Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

How is Your Trade Aggressiveness?

Recommended Posts

The more threads I have read, whether it is about a trading style, a type of method to trade, a timeframe preference.. each thread invariably tends to take a detour briefly.. One poster thinks another is being hateful or stepping on their method, the other poster backpedals signaling that "was not the intent” and it occurred to me that a lot of these tend to boil down to one simple statement: "Oh well I trade this way because that is what I am comfortable with and what works for me." Generally one trader is far more aggressive in their trade choices than the other trader in the conversation.

 

With my study of VSA I also saw this come to pass even with Tom Williams and Todd K (both work together in the same company and present VSA to students.) Tom Williams is an aggressive trader- when he has determined that he is looking to go long when he sees a bar that suits his fancy and BAM he is in. Todd K on the other hand waits for confirmation. He will wait out the next bar or even two before he gets in to his position.

 

What this does for the more conservative trader is give him/her a higher probability of success. What it does for the aggressive trader is let him/her be in on the entire start of the move when it does plow northward.

 

I have a good fellow trader who is more "confirmation oriented" and I tend to be the Tom Williams aggressive trader apparently.

 

I wanted to get a feel of how some of the traders here feel they fit into what category vs. the other? If I see a beautiful bull move on the horizon but will be unable to physically be at my platform to pull the trigger at the "perfect moment" I will accept the drawdown to be sure I get in on the trade. My fellow and well-respected trader from above would think I was crazy because he'd wait for the confirmation of that trend to form before pulling the trigger. Plus he is less susceptible to the fact that if it did decide to punch down a tad lower- I am now either stopped out or riding a nasty drawdown before the good times come.

 

I'd be interested in hearing others own self-reflection of what type of trader they really are. I'd be very interested in people who once sat in the "Aggressive Chair" and had a moment of clarity to become a more "Conservative Trader."

 

Once again I see an inadvertent lesson I was taught by a wonderful friend and fellow trader that I had to come too on my own... my aggressive days may be coming to an end... I may be leaning towards the “Conservative” and “boring” side with higher probability of win than I currently do now!

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Naturally, I am a more aggressive trader. For equities, I like to be in the trade before the breakout. But on the other hand, I never enter with a big position. In fact, I am extremely conservative in that sense. I realize that if the breakout doesn't come and the stock moves the other way, it quickly wipes out the position due to various components against me such as IV, Delta, etc.

 

On the ES, I typically don't wait for confirmation if I see a setup. I just enter and adjust my risk/reward accordingly. But again, I never take on a big position, but the trade itself could be deemed "aggressive."

 

I also take on other approaches in options that aren't aggressive at all, such as credit spreads. This allows a more consistent income, but it's not as exciting. It's kind of like the bread and butter, it gets the job done. I utilize my other trading strategies because I find it to be more challenging, and I like a challenge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thread... throughout the early years of my trading career, I went through a phase where I would be right about short term moves in the market but could not seem to profit from it. After thorough analysis, I realized I was overly aggresssive which forced me to jump into trades too early. Even my old mentor mentioned I was too aggressive. As a result, one of the things I struggled to change was to hold myself back and wait for further confirmation.... allowing me to time my trades better.

 

This took practice and time as I started to learn that being conservative didnt necessarily mean you had less balls. It was simply practicing more discipline and patience. In the end, all that really mattered was your PNL.... and thus changed my style of trading to a more sniper approach, crafting my timing and entry as careful as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
99.9% of the traders out there want confirmation. With that in mind, it makes more sense for me to be on the aggressive side.

 

All my best,

MK

 

I think there are degrees to the confirmation. This could be one extra bar, two bars, indicator based, etc... The more confirmation you require, you are in with the herd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Degree of aggression can be measured by degree of 'earliness' or 'lateness' as measured from a turning point. By waiting for confirmation you often give up trade location to have confirmation and also momentum already on your side. As you note the very earliest (most aggressive traders) will trade before the turn. (buying into a selling climax) This by definition would be counter trend trading.

