Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jarelj

Paper Trading Vs. Live Systems

Recommended Posts

What should one expect for differences in order execution times in a "Live" trading environment vs. the "Paper" trading environment? I've been practice trading the ES on the OEC Trader software for a couple of weeks now and working on my strategy. I'm curious what others have experienced on this platform or others on the execution of orders in the live system. I'm assuming that fills won't happen as fast, or rather some orders that are getting filled at a price on the paper system may not actually be filled at that price on the live system? I'd like to know what to expect before going live with real money, how big of a difference is there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What should one expect for differences in order execution times in a "Live" trading environment vs. the "Paper" trading environment? I've been practice trading the ES on the OEC Trader software for a couple of weeks now and working on my strategy. I'm curious what others have experienced on this platform or others on the execution of orders in the live system. I'm assuming that fills won't happen as fast, or rather some orders that are getting filled at a price on the paper system may not actually be filled at that price on the live system? I'd like to know what to expect before going live with real money, how big of a difference is there?

 

ES is very liquid, the fill time is very fast. If you are entering market orders, expect some slippage (1 tick for sure, be prepared for 2 ticks.)

 

if you are in a distance locale (ie not in North America), you should test your internet for latency.

 

if yo uare new to trading, you should use limit order instead of market orders. You will have better control of your entry price.

 

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What should one expect for differences in order execution times in a "Live" trading environment vs. the "Paper" trading environment? I'd like to know what to expect before going live with real money, how big of a difference is there?

 

Hey, Jareil

 

The only difference between paper and live trading are your emotions and account balance. Practice your methods on a chart replay and demo paper account. i find playing a day session back to have been very helpful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did contact OEC and they said that their demo system does mimic "live" fill times as much as possible by staging the orders in a que to be filled, rather than just triggering on a price being hit like some other demo systems. But they said it still wasn't a completely true representation of what the actual live fills would be. I've been trading on paper for a couple of weeks now and doing well with it, so just trying to make sure I know what I'm in for when I go live with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did contact OEC and they said that their demo system does mimic "live" fill times as much as possible by staging the orders in a que to be filled, rather than just triggering on a price being hit like some other demo systems. But they said it still wasn't a completely true representation of what the actual live fills would be. I've been trading on paper for a couple of weeks now and doing well with it, so just trying to make sure I know what I'm in for when I go live with it.

 

Try Infinity Futures you can trade on the demo with real time data and charts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paper trading is different on different systems.

 

The first question is whether the system you are using has data and actions that are as real time as their live system. Most are. The second, and bigger question, is whether the fills are realistic. Since you are not actually buying and selling this can never be 100% like live trading and most paper/sim systems show a better fill rate than live trading. What this means is that you will probably get better fills on a paper/sim system then in real life. The smaller your profit target the bigger the difference this makes. If you are swing/position trading and looking for 20 or 50 points and have stops that are 3 points or more then this will seldom make a difference. But if you are scalping and taking profits of a couple points or less then your sim/paper results will be very unrealistic. For example with many sim/paper systems you can go into a slow market where price isnt' moving much and put in a limit buy at current price, get filled, then enter a limit sell at a couple ticks profit and you'll get filled. Very small sim/paper profits but do this for an hour and you'll think you're the master of the trading universe and found 'the answer'. Do this live and you'll quickly find out that you never get filled at the price you want to buy or sell at and do nothing but lose money - unless this is part of some other successful strategy.

 

If you are trading a very liquid contract like the ES during higher volume (day market) hours then the difference will generally be only one tick on the fills. In other words your fills will probably not occur unless price goes one tick past them and/or your profits on a round trip trade will be 1/2 point (2 ticks) lower than the sim/paper trade.

 

On more thinly traded contracts, or even ES in some of the slower overnight hours, there could be a larger margin with several tick differences between sim/paper and live fills.

 

The above is the biggest technical difference. Beyond that is the wide world of psychological differences. Trading the sim/paper 'game' is a whole lot more different than trading real out of pocket dollars.

