Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

vienna

Financial Transaction Tax

Recommended Posts

This is probably OT...just came back from London, and saw news there that both Sarkozy and Merkel just agreed on a Financial Transaction Tax.They will meet in September to make a resolution on it. Christine Laguarde, the head of the IMF, is also a big proponent....seems the writing is on the wall...Given the fact that the US (Clinton and Obama) so far argumented against a "unilateral" FTT, but might change their tack now that it might not be unilateral:

 

What is your guys strategy to deal with it, should it occur? The numbers thrown around (.005 on the value of the contract) equal a $200 tax per lot per roundtrip ES, which would make at least the advanced method obsolete (not even the masters could slalom in and out with such a heavy toll on each turn)....

 

So- question to the experienced hands here- what would you do (markets, timeframes)?

 

Thanks, Vienna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is probably OT...just came back from London, and saw news there that both Sarkozy and Merkel just agreed on a Financial Transaction Tax.They will meet in September to make a resolution on it. Christine Laguarde, the head of the IMF, is also a big proponent....seems the writing is on the wall...Given the fact that the US (Clinton and Obama) so far argumented against a "unilateral" FTT, but might change their tack now that it might not be unilateral:

 

What is your guys strategy to deal with it, should it occur? The numbers thrown around (.005 on the value of the contract) equal a $200 tax per lot per roundtrip ES, which would make at least the advanced method obsolete (not even the masters could slalom in and out with such a heavy toll on each turn)....

 

So- question to the experienced hands here- what would you do (markets, timeframes)?

 

Thanks, Vienna

I think that is to combat HFT only, they will exclude us retail traders since 95% does not make money so taxing or not nothing to be gained from it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever they do, if they kill the ability or incentive for traders to make money, then it will hurt liquidity. From there it's just a down hill spiral. Taxing the trade is pathetically stupid. Tax end of year personal income, but don't increase fees on each trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is probably OT...just came back from London, and saw news there that both Sarkozy and Merkel just agreed on a Financial Transaction Tax.They will meet in September to make a resolution on it. Christine Laguarde, the head of the IMF, is also a big proponent....seems the writing is on the wall...Given the fact that the US (Clinton and Obama) so far argumented against a "unilateral" FTT, but might change their tack now that it might not be unilateral:

 

What is your guys strategy to deal with it, should it occur? The numbers thrown around (.005 on the value of the contract) equal a $200 tax per lot per roundtrip ES, which would make at least the advanced method obsolete (not even the masters could slalom in and out with such a heavy toll on each turn)....

 

So- question to the experienced hands here- what would you do (markets, timeframes)?

 

Thanks, Vienna

 

Hong Kong has been levying FFT for the longest time,

it did not dent the market a bit.

 

The number you quote is for equities,

futures would cost a lot less.

 

if and when it happens, just deal with it and go on. This is just another expense, no difference from CME charging another buck for quotes, or your ISP charging another dollar for internet... just be happy that the market is providing you with an opportunity to pay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi vienna,

good question.

I think a FTT has more than 50-50 chances to come.

Even a R President in the US might want this.

Sarkozy and Merkel are both right wing after all (or so their label reads).

The UK said they won't go for it unless the tax is globally charged. That is not a NO.

Italy almost passed a 0,15% stamp duty tax on equity/ETF/index futures trading earlier this summer.

The Belgian Parliament already approved a FTT, if I remember well 3 years ago, that was meant to automatically become effective as soon a FTT was "globally" approved.

I am sure many other countries are ready to join: you can always count on politicians being even impatient to do stupid things.

 

So I think it's unwise not to get prepared.

 

If a FTT is passed I guess one can:

1) trade Contract For Differences or Spread Betting;

2) trade where replica contracts will be launched.

 

I know nothing about (1) and on TL I found close to nothing.

Can anybody recommend:

a) the best CFD broker in his/her view ?

b) any other valuable source of info on CFDs (eg: reliable historical data on the width of bid/ask spreads) ?

 

 

When it comes to (2) it's almost certain that some country will reject a FTT.

Some of them (Dubai?) will probably launch replica futures contracts.

Having said that tax payers might be asked to pay a FTT to their tax authorities irrespective of where the trades are effected.

If you are happy to report fine, but if you are not it is good if the broker you use manages accounts/servers outside of where you pay taxes.

Eg: IB holds european customers money in London. As far as I know it executes orders via its servers in Switzerland. This means that all non-British (and non-Swiss) customers can feel almost 100% safe that IB will not be asked to report their trades to the relevant tax authorities or whether they moved funds offshore.

 

Any other idea ?

