Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

AuctionMarket_Trader

Stop Losses: Help or Hindrance?

Recommended Posts

I personally do not use stop losses instead i manage my position (however i typically have a 10 point crash stop which i have yet to take once). I think this is a big fallacy in the industry and one of the reason why over 90% fail ... just wanted to hear everyone thoughts....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never trade futures without a stop. The stop size is a function of the size of the account, the type of trade, and your tolerance for pain.

 

When I do get stopped out, which is frequently, I have no bones about getting back in. A lot of times it would have been better if I had not had a stop because I take a loss get in at a worse price from my original entry plus the loss. Other times it is a saving grace and I can laugh because I was completely wrong and would have gotten killed if I let price go all the way to what I deem to be support or resistance, but I got out with a small loss. Then there are other times when I enter and price just screams and it wouldn't have mattered if my stop was 1 tick or 100 ticks away because I got it right.

 

Gains are not going to kill me. Losses combined with an extra dose of bad luck will kill me. Using stops gives me ultimate control over whether I live or die.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrongly placed stops are one of the main causes of traders' losses. A drop dead stop is a must and I calculate mine by backtesting. However, a back tested stop is not appropriate for every trade as every trade is different eg context and volatility. So my drop dead stop means that this is where I exit come what may. In practice, I stop myself out when market activity tells me I am wrong. When i enter a trade, I have my generic stop and targets triggered by my software. I then manage each trade, moving both stops and targets to where they belong in that specific trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with el here. So many times I've seen traders put stops in silly places and inevitably get stopped out on what turns out to be a great trade. Not infrequently, you get stopped out to the tick. I don't think this is coincidence either as if you think about it, if it turns out to be a good trade, it's just the traders who are in the red on the trade who are exiting and not new trades being placed. So being stopped to the tick or close to that is not surprising imo.

 

The most important thing about stops though and why they can be a real hinderance is poor entry position. Not waiting for the optimal entry position for your technique due to lack of market awareness in general or lack of focus on the market, or just inexperience has the potential to stop you out before you even enter the trade. I know people have written that actually entries don't necessarily matter in the long run, but if you find yourself being stopped out a lot(so long as you're not trading with a single tick stop or something silly) before the market turns and goes in the direction you'd hoped, take a look at those entries. Think about it. Most traders risk a maximum percentage of their account on each trade. If you enter in the wrong place or on the wrong swing, you end up messing up your r:r by changing the size of your trade so that you can afford to get stopped out where you are wrong as well as within your account parameters or you get stopped out before you are wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always trade with a stop. I believe there has to be a point where you admit you were wrong on this particular trade/idea and you move on to the next trade. Where you put your stop is another story/another post, but I couldn't imagine trading without a stop loss.

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wrongly placed stops are one of the main causes of traders' losses. A drop dead stop is a must and I calculate mine by backtesting. However, a back tested stop is not appropriate for every trade as every trade is different eg context and volatility. So my drop dead stop means that this is where I exit come what may. In practice, I stop myself out when market activity tells me I am wrong. When i enter a trade, I have my generic stop and targets triggered by my software. I then manage each trade, moving both stops and targets to where they belong in that specific trade.

 

What is a wrongly placed stop? Is it one that is too close or one that is too far?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is a wrongly placed stop? Is it one that is too close or one that is too far?

 

1 ...It is a stop placed with no thought given to the direction and strength of the upcoming momentum.

 

2 ...It is a stop that is carefully hidden in an obvious place

 

# 1 will negate # 2

Edited by johnw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 ...It is a stop placed with not thought given to the direction and strength of the upcoming momentum.

 

2 ...It is a stop that is carefully hidden in an obvious place

 

# 1 will negate # 2

 

Does anyone actually place a stop that is either 1 or 2 if they know what they are doing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone actually place a stop that is either 1 or 2 if they know what they are doing?

 

I am obliged to believe that ALL Posters are operating to their fullest extent of "knowing what they are doing"

 

IF they are growing their competence then "knowing what they are doing" will grow with them.

And this is the second part of obligation to belief that I hold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point of this post was to exploit and necessity of a hard stop if you truly understand how you market work In my case ES which is dominated by probes and rotations you can easily avoid having hard stops but that doesn't mean not taking losses lol I am not saying don't take losses im saying don't have hard stop because most of the time you will have the chance to be able to get out for less that what you stop was if you understand the market your in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The point of this post was to exploit and necessity of a hard stop if you truly understand how you market work In my case ES which is dominated by probes and rotations you can easily avoid having hard stops but that doesn't mean not taking losses lol I am not saying don't take losses im saying don't have hard stop because most of the time you will have the chance to be able to get out for less that what you stop was if you understand the market your in.

 

Then it makes very little difference to me. If you have a plan and an exit point then trade it manually or with a stop market/limit order. You are at your most objective before you enter a trade so changing the defined losing exit mid trade isn't something that should be done lightly. Probes and rotations should be taken account of pre-trade surely? Is this more of what you were discussing or are you talking about the mechanics of stops such as slippage? (surely not in ES)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You must have stop if you trade. The reason is simple, one flash crash will wipe out your account, you may even have a negative balance.

