Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I know that when I have a few beers, thoughts of the market get crowded out and are replaced with the desire to see more of the rose and thorns tattoo on the lower back of someone half my age.

 

I give you credit for remaining focused on the market.

 

It is not something I have control over. I've accepted it as a condition I have to live with until my time is up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could you please explain in other words what you did analyze here exactly? I've re-read it now several times but I don't understand... :crap:

 

You mention the 30 min, 60 min, 135 min and even a 45 min period. How does these relate to the aforementioned AM, MD, PM sessions you did analyze?

 

I just redid some of my analysis using the cash session hours only, and they do not differ much but will explain in this context.

 

The cash session runs from 9:30am to 4:00pm ET. This is 390 minutes. We can break the day up into slices of time several different ways.

 

One way is to subdivide it three ways, as gosu has done. His times are flexible, but for the purposes of my analysis I decided to equally divide the day into three parts: 9:30 to 11:40, 11:40 to 1:50, and 1:50 to 4:00. Each period is 130 minutes in length.

 

Another way is to subdivide it into hours. So, we examine one period of 9:30 to 10:30, the next from 10:30 to 11:30, and so on, and finally we have 3:30 to 4:15, which is why I made the reference to a 45 minute period. But for my cash session analysis is a final period of only 30 minutes (3:30 - 4:00). We will have 7 such periods in this scenario, the final one being 30 minutes.

 

Finally, I examined half hour periods, the "traditional" MP frame of reference, and there are 13 such periods from 9:30 - 4:00.

 

Attached are charts showing when the HOD and LOD is made. I left out the "neither", since it skews the scale and is really only relevant on the 130m bracket analysis, where the 2nd bracket (midday period) is about 80% likely to be neither the high nor the low of the day.

 

The times are the times when the bracket closes. Also, this is for the last 250 trading days. It does not differ significantly using 1000 days (~4 years), or 250 days (~1 year). Though, the tendency to make the LOD earlier in the day, and the HOD in the final 90 minutes or so is somewhat significantly greater since Jan 1 of this year, for obvious reasons.

130mbrackets.thumb.png.6c599aa5012c39647a45222bd8a1f4fd.png

60mbrackets.thumb.png.92b5007b33749732a518756b90407632.png

30mbrackets.thumb.png.ef580f808fdabf0cd1f726712baeeced.png

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to reiterate that I believe in the value of statistics, but that I do not trade directly off of this information. I am simply providing a statistical basis for gosu's comments regarding the way that the market behaves, generally speaking. Outliers are always possible, and stats be damned in such cases. But when the stats are similar in the prior 90 days, 250 days, and 1000 days, it does tell a convincing story about the "usual" pattern of market behavior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I analyzed about 8 years of ES data ending in about 2009 comparing the RTH to the overnight to a buy and hold for the whole year. My crude findings seemed to show that the bulk of the move in ES occurred in the overnight session, regardless of whether it was a bull or bear market. The interesting observation was that in a bear market. where the buy and hold strategy would have produced an overall loss, the bulk of the move down occurred in the overnight. Also, when the buy and hold strategy would have produced a gain, the bulk of the move occurred during the overnight. There were periods, during the bear market, that would have netted a profit if you had bought the open of the RTH and sold the close of the RTH. Conversely, there were periods, during the bull markets, that would have netted a loss if you bought the open and sold the close of the RTH. Or, put another way, you would have been better off buying the open and selling the close of the overnight session during a bull market and doing the converse during a bear market. Yes, you need to know for sure if it is a bull or bear market, but the goal of the study was not to attempt to figure out a "set it and forget it" strategy for trading ES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In doing my weekly prep, I noticed that neither briefing.com nor earnings.com had AAPL on their "highlighted" list of companies releasing earnings this week. This defeats the purpose of having a web site even list them at all, as I'd rather not pour through hundreds of names.

 

What the heck is wrong with these sites? Do they not know that AAPL is hands down, the #1 stock of attention for investors and the market, as far as single stocks go? What is wrong with them? Is there something very obvious I'm not considering here?

 

"Good thing I checked the 4/24 calendar and saw that Boyd Gaming is releasing earnings, whew, almost missed that one!" :roll eyes:

briefing_com.png.efb74e8c524f31d6ef85641273fc8fc4.png

earnings_com.thumb.png.532a03ea6e4f47c1498b902df845d552.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting overnight move so far. Considering the balance profile has matured a little so we can see some agreement of "value" (82.75 vpoc) and considering that value was rejected (in that it did not bring in new buying), the next session or two could have a big impact on the longer term auction. Fail to get above 65-66.50 (although possibly 70.50 too) and we could see another test lower to overnight lows and balance lows and possibly 47/48 area of significance. However, given the low prices it's also possible to see responsive buyers come in and if they are strong, close the gap. I would think if this does happen, that 92.50 will be a near term goal (probably not today but you never know).

