Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Just one-timeframing the day away....

 

Hey, that'd be a great crooner song!

 

(couch) anyway.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28427&stc=1&d=1334083920

 

I personally find it a little weird that it just sank with no urgency like in slow motion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ya, Rays is good stuff... Did you ever go to the Peanut Butter Restaurant down there?

 

Nope. I've only recently heard about that place from a vegan friend, which made me think it's not a place for an omnivore like me.

 

 

Back to the market: currently left to right on the tilted lateral. Going into the last hour of the day...I think most of the juice has been squeezed out of the short trend for today. Will need a big surge in volume to get the VE on the larger fractal. It's not off the table but I just don't picture that happening.

 

Closing shop early and gonna take the good vibes to the beach. Good chatting with you, roztom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope. I've only recently heard about that place from a vegan friend, which made me think it's not a place for an omnivore like me.

 

 

Back to the market: currently left to right on the tilted lateral. Going into the last hour of the day...I think most of the juice has been squeezed out of the short trend for today. Will need a big surge in volume to get the VE on the larger fractal. It's not off the table but I just don't picture that happening.

 

Closing shop early and gonna take the good vibes to the beach. Good chatting with you, roztom.

 

Are you over by Venice Beach? When I traded out there I had an office in Santa Monica and lived in Marina Del Ray...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hopefully this is not a repeat of stupidity, but I bought 55.25, 2/3 position.

 

targets are 59 and 60.25, will stop out for a loss around 54

 

Even if I stop out, I may look to re-enter long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
targets are 59 and 60.25

 

took 57.75 instead of 59, and holding last for 60, stop at 55.50 on remaining

 

EDIT: out 55.50 on remaining..

 

all in all, a very average trade -- subpar entry location, good exit on the scale, but overall fortunate to be a winner.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I strongly dislike this volatility. I will never complain about a 10 point day again. After having so many 10 point days, it's hard for me to readjust to "the way it used to be."

 

Largest range so far this year (26.00)

Highest volume this year (2.4M or so by close)

5th or 6th highest range since bull run started on "turnaround tuesday" 10/4/11

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you over by Venice Beach? When I traded out there I had an office in Santa Monica and lived in Marina Del Ray...

 

Not too far from there, further east, nearer the "gritty" neighborhoods. I get a kick out of my OC friends coming to visit and freaking out about the area. They think they're about to get mugged when approached by a panhandler. I've lived in rougher places but they're used to new streets lined with palm trees so their perception is a bit warped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not too far from there, further east, nearer the "gritty" neighborhoods. I get a kick out of my OC friends coming to visit and freaking out about the area. They think they're about to get mugged when approached by a panhandler. I've lived in rougher places but they're used to new streets lined with palm trees so their perception is a bit warped.

 

I liked it out there... I had a CQG TQ20/20 with a satellite dish on top of a building for data...unreal... the only issue was the earthquakes...the building was 9 stories high and it would sway when there were tremors... Not exactly my cup of tea....

 

After trading I would walk from the Marina to the pier in Santa Monica to air my brain out.. great spot and the "scenery" was incredible... :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I strongly dislike this volatility. I will never complain about a 10 point day again. After having so many 10 point days, it's hard for me to readjust to "the way it used to be."

 

Largest range so far this year (26.00)

Highest volume this year (2.4M or so by close)

5th or 6th highest range since bull run started on "turnaround tuesday" 10/4/11

 

Those are good stats to keep.

 

Today was the third dominant leg after the BO of the 4/3 pennant, and the best one so far for trading RTH. The prior 2 dominant legs had the bulk of the move occurring overnight or on a holiday, leaving the RTH session mostly in nondom modus.

 

I'm not sure about calling today volatile. It was a one-way market, what's commonly called a trend day. I don't particularly care for the term "trend day" because I always look at the day in 3 related but disparate parts that usually require disparate strategies.

 

The strategy for a "trend AM" is always the same: detect the potential for a trend day ASAP, entire on the dominant side, and sit on my hands until midday which usually begins around 8:50 more or less. The strategy protects me against the very strong urge to trade the nondoms, which from experience I know to be not worth the risk of getting a poor price or even missing out on the resumption.

