Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

method

Letting Profits Run Vs Taking Them

Recommended Posts

I've been trading for about 2 years and I have gotten to the point where I can enter in reasonably profitable spots and limit my losses quickly.

 

However, one sticking point I have is knowing when to take profits vs letting profits run.

 

I know that most of the greatest traders (livermore, soros) advocated and practiced going for the homerun and this is what I have been trying to implement into my trading. However, there have been several incidences where the trade initially went very well (I'm talking 10 tick risk : 100+ tick running profit) and then promptly reversed. In fact, the see saws in my P/L graph is because of these movements.

 

I have been reviewing some of my profit taking patterns and it appears the most solid, consistent growth in my P/L curve occurred when I was taking profits in a reasonable timeframe rather than letting them run.

 

Of course I would like to complement this solid growth in P/L with some extra spurts here and there by letting profits run, but I am struggling to do this in the timeframe that I trade (usually 1 to 2 days).

 

I am interested to hear what TL'ers thoughts are on this topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done some work on this, thought about it long and hard and come to the one conclusion that makes sense for me.

Consistency.

what ever you do, this is vital. If you wish to run a "' jobbing account"", and a separate "" let them ride"" account, then have different plans for both and don't mix them up.

Sometimes it will work, other times it won't - where many get into trouble OR have constant nagging issues that there is a better way, is when they mix the two.

Also if you cant do both, then pick the one that suits you.

 

Often when trying to capture the best in both worlds results in getting the worst of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Often when trying to capture the best in both worlds results in getting the worst of them.

 

Yep, well said.

 

There's no perfect answer here as you have to decide whether you want to grab your profits in chunks or get a bunch of small trades while waiting for that big one.

 

I wish I had the answer for you but it's a personal/personality thing IMO. Some people love grabbing that huge profit and are ok with taking lots of little ones while you wait for it; others like myself like to grab it in chunks and try to accumulate enough chunks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been trading for about 2 years and I have gotten to the point where I can enter in reasonably profitable spots and limit my losses quickly.

 

However, one sticking point I have is knowing when to take profits vs letting profits run.

 

I know that most of the greatest traders (livermore, soros) advocated and practiced going for the homerun and this is what I have been trying to implement into my trading. However, there have been several incidences where the trade initially went very well (I'm talking 10 tick risk : 100+ tick running profit) and then promptly reversed. In fact, the see saws in my P/L graph is because of these movements.

 

I have been reviewing some of my profit taking patterns and it appears the most solid, consistent growth in my P/L curve occurred when I was taking profits in a reasonable timeframe rather than letting them run.

 

Of course I would like to complement this solid growth in P/L with some extra spurts here and there by letting profits run, but I am struggling to do this in the timeframe that I trade (usually 1 to 2 days).

 

I am interested to hear what TL'ers thoughts are on this topic.

 

the best place to exit a LONG is the best place to enter a SHORT

 

the best place to exit a SHORT is the best place to enter a LONG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to be able to capture intraday profits AND still stay in the move I developed a Re-entry tecnique where I would add back my scaled out position with a tighter stop than the original entry. As an example using the ES, if I exited/scaled at a bar's high tick extreme or some target - but momentum was still in my direction, I will add back the scale out on a pullback of approx 6 ticks usually near an 8EMA average. Very often this marks the end of a (small pullback) and allows me to get into the next push back up with a full position on.

 

My logic was based on my observation that I hated seeing the loss in profit that was available while the pullback occurred which usually was this 6 ticks. So why not get out at the high (in a long trade) and get back in with a tight stop?

 

By having a really effective "re" entry technique, you can take you profits and let them run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the best place to exit a LONG is the best place to enter a SHORT

 

the best place to exit a SHORT is the best place to enter a LONG

 

That's not necessarily true tams. Often I get a short or long signal that provides profit potential and by the time an opposite trade shows that trade has a lot less profit. You may argue that there's a system flaw but I am not interested in being in the market at all times. And your response is just that - always in. And for the average retail trader that means a lot of flip flopping back and forth that only gets your broker wealthy.