 

None the less I feel that sim/paper trading is an essential way to learning to trade with consistent profits. You should always set some sort of consistency goals with a strategy and never trade live until can do it consistently on sim/paper. If you can't make money on sim/paper you'll lose even more on live trading. Unfortunately making money on sim/paper trading does not mean you'll do well on live - but you have to do it first as a step on the way there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to follow up on this for any future sim-to-live convertees who might read this, now that I've "gone live", yes the fills on the Live system do not match those of the Sim system (at least on Open E Cry). As Cruiser indicated, if you practice a scalping strategy in Sim and it looks like it's too good to be true, guess what, it's too good to be true! Trying to scalp 2 ticks from the Live system is like tearing up dollar bills and throwing them out the window. Put in a limit order and watch the price bounce off your limit 10 times without filling, and once in a while it will actually hit, or if the price moves one tick past then your limit will hit. I had to try it a little bit anyway, but didn't take long to see that yes, it's too good to be true that orders would be filled as quick as the Sim system. So now I've spent a couple of weeks in the trenches learning the hard way what is a trend and what is "noise", analyzing charts, evaluating support and resistance and trading ranges, winning some, losing some, trying to make the winners outweight the losers. Another couple of years and I might actually know what I'm doing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also use Infinity. Paper trading is great for working out ideas and tuning your methodology, but the real value comes in the experience of pulling the trigger. If you aren't able to trade at least 3 contracts in the futures markets you can always trade the equivalent ETF in blocks of 500, or even 100. The point is that you are involved in the markets and able to scale out. Much more valuable I feel than paper trading when the market is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I also use Infinity. Paper trading is great for working out ideas and tuning your methodology, but the real value comes in the experience of pulling the trigger. If you aren't able to trade at least 3 contracts in the futures markets you can always trade the equivalent ETF in blocks of 500, or even 100. The point is that you are involved in the markets and able to scale out. Much more valuable I feel than paper trading when the market is good.

 

To day trade etf's you need 25k or you need to go get fleeced at a prop shop.

 

You need capital to trade. Lots and lots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you aren't able to trade at least 3 contracts in the futures markets you can always trade the equivalent ETF in blocks of 500, or even 100. The point is that you are involved in the markets and able to scale out.

 

Much more useful IMO to learn how to trade all-in-all-out (trading 1 contract or 100) and learn how to manage a trade (something I have a lot of work yet to do), than increase initial risk and diminish returns by scaling out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To day trade etf's you need 25k or you need to go get fleeced at a prop shop.

 

You need capital to trade. Lots and lots.

 

Well, you do need capital, but having lots of capital if the trading is going poorly will only mean you would be losing more capital. Capital will get you in the trade, but it will not help you lose less money. Capital will help a good trader be able to trade with greater size and make more money, and it will result in a poor trader losing more money if he increases his size, or else it will sit there doing nothing if he decreases his size and therefore is not using the money as margin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, you do need capital, but having lots of capital if the trading is going poorly will only mean you would be losing more capital. Capital will get you in the trade, but it will not help you lose less money. Capital will help a good trader be able to trade with greater size and make more money, and it will result in a poor trader losing more money if he increases his size, or else it will sit there doing nothing if he decreases his size and therefore is not using the money as margin.

 

I agree totally; know-how is far more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Much more useful IMO to learn how to trade all-in-all-out (trading 1 contract or 100) and learn how to manage a trade (something I have a lot of work yet to do), than increase initial risk and diminish returns by scaling out.

 

I can see the value in that. It also helps develop patience. The tricky part arises in 2 areas, using a smaller profit target vs. bigger profit target and using a tight stop versus a wide stop if you begin to trail (you in the general sense).

 

I started with 1 contract on the ES before moving to 2, 4, etc then I added in the 6E. If I did it over again I would start with the 6E 1 contract, much bigger swings and reward/risk ratio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To day trade etf's you need 25k or you need to go get fleeced at a prop shop.

 

You need capital to trade. Lots and lots.

 

I would also argue that you need capital to trade futures, or any market. It can't be expected to make a 100k return per yr on 10k. While I understand risking 1-2% of your total trading capital is hard for small trading accounts, if you were to take a set of 20-30 trades and multiply your risk per trade by say 25 (a theoretical worse case scenario for this example a string of 25 losers) how much capital would you need to overcome that draw down. Then multiply that # by 3, what does it come out to? That could be used as a starting point for capital requirements.

 

I personally found the ETF method helpful for the reasons of being able to still make live trades and scale out, but at small risk. Once I built my confidence up then I just switched back over to the corresponding futures contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would also argue that you need capital to trade futures, or any market. It can't be expected to make a 100k return per yr on 10k. While I understand risking 1-2% of your total trading capital is hard for small trading accounts, if you were to take a set of 20-30 trades and multiply your risk per trade by say 25 (a theoretical worse case scenario for this example a string of 25 losers) how much capital would you need to overcome that draw down. Then multiply that # by 3, what does it come out to? That could be used as a starting point for capital requirements.

