Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Open and Free Discussion on Volume

Recommended Posts

A decisive break of 895.50 should clear the way to a test of the 3.25 point range betwen 891.25-894.50

 

 

This thing is starting to feel like a long term investment for me here.

 

With the break lower, my stop is lowered to 896.50, and my limit is still 891.75

5aa70ef5c8f68_7-02-2009ESTradingTVGR16.thumb.jpg.ccb54da78031a4e86288bdda2558d313.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+2.5 points on 1/2 and +7.25 points on 1/2 = +4 5/8 points/contract traded

 

 

Checking my trade blotter, my average fill on entry was more than .25 lower than I had thought, so my average profit before commissions is only 4.5 points.contract traded. Sorry about the misinformation, as it was not my intention to mislead anyone.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was generous of you to share your live analysis. Nice trade

 

No problem, I hope you might find even a small part of it useful, and if not, I hope you at least found it somewhat interesting.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's a sly remark. It is not accepted here.

I am putting you on ignore.

Have a nice day.

 

There was nothing sly about my request that the person in question either put up or shut up with respect to showing how his system applies to real time trading decisions.

 

I myself have been too often the victim of the truly sly. I did not judge. I asked that if the parties in question really possessed such a key to profitability, then, please, share it with the rest of us.

 

If I help even one other hopeful trader from falling for more of the same promises and delusions that I fell for, then I will have done well by my fellow humans.

 

You unfairly judged me. I, after all, have no chat room, web site, educational materials, etc. I do not seek to be anyone's mentor. I do not want students, followers or disciples. I have nothing to sell, and little to give. But what I have, I give freely.

 

Only one deserves such disciples, and I try always to remember the lessons of he taught, and in particular, I am reminded of the lesson of Matthew 7:1.

 

In then end, the measure you give will be the measure you get.

 

Best Wishes to all,

 

Thales

 

God Bless America

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, rather than post my chart complete with notes and annotations from throughout the day, I posted a trade execution report.

 

Good Trading to you.

 

- Spydertrader

 

Rather than sharing your chart reading skills in real time, you chose to leave this thread alone all week.

 

You chose not to share one live example of the method you claim to be "the first step to consistent profitability".

 

Why not post at 9:29 am this morning that you were going to short the market on open? Why not post at any time today that you were looking to cover at the 893.50? Why not share something that would show folks how you apply your method at the"hard right edge of the chart"?

 

I do not think the request unreasonable. Your charts and channels and fractals are not intuitive and readily apparent to the uninitiated with your FTT's and CCC's and HVS's and FBO's etc.

 

You see, other folks may post after the fact charts, with explanations of their aproach, and the explanation is readily apparent and easily understood (it is not too difficult to understand the concept of a MA cross or a trendline break). It wouldn't matter if that person really traded it or not, because one can see how and why such a decision would have been reasonable as price action unfolded.

 

But that is not the case with your method. Why not spend a day or two here or at ET and trade live. Post your trades live. No one expects every trade to be profitable. But if your method is real, then it should be easily communicable and able to be shared in real time.

 

I do not know what you expect of folks. I'm sure you'll respond and say that you don't expect anything. But then why bother? What is the point of your posts here at TL?

 

If you are posting because you wish to help folks, great! Help us! Show us how your method is to be applied in real time. I stand by my words: Anyone can mark up a dead chart after the closing bell and look like a genius.

 

Anyone can claim to possess the key to trading success.

 

I have seen many post mortem charts and I have heard many make such claims.

 

I have not seen any willingly make live trade calls and share the reasoning behind those calls publically (at least not without charging a fee).

 

I know that your method has many parts and seems very complicated. But certainly you are the master of it. If anyone has the ability to employ the method in real time and thus to demonstrate its effectiveness at anticipating immediate price trends and movement, it is you.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I have not been showing volume at all, it might be assumed that I would fall under the second option above, along with Brownie. However, I do believe that volume, especially on daily, weekly, and monthly analysis of stock price movements, can be very useful, and provide important information.

 

I have not found it to be useful for intraday day trading.

 

Here is the 5 minute ES with volume. I was hoping that at some point this morning one of the Volumiati would appear and share his or her views on how to trade the ES today based upon volume analysis rather than price action. I'd really rather see and hear the analysis in real time as the action unfolds. Afterall, anyone can mark up a dead chart after the fact and look like a genius.