 

If I have to set a stop loss and walk away from the screens to avoid trading around the nondoms, then that's what I do. Sometimes I have to remind myself who is in charge of profits in the partnership because on trend AMs it is easy for me to usurp the market's role.

 

Much has been written on how to detect the potential for a trend day - narrow ranges (nr3, nr7, etc.), surprise side moves, etc. I take a bit more focused approach and want to know the potential for a trend AM, which can be a part of a trend day proper or even a day where the market reverses the morning move in the PM.

 

Finally, it is true that the market's design is such that your volatile days outnumber the one-way days. It is important not to sit on positions in the AM on such days because nondoms can be as profitable as dominants and can erase profits from dominants without action. Most days are of this type and they come in various forms. I detect them by default - once the trend day is taken off the table, I know to go into default mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I liked it out there... I had a CQG TQ20/20 with a satellite dish on top of a building for data...unreal... the only issue was the earthquakes...the building was 9 stories high and it would sway when there were tremors... Not exactly my cup of tea....

 

After trading I would walk from the Marina to the pier in Santa Monica to air my brain out.. great spot and the "scenery" was incredible... :cool:

 

Tom - you old dog! You weren't only enjoying the ocean scenery, but you were also watching the "mountains"... ;).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...

 

Today was the third dominant leg after the BO of the 4/3 pennant... The prior 2 dominant legs had the bulk of the move occurring overnight or on a holiday, leaving the RTH session mostly in nondom modus.

 

...

 

The strategy for a "trend AM" is always the same: detect the potential for a trend day ASAP, entire on the dominant side, and sit on my hands until midday which usually begins around 8:50 more or less. The strategy protects me against the very strong urge to trade the nondoms, which from experience I know to be not worth the risk of getting a poor price or even missing out on the resumption.

 

... avoid trading around the nondoms...

 

... It is important not to sit on positions in the AM on such days because nondoms can be as profitable as dominants and can erase profits from dominants without action.

 

 

Hi gosu,

 

Interesting comment. First I thought I understood you comment, but your reference to dominants and nondom modus (non-dominants I guess?) confused me. Could you please explain what you mean by that, in particular the way you refer to both?

 

That would be helpful.

 

Thanks!

k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi gosu,

 

Interesting comment. First I thought I understood you comment, but your reference to dominants and nondom modus (non-dominants I guess?) confused me. Could you please explain what you mean by that, in particular the way you refer to both?

 

That would be helpful.

 

Thanks!

k

 

Yes, I could have been clearer by making explicit that I am referencing different "fractals," for want of a better term. Elliott Wavers would say I am referencing more than one "degree" of trend.

 

The reference to "nondom modus" is to the fractal that overlaps days and connects RTH sessions, what I call the ST (short term). Specifically, I am saying that the RTH sessions following the first two dominant legs after the 4/3 BO are nondom on the ST. Contained within these nondom sessions are, of course, smaller dominant/nondominant moves that are traded by intraday players.

 

With the ST in mind, yesterday's RTH session was a "trend day" comprising the third dominant leg short following the 4/3 BO.

 

All subsequent references to dominant/nondom are with intraday legs in mind, specifically in the AM portion of the day which is from the RTH open to roughly 8:50 a.m. pacific time, give or take a few 5m bars.

 

A bit of background: I always see an RTH session, unless holiday-shortened, as consisting of 3 parts - AM, midday, PM. The open and AM is what I trade primarily; midday I usually break for a meal; and PM I will come back to trade if I think it has potential.

 

My strategy for the AM on what is potentially a trend day is to enter on the dominant side and sit tight all through the AM. This is not as easy as it sounds because it requires a change in the mindset used to trade the AM on most other days, what I call "default" days.

 

On default AM's, the strategy is to take profit at the end of a dominant leg followed by a choice to either reverse and reverse again on the nondom and resumption that follow, or, in the alternative, to sideline through the nondom and reenter on the resumption. In a potential trend AM, I am better off just holding throughout the dominant/nondom cycles without either trading the nondoms (reverse-reverse) or trading around the nondoms (sideline-reenter). I've learned from experience that it is easy to mistime the beginnings and endings of nondom legs as the trend continues on toward lunch (and congestion).