 

I personally found the ETF method helpful for the reasons of being able to still make live trades and scale out, but at small risk. Once I built my confidence up then I just switched back over to the corresponding futures contract.

 

This is very poor advice to a novice.

 

I think you missed entirely the point that ETF's are subject to the PDT rule whereas the futures counterpart is not. Therefore, to daytrade an ETF, $25,000 would be the MINIMUM required in an account at all times. I would not recommend to any novice futures trader to trade more than 1 contract, and $10,000 is plenty to do this and even $5,000 is enough with brokers that have $500 intraday margin.

 

Moreover, your argument that one needs capital to trade index futures because it cannot be expected to make $100K on $10K is specious. A novice should not be thinking about how much money he can make. He should be thinking about how to keep the cost of learning to a minimum and survive the initial stages. The best way to do that is to trade the minimum and to participate only during low/no risk periods. The first part of that is simple - just set the trading software for 1 contract. The second part is problematic: To a novice everything is high risk because he is unable to discern the various market operating points.

 

In a nutshell, that is the problem to be solved by a novice. To some extent it is a choice as to how much to pay to figure it out. I suggest that paying anything more than the minimum is irrational thinking and ought to be avoided. This puts into perspective your recommendation of starting capital that can withstand a worst case scenario of 25 losers in a row. A rational person ought to figure out that he does not know what he is doing way before he hits the 25th loser. A person who cannot figure that out is better served with an account that blows out before then because it will mercifully force him to stop trading and save him money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya gosu I'm just saying I found ETFs a nice alternative to trading 1 or 2 lots because I was able to scale out. Obviously everyone is different. You could certainly trade 10 lots with a 10k account if you're controlling your risk right? Just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ya gosu I'm just saying I found ETFs a nice alternative to trading 1 or 2 lots because I was able to scale out. Obviously everyone is different. You could certainly trade 10 lots with a 10k account if you're controlling your risk right? Just my opinion.

 

Sure Tim, you could do 10 with 10K if your broker allows that and if you knew what you were doing. However, I was under the impression we were talking about someone going from sim to live for the first time.

 

It's just my opinion that I think trading a 1 lot with a small account is better than trading an ETF which requires 25K. The nature of being a novice is such that any amount he puts into an account has to be considered at risk.

 

You emphasize scaling out as some advantage. You have your reasons I'm sure, but there's nothing in my experience to recommend scaling out when trading index futures. Do you also recommend scaling in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That makes sense, a 1 lot with a small account. I prefer to scale out because a lot of the time intermediate profit targets will be hit much more often than the larger profit target. This way I can exit 3/4 of the position and trail the rest to the larger (in my case 15-min) profit target.

 

As for scaling in, that's certainly a viable strategy...For Example... On the euro if you trade really small time frames (I use a 233 tick chart) you could enter 2 contracts at a larger level like a 15-min and then if the trade goes in your favor enter 2 more at the 233 tick chart entry. This way you are only risking half the position if it blows through your entry and if the trade begins to work in your favor for the first 2 contracts then your risk is reduced when adding the second 2.

 

For a breakout strategy I'd prefer to go all in all out as the best price would be the onset of the trade, but I see the value in both scaling in and scaling out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

I think that the difference between papers trading and live trading is that it allow me to gain real experience. Real life experience is the critical component of success as learned from the Rich Dad's series. I can learn all the theories about investment. I may even 'paper trade' investment. But if I do take actions to do the real things, I will never master the investment skills.

Thanks

Regard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the key issue with paper vs. real trading is the psychological aspect. We are all human and when we have real money in a trade our emotions and reactions will be different than when we have "fake" money in a trade. We know the difference and for most traders just starting out, this difference will mean that they handle the trades very differently even if they do not intend to.

 

We need to learn under the real conditions of trading with real money on the line. That is why as traders we need to start off small, know how to control our risk, and only trade with money we can afford to lose.

 

I believe that paper trading "sim" accounts have a lot of value in learning the platform, watching the price action of the contract being traded and fine tuning our reaction times when entering orders etc., but have limited value in teaching the new trader how to psychologically handle a trade when "real" money is on the line.

 

Tristan Jeanneault

------------------------------------------------

T2C Trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.