 

If your entry is correct, then the chance of you stop getting run over is slim. If you do get stop out constantly, chance are that you have misreaded the market.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"What is a wrongly placed stop? Is it one that is too close or one that is too far?"

 

Often its not close enough,

plus for my two cents - if you are going for pin point stops, what is often more important is that you make sure you have a good way of ensuring you get on the move you were looking for even after a few quick losses. Taking three 5 tick losses, to then miss the 50 tick move can hurt. Ideally you wont take a loss while trying to get on, but this is not the case in reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"What is a wrongly placed stop? Is it one that is too close or one that is too far?"

 

Often its not close enough,

plus for my two cents - if you are going for pin point stops, what is often more important is that you make sure you have a good way of ensuring you get on the move you were looking for even after a few quick losses. Taking three 5 tick losses, to then miss the 50 tick move can hurt. Ideally you wont take a loss while trying to get on, but this is not the case in reality.

 

I asked the question because you can only know if a stop was wrongly placed after the fact; meaning, when it stops you out. Thinking that there is a right and wrong stop based on structure is the equivalent to thinking that the structure you see is the only structure that matters, and if you are looking at the only structure that matters then you are looking at the holy grail. Since we know there is no holy grail then we know that the structure that you are looking at is not the only structure that matters and therefore there is no stop that is too close or too far based on structure.

 

On the other hand the things you do know are how much you feel like losing and possibly how much pain you feel like feeling.

 

Minimizing losses, which are trading costs, is a major part of maximizing trading profits, so the topic is a very important topic to discuss.

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You must have stop if you trade. The reason is simple, one flash crash will wipe out your account,

 

If one flash crash could wipe out your account, that would mean you are highly leveraged and trading every penny you could trade. I don't see how a flash crash could wipe out your account if that wasn't true.

 

The other issue is how the trade is being monitored. If there is a flash crash, and you are right there watching it, then you could just hit "flat" and exit.

 

So, at the very least, there are 3 issues here:

 

  • Leverage
  • Amount being risked relative to account size
  • How the trade is being monitered

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I asked the question because you can only know if a stop was wrongly placed after the fact; meaning, when it stops you out. Thinking that there is a right and wrong stop based on structure is the equivalent to thinking that the structure you see is the only structure that matters, and if you are looking at the only structure that matters then you are looking at the holy grail. Since we know there is no holy grail then we know that the structure that you are looking at is not the only structure that matters and therefore there is no stop that is too close or too far based on structure.

 

On the other hand the things you do know are how much you feel like losing and possibly how much pain you feel like feeling.

 

Minimizing losses, which are trading costs, is a major part of maximizing trading profits, so the topic is a very important topic to discuss.

 

MM

 

I am not sure if we agree or disagree here :) I actually was trying to add to your comment, and was trying to make the point that really close stops are often underestimated if watching a market closely - stops are all part of the structure you are looking at, the market does not know or care what you are thinking, but it becomes semantics about stops being in the right place or not.....maybe the question is of weather the stop was poorly placed.

Stops are designed to minimise losses. period. They cannot really be in the wrong place.

 

Where you place them should be based on the structure/timeframe/mindset/plan you are trading......otherwise you may as well flip coins.

 

I would say the only time a stop is wrong is when it is not kept.

(end of mindless ramble for the afternoon)

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I asked the question because you can only know if a stop was wrongly placed after the fact; meaning, when it stops you out. Thinking that there is a right and wrong stop based on structure is the equivalent to thinking that the structure you see is the only structure that matters, and if you are looking at the only structure that matters then you are looking at the holy grail. Since we know there is no holy grail then we know that the structure that you are looking at is not the only structure that matters and therefore there is no stop that is too close or too far based on structure.

 

On the other hand the things you do know are how much you feel like losing and possibly how much pain you feel like feeling.

 

Minimizing losses, which are trading costs, is a major part of maximizing trading profits, so the topic is a very important topic to discuss.

 

MM

 

This is the "logic" that I often hear from those who haven't taken the time to adequately test their own systems, or from those who have insufficient experience in a market.

If you know what you are doing you can corellate stop placement with volatility, that way on an individual trade basis you can minimize the cost of being wrong and on a systemwide basis (over a period of months for example) you can keep risk down to a point where you know that profit will always exceed expenses.

For individual trades I know where I am wrong because "being wrong" corresponds to a boundary of my supply or demand node. Once price closes above or below a "node" the reason for being in the trade is invalidated and I have to pay up.

On a systemwide basis, I can allow myself to be wrong a specific number of times per day, week and month...once I use up those "bullets" I'm done. In other words if I don't have a valid edge, my system will eventually stop me from trading completely. The way it works for me, holding to strict risk management rules on a daily and weekly basis actually "insures" the profitability of my system on a monthly, quarterly and yearly basis. Sorry I can't provide more details but I wanted to give folks some idea of what can be accomplished if you really look into the subject.