 

Best

 

F

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The number you quote is for equities,

futures would cost a lot less.

 

if and when it happens, just deal with it and go on. This is just another expense, no difference from CME charging another buck for quotes, or your ISP charging another dollar for internet... just be happy that the market is providing you with an opportunity to pay.

 

I think you are wrong:

0.1% of TRANSACTION VALUE means:

 

130k eur x 0.1% = 130 eur for buy and 130 for sell.

total 260 eur. or over 10 dax points, or 4 ES points.

 

If it were just a small fee, of course, you would be right...no course of concern at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you are wrong:

0.1% of TRANSACTION VALUE means:

 

130k eur x 0.1% = 130 eur for buy and 130 for sell.

total 260 eur. or over 10 dax points, or 4 ES points.

 

If it were just a small fee, of course, you would be right...no course of concern at all.

 

If they did that, liquidity would vaporize. Spreads would be HUGE to reflect the cost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I am reading the bill just introduced (HR3313) correctly, and it passes, it will effectively end day trading futures and other instruments. The bill calls for a .03% tax on the underlying specified base amount for the instrument.

 

This would mean $10,000 worth of stock would be taxed $3 in addition to current commissions and fees. What is now a $9.99 transaction will be $12.99.

 

For ES which is currently trading at around 1250, the base amount would be 1250 X $50 per contract = $62,500. The tax would be $62,500 X .03% or $18.75 per side and $37.5 round trip. Add that to the current $5 per round trip and you get $42.50 per round trip.

 

I am not sure how many day trading models can handle $42.50/contract in transaction costs.

 

Peter DeFazio (D) Oregon has openly said he wants to eliminate day trading, claiming it is a useless and destructive endeavor. This would do it.

 

I hope I am interpreting this wrong. Please someone tell me I am!

 

In all likelihood it will not pass with a Republican House but this is the third time a bill like this has been introduced. They will keep hammering away until they get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Peter DeFazio (D) Oregon has openly said he wants to eliminate day trading, claiming it is a useless and destructive endeavor. This would do it.

 

I hope I am interpreting this wrong. Please someone tell me I am!

You are not wrong at all.

You can thank DeFazio for talking so frankly.

Other politicians would say "we are looking for reasonable means to generate tax income".

But that's just the insanity about politicians and the people who vote them into power: how do you want to tax a business that you destroy?

About 80 years it was the "greedy jew" who was to blame for the world crisis.

And they didn't tax them to squeeze some money out. They just destroyed them. And the destroyers didn't even bother to make it sound good or reasonable.

 

Another evil scheme of european politicians is that they saw that a ftt in Sweden about 25 years ago killed all liquidity and sent money abroad. So to what conclusion has Merkel come? tax the traders according to their location, and not to the markets they're trading in.

 

I really hate them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
* * *

 

They will keep hammering away until they get it.

 

Who is "they"? Seems to me it's the same guy over and over again.

 

I don't know if you're reading the bill correctly or incorrectly, but think of all the lost jobs and lost revenue that such a measure would cost, not to mention the loss of dominance of US financial markets in the world. There is a reason the current administration, and not just the republicans, opposes a FTT.

 

Any sweeping FTT will not work unless ALL major economies agree to impose the same kind of tax. Very slim and none are the chances of that happening. No country is going to shoot itself in the foot by imposing a broad FTT unilaterally.

 

You have to understand that HFT is the villain du jour, just like daytrading was 10 years ago and short-selling was way before then. The last flash crash was blamed on it and the next flash crash will bring more negativity on HFT and I would not be surprised to see some kind of regulation or legislation to curb it. It remains to be seen whether or not daytrading as we know it will be collateral damage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who is "they"? Seems to me it's the same guy over and over again.

 

You are correct that the people specifically introducing the legislation are the same, namely DeFazio and Harkin. But there is a growing chorus of influential individuals joining them calling for a worldwide FTT: Sarkozy of France, Merkel of Germany, and Bill Gates to name a few. Thankfully some do "get it" like Cameron of the UK and even perhaps Obama at this time (though I wonder how his feelings would change in a second term when there is no longer anything to lose). However, if the economy worsens and there is more civil unrest there will be a need for a "villain du jour" as you put it. In spite of how stupid and destructive such a tax would be, politicians are fully capable of such stupidity and destruction. It would behoove all of us, especially those participants on a trading website, to pay attention and spread the word lest the ball get rolling a bit too fast to stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are correct that the people specifically introducing the legislation are the same, namely DeFazio and Harkin. But there is a growing chorus of influential individuals joining them calling for a worldwide FTT: Sarkozy of France, Merkel of Germany, and Bill Gates to name a few. Thankfully some do "get it" like Cameron of the UK and even perhaps Obama at this time (though I wonder how his feelings would change in a second term when there is no longer anything to lose). However, if the economy worsens and there is more civil unrest there will be a need for a "villain du jour" as you put it. In spite of how stupid and destructive such a tax would be, politicians are fully capable of such stupidity and destruction. It would behoove all of us, especially those participants on a trading website, to pay attention and spread the word lest the ball get rolling a bit too fast to stop.

