Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

Moment of Truth for Stock Investors

Recommended Posts

1. A similar drop like past 10 days (more than 10% decline in a healthy bull market) is a very unusual event. This has occurred so seldom since great depression that you can count the instances on fingers. Technically this indicates a very high probability for negative returns for next few years.

Date/Time	10 day change
8/4/2011	-10.54
3/21/2001	-11.58
10/27/1997	-11.29
10/15/1987	-10.76
10/27/1978	-10.15
9/3/1946	-10.74
5/14/1940	-13.58
9/8/1937	-10.43
5/11/1934	-10.1
7/21/1933	-15.79

 

2. Relative Strength of financials has peaked out considerably. Note that financials are usually the leading sector to turn down at a peak.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25619&stc=1&d=1312553116

 

3. Fundamentally stocks are NOT undervalued- there is sufficient room for price stagnation for few years or a further decline of around 20%.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25620&stc=1&d=1312553116

4. The NY Fed's Treasury model suggests a recession probability less than 1% (0.97%); and for July of next year the recession probability is even lower, at 0.80%. This data will soon be significantly updated with the recent fall in treasury yields. I have a hunch that this model in hyped being in public domain and has lost its edge. In any case, we may not see a typical recession but the chances of slow downtrend on weekly charts cannot be ruled out. (The model uses the spread between the yields on 10-year Treasury notes and 3-month Treasury bills to calculate the probability of a U.S. recession up to twelve months ahead)

 

5. This crash is unlike any similar past instances in the sense that it is triggered by global events and not just the US economy. The recent fall is most likely triggered by Europe’s dire crisis, with Italy and Spain joining to the list of troubled economies. ECB rate hikes expectations (until very recently anticipated for autumn 2011) have suddenly vanished, and the September 2012 Euribor contract prices them at slightly below those for 2011. The biggest consumer’s market, China, is slowing down. Japan currently is a distinct case study :)

 

6. The US Economy has just grown by 0.4% in the first half of 2011 and all major economic indicators continue to point slow economic activity. According to the National Association of Realtors home prices will likely drop another 10 % nationwide, and according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, 70% of all loan applications are refinancings. Rapidly rising prices have (and will) hit the confidence of consumers. ISM data suggests that new orders will be dropped off and firms appeared to have tightened down on inventories. Recent PMI number indicates that manufacturing is barely above the zero line.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25621&stc=1&d=1312553116

 

7. Institutional Funds are flowing from relatively riskier assets to relatively safer assets (from stocks to treasuries and gold).

 

 

The market has made a strong opening today reacting to yesterday’s price action which looks like a climactic bar. I have marked yesterday’s lows and currently working to liquidate my investment portfolio (wrote most of this stuff yesterday evening).

RS.thumb.png.9266b9373015298c510e5ddeee8f4d08.png

5aa71095b466d_SnPPE.png.e6151174d32afe5aa39688413f863e48.png

mortgage.png.96cef16d8dc7f1093b8f36cf26aaa22f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the event that led to this "unusual" event is also very unusual...

I doubt the past historical market behavior is a good guide for this unusual current event.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..

ie. the past historical market behavior is not likely to be a guide for this unusual current event.

 

wow... thanks for the pointer... so when are you going to sell me that magic forecasting mirror

 

PS: think calmly sometimes later can you make a more useless statement ever :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wow... thanks for the pointer... so when are you going to sell me that magic forecasting mirror

 

PS: think calmly sometimes later can you make a more useless statement ever :rofl:

 

you are reacting to this at an emotional level... you are displaying your maturity level in dealing with a discussion topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think I read somewhere on this page...
You can edit your post, but you can't hide your (posting) personality. LOL

:rofl:

 

You are reacting to this at a personal level... you are displaying your maturity level in dealing with emotional matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

funny discussion guys - good little piece of analysis doordie.....

going with Tams on this I guess this has been brewing for a bit and has just taken the market some time to wake up. Every crisis is different, yet every crisis has similarities.

The Asian financial crisis in 1997 was much the same - 6 months of fundamentally bad news and then one day the equity market craps its self - and that was a far bigger move. Looking back it now a blip.

 

Point is for every fundamental bit of info out there that is bullish, there are plenty of bearish ones too, but its what the market does that is important (unless you have billions to slowly move in and out). You can always point out both sides and make a case - thats what brokers do all day. (a few weeks ago on the same day we saw two reports - one commodities to crash 50-70%, the other was about the super cycle in commodities - all looking at the same info)

Whats is interesting for us in Australia is that our market has been one of the worst performing this year - we are already down from the highs around 20% after yesterday and yet we supposedly have one of the best performing economies around - go figure :)

Is this a bargain hunting opportunity, or a sign to exit? who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tams,

 

I almost fell from chair at your first post (before edit). Let me clarify.

 

I'm done way past the stage of generalizations. Generalized one-liners can be expected from beginners but it was a surprise from you. I'm referring to type of statements like "MA crossovers do not work", "tap reading does not works", "Elliott waves can forecast magnitude of imminent moves", "past historical market behavior is not likely to be a guide for this unusual current event".....

 

To say not to refer historical market behavior puts everything in question- TA, FA, QA or whatever.

 

I think you did not read further to the first point. I mentioned several reasons why "this crash is unlike any similar past instances"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Point is for every fundamental bit of info out there that is bullish, there are plenty of bearish ones too, but its what the market does that is important (unless you have billions to slowly move in and out)...