 

For me, a volume+price action approach is more useful and conclusive when price is at a level of importance. I would like to analyze volume+price when they are at a level of prior resistance or support. Without these levels i would have to say that coming to any accurate conclusion would be quite hard as when price is not at one of these levels, it is either heading to one or is establishing a new one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something i felt like contributing to the thread. :) I guess this is what someone would call price-discovery.

 

Traders are always searching for trades. If they cannot find these, then price moves (representing this search). When they have found trades, then price will move sideways until traders once again have to search for trades. Example: when price is rising the majority of the sellers are finding prices too cheap and are withholding their selling orders until they find prices to be high enough. Since price is rising, the buyers are obviously agreeing with the sellers that price is too cheap. When price arrives at a suitable level to the sellers, they will start to sell and whatever buyers are left will buy. This will most likely lead to a congestion (representing an area at which a lot of traders are willing to trade with each other), from which price will leave once traders no longer agree on value. The trend is a result of a disagreement and the congestion is the result of agreement.

Edited by johnjohn1hew
grammar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The definition of fractal is not what is the issue here. Rather, it is your assertion about the existence of "sequences of volume" that must "complete."

 

You wil need to provide a much more detailed account of what you are asserting for that assertion to have the character of proof, rather than character of a mysterious scroll that only the initiated may translate.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

"sequences of volume"

sequence.png.ab3ac66b4334519ea407912e9ff52d0c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traders enter the market to make profit. This search for profit causes trends and congestions. The trend is the path and the congestion is the destination, from which a new/old path will eventually be followed. Price moves in a trend-like fashion as the sellers are in a disagreement about value. When one side find prices to be unacceptable, they will hold off until price is at a acceptable level. This is the basic idea of a trend. When both sides find price to be at a acceptable level/zone traders will trade and price will remain at/inside this level/zone. When a balance occurs, traders believe value to be (relatively) at the same level. Price is being supported at this level and (ideally) many trades should be taking place. Price remains in a zone because at the top price is being resisted and at the bottom price is being supported. I.e. at the top sellers are finding prices to be high enough and acceptable, so they sell; and at the bottom buyers buyers are finding price to be low enough and acceptable, so they buy. Normally at these extremes the force driving price towards it will be overcome easily. Generally, at the top and bottom of a value zone, volume should be the lowest and it should be the highest in the middle. When volume is highest in the middle, the majority of the trades are taking place as a result of a compromise by both the buyers and the sellers. Price is not too high and it is not too low. When a zone is no longer acceptable, price will move. But in order for price to move, one side has to find it unacceptable and the other has to be in agreement, or price will go nowhere. Example: Sellers no longer find the range to be acceptable, so they ease off and now the buyers are able to take price higher if they so desire to. If they believe price to be cheap, they will easily drive price upwards. If they believe price to be expensive they will hold off, thus both sides are holding off and the result is little to no trades and price goes nowhere.

 

"Generally, at the top and bottom of a value zone, volume should be the lowest and it should be the highest in the middle." This statement may seem to be contradictory to some, but i believe that a true value area should be confirmed by high volume as then traders are actually expressing their agreement. When volume is low at this point the traders are just lacking - not indicating value, but a withdrawal.I believe value should be a clear indication by the traders and not just a result of a lack of trades. I think i can understand why some believe a balance should be on light volume: It is because the majority have traded and expressed their opinion in the market and the result is an interesting meeting in price of the buyers and sellers. A price at which their remains few traders, because the majority who wanted to express their opinion have and the others are waiting for a sign of a new trend.

 

What's your opinion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"sequences of volume"

 

Thanks, but until one of you Iterative Refinement folks becomes willing to show me, on a 5 minute es chart, which is, after all, the chart you folks claim to use for trading, 1) an actual trade, 2) an explanation in a shared language for the basis of the trade decision and 3) at what price you entered, I am done with you.

 

I mean really, you would think I was speaking an alien language. Getting one of you folks to name a price is like pulling teeth. The best I can get is here's a "sample of P3 trade on Friday chart#1 is the moment when I enter chart#2 is where I am taking profits....My stop was 2 points." P3? Moment? I don't know how your broker does it, but mine calculates my pnl based on price, not "moments."

