Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

johnjohn1hew

AHG Thread

Recommended Posts

Lately i have been looking at the AHG method and have noticed similarities between that method and all other price action methods. AHG trades only price, using support and resistance, trend lines, price patterns, volume, market internals, market profile, etc. as confirmation. If you're not familiar with the AHG i have included a pdf of the original AHG method that contains snippets from the enormous journal on Elitetrader.

 

In this thread post your analysis of charts using your method in conjunction with the AHG method. Lets see what we can learn from this.

AHG Bible Full Version.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AHG method has evolved many iterations... it is a moving target !

 

A is using volume now... it is not just price action alone

 

 

 

p.s. he also uses indicators to supplement his price reading.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't really matter what Anek is doing right now. I read over the method and i think it makes sense. In my interpretation of it and in my submissions to this thread i will only be using volume as an indicator in conjunction with price movements. But you are free to post what you'd like and how you use "indicators" to confirm your trades based on price action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It doesn't really matter what Anek is doing right now. I read over the method and i think it makes sense. In my interpretation of it and in my submissions to this thread i will only be using volume as an indicator in conjunction with price movements. But you are free to post what you'd like and how you use "indicators" to confirm your trades based on price action.

 

 

I did not download your attachment.

Do you know which version is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It doesn't really matter what Anek is doing right now. I read over the method and i think it makes sense. In my interpretation of it and in my submissions to this thread i will only be using volume as an indicator in conjunction with price movements. But you are free to post what you'd like and how you use "indicators" to confirm your trades based on price action.

 

I think it's important to note for others reading this that the system being discussed is possibly no longer being used by the original author of the system. That's kind of important to mention IMO.

 

B/c the follow up question is - if it was working so good, why scrap it? Again, in the interest of full disclosure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AHG 1.0 is what i think they call it.

 

 

I don't mean to discourage you... but he has publicly renounced it.

 

use it as an academic study,

even if you don't find out what works,

knowing what doesn't work is just as valuable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AHG method has evolved many iterations... it is a moving target !

 

A is using volume now... it is not just price action alone

 

 

 

p.s. he also uses indicators to supplement his price reading.

 

At one time his charts where covered in indicators. There seems to be some sound principles at the core but as you say it seems to be a different approach from month to month

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm done with the forums. ^^ Explains everything.

 

Not sure why? Because what he wrote was not all that it purported to be or that someone pointed out it was not all it was purported to be? There is (imho) stuff to be found on forums that is as good as any published anywhere. In fact the cost of material is absolutely no guarantee of its efficacy,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm done with the forums. ^^ Explains everything.

JohnJohn - below are some excepts from A's later postings that give clues as to the evolution of the method. I'm sure these concepts sound familiar.

 

06-11-08 :

 

My initial goal with the journal was to help out newcomers. I believe I provided some ground rules and basic methods to get you on the right track, now I'm retired from the journal as I have taken the teachings more seriously and into a closed community.

 

I took a group of hard working journal followers and expanded the method to such degree that it's now tough to go back and catch where I left here, even tougher and near impossible to allow new members, as we are several phases above this journal now, private forums, etc. Think AHG2, AHG2.5, AHG3 and beyond, no joke.

...

The principles remain the same, highs, lows, trendlines, no indicators but we have added volume, specifically the teachings of Wyckoff to improve our accuracy.

...

If there's anything extra I can post to help I think it's the fact that you should think of uptrends as resistances becoming supports and downtrends as supports becoming resistances. This is pretty much the golden rule for trend determination as several factors throughout the trading day, including volatility and low volume can produce what might seem like a LL in an uptrend or a HH in a downtrend. In the end, it all comes down to support and resistance, supply and demand around key pivotal levels and how price afffects what once was support and what once was resistance.

 

Hope it helps and remember, nothing replaces screen time, it is by far the greatest tool.

--------

 

06-12-08 :

The volume application we are implementing is making sure the trend is healthy by combining the beauty of price action of volume based charts and the critical volume definition of 1 minute based charts. Strongly suggest to study the work of Wyckoff in detail.

 

For instance...

 

In an uptrend you want expanding volume on the upside, decreasing volume on the downside.

 

In a downtrend, you want expanding volume on the downside, decreasing volume on the upside.

 

On top of that, we have implemented this on reversal formations, looking for volume divergence. First leg high volume, second leg much lower volume (buyers or sellers done exhausted).

 

Last but not least stop run hunting to further improve our entries or scale outs. Little more complicated than the above but worth studying on your own.

...

Edited by R/R
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I spent some time with Anek in #AHG. It's PA with a little bit of volume (mostly for divergence). It's comparable to what Thales does in that it's very simple and is based on price. As of now everything I do comes straight from what I learned from Anek.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.