 

A world-wide FTT will happen when nationalism and economic competition among nations cease to exist.

 

In any case I see the current trend as:

 

1. The economy worsens, more joblessness, poverty, despair.

 

2. There will be increased civil unrest, demonstrations, occupations, riots, clashes with authority.

 

3. There is already an obvious group of villains - the "1%", GS, HFT that will be targeted.

 

4. There will be regulatory and legislative overreaction, just like the last time with PDT.

 

 

Personally I am not alarmed at all by the chatter about a FTT as I see it as just one of many symptoms of the secular bear market in progress. Moreover, I believe there is nothing that people on a trading website, or even the entire population of traders, can do to alter that trend. I will ride it out and take advantage of the opportunities just like the last bear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting read:

Financial transaction tax - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

 

Swedish tax on equity securities, fixed income securities and financial derivatives (1984 - 1991)

 

In January, 1984, Sweden introduced a 0.5% tax on the purchase or sale of an equity security. Hence a round trip (purchase and sale) transaction resulted in a 1% tax. In July, 1986, the rate was doubled, and in January, 1989, a considerably lower tax of 0.002% on fixed-income securities was introduced for a security with a maturity of 90 days or less. On a bond with a maturity of five years or more, the tax was 0.003%. Analyst Marion G. Wrobel prepared a paper for Canadian Government in July, 2006, examining the international experience with financial transaction taxes, and paying particular attention to the Swedish experience.[30]

 

The revenues from taxes were disappointing; for example, revenues from the tax on fixed-income securities were initially expected to amount to 1,500 million Swedish kroner per year. They did not amount to more than 80 million Swedish kroner in any year and the average was closer to 50 million.[31] In addition, as taxable trading volumes fell, so did revenues from capital gains taxes, entirely offsetting revenues from the equity transactions tax that had grown to 4,000 million Swedish kroner by 1988.[32]

 

On the day that the tax was announced, share prices fell by 2.2%. But there was leakage of information prior to the announcement, which might explain the 5.35% price decline in the 30 days prior to the announcement. When the tax was doubled, prices again fell by another 1%. These declines were in line with the capitalized value of future tax payments resulting from expected trades. It was further felt that the taxes on fixed-income securities only served to increase the cost of government borrowing, providing another argument against the tax.

 

Even though the tax on fixed-income securities was much lower than that on equities, the impact on market trading was much more dramatic. During the first week of the tax, the volume of bond trading fell by 85%, even though the tax rate on five-year bonds was only 0.003%. The volume of futures trading fell by 98% and the options trading market disappeared. On 15 April 1990, the tax on fixed-income securities was abolished. In January 1991 the rates on the remaining taxes were cut in half and by the end of the year they were abolished completely. Once the taxes were eliminated, trading volumes returned and grew substantially in the 1990s.[33]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, if this goes through in some form i believe someone will come up with a way to lessen the actual fee per transaction. my intial idea would be to somehow (within the exchange or your broker a transaction wouldn't involve the whole contract. an example would be for you and i to draw up a futures contract to buy/sell a house but because we are short term buyer and short term seller neither of us is going to hold and take delivery of the house. so maybe the seller only "sells" a bedroom not the whole house. transaction fee would be for something like 1/5 of what it would be for the whole house.

 

so with a s&p 500 contract neither of us would buy/sell the whole contract but only a portion of it. we really don't need to buy/sell 1250 points but only a few points, maybe 1 or 2, 5, 10, 20. of the 1250 points i buy 5 of the 1250 and you only sell 5, the broker "holds" "escrows" the other 1245 and they are never sold and never charged the transaction.

 

another idea is we don't buy or sell anything but it would be handled something like shorting a stock. my broker is your broker and we don't actually buy or sell a contract so we don't get charged the fee. the broker loans it to the seller, or leases it or _____it. maybe even at the exchange nothing is bought or sold. it could be some sort of unique option but trades like the futures. the only buy and sell would be if the buyer took delivery at the expiration of the contract, the fee could only be fully charged at that time.

 

last idea is daytraders don't even use the cme anymore but another type of exchange is set up and they are bets. just as etf's are hybreds a "hybred-casino" could be set up or maybe the las vegas casinos could jump in the futures business. they could set up their computers to be a millionthe of a second behind the exchange and we could trade there(actually it would be a bet).