 

I don't mean to sound rude, but I just do not have the time to look into an approach that can have no utility so long as you folks seek to conceal more than you are willing to reveal.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, but until one of you Iterative Refinement folks becomes willing to show me, on a 5 minute es chart, which is, after all, the chart you folks claim to use for trading, 1) an actual trade, 2) an explanation in a shared language for the basis of the trade decision and 3) at what price you entered, I am done with you.

 

I mean really, you would think I was speaking an alien language. Getting one of you folks to name a price is like pulling teeth. The best I can get is here's a "sample of P3 trade on Friday chart#1 is the moment when I enter chart#2 is where I am taking profits....My stop was 2 points." P3? Moment? I don't know how your broker does it, but mine calculates my pnl based on price, not "moments."

 

I don't mean to sound rude, but I just do not have the time to look into an approach that can have no utility so long as you folks seek to conceal more than you are willing to reveal.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

I though you interested in vol seq? my bad. As far as following my call, I don't do that so so sorry!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For any interested in 'volume' its probably worth taking a look at Studies in Tape Reading by Rollo Tape (a pen name of Wycoff) or Tape reading and market Tactics by Neil. These cover 'volume sequences' but in language that most any market practitioner will understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we could just get more traders in an educational forum like this to post a real time trade with strategy and comments the educational value to all those reading would increase 10 fold. Thalestrader, I applaud you for taking the time to truly demonstrate your method bar by bar without the enormous problems that hindsight analysis provides to all trade analysis. Blowfish, thanks for the suggested reading.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is me trying to get this thread back on track for the volume curious. :)

 

 

In short, if prices are rising there is more demand than supply. If price are falling there is more supply than demand. The buyers have to search higher for sellers (D>S) and the sellers have to search lower for buyers (S>D).

 

One will need an understanding of market structure in-order to fully grasp this theory. I learned it by studying the DOM ladder.

 

 

Thanks, I agree with this statement. However this seems to indicate I don't need to look at volume at all. I can determine this by watching price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Something i felt like contributing to the thread. :) I guess this is what someone would call price-discovery.

 

Traders are always searching for trades. If they cannot find these, then price moves (representing this search). When they have found trades, then price will move sideways until traders once again have to search for trades. Example: when price is rising the majority of the sellers are finding prices too cheap and are withholding their selling orders until they find prices to be high enough. Since price is rising, the buyers are obviously agreeing with the sellers that price is too cheap. When price arrives at a suitable level to the sellers, they will start to sell and whatever buyers are left will buy. This will most likely lead to a congestion (representing an area at which a lot of traders are willing to trade with each other), from which price will leave once traders no longer agree on value. The trend is a result of a disagreement and the congestion is the result of agreement.

 

 

First of all, johnjohn, let me say that if anything that follows strikes you as offensive or combative or in any manner an attack on you or your post, please know that such is not my intention. I do appreciate your posts, including the one quoted here.

 

Let us assume that your description of the phenomona is accurate. This still begs the question as to how does one convert this information into action, i.e. how does one use it to place trades?

 

George Lane, who did know a thing or two about auction markets, argued that price rises due to the the activity of "inspired buyers," i.e. short sellers covering, and not because of a search for value by buyers and sellers agreeing that current price is too low.

 

In my opinion, the concept, "value," is itself devoid of value to the speculator; and volume, as an indicator of future price movement on any time frame shorter than one composed of daily data, has so little value as to warrant the speculator's dilligent inattention.

 

Only one person has articulated a trading strategy in this thread that actually uses volume information to support trading decisions: Blowfish and his use of volume on 15 second charts looking for potential reversals to scalp. And, if I am not mistaken, price, specifically price action around support and resistance actually trigger and guide Blowfish's trades.

 

If volume leads price, always, as has been asserted here, then someone should be able and willing to demonstrate how volume caused them to buy or sell, price be damned. Thus far, no one has even come close.

 

 

 

Respectfully,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
George Lane, who did know a thing or two about auction markets, argued that price rises due to the the activity of "inspired buyers," i.e. short sellers covering, and not because of a search for value by buyers and sellers agreeing that current price is too low.