 

I think exits will always be my personal crutch - like today in oil, WTF was that? I have a signal to buy at the lod but how on Earth could I have seen that move coming? Other days that exact same thing will yield my standard 20-25 ticks of profit and promptly retrace (and usually before a short signal will trigger).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I've done better letting profits run and just adjusting my stop/loss point manually. I tried trailing stops, but they always stopped me out before the larger move got started. I believe the old farts were right in saying that your year will be made by a few big trades that make up for all those small losers you endure. There's always a trade-off, and trading a longer time frame often requires a wider stop/loss and more patience, so if you're someone who likes action or are not willing to hold through retracements, it could be a futile strategy. With stocks I trade the weekly chart, but Forex is a different animal. I don't have the cajones for that. I used to trade very short-term charts, without much success but now have latched on to the 4hr timeframe. Maybe someday I'll trade the daily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not do both? Have a minimum target that you will feel okay closing after that is relation to your initial risk...say 2.5x your initial risk...? Knowing that you will be happy with any profit over that mark...?

 

For me it comes down to knowing what I'm looking for going in and having an overall strategy in place. I have that strategy in place because it makes money. If it makes money I keep it in place. After that it comes down to balancing the need for improvement with greed. Yes, we always want to get better, but we have to know the difference between that healthy desire and the destructive force of greed.

 

My profits are defined by my risk and my win rate as these variables are always acting upon each other. If I have a high win rate I will probably have smaller per trade profits. If I have a lower win rate I will need bigger profits and smaller risk. As someone else said, we have to find which we're most comfortable -- and realize that we can't do both for the simple reason that...

 

Knowing which trades were going to turn and which were going to reverse before that happened would mean that I could predict the future. If it were possible for me to predict the future then I would be a gazillionaire. Because I can't predict the future then I have to use the tools available to me to profit in the market. One of those tools is letting profits run. The other is closing at predetermined targets and being okay in the knowledge that some of the trades you close are going to the moon without me. Sometimes I catch those rockets, sometimes I watch them leave without me. Sometimes I close on target and watch price plummet and feel like a hero.

 

By knowing what I'm looking for I can look at any trade I'm currently in and ask: is this what I'm looking for? Are we making new highs? Is volume present? Are the consolidations healthy? If so, then the trade stays open. But...

 

If I am up over 2.5 times my initial risk I allow myself to close if I want to. Why not, right? The only thing I have to worry about is that trade skyrocketing to the moon without me on it. LOL As long as I can be okay with that happening then I'll ring the register. But....the more that I do that the more I'm reminded that I simply cannot predict the future...

 

In closing, here's a recent example. A trade I closed a couple months ago in URG. The trade opened well and after a bumpy start was off to the races. Then at +44% gain it started to faulter. Now, URG is a low priced stock and I've been trading them for a few years so I know how fickle they can be. With my initial risk at 10%, and having a 44% gain...I am happy, and close the trade. Here's the chart:

 

urg1.jpg

 

Now here's what happened after I closed:

 

urg2.jpg

 

200%+ gain. Now, I can either beat myself up or understand that if I want to get gains like this then I have to be willing to give back a lot of those early gains...or I have to be content with letting these monsters go. Or...I can shoot for both. While I've never made a 200% gain I have got plenty of 100%+ gains and I'm pretty sure it all balances out.

 

Good luck to you.

 

David John Hall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not mention if you are trading stocks, options, futures or Forex - it is all different.

The same goes for the time frame that you are using - tick, minutes, intra-day, days etc.