 

Personally, my gut feeling is lower, but I could just be confusing that with stomach rumbling. Of course the last possible option is a "more data please" scenario where we don't actually do much other than develop some more volume (probably around 65-66.50).

 

One way or another, I'll be right! :rofl:

 

(cough) Here's a chart anyway:-

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28679&stc=1&d=1335185613

2012-04-23.thumb.jpg.b662f39e68c5186170deec234597ac2b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you guys are short at this moment. I missed an early buy, then tried to buy again, and lost 4 ticks on it. Then I shorted 57.75 around 9:50 -- almost shaken out a few minutes later when it retested, but held through it and just closed 1/2 at 55. Target was 54, but the sellers aren't quite "running away" with it so I was a little safe. 49 is my final target but it really needs to slide to get there with prior 4/10 support at 53 or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 is my final target but it really needs to slide to get there with prior 4/10 support at 53 or so.

 

I have closed and am flat at 56 ... unfortunately I stepped away for a moment when it went to 54 the second time, and I could have possibly closed there for a better price. It failed to get above VWAP, but lots of buying pressure coming in here, and sentiment may have shifted for the time at least. So, I'm flat, and waiting for next thing. If it goes lower, I'll try to jump on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anyone here familiar with and attempting to apply Peter Steidlnmayer's volume strip analysis at present.

For those who are not aware or familiar with his new approach to the electronic markets here is a link to a 94 minute video at the CME describing same.

CME Article Page - Single Player

 

I am trying to employ his reasoning on a 15 minute market profile chart with volume assessment on individual brackets broken down.

 

Thanks

 

slick60

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is anyone here familiar with and attempting to apply Peter Steidlnmayer's volume strip analysis at present.

For those who are not aware or familiar with his new approach to the electronic markets here is a link to a 94 minute video at the CME describing same.

CME Article Page - Single Player

 

I am trying to employ his reasoning on a 15 minute market profile chart with volume assessment on individual brackets broken down.

 

Thanks

 

slick60

 

I watched that video several months ago, and unfortunately it is not that specific as far as actual methodology. The basic thoughts I got from that video are that we want to allow others to engage in price discovery and assume the risk. When they do, their footprints (volume) will be identified, and THEN we assume less risk by initiating trades at those (high volume) areas. That's about it as far as I remember though maybe there was more to it. Very logical, powerful stuff, but it seems not much different from using volume profiling, instead of a traditional market profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's hope I'm not being flip-floppy, but I'm long form 55.50 -- it struggled way too much to retest the lows, let's see if we can get to 60.

 

Well I scaled 1/2 at 57, and holding the stop at 55.50, BE on the other half. High probability of being taken out, but no risk and only potential reward up to 59s for my target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I watched that video several months ago, and unfortunately it is not that specific as far as actual methodology. The basic thoughts I got from that video are that we want to allow others to engage in price discovery and assume the risk. When they do, their footprints (volume) will be identified, and THEN we assume less risk by initiating trades at those (high volume) areas. That's about it as far as I remember though maybe there was more to it. Very logical, powerful stuff, but it seems not much different from using volume profiling, instead of a traditional market profile.

 

Hi Josh

Yeah that is basically it. This morning breaking auctions down as I do when a completed curve is in place and a new step 1 begins I split the brackets and take note of the vol number and wait for that number to be met. If we close the opposite way then it signifies minus development which Peter says "should run". Here is a snap as I had it.

 

2012-04-23_1056 - slick60's library

 

slick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking at the broader picture for a comparison of action to the last break down from the upper balance. 4/4 & 4/5 was kinda a break before the break, but balanced. Today, we are in a very similar situation at the moment. The current RTH profile is quite balanced and relatively small. IF we do the same sort of thing, it's possible we reach up higher to that original 65-66.50 area.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28684&stc=1&d=1335196506

2012-04-23_3.thumb.jpg.c28ca6015982bc634b40e1ae60620e41.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it's possible we reach up higher to that original 65-66.50 area.

 

That is what I'm hoping for as well. Hope is what it is, because I'm in it with no control except to exit at a point where it no longer looks probable. 62, test of pre-open balance high, then 65, is what my premise is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gosu, if you're around-- given your way of modeling the market, your general thesis is that if the morning high of 61.25 is taken out, then that means the low of the day is already in at 54 -- is that correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gosu, if you're around-- given your way of modeling the market, your general thesis is that if the morning high of 61.25 is taken out, then that means the low of the day is already in at 54 -- is that correct?

 

Today falls under the single caveat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today falls under the single caveat.

 

Did you 'know' that before the open -- due to the gap? Or is this something you have discerned during the AM session? Is there a specific criteria (perhaps the large gap) that makes it more objective that this is the single caveat scenario?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.