 

A trader is not a dedicated bear or bull. A trader is a person who goes with his/her opinion of the movements of price (+volume). If the traders who believe price to be unacceptable overcome the traders who believe price to be acceptable, price would not stay in a range, price would vacate this range and start trending. In a range, traders find the top to be expensive and they express this belief by selling; and at the bottom they believe these prices to be cheap, so they express their belief by buying. They believe the top to be expensive because of a lack of buyers, or because of previous levels, or because of whatever. They believe the bottom to be cheap because of a lack of sellers, or because of previous levels, or because of whatever. They are selling at the top because they find price to be acceptable and they are buying at the bottom because they find price to be acceptable. If this continually happens, then a range of acceptable prices is the result. When the levels inside the range are no longer acceptable, price may move in the direction in which acceptable prices reside. By saying that "price may move in the direction in which acceptable prices reside" i mean that in order for prices to move, a force has to be driving them. If traders are unwilling to exert a force, then price will not move. On the way to the top, buying is taking place because of short-covering and/or because of new longs. The short-covering traders have found price to be unacceptable, so they take their profits. The new longs have found prices to be acceptable so they establish their long positions. Eventually both types of buying will cease. The short-covering will cease when their are no more traders their/willing to cover. The long buying will cease when prices are at a level that is unacceptable. When the long traders decide to sell, it will be at a level of unacceptable prices, as they no longer want to hold their positions. At this level, new shorts will also enter as they find price to be at an acceptable level. This action will take price down to a level of unacceptable/acceptable prices.

 

In my opinion, the concept, "value," is itself devoid of value to the speculator; and volume, as an indicator of future price movement on any time frame shorter than one composed of daily data, has so little value as to warrant the speculator's diligent inattention.

 

Value is an occurrence of an acceptable/unacceptable range in price. The buyers, at the bottom, believe price to be more inclined to go up and the sellers, at the top, believe price more inclined to go down. This type of analysis is not a methodology built on top of what occurs in the markets, it is what occurs in the markets. Value is just what happens as a result of traders trading.

 

If volume leads price, always, as has been asserted here, then someone should be able and willing to demonstrate how volume caused them to buy or sell, price be damned. Thus far, no one has even come close.

 

I stated that i do not believe this idea to be accurate. Here was my post on the subject.

 

What volume is, is not up to an individual's discretion. Volume is the quantity of contracts (or other vehicles) traded. PERIOD. Volume and price are instantly plotted at the same time as volume can not be plotted without a result in price and price can not be plotted without an appearance in volume. Traders make volume and volume is plotted at the same time price is created. Price is the price at which traders have traded. Price does not lead volume and volume does not lead price. Ideas of movements (which are opinions of the future direction of price) lead volume and price (i.e. traders' actions lead price, which are represented on the chart as volume and price). So one could say volume and price leads volume and price. When Wyckoff (or whoever stated it first) said that volume is the effort and price is the result, he was not pulling this out of his ass, he was stating the obvious. If you submit a market order to buy one contract you are adding 1 unit of volume to the volume bar and one point in price to the chart AT THE EXACT SAME TIME.

 

Wyckoff, Livermore and the other price action (+volume) gurus realized the obvious and traded accordingly. :)

 

Also, i focus on the relationship between volume and price. I can make no deductions based on volume alone. Deductions can be made on price alone, but i choose to use both, as i believe volume to enable me to more accurately guess the reasons why price is moving the way it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might make a catchy title for a new thread... :)

 

I see volume and i see price. Both of these elements are plotted at the same time. People base their actions on the movements of price (+volume). Price and volume lead price and volume. This is what makes sense. This is not some random theory based on nothing, this is what happens. If you watch a real-time, 1 volume bar chart you will see that for every one unit of volume a price is plotted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might make a catchy title for a new thread... :)

 

 

So the idea is that if you folks say it enough times the masses will start to believe it?

 

Looking at Thursday's price action with volume data one could more easily conclude that volume follows price. For example, when price finally broke below the line in which it traded for most of the day, volume increased. Volume was timid and indecisive until price signaled its direction out of the line.

 

After all, are we to believe that bulk of the volume trade during the 15:25 EDT bar (based on Ninjatrader's time stamp) occurred prior to the price break, and price dropped in response to that increase in volume? Or did price break, and volume swelled as price continued to move down from the now broken support?

