Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Some observations on the primary trend for EU with regards to this thread. I think the pic is self explanatory, so post if something doesn't make sense.

 

Well stated.

Price is consolidating at a long term Prime Resistance top.

Prime PPF of Resitance is the confirming oscillation of that top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well stated.

Prime PPF of Resitance is the confirming oscillation of that top.

 

So when would you know? Would you consider that PPF that occurred(the major one on the right of the chart) a Prime PPF to confirm that top?

 

Or would you need to see a LL created first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So when would you know? Would you consider that PPF that occurred(the major one on the right of the chart) a Prime PPF to confirm that top?

 

Or would you need to see a LL created first?

 

You know when the Prime Oscillation is created and that is coordinated now at the price level at 1.4627.

 

A LL confirmes the PPF (LH)

Another LH is further confirmation of the top.

Another PPF (LH) is further confirmation.

 

The Ninja Trader template I posted has both the trading oscillations and Strength oscillations listed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an EU chart for some analysis.

 

First let me ask, is the idea to define the trend based on HHs and HLs? I am attaching a pic showing the basic trend that everyone has understood for a while. Is this how you would go about defining the trend similar to this pic.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24304&stc=1&d=1303824267

 

Also once you have that HH or LL, is the idea to then enter on the next pb once that trend has been defined as shown in the picture? Also, you are willing to take countertrend trades against the direction of the OVERALL trend, as long as it matches the direction of the current leg you are trading correct?

 

Next, just attaching a picture of the EU action currently. Right now, there was a LL put in place, now we have a HH. So does that mean this current pa is just still stagnant and we need to wait for a trend to be put in place?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24303&stc=1&d=1303824267

Prime2011-04-26_080603.thumb.jpg.35e56fa453a0c0ddd6254c9fbe6ec876.jpg

5aa7106f62316_4-26-20118-12-34AM.thumb.png.2898ecdedee3e42238ab3dadedde0c16.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have an EU chart for some analysis.

 

First let me ask, is the idea to define the trend based on HHs and HLs? I am attaching a pic showing the basic trend that everyone has understood for a while. Is this how you would go about defining the trend similar to this pic.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24304&stc=1&d=1303824267

 

Also once you have that HH or LL, is the idea to then enter on the next pb once that trend has been defined as shown in the picture? Also, you are willing to take countertrend trades against the direction of the OVERALL trend, as long as it matches the direction of the current leg you are trading correct?

 

Next, just attaching a picture of the EU action currently. Right now, there was a LL put in place, now we have a HH. So does that mean this current pa is just still stagnant and we need to wait for a trend to be put in place?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24303&stc=1&d=1303824267

 

The annotating of your chart is perfect. Look how my chart is different. I break the indicator up to Trading oscillations and Strength oscillations. If you want to talk about it, let's SKYPE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't receive Crude Oil data and am new to Multicharts, so I am having a little trouble following the chart template. Is the following correct?

 

1. The price portion of the chart is 343 volume bars with labels based on the prime trading oscillations on the next fastest chart, which would be 49 volume bars.

 

2. The second pane is the ERG and ERG histogram based on the 343 volume chart.

 

3. The bottom pane is the ERG histogram from the 2401 volume chart.

 

4. A change in the color of the ERG histogram on the bottom pane shows a change in

SHORT term strength?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't receive Crude Oil data and am new to Multicharts, so I am having a little trouble following the chart template. Is the following correct?

 

1. The price portion of the chart is 343 volume bars with labels based on the prime trading oscillations on the next fastest chart, which would be 49 volume bars.

 

2. The second pane is the ERG and ERG histogram based on the 343 volume chart.

 

3. The bottom pane is the ERG histogram from the 2401 volume chart.

 

4. A change in the color of the ERG histogram on the bottom pane shows a change in

SHORT term strength?

 

The template I posted was for NinjaTrader not MultiCharts.

Email me and I will send you the indicator and a template workspace for Multicharts.

(wm.schamp@pricephysics.com)

 

1. Price bars are 343 Volume Bars.

2. 2nd pane is Trading ERG & Trading ERG Histogram based on the 343 Volume Bars

3. Bottom pane is the Strength ERG & Strength ERG Histogram based on the 2401 Volume Bars

4. Change in color in Trading ERG or Trading ERG Histogram is where the primary Trade entries and Trade exits take place & specifically where Long Term Strength is confirmed from the Trading ERG.

5. Change in color in the Strength Histogram is where we see short term strength. We do not use the Strength ERG. Too long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I break the indicator up to Trading oscillations and Strength oscillations.

 

When you have an opportunity, could you further explain this?

 

Yes, please. I second the request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Strength Histogram

 

Yes, I understand where it is on the chart and what its based on, but I was hoping for more information on how it is used in your method.

 

As I recall from wading through the mess in that other forum the largest volumeframe was used to determine Primary Trend: Bull or Bear. Or am I mistaken? Does the Strength Histogram replace that?

 

I noticed that most of the trades you've shown were taken in agreement with the color of the strength histogram. So do you use the strength histogram as a filter?

 

Any insights you're willing to share are appreciated greatly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Re: Strength Histogram

 

Yes, I understand where it is on the chart and what its based on, but I was hoping for more information on how it is used in your method.

 

As I recall from wading through the mess in that other forum the largest volumeframe was used to determine Primary Trend: Bull or Bear. Or am I mistaken? Does the Strength Histogram replace that?

 

I noticed that most of the trades you've shown were taken in agreement with the color of the strength histogram. So do you use the strength histogram as a filter?

 

Any insights you're willing to share are appreciated greatly.