 

Because I always hear this question I will answer it in advance. Yes you still have to have an edge for this kind of risk management to work....If you don't have an edge, this system will eventually make you stop trading...all this does is maximize the result you get when you have an edge (and the discipline to trade it).

 

Best of luck to all

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were right 100% of the time, you would never need a stop. So the issue is about whether you are right or not. Then there is the issue of luck. You could have an order taking draw down, but then be at another high probability set up in the same direction as the order. In that situation, it doesn't make any sense to exit. But the key is having a way to judge what the probability of success is. If there is no way to judge how probable the next price move will be, then trading is nothing more than managing a gamble. That is part of trading, but is it more of a gamble, or more of an informed decision? Let's say that you take a loss, and re-enter, take a loss and re-enter, and then take a third loss; if it were me, I'd be thinking that there is something that I don't understand. So there would be a fundamental issue other than where to place the stop loss.

 

Here is another thought. If you enter an order, and you are wrong, then why wouldn't you just reverse? I'm not suggesting that is the right thing to do, I'm just getting back to the point of knowing what the price is going to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never found market stops to improve system profitability, so I place them as wide as possible, based on the amount of pain I'm willing to endure. I think what is more important is to diversify your trades so that you don't have everything riding on one trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the "logic" that I often hear from those who haven't taken the time to adequately test their own systems, or from those who have insufficient experience in a market.

If you know what you are doing you can corellate stop placement with volatility, that way on an individual trade basis you can minimize the cost of being wrong and on a systemwide basis (over a period of months for example) you can keep risk down to a point where you know that profit will always exceed expenses.

For individual trades I know where I am wrong because "being wrong" corresponds to a boundary of my supply or demand node. Once price closes above or below a "node" the reason for being in the trade is invalidated and I have to pay up.

On a systemwide basis, I can allow myself to be wrong a specific number of times per day, week and month...once I use up those "bullets" I'm done. In other words if I don't have a valid edge, my system will eventually stop me from trading completely. The way it works for me, holding to strict risk management rules on a daily and weekly basis actually "insures" the profitability of my system on a monthly, quarterly and yearly basis. Sorry I can't provide more details but I wanted to give folks some idea of what can be accomplished if you really look into the subject.

 

Because I always hear this question I will answer it in advance. Yes you still have to have an edge for this kind of risk management to work....If you don't have an edge, this system will eventually make you stop trading...all this does is maximize the result you get when you have an edge (and the discipline to trade it).

 

Best of luck to all

 

Right! Sure! The markets do exactly the same thing every time. You should crawl back into a hole until you are prepared to prove that you have a right to be arrogant. Otherwise you are plain BS.

 

Once again, old man, you simply do not have the balls. Big mouth and no balls and a fear of being exposed. Sounds like a recipe for success.

 

Whether or I know what I am doing, I at least have the balls to take trades in an open forum with before the fact information for all to see. Something that you fear.

 

Carry on with the name calling. That is the only tool you have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For individual trades I know where I am wrong because "being wrong" corresponds to a boundary of my supply or demand node. Once price closes above or below a "node" the reason for being in the trade is invalidated and I have to pay up.

 

Thanks for sharing that Steve. I've looked at your posts about the supply and demand nodes, and find it very interesting. So it seems that your "stop loss" for a long order would be when price drops below the node band. If this is your "stop loss", then personally, I prefer this tactic for a stop loss rather than a specific price target.

 

In your case, if the band for taking a long position is broken to the downside, which is a failure to maintain support, it's a reason to stop the loss. I'm taking the liberty to make some assumptions here. I'm just guessing at how you are trading.

 

Again, it seems that your "stop loss" is the failure of your long signal, NOT a specific loss target. I use the same logic. It's not about a specific loss amount, it's about whether the reason for a trade is still valid or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for sharing that Steve. I've looked at your posts about the supply and demand nodes, and find it very interesting. So it seems that your "stop loss" for a long order would be when price drops below the node band. If this is your "stop loss", then personally, I prefer this tactic for a stop loss rather than a specific price target.

 

In your case, if the band for taking a long position is broken to the downside, which is a failure to maintain support, it's a reason to stop the loss. I'm taking the liberty to make some assumptions here. I'm just guessing at how you are trading.

 

Again, it seems that your "stop loss" is the failure of your long signal, NOT a specific loss target. I use the same logic. It's not about a specific loss amount, it's about whether the reason for a trade is still valid or not.

 

Yes, you have it right on target....the only question to resolve is whether the size of the supply/demand node is too big for your risk tolerance....you see what I mean? I use that data to decide whether to take a trade or to stand aside....Also if I may add to that...if you think about it...the size of the supply/demand node is related to the time frame of the chart....on longer term charts the size of the node is bigger, therefore if you see a nice setup, you have to be willing to take a bigger risk....and the final "take away" is that you also want to have a bigger potential profit target on your horizon....Depending on your perspective, this can be "pro" or "con"...but one thing it does is "enforce" a realistic size stop for every trade setup.. Hope this helps you.

 

Best Regards

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.