 

On default AM's, the nondoms are more pronounced and there is usually at least one reversal. Consequently, holding through a nondom retrace will result in profit erosion with a likelihood of some type of failure (ftt, fp3, ftr) to follow. Thus, the strategy is to take profit at the end of a dominant leg and to either trade the nondom as well or trade around it.

 

Hopefully this doesn't confuse you further and clears things up at least a little.

 

Cheers. :beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! That was helpful.

 

 

 

...

 

A bit of background: I always see an RTH session, unless holiday-shortened, as consisting of 3 parts - AM, midday, PM. The open and AM is what I trade primarily; midday I usually break for a meal; and PM I will come back to trade if I think it has potential.

 

...

 

 

 

I've divided the sessions the same way like you did, except for I do trade the PM session nearly always, although the moves might be smaller as compared to the AM session.

 

 

 

...

 

I've learned from experience that it is easy to mistime the beginnings and endings of nondom legs as the trend continues on toward lunch (and congestion).

 

 

 

Yeah... have been underwater yesterday for a looong time... :( ... managed to make a profit still at the end of the day, but only with very aggressive scalping in the PM session. Not happy about my performance yesterday...

 

 

 

... a likelihood of some type of failure (ftt, fp3, ftr) to follow.

 

 

What do these acronyms mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I could have been clearer by making explicit that I am referencing different "fractals," for want of a better term. Elliott Wavers would say I am referencing more than one "degree" of trend.

 

The reference to "nondom modus" is to the fractal that overlaps days and connects RTH sessions, what I call the ST (short term). Specifically, I am saying that the RTH sessions following the first two dominant legs after the 4/3 BO are nondom on the ST. Contained within these nondom sessions are, of course, smaller dominant/nondominant moves that are traded by intraday players.

 

With the ST in mind, yesterday's RTH session was a "trend day" comprising the third dominant leg short following the 4/3 BO.

 

All subsequent references to dominant/nondom are with intraday legs in mind, specifically in the AM portion of the day which is from the RTH open to roughly 8:50 a.m. pacific time, give or take a few 5m bars.

 

A bit of background: I always see an RTH session, unless holiday-shortened, as consisting of 3 parts - AM, midday, PM. The open and AM is what I trade primarily; midday I usually break for a meal; and PM I will come back to trade if I think it has potential.

 

My strategy for the AM on what is potentially a trend day is to enter on the dominant side and sit tight all through the AM. This is not as easy as it sounds because it requires a change in the mindset used to trade the AM on most other days, what I call "default" days.

 

On default AM's, the strategy is to take profit at the end of a dominant leg followed by a choice to either reverse and reverse again on the nondom and resumption that follow, or, in the alternative, to sideline through the nondom and reenter on the resumption. In a potential trend AM, I am better off just holding throughout the dominant/nondom cycles without either trading the nondoms (reverse-reverse) or trading around the nondoms (sideline-reenter). I've learned from experience that it is easy to mistime the beginnings and endings of nondom legs as the trend continues on toward lunch (and congestion).

 

On default AM's, the nondoms are more pronounced and there is usually at least one reversal. Consequently, holding through a nondom retrace will result in profit erosion with a likelihood of some type of failure (ftt, fp3, ftr) to follow. Thus, the strategy is to take profit at the end of a dominant leg and to either trade the nondom as well or trade around it.

 

Hopefully this doesn't confuse you further and clears things up at least a little.

 

Cheers. :beer:

 

Is this market based or time based?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is this market based or time based?

 

Both. The determination of a trend day beginning (trend AM) is market based. Once the determination is made, the hold through the AM is based on duration alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both. The determination of a trend day beginning (trend AM) is market based. Once the determination is made, the hold through the AM is based on duration alone.

 

Yesterday was a somewhat out of sample day.. no rotation... would you hold this through lunch or get out after the morning part of the session?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.