Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ktartarotti

Does Anyone Truly Make a Living Solely Trading the E-minis???

Recommended Posts

It's really interesting to watch. I'm sure all of you will agree with me here, even if you don't chose to voice your opinions, that 'trading communities' like this with their monderators, thanked post counts, number post contributed are basically an online hierarchical arrangement of individuals into divisions of percieved trading credibility, which is just social stratification. As mentioned above, this just causes a power struggle as people fight for their place in the pecking order because people want to be 'the one'...that trader in the community that people acknowlege as being successful and who's opinions are worthy. So as the majority of people fight it out for their place, and just look around this forum, you can find plenty of posts of people fighting amongst each other, trying to disprove other people, and the various witch hunts that have run rampent within threads.... it's clear to see that the original conception and ideology of the group which was to help share information and education about trading has just taking a complete back seat as people fight for their place in the social order.

 

I have only "flipped" through this thread, and my intention is not to take sides. But I find this one comment I have quoted above interesting, and I agree with it 100%. I have had the exact same thoughts as above about the hierarchical structure that takes place on the forums.... This forum happens to be a tiny little microcosm of the real world and naturally we perform and behave in similar ways we do in society.

 

At first I thought it was cool(thank feature) as this was the first site I had seen it on, now it is more of an annoyance than anything. It often, IMO of course becomes a rather arbitrary and useless statistic at times.... that isn't really about 'thanking' someone for taking the time to make a salient point or taking the time to respond to you personally, but rather a method for showing approval.

 

I've seen the most useless comments(IMO of course) receive thanks for what doesn't appear to be any value added content, but because they are simply trying to show affection, or gratification for someone elses post that happen to run congruent with their beliefs.

 

An example I am imagining just for the sake of argument..... imagine there existed a thread with two schools of thought. Group A believed that trading with anything but price was foolish and that any other way, it is not possible to profit from it. Group B believes that indicators are necessary to assist someone in making decisions. Also in this example, each school of thought has an ambassador(one poster) for each camp.

 

Naturally, there will be supporters for each group..... and the thanks will most likely be used as a voting system to approve/disapprove or show support for a particular belief system, as opposed to a system to thank those for adding actual value-added content.

 

I remember a similar behavior being exhibited in the "Brooks" thread a long time ago, whenever the thread was derailed from a thread about TA, to a thread of some saying this is the "wrong" way. And naturally, those posters with heavy 'thanks' count were constantly being thanked by those either showing approval for their belief system, or naturally filing into the general societal pecking order under certain posters. You would later be able to observe these same 'lower thanked posters' attempting to 'kiss up to' or please the higher thanked posters by deriding the posters discussing TA in that thread in various chat sessions and other threads.

 

I don't know if the behavior from the lower ranked members was because of them just wanting to be on what they perceived as the right side of the hierarchical structure we created, or for altruistic measure so they could remain in good favor with the higher ranked members? But nonetheless I found this behavior interesting.

 

Disclaimer: Not calling anyone out, just making comments about the behavior I seemed to have observed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

forrestang..... thanks.

I agree with what you are saying, yet as part of the value of open discussion I will back the side of the thanks button. I try to use it so actually say thanks especially to those who I might not agree with, but can acknowledge their point of view.

On a serious note, I actually think that the thanks button is actually good as you can see the names of those who thank, not just a poll, or just another post saying thanks and cluttering things up. Its open and disclosed.

Possibly there is a suggestion here to have two extra buttons..... keep the thanks, add an "I agree" and an "I disagree" button or something similar.

Additionally I think the internet, and its threads do require an extra level of ass kissing and buttering up with everything people say, as context and non verbal (written) ques are extremely important in communication, and this is not possible on line.

 

Humans are like chickens - like pecking orders. If it was not the thanks button, it would be the number of posts, the number of threads started..... anything.

At least this way I feel that thanks which is often not offered freely enough in society is a nice thing.

 

I also found this a while ago....

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I traded for a living about nine years ago. I started with Datek which is no longer in existence and then I went to Speedtrader. My success was due more to common sense & luck because my knowledge was minimal at best. I made about 150K in 13 months. I then became a landlord. I plan on returning to Trading come the first of the year as soon as I settle on the sale of my apartment building. Now I will be playing with between 3 & 5 hundred K. I am taking these couple of months to reacquaint myself with the market by learning the routine of the ten stocks I will play with.

