Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I might have a solution . . . simply 'cut and paste' the post.

 

A good idea. Perhaps someone could do so for the purpose of defining the terms used in the rules posting at the beginning of the thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

I'm using MT4, how to setting Ergodic in MT4?

anyone can conver multichart ProfLogic indicator to MT4 ?

 

thk

 

 

 

The settings for the Ergodic Indicator are:

49, 147, 49

mt4.thumb.jpg.672a0ec0ef7c92f8fcc4ae3626f43393.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that FOREX I see? Forex doesn't have volume bars, the foundation of what I do. The other problem with FOREX is that the banks control all of the information coming from the trades. There is no other more grossly manipulated market on the face of the earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

I'e used Proflogic's CVB charts for about 6 months now, but without the ergodic indicator and all the rules - primarily 343 & 2401 charts. I use Trade Navigator which I'm happy with, but as noted without the ergodic indicator. Can it be written up and programmed into my trade platform?

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams,

I'e used Proflogic's CVB charts for about 6 months now, but without the ergodic indicator and all the rules - primarily 343 & 2401 charts. I use Trade Navigator which I'm happy with, but as noted without the ergodic indicator. Can it be written up and programmed into my trade platform?

Thanks in advance for your reply.

 

Please contact Trade Navigator, they already have the Ergodic indicator coded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams,

I'e used Proflogic's CVB charts for about 6 months now, but without the ergodic indicator and all the rules - primarily 343 & 2401 charts. I use Trade Navigator which I'm happy with, but as noted without the ergodic indicator. Can it be written up and programmed into my trade platform?

Thanks in advance for your reply.

 

Let me know the programming language they use and I will do my best to find one for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TAM and LOGIC...does anyone have the tradestation .eld file that has the ergodic indicator as previously posted. I have looked into the tradestation website but the ergodic indicator does not look like the histogram one on your posts...

 

thanks in advance....victor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi TAM and LOGIC...does anyone have the tradestation .eld file that has the ergodic indicator as previously posted. I have looked into the tradestation website but the ergodic indicator does not look like the histogram one on your posts...

thanks in advance....victor

 

You have to PM Logic, he has the code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Until you learn you how to use a tool, they will all suck.

 

Absolutely correct.

 

And after you use one for a while and then learn . . . . it still sucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi TAM and LOGIC...does anyone have the tradestation .eld file that has the ergodic indicator as previously posted. I have looked into the tradestation website but the ergodic indicator does not look like the histogram one on your posts...

 

thanks in advance....victor

 

Proflogic,

As noted above for tradestation, the ergodic indicator for Trade Navigator (Genensis - Trade Sense) does not display anything like that shown in the posts regarding your E.I. Would it be possible to get the coding as mentioned before?

Thanks,

avalanch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not contribute something to the thread? Maybe a chart or an observation, even a question would do. Stimulate conversation and you would not need to bump it. :):) Maybe I am just getting old and intolerant but at the end of the day spam will never be ham and that was just spam.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Logic,

 

I've tried coding my own Ergodic oscillator but whenever I plot the oscillator in MultiCharts, I get different results. It seems my code is unstable. I was wondering if you're willing to share your Ergodic .ELD so that I can figure out what's going wrong with my code.

 

Greatly appreciate any assistance you can provide.

 

Regards,

Albert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why not post your chart, at least someone can review it and give you a hand.

 

Alright. I've attached three charts, each showing different calculated values for the Ergodic oscillator. I believe the last chart should be the correct one. I'm using a custom weighted moving average (as opposed to EL's WAverage) function for the smoothing. The function applies the concept of convolution in calculating the WMA and approximates WAverage closely (slight rounding errors). This function could be a source of error but I'm not sure. I've posted the code below.

 

Inputs:
Price( NumericSeries ), 
Period( NumericSimple );

Variables:
var0( 0 ),
var1( 0 );

if CurrentBar = 1 then 
begin
for Value1 = 0 to Period - 1
	begin
	var0 = var0 + ( Period - Value1 ) * Price[Value1] ;
	end ;
end
else
var0 = var0[1] + Period * Price[0] - SummationFC(Price, Period) ;

var1 = ( Period + 1 ) * Period * .5 ;
WMA  = var0 / var1 ;

 

Any ideas on what's wrong? Thanks.

Ergodic-test1.thumb.png.f19df609ba62f8e91275c682cb9bc082.png

Ergodic-test2.thumb.png.1d8503cdff8dba17941cfa340bd0af45.png

Ergodic-test3.thumb.png.3a8ae1a5984f4f83586569cbfd1b3e23.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alright. I've attached three charts, each showing different calculated values for the Ergodic oscillator. I believe the last chart should be the correct one. I'm using a custom weighted moving average (as opposed to EL's WAverage) function for the smoothing. The function applies the concept of convolution in calculating the WMA and approximates WAverage closely (slight rounding errors). This function could be a source of error but I'm not sure. I've posted the code below.

 

Inputs:
Price( NumericSeries ), 
Period( NumericSimple );

Variables:
var0( 0 ),
var1( 0 );

if CurrentBar = 1 then 
begin
for Value1 = 0 to Period - 1
	begin
	var0 = var0 + ( Period - Value1 ) * Price[Value1] ;
	end ;
end
else
var0 = var0[1] + Period * Price[0] - SummationFC(Price, Period) ;

var1 = ( Period + 1 ) * Period * .5 ;
WMA  = var0 / var1 ;

 

Any ideas on what's wrong? Thanks.

 

 

 

which chart has this code applied?

what are the differences between the charts?

what are you looking for?

 

with the limited information you are providing, you are not being helpful to yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought from the charts it's pretty obvious what the differences are. The ergodic oscillator plotted on each of the chart does not match when they should (same time frame). The indicator was applied to the same symbol with the same time frame 3 different times. However, each time MultiCharts plotted it differently.

 

To clarify, my Ergodic code was applied to the E-mini S&P (symbol ES #F from eSignal).

 

Anyways, Tams, can I send you my code in a private message? I think it'll be very difficult to explain what's going on or what I'm trying to ask in this thread.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alright. I've attached three charts, each showing different calculated values for the Ergodic oscillator. I believe the last chart should be the correct one. I'm using a custom weighted moving average (as opposed to EL's WAverage) function for the smoothing. ....

 

 

why are you using a custom code?

 

if the anomaly is observed after the customization, then the error is in the customization.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot use a FC function inside a function.

 

I have highlighted the error in your code.

 

 

 

 

 

Inputs:
Price( NumericSeries ), 
Period( NumericSimple );

Variables:
var0( 0 ),
var1( 0 );

if CurrentBar = 1 then 
begin
for Value1 = 0 to Period - 1
	begin
	var0 = var0 + ( Period - Value1 ) * Price[Value1] ;
	end ;
end
else
var0 = var0[1] + Period * Price[0] - SummationFC(Price, Period) ;  {<---- error here}

var1 = ( Period + 1 ) * Period * .5 ;
WMA  = var0 / var1 ;

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.