 

The later you trade (the further away) the less aggressive you are. You pay for this with poorer trade location and so potentially higher risk. As I mentioned above you have momentum working for you as compensation. 'Break out' traders and 'trend followers' are the latest. Of course if you are really late trading a pull back for example you run the risk of trading straight into the next turn.

 

Getting the right style (early or late) for your personality is one of the fundamental choices you make as a trader so worthy of special consideration.

 

Personally I trade early (I try and trade as close to the turn as possible) and with quite a high frequency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The more threads I have read, whether it is about a trading style, a type of method to trade, a timeframe preference.. each thread invariably tends to take a detour briefly.. One poster thinks another is being hateful or stepping on their method, the other poster backpedals signaling that "was not the intent” and it occurred to me that a lot of these tend to boil down to one simple statement: "Oh well I trade this way because that is what I am comfortable with and what works for me." Generally one trader is far more aggressive in their trade choices than the other trader in the conversation.

 

With my study of VSA I also saw this come to pass even with Tom Williams and Todd K (both work together in the same company and present VSA to students.) Tom Williams is an aggressive trader- when he has determined that he is looking to go long when he sees a bar that suits his fancy and BAM he is in. Todd K on the other hand waits for confirmation. He will wait out the next bar or even two before he gets in to his position.

 

What this does for the more conservative trader is give him/her a higher probability of success. What it does for the aggressive trader is let him/her be in on the entire start of the move when it does plow northward.

 

I have a good fellow trader who is more "confirmation oriented" and I tend to be the Tom Williams aggressive trader apparently.

 

I wanted to get a feel of how some of the traders here feel they fit into what category vs. the other? If I see a beautiful bull move on the horizon but will be unable to physically be at my platform to pull the trigger at the "perfect moment" I will accept the drawdown to be sure I get in on the trade. My fellow and well-respected trader from above would think I was crazy because he'd wait for the confirmation of that trend to form before pulling the trigger. Plus he is less susceptible to the fact that if it did decide to punch down a tad lower- I am now either stopped out or riding a nasty drawdown before the good times come.

 

I'd be interested in hearing others own self-reflection of what type of trader they really are. I'd be very interested in people who once sat in the "Aggressive Chair" and had a moment of clarity to become a more "Conservative Trader."

 

Once again I see an inadvertent lesson I was taught by a wonderful friend and fellow trader that I had to come too on my own... my aggressive days may be coming to an end... I may be leaning towards the “Conservative” and “boring” side with higher probability of win than I currently do now!

Aaron

 

 

Mainstream TA is an endless supply of patterns, techniques, methods etc. Depending on which books a person reads, what they see in a chart and the individuals personality is all relavant.

 

Personally i've never really understood the aggresive/passive arguement, Jeckyll and Hyde trading in an individual can't be good for the curve.

 

Good trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting thread... After thorough analysis, I realized I was overly aggresssive which forced me to jump into trades too early. Even my old mentor mentioned I was too aggressive. As a result, one of the things I struggled to change was to hold myself back and wait for further confirmation.... allowing me to time my trades better.

 

This took practice and time as I started to learn that being conservative didnt necessarily mean you had less balls. It was simply practicing more discipline and patience. In the end, all that really mattered was your PNL.... and thus changed my style of trading to a more sniper approach, crafting my timing and entry as careful as possible.

 

James-

Thank you, After self-analysis, I appear to be in your former state. I don't like drawdown, but my trades virtually always work out and end in the + side of my sheet (sometimes not at the dollar figure I had intended because of the further downward movement.) I think I would prefer to be a little later in the move- but be more certain that the move is going to bank money.

 

Anyone here work out their trades in this way, I have been toying with it but not come close to mastereing it at all:

 

Instead of doing an instant execution trade and having drawdown, you put in a pending order at some pre-determined price and when the market does go in your direction, you are filled. This way their is little or no drawdown and you are in on the major part of the move. I'm looking at this as a potential way to solve both problems. I get into the major part of the move, but don't ride the drawdown. If the order doesn't fill, I'll reassess after and see if their is a better entry.

 

Thoughts?

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.