I must admit it is very scary and there is so much information out there to interpret. :crap: The benefit I have is that a can stay away from the smaller stocks which tend to have more volatility in them. I don't even plan on using any margin until I feel comfortable with the way things have changed and work now.

 

If anyone has any help, suggestions it will be appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To become a full time traders, it will take years. Full time trader is smiliar to becoming a lawyer, Doctors, etc. The problem is many people believe day trading es is "get rich quick." If it takes 5 yrs to become a doctor, it will take 5 yrs to become a full time trader. I have no clue why people believe they can become a full time trader less than 1 yr. If that is true, why does it take a long time to become a doctor, lawyer, etc.

 

According to the Gov report, 97% of the people lose trading in the futures market. One of the reason they lose is, they failed to understand trading futures involves substantial risk and only risk capital should be used. All brokerages and few trading school websites have those risk disclaimer. But for some reason, most people FAILED or ignore the risk disclaimer.

 

For those who are a successful full time traders took them yrs to get there. Plus, they fully understood that trading es is NOT A GET RICH QUICK and trading futures involves SUBSTANTIAL RISK!!!!!!

 

hope this help

 

I have to respectfully disagree. With stocks which is all I know about, your chances are 50/50 In all fairness to that, you can throw a dart and you have a fifty percent chance it will go up. There is no other places for it to go. Up, Down... That's it. Now if you incorporate stop losses, when you lose you don't lose much. Sure that is in really simple terms but it is the truth.

Now as you hone your skills you will become more proficient and therefor increase the amount of profitable trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have to respectfully disagree. With stocks which is all I know about, your chances are 50/50 In all fairness to that, you can throw a dart and you have a fifty percent chance it will go up. There is no other places for it to go. Up, Down... That's it. Now if you incorporate stop losses, when you lose you don't lose much. Sure that is in really simple terms but it is the truth.

Now as you hone your skills you will become more proficient and therefor increase the amount of profitable trades.

 

This post does not make sense.

 

You believe that the markets are random and that there is a 50% probability that it will go either up or down? Flip a coin?

 

Then you say that "as you hone your skills you will become more proficient....."

 

Which is exactly the point emg was making. It takes time to learn trading and the failure rate is high.

 

Markets can go up, down AND sideways. Add commissions and slippage and it is easy to understand how someone who is not "proficient" can quickly become broke, especially trading leveraged instruments like futures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8675309- you have way too much time on your hands to be a fund manager. I have been trading the curve for 4 yrs, sole source of income for wife and 3 kids. Own a Cbot AM seat, and a cme IMM. Get over yourself.

Back to the topic: no I do not know a single person making a living off soley es.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This post does not make sense.

 

You believe that the markets are random and that there is a 50% probability that it will go either up or down? Flip a coin?

 

Then you say that "as you hone your skills you will become more proficient....."

 

Which is exactly the point emg was making. It takes time to learn trading and the failure rate is high.

 

Markets can go up, down AND sideways. Add commissions and slippage and it is easy to understand how someone who is not "proficient" can quickly become broke, especially trading leveraged instruments like futures.

 

 

In that regard, yes you are right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you consider The CL, GC or NG an emini? I trade with limited risk and make about 2K a day. You can easily make a living as a trader. Now, I don't make 2K every day, some Break Even, some 1K, but when I get my trades early I am done and move on with my life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting stories, that is for sure. I have been trading eminis for 2 full years now and I just finally "figured it out", at least what works for me. I spent a lot of cash going through the usual "newbie route"...buying systems and trading room subscriptions. Nothing worked.

 

What did work was a lot of inner soul searching. Now, I have made the "corner".

 

I started an educational site that tells my story. Check it out. Perhaps it will help some of those out who have a a lot of questions, as I did. The difference was, nobody ever really shared information that helped me.

 

I know that I will make a full time living by successfully trading intra day the emini contracts like ES and NQ. It is all in your head...it is not with flashy cool looking vendor's systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your logic seems flawed.

Are you saying that if one is aware of the risk associated with trading then they will not lose?

I am sure most people are aware of the risk. What kills them (their account rather) is lack of a plan, lack of training, lack of discipline and lack of capital.

 

Gabe

 

I think there is a big difference between being aware of the risk and actually accepting the risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think there is a big difference between being aware of the risk and actually accepting the risk.

