Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MadMarketScientist

Is Ben Bernanke an Idiot, Dumb, & Ignorant?

Recommended Posts

...And ... let's hope the recovery gets strong legs from here on - we deserve it after the past 5 years of :bang head:

 

(See next post)

 

The recovery here in the states has been far more robust than the aveage joe will acknowledge. The Fed has done its job. Unfortunately, an unintended, though predictable side-effect of its actions will be to go too far on the side of inflation, which causes it to put on the brakes, which causes recessions and depressions.

 

The creation of central banking did not repeal the business cycle. What it did do is made the business cycle a fairly regular, and hence somewhat more preictable than it had historically been prior to 1913.

 

It also caused price inflation. Whereas prices through human history had been fairly stable for hundreds and even thousands of years, prices since the advent of central banking have taken on a staggering, yet regular, projectory.

 

At any rate, the current recovery is likely nearing the end of its run. The next recession is perhaps even already quietly taking hold beneath the surface. However, the market will likely continue higher from here, with a top in the SP-500 coming somewhere between 1550-1800. We will probably see one or two 3-5% corrections along the way, perhaps one 9-13% correction, and then the top. We will then have your bear market, which will likely reduce the SP-500's market cap by 40-50%. Depending upon the actual high, that would project a bear market low somewhere between 750 and 1000.

 

Along the way, price will tell you everything you need to know. But if you want a fundamental edge, I suggest you pay attention to what the Fed tells us it is doing with its money, how much money it is deploying, and then compare that to what the market does. Money moves the markets. And X dolars will usually move the market y%. It sure helps your TA if you have a real money reason supporting price action at a given point in time.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At any rate, the current recovery is likely nearing the end of its run. The next recession is perhaps even already quietly taking hold beneath the surface. However, the market will likely continue higher from here, with a top in the SP-500 coming somewhere between 1550-1800. We will probably see one or two 3-5% corrections along the way, perhaps one 9-13% correction, and then the top. We will then have your bear market, which will likely reduce the SP-500's market cap by 40-50%. Depending upon the actual high, that would project a bear market low somewhere between 750 and 1000.

 

 

The fed has done a great job at creating equity and, hence, wealth. Expansion hasn't really occurred yet. I am expecting at least another 4-5 years before this run peters out. Yes, corrections, dips, and trips. But 2500-3000 in the S&P is very possible given the unprecedented amount of money that has been put out there.

 

At this point the fed is projecting current policy to remain the same until 2015. No reason to doubt it. a 25% to 50% rise in that time is totally possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The fed has done a great job at creating equity and, hence, wealth. Expansion hasn't really occurred yet. I am expecting at least another 4-5 years before this run peters out. Yes, corrections, dips, and trips. But 2500-3000 in the S&P is very possible given the unprecedented amount of money that has been put out there.

 

At this point the fed is projecting current policy to remain the same until 2015. No reason to doubt it. a 25% to 50% rise in that time is totally possible.

 

I would not be surprised by such a rise and within the timeframe you propose, MM. I think we could go 2500-3000 without anything more than 3-13% pullbacks through 2016; but I do think it is more likely that we get a bear market that wipes out 40-50% of market cap first, and then we reach the levels you propose (and possibly all within the time fame you project).

 

In the end, it does not matter which is right. If your scenario plays out, I will be quite content staying long. If my scenario plays out, I will be just as content to play the short side and then switch again when the inevitable bull rises again.

 

At any rate, if you go back to my previous posts in this thread from November, you will see that you and I are in fairly strong agreement as tothe role an effect of Fed liquidity programs on the overall trend in stock prices.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This policy of debt and printing is good or bad depending on your time horizon. If you only have 10 years to live, then you'd want the government to continue borrowing and mismanaging taxes so that you can continue to have a nice life. If you're two years old, this mismanagement might be a bit more concerning. But that's why 2 year old don't get to vote ;)

 

People like to criticise how the Fed, Bank of England, Governments etc run up these massive debts and print money. But a lot of these people are deep down pleased that their life isn't changing that much, because they don't want change, and want it to be someone else's problem.

 

In short is Bernanke an idiot? No, he's highly educated. Is he/was he doing the wrong thing? Long term, definitely. Short term probably not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ingot54,

 

Big time thanks for making me aware of The Daily Bell website! (post back on November 18th, 2012) I read the articles whenever I have the time. Really good stuff for thought. I believe it is important read for all of us no matter which country one are living in around the world.

 

Laurus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.