Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Thanks for pointing this out, Tams. I wasn't aware that you can not use FC within a function. Just out of curiosity, why not?

 

I'm using this version of the WMA because it is more efficient than WAverage. WAverage has to calculate a loop for each bar, and depending on the length of the smoothing period, these loops can slow down calculations considerably. From Logic's Ergodic oscillator parameters, it appears that triple smoothing is used, so this means that even more loops are calculated per bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for pointing this out, Tams. I wasn't aware that you can not use FC within a function. Just out of curiosity, why not?

 

I'm using this version of the WMA because it is more efficient than WAverage. WAverage has to calculate a loop for each bar, and depending on the length of the smoothing period, these loops can slow down calculations considerably. From Logic's Ergodic oscillator parameters, it appears that triple smoothing is used, so this means that even more loops are calculated per bar.

 

 

re: these loops can slow down calculations considerably

 

this code was created 20 yrs ago for the computers of the day.

it won't make a difference with today's computer.

 

 

FC remembers the result from previous calculation, and makes a short cut for the current calculation.

This technique works fine inside an indicator, but the memory gets lost when it is called from within a function.

 

 

Try SUMMATION instead of SUMATIONFC, you will get the result you expect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside loops are generally a pretty poor way of averaging though they are 'unintuitively' what people seem to use. Sum the new point and drop the point n periods ago for the win :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For ch33ch - I tried to pm you, but it was rejected because I haven't posted on this board 5 times. I'll be happy to assist, but you will need to pm me w/ your email address. Standing by, if you're interested ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember a couple of early posts of yours at ET. They where pretty succinct but also a fairly detailed account of your methodology. I probably have them in a bit bucket somewhere (though lord know where). Something like that might spark a bit of activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just used to the flame wars at ET that I'm a bit burnt. No pun intended. I'm in the process of my final update on my book. Give me a few days and I will post a clear synopsis of my method.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm in the process of my final update on my book. Give me a few days and I will post a clear synopsis of my method.

 

Any update on this? It'd be good to see a clear synopsis here, may stimulate interest over here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From father to son the blood runs thin

See faces frozen still against the wind

The seam is split, the coal face cracked

The lines are long, there's no going back

Through hands of steel and a heart of stone

Our labor day has come and gone

 

-Bono-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From father to son the blood runs thin

See faces frozen still against the wind

The seam is split, the coal face cracked

The lines are long, there's no going back

Through hands of steel and a heart of stone

Our labor day has come and gone

 

-Bono-

 

I'm swamped with a new labeling program but will bookmark this and start posting soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I read entire thred and the rules posted by Tams , thanks for his effort to help TL. :)

 

i have a doubt related to this :

 

In the rules i read about three charts:

Trading Decision Chart,Strength Chart,Entry Chart , they are 3 differents type of charts ? each with different setting?

 

thanks to all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just getting started here but wanted to say one thing - the volume bars are such a logical chart type. I'm working on cobbling out a Tradestation oscillator.

The tradestation code already exists. You might try sending proflogic a pm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, does anyone use this method profitably ?

 

How objective is it really ? If two people used the same charting program and the same settings for the ergodic etc....would they both come up with the same entries and exits according to the rules by "Logic" ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, does anyone use this method profitably ?

 

How objective is it really ? If two people used the same charting program and the same settings for the ergodic etc....would they both come up with the same entries and exits according to the rules by "Logic" ?

 

I use it profitably and know many others that do as well but I'm bias. :cool:

 

How objective is it? Extremely!

 

Most of use eSignal as a data feed and as you are probably aware, being on different data servers will produce very slightly different entries and exits but the overall results are consistent. There are others that use different feeds and even different charting software programs and the results are still extremely close.

The key is to confidently trade what is on your screen and that comes with screen time and building one's confidence in the rules and the outcomes as they play out in real time. The main problem with traders is that they don't have the patience to learn anything, they simply want a turn key method that will trade for them. Once must learn to read a chart first . . . period.

 

Example . . . in skeet shooting when the target is released the outcome is the same. The individual shooting at the clay target, aims and fires. Will everyone shooting at the clay target react in the exact same time frame, no but the reaction is identical. Good thing trading isn't like skeet shooting though where the target must be hit. In trading when executing the the trade in a particular direction it is only necessary that you get the price direction and strength correct. If the target isn't hit, you can still profit from the correct decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Logic :)

 

Sorry if I'm annoying ,but I really didn't understand if we have to set up 3 differents graphs or in the same graph you use three different kinds of indicators ?

 

tanks Max :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Logic :)

 

Sorry if I'm annoying ,but I really didn't understand if we have to set up 3 differents graphs or in the same graph you use three different kinds of indicators ?

 

tanks Max :)

 

One indicator set at 2 separate speeds on the same price chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a screen shot of a manual Euro Futures chart from today, a manually traded eMini S&P chart from today and an automated Euro Futures chart from today.

5aa7100daf61a_6EF060110.png.1e3bd42166cfcc08a9b742bc818dea61.png

5aa7100db54ee_ESF060110.thumb.png.10ce0194db811716a17ab94575b19aba.png

SP32-20100601-173141.thumb.png.d59452267f534648b1be63e59a367169.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.