 

What do you perceive to be the big difference between being aware of the risk and accepting it and how can one put that to practical use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like to open this topic to offer a thread of hope to all of those that find it impossible to believe that one can actually make a living trading solely the e-minis.

 

I trade the ES and 6E, they compliment each other nicely. I know a handful of traders that just trade the SPOOS (big contract) solely and make a nice living. I also have colleagues that trade the ES/6E and make a great living as well.

 

I myself have been trading the two for about 2 years and have grown consistently profitable trading 4-ES contracts and 2-6E contracts. I'm + almost every week since Labor Day and my down weeks haven't detracted much from my winning weeks. I keep my risk extremely small 0.5% per trade so that's why I haven't gone to more contracts. I'm pretty young so my account is still in the 5 figures.

 

With a 100k account trading the ES nd 6E using this tick you could do some serious damage easily making 50-100k a year. But like other trader's have expressed it all comes in practice and experience. I've got friends on the trading floor who have been there 25+ years. Granted pit trading is a different game than screen trading, but if they can do it there's no reason you can't either.

 

--

Tim Racette

URL Removed by Moderator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8675309- you have way too much time on your hands to be a fund manager. I have been trading the curve for 4 yrs, sole source of income for wife and 3 kids. Own a Cbot AM seat, and a cme IMM. Get over yourself.

Back to the topic: no I do not know a single person making a living off soley es.

 

I don't know a single movie star. I know they exist though.

 

Seriously, whats the fuss about? Of course you can make a living trading just ES. Or YM, NQ 6E, US, GE, TY, stocks etc. The only thing that stops people doing it is themselves and poor market understanding from reading the typical drivel like Elder and other 'How to' books.

 

I think people are looking for a step-by step guide for trading - an instruction manual. 'If this, then do that'. Is it any wonder most find it so hard?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here. I trade to compliment my income, but it is not my sole source. I've contemplated upping size and trying full time, but it makes me nervous. Keeping the 9-5 helps me stay relaxed while trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Same here. I trade to compliment my income, but it is not my sole source. I've contemplated upping size and trying full time, but it makes me nervous. Keeping the 9-5 helps me stay relaxed while trading.

 

There's a lot of benefits of having supplemental income or a passive income stream, especially when making the switch or trying out full time trading. Timothy Ferris's book the 4-hr Work Week is a great attest to that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you consider The CL, GC or NG an emini? I trade with limited risk and make about 2K a day. You can easily make a living as a trader. Now, I don't make 2K every day, some Break Even, some 1K, but when I get my trades early I am done and move on with my life.

 

This is one of the biggest pieces to remaining a successful trader and making it as a full-time trader. I've seen too many traders make 5k+ in the morning and give it all back by the end of the day because they believe they are in sync with the market or know what the market is going to do next.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moderated Message:
LINK DELETED
Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Limiting yourself to two full stop outs on the day allows you to keep the gains you have accumulated and limits your risk if you start off the day with a losing trade. Trade small when you are losing, trade big when you are winning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you CAN most definiteloy make a good living off the e minis s&p.

If you are trading 1 lot, hoeer, there is no way. But if you trade consistently profitablly for 3 month, say increase your lots to 3, then try 5 til you get a decent size of trading power.

 

Trades with 15-20 lots are not uncommon! Mind you, the standard commissions apply on a "per lot per trade" basis in most cases. Check with your broker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so I see everyone talked about trading and said silly things

But no answered the question you asked

 

I'll answer it. I trade the eMini but do not make a living from the trading.

 

 

Moderated Message:
LINK DELETED
Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so I see everyone talked about trading and said silly things

But no answered the question you asked

 

I am retired and don't need the money, I am trading only the ES contract and yes I do make enough to live on if I had to...

 

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. I have been making my living solely trading the ES for the past 3+ years.

 

But I must say that before then I was a horrible trader (primarily due to poor risk management principles). Giving back weeks of profits being on the wrong side of trend days.

 

It was only due to the efforts of some prop traders (and this is not a plug - won't even mention their firm) that turned my trading around. I can't even count the number of accounts that I blew out.

 

I'm new to posting on this board and because those prop traders took the time to help me, I feel that I have a debt to repay by helping others. True professional trading has nothing to do with setups, technical analysis, or any of the commonly accepted garbage that is out there.

 

I have nothing to gain. nothing to sell, and my only motivation is to help traders who are in search of valid trading information to fill the void...

 

Ronnie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.