 

I'm on SKYPE. It's easy to share my sreen to show you. Picture is worth a thousand words you know. Let me know if that works. Email me at wm.schamp@pricephysics.com and I will forward you my contact info. I do SKYPE every afternoon after trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Logic,

 

I just finished reading THE thread from ET and finally got some basic idea.

 

Before I could ask some questions with specific setups I wonder if you could do me a favor.

 

I took the indicator from the other site and wonder if this looks right compared to your chart especially histogram part?

 

I don't have old data and couldn't compare my chart vs yours that you posted here.

 

If this doesn't look right or if you have updated version could you please share it?

 

This chart is from 1-18-12 and time's pacific time. It's 2401 volume.

 

Thank you.

PFLOGIC.thumb.jpg.b07da451529a9ecfcfe4cdbbe52b167f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Logic,

 

I just finished reading THE thread from ET and finally got some basic idea.

Before I could ask some questions with specific setups I wonder if you could do me a favor.

I took the indicator from the other site and wonder if this looks right compared to your chart especially histogram part?

I don't have old data and couldn't compare my chart vs yours that you posted here.

If this doesn't look right or if you have updated version could you please share it?

This chart is from 1-18-12 and time's pacific time. It's 2401 volume.

Thank you.

 

One thing I've found in the many years of using these charts is that real time data and historic data are different. This is why I've always stated that the key to trading is learning to read a chart and that begins with a chart constructed with Constant volume bars. You've done that . . . well done!

 

Now the indicator. Whatever indicator you use it shouldn't be confined to a range. The Sto and MACD are range bound and that is why they are worthless. Most other indicators are just as worthless for the same reasons. This is why I use the Ergodic. It is not because it is range bound not because it has some magical power.

 

Now that I've set the ground rules and explained what I learned digging through and watching over 40,000 hours of real time data, I can tell you the key. Take ANY indicator that isn't range bound, apply it to the chart, adjust it to show you the extreme oscillations and make it smooth to ease you into being comfortable with making decisions on what is shown on the chart. Then watch that chart to establish your confidence in making decision based on those oscillations.

 

The chart you posted is as good as any and if you learn to read it you will be consistently profitable. If you want to play with the parameters in your off hours to see if you can improve on them . . . go for it. That is a good way to learn the indicator.

 

Since posting that thread on that other website, I've tweaked the parameters and improved on them. I've even had a programmer create a program that will read the chart in real time. It will label the entries, exits, reverses, stops and exits in real time. It will display trade alerts on the screen and send trade and exit alerts to my email.

 

A new day is dawning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One thing I've found in the many years of using these charts is that real time data and historic data are different. This is why I've always stated that the key to trading is learning to read a chart and that begins with a chart constructed with Constant volume bars. You've done that . . . well done!

 

Now the indicator. Whatever indicator you use it shouldn't be confined to a range. The Sto and MACD are range bound and that is why they are worthless. Most other indicators are just as worthless for the same reasons. This is why I use the Ergodic. It is not because it is range bound not because it has some magical power.

 

Now that I've set the ground rules and explained what I learned digging through and watching over 40,000 hours of real time data, I can tell you the key. Take ANY indicator that isn't range bound, apply it to the chart, adjust it to show you the extreme oscillations and make it smooth to ease you into being comfortable with making decisions on what is shown on the chart. Then watch that chart to establish your confidence in making decision based on those oscillations.

 

The chart you posted is as good as any and if you learn to read it you will be consistently profitable. If you want to play with the parameters in your off hours to see if you can improve on them . . . go for it. That is a good way to learn the indicator.

 

Since posting that thread on that other website, I've tweaked the parameters and improved on them. I've even had a programmer create a program that will read the chart in real time. It will label the entries, exits, reverses, stops and exits in real time. It will display trade alerts on the screen and send trade and exit alerts to my email.

 

A new day is dawning.

 

It looks like you've come far since the thread in 2009.

Also it's seems that you advanced from trading just pullbacks after HH or LL (that's the basic concept I took from the other thread about your system).

 

If you think I should stick with the indicator I have and be proficient with it

could you post an ES chart, preferably 2401 volume, so I can at least have a chart to base off for comarison.

I know you said it can by ANY non range-bound indicator but it's a CONFIDENCE thing from knowing mine's close enough to yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching over 40,000 hours of real time data works out to - a typical long day of 12 hours of screen watching over 3333 days or 13.332 years if 250 trading days/year.

 

So unless this is covering a far greater period than 13+ years "Billy needs a new hobby and/or just see the light of day".

 

Unless a fat finger was involved in calculations. But then again you don't care for time, now do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Watching over 40,000 hours of real time data works out to - a typical long day of 12 hours of screen watching over 3333 days or 13.332 years if 250 trading days/year.

 

So unless this is covering a far greater period than 13+ years "Billy needs a new hobby and/or just see the light of day".

 

Unless a fat finger was involved in calculations. But then again you don't care for time, now do you?

 

12 hours per day X 20 trading days a month X 12 months a year X 15 years = 43,200 hours.

 

The first 9 years it was more like 16 hour days and that doesn't count the typical 15 hour weekends reviewing the weekly data for any errors.

 

Billy's focus was to create a consistently profitable trading program. I did. So I guess all those hours were worth it. I get a kick out of all the hundreds of traders that have made fun of my work over the years that are still trying to put a consistently profitable week of trading together. A typical neurosurgeon's time in training is well under 15,000 hours but people say I couldn't accomplish what I've accomplished with nearly 3 times the time involved.

 

:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.