Would you mind being a little more specific? It may help then to give an answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I trade the 6B and FESX futures almost exclusively

 

Usually 30 min graphs

 

I usually go for 1:3 risk to reward ratio trades

 

When I'm feeling greedy after on a winning streak perhaps I will let it run (this is especially the case with forex futures, mainly because they are more volatile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've done extensive back testing of both types of exits (in TradeStation): 1: Where I set a profit target and got out, and 2: Where I let the winners run (using a moving average). The result was a wash. The amount left on the table that I would have gotten if I hadn't exited at the target, was almost exactly the same as the amount lost from trying to let the winner run past the target until it hit a moving average (tried lots of different averages). Despite the back testing however, psychologically, I'm more comfortable with letting my winners run, rather than exiting at a target. So that is how I trade. In my plan, I've recorded these statements to remind myself of the game I play:

No matter what trading plan you have, periodically, it's going to:

1. Leave money on the table.

2. Get you into a bad trade.

3. Keep you out of a good trade.

4. Miss it's target exit by a small amount and then turn into a bad trade.

Get over it and take the next trade! (From Trading in the Zone).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure what your entry criteria are.

This is a chart I constructed for you of a 30 min GBPUSD.

Getting in would be related to the MACD_BB_HullMA composite of the BB/Keltner Squeeze.

 

Getting out is related to a few things to look at that may be of use to you.

When the Bars drift away from the BB (length set to 12) one needs to be aware that this is a pull back or a change of trend and be ready to get out.

 

In the DMI/ADX set to 11 or 9, when the ADX is pulling back particularly if it is coming down below a level of 40, it is definitely time to get out.

 

Hope that this is helpful.

5aa71055152a7_GettingInandGettingOut.jpg.c3adc360b568f49a4fe05dfe7c0e8ca5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, The answer to your question – It’s system dependent. Every answer on the first page, except for Iris’s, was system dependent. Good ideas, but, unfortunately, not one answer acknowledged ‘system dependency’ or the type of system behind whether 'letting them run' or 'taking them' and a hybrid was best.

Rough examples of system dependency: In pure trend following systems, you have to let profits run – because outliers are literally the edge. In quasi-trend trading systems, you have to test it out and like others have posted – go with the best one or with the hybrid that tests out. Most swing type, etc. etc etc systems will almost always test out best to take profits instead of staying…etc. hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I trade the 6B and FESX futures almost exclusively

 

Usually 30 min graphs

 

I usually go for 1:3 risk to reward ratio trades

 

When I'm feeling greedy after on a winning streak perhaps I will let it run (this is especially the case with forex futures, mainly because they are more volatile

 

I don't trade either of these, but, generally, you have to throw away small winners to get to the big winners. You'll end up with BE or losers when you could have taken a small winner and it will suck no matter how accustomed you get to doing it. Consistently trying 1:3 trades will eventually lead to break even or worse. fesx is a little short on volatility these days to trade what I am suggesting. 6E might be better suited for a large move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a couple of simplification to that question I think, because the time period is what matters. The reason why I say that is because the money management part of this, is part of the holy grail in trading. Letting your profits run and cutting your losses is no fluke given the right pivot point that you begin from only.

 

Example: If my pivot point was July 2-9 that would be consider the right time period for me to manage my money that way.

 

Livermore had pivot points and knew when the trend was turning. At a major bottom this form of money managing is best where you cut short your losers. I did this since July 9 with a paper portfolio and I am up 50% a little earlier in the year.

 

If you're going to trade and take quicker profits and not let them run would be another time period. I have to say when you know you did not buy at the bottom than revert to taking quicker profits. Like I said Livermore knew the Pivots and he couldn't calculate all the pivots as conditions change. He was always using this method when the major trend turned though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like overall you are doing well in your trading if you are consistently profitable.

 

Taking profit vs letting it run is a tough decision and often it seems like the day you do one the other happens and vice versa.

Here are a few things to keep in mind.

1. what type of day is it? are we trending or in a range. if we're in a range then odds favor non extension and you want to take your profits off the table.

if we're in a trending environment or if we have just made a break from a tight range then try to let your trades run.

 

2. try to incorporate some tools into your trading that give you hints that the run is over. a few suggestions... momentum divergence, wave counting (ie if wave 5 and divergence then consider exiting the trade). You might consider using lower timeframes to time you're entries/exits on the higher timeframe.

 

good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.