 

"I like uncertain environments because that's where the opportunities are. That's where I can out-analyze other people." :cool:

 

For every fundamental but of info that is bullish, one can find plenty of bearish info. Similarly show a chart to 10 technical analysts- half of them go bearish while half of them are bullish. The funny thing is, if a majority of people using either FA or TA have a common opinion the market defies them by moving in opposite direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
currently working to liquidate my investment portfolio

 

Aren't there instruments that you can trade in an investment portfolio that effectively act like a short? I thought there were things that technically you "Buy Long", but they make money if the market goes down? That way you can use them in a retirement account. If anyone has any info on this I'd be interested to know about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traderwinds, there are essentially ETFs to short for anything major you want to short from around the globe. I have few in my portfolio and will be adding some. There are many sites dedicated to them and just a google will help, I will be happy to discuss.

 

I'm not sure how to use them in a retirement account though because hardly any of my short trades last for more than 9 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For every fundamental but of info that is bullish, one can find plenty of bearish info. Similarly show a chart to 10 technical analysts- half of them go bearish while half of them are bullish. The funny thing is, if a majority of people using either FA or TA have a common opinion the market defies them by moving in opposite direction.

 

yes - thats why predictions regardless of their basis are so tough/pointless/meaningless

I though the last comment was interesting...sounds like you are a contrarian, I prefer to be part of the crowd, and look for reasons in the price action giving me indications to exit the crowd for a short while, as often market opinions and market actions become divergent. (much like a trader not sticking to his plan) :)

have a good weekend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. A similar drop like past 10 days (more than 10% decline in a healthy bull market) is a very unusual event. This has occurred so seldom since great depression that you can count the instances on fingers.

 

2. Relative Strength of financials has peaked out considerably. Note that financials are usually the leading sector to turn down at a peak.

 

3. Fundamentally stocks are NOT undervalued- there is sufficient room for price stagnation for few years or a further decline of around 20%.

 

5. This crash is unlike any similar past instances in the sense that it is triggered by global events and not just the US economy...Japan currently is a distinct case study :)

 

7. Institutional Funds are flowing from relatively riskier assets to relatively safer assets (from stocks to treasuries and gold).

 

Some notes:

1) In spite of the "black swan" nature of the *cascade* of global events that are causing the volatility in world markets, our own stock market's woes do not seem to mirror the magnitude of what's happening. Shouldn't the market be down a lot more??

 

2) Financial companies started our government intervention problems. Do you think investors are "punishing" them?

 

3) "Fundamentally stocks are NOT undervalued..." did you mean technically? All the fund managers I have heard say companies are the strongest they have been in years (cash on books, M&A positioning). Yes, technically everything is very weak.

 

5) Japan is indeed an interesting outlier. Its economy is weak but the repatriation of funds inside the country after all the disasters seems to have at least temporarily shored things up. The Yen has been beating up on the Dollar for four months.

 

7) The price action in gold has me baffled... shoots straight up then crashes. Wat up wi dat??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) In spite of the "black swan" nature of the *cascade* of global events that are causing the volatility in world markets, our own stock market's woes do not seem to mirror the magnitude of what's happening. Shouldn't the market be down a lot more??

Maybe it will 'correct' and the time for correction has just started.

2) Financial companies started our government intervention problems. Do you think investors are "punishing" them?

Refer to sector rotation model (I included a link to Relative Strength in first post).

cyclicalpic.jpg

 

3) "Fundamentally stocks are NOT undervalued..." did you mean technically? All the fund managers I have heard say companies are the strongest they have been in years (cash on books, M&A positioning). Yes, technically everything is very weak.

Yes technically they are weak, and fundamentally there is room for correction. This implies stop adding your investments (title of thread).

5) Japan is indeed an interesting outlier. Its economy is weak but the repatriation of funds inside the country after all the disasters seems to have at least temporarily shored things up. The Yen has been beating up on the Dollar for four months.

Global economy is a mess now, we both are on the same page.

7) The price action in gold has me baffled... shoots straight up then crashes. Wat up wi dat??

Refer to intermarket analysis & sector rotation again. At the start of recession money flows from stocks to gold and t-bills- and the prices of both advance. (T-bills may be a different story now because US rating downgrade by SnP, and the flow of money in this global mess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

3) "Fundamentally stocks are NOT undervalued..." did you mean technically? All the fund managers I have heard say companies are the strongest they have been in years (cash on books, M&A positioning). Yes, technically everything is very weak.

 

Take a look at historical PE ratios. All that the 2008 drop could muster was to get us back to historical mean territory of around 15-16. A real selloff should have overshot the mean as the taste for equities became too much to stomach. Of course, such an outcome was subverted (perverted) through political machinations. And that supported another quick (psychotic) move back above 20 as if all systemic risk had been resolved. Moving down to a single digit PE will bring about the kind of disgust for equities as seen in the 1930s. And that's a long ways down from here.

Edited by jackb
wording

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Short bonds at the top? No.The bond market has exploded to the upside since July 25th. This trader is getting killed!

 

Yes the bond market went up since stocks going down, but he was betting on Treasury futures and supposedly made 1000% return on that trade:

Did George Soros win 10/1 return on S&P's US credit rating downgrade? | Mail Online

 

10 year T-notes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.