 

binary options are somewhat in the gambling direction.

 

i'm sure there are a host of ideas out there.

 

somehow there will be a way to get around it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date : 26th November 2020.Brexit endgame remains in sharp focus!The USD has remained soft in quiet conditions, while global asset markets have seen little direction. The US Thanksgiving holiday has quelled activity. Europe’s Stoxx 600 traded near flat. Most stock markets in Asia gained, though remained off recent highs. The MSCI World Index is also off its highs, but remained buoyant and on course for a record monthly increase this month. Copper posted a new near 7-year high, and while other base metal prices were also underpinned most remained off recent trend highs. Oil prices saw modest declines after recent gains, which culminated in a nine-month high yesterday.The Brexit endgame remains in sharp focus!Sterling has seen limited direction, continuing to hold gains from month-ago levels of around 1.5% to 2.5% versus the Dollar, Euro and Yen. There is still no breakthrough in down-to-the-wire negotiations between the EU and UK, and there are lots of warnings of border chaos and, from external BoE MPC member Saunders, of long-lasting economic consequences in the event of a no deal exit from the common market.European Commission president von der Leyen said “we are ready to be creative” to get a deal while repeating that “we are not ready to put into question the integrity of the single market.” An Irish government member said that a deal was “imperative” for everyone.The steadiness in the Pound, the principal conduit of financial market Brexit sentiment, reveals that investors remain unperturbed. One explanation is the real money participants are sitting on their collective hands, positioning for an expected deal but waiting on concrete developments and details, while maintaining vigilance on the possibility of there being a no deal by accident.Short-term speculative participants, meanwhile, don’t seem to have had a fruitful time in trying to play the fatiguing myriad news headlines and endless deadlines that have come and gone. The latest and supposedly final deadline, is next Tuesday — December 1 — which leaves just one month for a deal to be ratified on both sides of the Channel. We expect to a deal to materialize at the last minute, just as the withdrawal agreement was seemingly pulled out of the hat at the ultimate minute a year ago. There may even be a fudged extension.Pressure on the UK government is intense. US president-elect Biden warned London that the scope for a deal with the US would be compromised if there is a return of a hard border on Ireland — which is what could happen in a no-deal scenario (the UK government would have the choice between maintaining a free-flowing border on Ireland at the price of breaking up the border integrity of the UK, and possible protests and even violence from loyalists, or breaking the EU withdrawal agreement, which would result in a hard Irish land border).A leaked Whitehall document warns of a “perfect storm” of chaos in the event of a no-deal in the Covid-19 era. There are also pressures on the other side of the Channel to reach an accord. While French President Macron has political incentive to put up a show of fighting over fishing rights, he is not likely to carry through on his threat to veto any deal as other key EU states don’t see the UK’s position on fishing as being unreasonable. France and other nations, and the UK, also need to maintain good relations for security and many other practical reasons.As for the market impact of a deal, much will depend on how narrow the deal is. The narrower it is, the bigger the negative impact on both the UK and EU’s terms of trade positions will be on January 1, particularly the UK’s.Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Those who take quick and payday loans and refuse to pay them back are now hooked.   Normally, it is not a good thing to go into debt unless that is your last resort. We know that people are fond of borrowing and they seriously hate paying it back. Even when it comes to paying back what was borrowed, your creditor will become your enemy. Such is the nature of human beings.   Debtors don’t want to return money even when they eventually have means of repayment. If anyone borrows money and returns it, it means the person has a Godly spirit in him.   If people ponder the power of compound interest, they would stay away from loans. If you pay 1.33% or 1.79% interest per month on a loan, you will need to pay back roughly 16% or 20% per annum. And this will begin to compound as long as you don’t pay.   Most borrowers who are now in trouble have realized that the interest rates are eventually higher than the capitals borrowed. They realize that the creditors are using an indirect way to enslave borrowers (go and work for me, bring back the capital plus profits).   The banks themselves know that business environment is very tough and are now indirectly asking people to work with or spend the banks’ funds and bring the funds plus profits back to them. Many borrowers really have poor mentality and they don’t know the gravity of what they’re putting themselves into.   If a bank could lend out 1 billion USD per annum, it would reap a return of 150 million USD (at least on paper). Do you think they will forget about you if you owe them even a small amount?   Loans without collateral are now popular. But your collateral is your BVN – unless you don’t want to operate accounts again in the country.   