose. Trading in the middle

But you are not part of the 95% losers AND your potplant flourish.

regards

bobc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bob, I want to thank you for your advice and I need further assistance from you,

 

your strategy works only in a ranging market but not in a trending market, since 80% of the time the market is ranging your strategy will work within that percentage, but how you handle the trending market, the other 20%?

 

I used your strategy for a while and I was making a $1000 a day before even taking a lunch, the problem is I was losing $10,000-$15,000 a day when the market was trending

 

Here I need your advice, how you know it’s going to be a trending day to switch this strategy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bob, I want to thank you for your advice and I need further assistance from you,

 

your strategy works only in a ranging market but not in a trending market, since 80% of the time the market is ranging your strategy will work within that percentage, but how you handle the trending market, the other 20%?

 

I used your strategy for a while and I was making a $1000 a day before even taking a lunch, the problem is I was losing $10,000-$15,000 a day when the market was trending

 

Here I need your advice, how you know it’s going to be a trending day to switch this strategy?

 

There are many threads or messages here at Traderslaboratory and other forums that traders explains how to recognize range price actions and how to recognize trend price actions.

 

Thus, if you know your trade signals performs poorly in trend price actions...you have several options:

 

  • #1) Identify its a trend in its early stages and then ignore any trade signals to trade "against" that trend.
     
     
  • #2) Identify its a trend and then lower your position size, tighten your stop loss and lower your profit expectation if you don't have the discipline to ignore trading trend price actions.
     
     
  • #3) Identify its a trend and use a different trade method that's suitable for trend trading. Thus, you have a trade method for range price actions and a trade method for trend price actions...overall two different trade methods for different types of market conditions.

 

With that said, most trends or strong directional price actions are the result of key market events (e.g. FED, IMF, ECB, Economic Reports, Global Economic Events and anything else along that path). Therefore, if you want to know when a trend has a chance of developing...you need to pay attention to those schedule key market events and the unexpected breaking news key market events.

 

Just think, you're losing 10k - 15k per trending day...you have great incentive to pay attention to how the price action reacts to these key market events. Also, it doesn't matter what the specific details (numbers) of the key market event...what matters is that you know there will be a price action reaction and that there could be a trend developed from the event. Simply, if price reacts and breaks outside of your identified range price action...you will then know which of the above options to use (#1, #2 or #3).

 

Also, if I was in your shoes and I knew I only make 1k on range days and lose 10k - 15k on trend days...I would start my own thread here at Traderslaboratory, post a lot of charts of what I consider to be range versus trend, discuss my trade strategy (from entry to exit) and ask for help in comparison to starting these types of discussions within a thread that has a completely different topic.

 

You must be rich and can afford losses like that because there's a lot of trend days in any given year, 20 - 30% per month or 1 - 2 per week depending upon the trade instruments you're trading or the numbers you mentioned are via simulator results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bob, I want to thank you for your advice and I need further assistance from you,

 

your strategy works only in a ranging market but not in a trending market, since 80% of the time the market is ranging your strategy will work within that percentage, but how you handle the trending market, the other 20%?

 

I used your strategy for a while and I was making a $1000 a day before even taking a lunch, the problem is I was losing $10,000-$15,000 a day when the market was trending

 

Here I need your advice, how you know it’s going to be a trending day to switch this strategy?

 

Hi khamore

I am going to ignore your question and try go a bit deeper into why the majority of traders loose.. We all look for certainty in life in everything we do.We are trained from a young age to be sure of the facts. "Did you lock the door ?"Did you turn off the stove?" But because of the randomness in the market , there is no certainty in trading.

.Its a probability outcome.

Traders keep tweeking/ changing their trading systems to get it right. That certainty.And because its impossible they continue to loose.

What changed my thinking (and profitability) was accepting that I can only win 50% of the time. I am simply not good enough or experienced enough to achieve more. This reasoning hurts my ego no end. My certainty is 50%

And as long as I set my risk:reward ratio at more than 1:1, I win.

Even 1: 1,0001 is a win .Ignore commission

Now there is no more searching for the holy grail.

There are two more points to the above which I will explain next time

Kind regards

bobc

 

"I'll be back"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi khamore1

My second point is you must have an Edge.

And if you are using Technical analysis , candle sticks or similar, the same as a million other traders,then you've got no edge.

Now lets take a new trader who trades Demo very nicely.

The new trader goes live and his first 5 trades are losers.He did everything correctly but got hit by randomness.

Whats he going to do now?

Tweek.

So my third point is, you need a bit of luck.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.