 

In the end, the real question is how do you trade it? See my charts attached here: If I were not already in a short position, I would have traded that break with a sell stop at 896 and a stop loss at 899.25. I would have had a profit target somewhere just above 891.25 support. Anyone, including my nine year old daughter, can look at the chart, read my explanation as to how I would have traded that break, and duplicate it in the future. This is emphatically not the case with the contributions made by you and your friends to this thread.

 

I've attached my charts - one with volume one without. If one looks at the volume bars, it seems to me that volume follows price, and not the other way around. Volume, in addition to simple number of contracts, represents the level of activity by people. The history of the world shows that people are many followers and few leaders. People are always looking for someone or something to follow.

 

As I said before, anyone can put "I sold here" and "I covered here" on a dead chart 72 hours after the closing bell and look, or I should say, try to look like a genius.

 

This is not to say that there cannot be usefulness in such annotations on a dead chart, so long as explanations are clear, and all relevant and necessary information is provided.

 

However, yet again, here is another proponent of a view, to wit, the view that "volume leads price, always," who claims to have made a wonderfully profitable trade, selling at almost the HOD and covering at the LOD, but without any explanation of 1) why he entered, 2) at what price he entered, 3) was entry a market, limit, or stop order and why?

 

I do believe that it is possible to sell the HOD and buy the LOD occasionally. But to make such claims and not detail how the feat was accomplished has a bad odor to it. Many folks on July 2 no doubt sold market on open, and their doing so had nothing whatsoever to do with any thing other than that price itself was pointing to lower prices. But that is not given as the reason in your post or that of your friends. I am not even doubting you and your friends made the trade. But no one here could look at what you did and duplicate the trade in the future on the basis upon which you claim to have made it, because there has been no basis given.

 

I really do not believe I am being unreasonable. If you folks are for real, then why not share the minimum required for intelligent and respectful human communication?

 

I participate here at TL because it has always seemed, for the most part, like a forum of seriously interested folks, with very little of the guru speak and fraud that one sees over at other forums, most notoriously notable, ET. I have apparently stirred the nest and we have attracted the the attention of the minions of a few gurus who have a near cult-like following (see how many who have rushed to defend the manifesto are new to TL, and who have a mere handful or even fewer posts here). In the interest of preserving the character of TL, and hoping that this contagion maybe contained, rather than spread throughout the forum, I will no longer participate in this thread.

 

And I reiterate: People are always looking for someone or something to follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ef777a8c_7-02-2009ESPriceAction1.thumb.jpg.5dca189dba854b21a8242ffa2c2ade3b.jpg

5aa70ef77df4a_7-02-2009ESPriceAction2.thumb.jpg.25fb9556e183fd45419e1359bf81adff.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A trader is not a dedicated bear or bull. A trader is a person who goes with his/her opinion of the movements of price (+volume). If the traders who believe price to be unacceptable overcome the traders who believe price to be acceptable ...

 

Though I am no longer going to particpate in the discussion on this thread, I feel that I owe you an explanation of my prior port to which you have repsonded.

 

I was only trying to make a point about the usefulness or lack of usefulness to trading of various abstract concepts. I appreciate your comments, and in the end your account may very well be correct.

 

But to me, such accounts are far too academic and abstract and removed from the reality of trading to have any practical application.

 

 