I have heard people saying” Don’t pay to my Access Bank account again, but pay into my UBA bank account.” “Don’t send that cash into my GTBank account again, but send it to Zenith Bank.” It’s like postponing the evil day.   Ti iya o ba i tii je eniyan, iya nri nkan panu lowo ni (Yoruba adage). I literally means: If Suffering has not come to attack you, it means Suffering is currently busy with something. If you think you can avoid payment by abandoning the account you used to borrow money, you’re only postponing the evil day.   They cannot come for you when your debt is small, but the debt will begin to compound and compound till it would make sense for them to come for you.   BAD NEWS FOR DEBTORS CBN has given banks permission to deduct from funds a debtor has in another bank account. For example, if you borrow quick loans from FCMB and you abandon your FCMB account and you are now operating another account with First Bank, FCMB can make a request to First Bank, and the money you owed will be deducted once or gradually from your account at First Bank, without your permission.   Would you now keep money at home, so that bad boys will come to you to take their dues?   Borrowing isn’t a good thing, no matter how plausible it looks.   Profits from games of knowledge: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • LITECOIN (LTC) SUSTAINS RECENT RALLIES, FACES RESISTANCE AT $90 HIGH Key Highlights Litecoin rallies to the high of $90 The crypto may be range-bound between $80 and $90 Litecoin (LTC) Current Statistics The current price: $89.20 Market Capitalization: $5,900,735,267 Trading Volume: $7,953,660,011 Major supply zones: $70, $80, $90 Major demand zones: $50, $30, $10 Litecoin (LTC) Price Analysis November 24, 2020 Litecoin has continued its rallies as the coin reached a high of $89.86. LTC price has been making a series of higher highs and higher lows. The upward move has been facing resistance at $90. On the upside, if buyers can push LTC above $90, the coin will rally above $100 high. However, if buyers fail to resume the upside momentum, LTC will be compelled to a sideways move for a few days. If the uptrend is resisted the coin will be range bound between $80 and $90. LTC/USD – Daily Chart Litecoin (LTC) Technical Indicators Reading LTC price broke the resistance line of the ascending channel. This indicates a further upward movement of the coin. The crypto is at level 74 of the Relative Strength Index period 14. It indicates that the coin is in the overbought region of the market. LTC/USD – 4 Hour Chart Conclusion Litecoin has made an impressive bullish run on the upside. Nevertheless, the retraced candle body on October 31 tested the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level. It indicates that the coin will rise to a level of 1.618 Fibonacci extension level. This extension is equivalent to $70 high. Meanwhile, the price action is above the projected price level. Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • XRP/USD PULLS BACK AT RESISTANCE LEVEL OF $0.72 XRP/USD MARKET NOVEMBER 26 After the price retracement, it may resume its bullish trend and the resistance level of $0.79 and $0.88 may be reached. Below the current price, the level is found the support levels at $0.55, $0.44, and $0.39. However, the relative strength index period 14 is at 70 levels bending down to indicate a sell signal which may be a pullback. KEY LEVELS: Resistance levels: $0.72, $0.79, $0.88 Support levels: $0.61, $0.55, $0.49 XRP/USD Long-term Trend: Bullish XRPUSD is bullish in the long-term outlook; the crypto soars towards the north by the strong bullish momentum. The bulls’ momentum breaks up the resistance levels of $0.28, $0.33, and $0.36. The price has tested the resistance level of $0.79 on October 24. The price pulls back to retest the broken level of $0.61. Today, the XRP market is dominated by the bears and the daily candle is bearish. The price may increase further after the pullback. XRPUSD Daily chart, November 26 The two EMAs are located below the coin and it is trading far above 9 periods EMA and 21 periods EMA which indicate a strong bullish momentum. After the price retracement, it may resume its bullish trend and the resistance level of $0.79 and $0.88 may be reached. Below the current price, the support levels is found at $0.55, $0.44, and $0.39. However, the relative strength index period 14 is at 70 levels bending down to indicate a sell signal which may be a pullback. XRP/USD medium-term Trend: Bullish The bulls dominate the XRPUSD market. Immediately after the breakout from the consolidation zone, the bulls push the price high above the September high. It is currently pulling back at the resistance level of $0.72. The price is testing the support level of $0.55 at the time of writing this report. In case the just mentioned level does not hold, there will be a further price reduction. XRPUSD 4-Hour chart, November 26 The price has penetrated the two EMAs downside and it is trading below 9 periods EMA and 21 periods EMA. The fast-moving EMA is trying to cross the slow-moving EMA downside. The relative strength index period 14 is pointing down at 50 levels which connotes a sell signal and it may be a pullback.   Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • this is great news, good partnership and neymar is a big name along side mbappe and di maria. its gonna be a good season to watch
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.