Respectfully,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one can specify that who can become successful in what time, it all depends on the skills you have applied and know;edge you have implied while trading.
    • On this Forum by Introducing yourself new beginner will get many things to learn, good links and videos also. Forex4you is a platform where you can learn about Forex as well as Demo account trading.
    • Open a new futures brokerage account by April 30th with a NinjaTrader Lifetime license & receive: Commission-Free Micro trading in May $50 margins on Micros Access to the most powerful version of NinjaTrader Free platform upgrades for life! Simply open & fund your new account in April with as little as $400 & purchase a Lifetime license. You will then receive a rebate for commissions on all Micro futures trades placed from May 1 – May 31st.* Open Futures Account A NinjaTrader Lifetime license provide access to all premium features including Chart Trader, OCO orders, Order Flow +, and more. *Program Requirements: Account must be funded by April 30th, 2020 with $400 minimum A new NinjaTrader Lifetime license ($1099) must be purchased by April 30th, 2020 Standard exchange, NFA and routing fees still apply A commission rebate will be applied to the account holder’s balance for all May Micro trades 2nd accounts for current NinjaTrader Brokerage account owners not eligible for rebates Futures and Forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. View Full Risk Disclosure.
    • Date : 1st April 2020. All eyes on Commodity Currencies.Asian stock markets are lower, while European and US equity index futures are showing losses of around 3%. Data out of Asia today were nothing short of dismal, showing manufacturing contracting across most of the region, highlighting the economic toll that virus-containing measures are having.The main concern remains that the massive global stimulus measures simply won’t be fully effective while many economies remain in a state of lockdown of as-yet unknown duration.Commodity currencies have come under pressure as the winds of risk aversion picked up again.The Canadian dollar was the main loser so far today , while it has remained under pressure with oil prices sinking back toward major-trend lows as crude storage facilities burst at the seems from excessive supplies.USDCAD has gained up nearly 2% in making a 1.4230 high, though the pair so far has remained below yesterday’s peak at 1.4350. This is due to the fact that crude prices are down by over 65% year-to-date. This level of price decline in Canada’s principal export, while it sustains, marks a significant deterioration in the Canadian economy’s terms of trade. Given the glut of crude flooding the market, and given that supply is increasing as demand will remain weak for a historically protracted amount of time, Canadian Dollar is anticipated to remain apt to underperformance. The likes of the Norwegian krona, which like the Canadian dollar is an oil-price correlator, and many developing world currencies have also come under pressure.From the technical perspective, USDCAD overall outlook remains positive with asset holding above all three daily SMAs since January, and momentum indicators positively configured. RSI at 59 recovery from a pullback last week, Stochastic rebound from oversold territory and MACD presents some decline of the bullish momentum but holds well above 0. That said, USDCAD revisiting its recent 17-year high at 1.4669 seems likely before long.Intraday meanwhile, the rebound of USDCAD looks to run out of steam, however only a move below 1.4050 could suggest a reverse of the outlook.AUDUSD tipped over 1% lower in making a 5-day low at 0.6064 amid weaker Gold prices (end-of-quarter flows). The Aussie still remains comfortably above the 17-year low that was seen on March 19th at 0.5507. The Kiwi dollar has also taken a tumble.Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Stuart Cowell Head Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date : 31st March 2020. Dead cat Bounce!Dead cat Bounce! A new term? Not really but definitely something that we haven’t seen for more than a generation.In general, investors throughout the years invented this term as a follow up to a market free fall. By definition, the “Dead cat Bounce” is simply a market phenomenon that translates into temporary small and short-lived rebounds of an asset’s price within a prolonged period of downside. This term is based on the idiom that “even a dead cat will bounce if it falls far enough and fast enough“. Hence in the financial market it is said that even if an asset falls with a considerable speed, it would rebound as even a dead cat would bounce. However, every time there is a rebound, the overall initial trend is then anticipated to resume, bringing the bearish influence back into play.In addition, the phenomenon can occur in any market, yet is particularly prevalent in equity markets. It is often the case that it is considered a continuation pattern.Why are we raising this topic now? This March, was the first time after Black Monday 1987 that we have seen the worst intraday selloffs in stock markets. Since February 20th, the stock market entered an aggressive bear market with a few days of an absolute rally. An example was the 13th of March in which the stock market roared back in the biggest one-day rally since 2008 after its worst single-day crash in 33 years just a day before. This is the classic dead cat bounce.If you closely observe stock market behaviour in March you will notice that there is a dramatic decline, with a number of days when the market reversed some of its losses, but failed to take the bait, and eventually fell back down again. This is a situation of portfolio managers wanting to sell some of their positions and when they see some strength in the market, decided to unload. This is what we call a “dead cat bounce” after it falls from high enough. Remember however that not every correction/reversal can be interpreted as a dead cat bounce.Theoretically this term is defined as the term in which,   A stock in a severe steep decline has a sharp bounce off the lows. A small upward price movement in a bear market after which the market continues to fall. Unfortunately, I need to highlight that there is not an easy way to determine in advance whether an upwards movement is a dead cat bounce which will eventually reverse quickly or whether it is a trend reversal. There is nothing easy in identifying the bottom of the market. However to a large extent a dead cat bounce is a retracement, in comparison to a reversal, i.e. it is temporary.Dead cat bounce as a technical analysis tool and more precisely as a continuation pattern could be tradable from short-term or medium term traders. Having explained this phenomenon, a follow-up article will elaborate on how market participants can trade a dead cat bounce.Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.