Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

The Chimp`s new "Futures Scalps"

Recommended Posts

Unicorn : so far BOP outperforms ad and chaikin...

 

Hello Walter;

it is great that you have already tested BOP versus AD_Osc; it is nice to know that BOP outperforms.

 

remember to take care on momentum conditions, as they may diverge and then still keep going on the same direction...

 

Indeed, I know that too well; especially when price hits the trailing stop and then sprints to hit the pivot point no matter what...

 

counter trend trades demand good momentum discernment skills...

 

Yes; I am not there yet.

 

I am studying the negative laddering and the subsequent vmar icon. That is a very interesting setup. :thumbs up::thumbs up:

If you get a chance, please point out a few of those trades - negative laddering and subsequent vmar icon - in your video presentations.

 

Take it easy.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am studying the negative laddering and the subsequent vmar icon. That is a very interesting setup. :thumbs up::thumbs up:

If you get a chance, please point out a few of those trades - negative laddering and subsequent vmar icon - in your video presentations.

 

Take it easy.

Unicorn.

 

Laddering became automatic and is discounted on the new way setups are formed... so I dont look at them on the setup formation anymore, it was a very good interesting instance during the open research... but is good to know how they work as they became hidden components of our trading aproach... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Cattus;

 

this is the accumulation_distribution Line, a summation of the value since the beginning of the chart. It is not the oscillator; that's why it does not require the 14 bar input.

 

It is also a different from the BOP based computation because it uses

 

((Close- Low) - (High - Close)) / (High - Low) * Volume

 

instead of

 

(Close- Open) / (High - Low) * Volume

 

 

regards.

Unicorn.

 

 

OK, Unicorn. I understand.

 

I tried to find some oscillator of Accumulation/Distribution in the forum of NT, but I did not find a example of them. May be other can help you.

 

Regards.

Agustín

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Chimp`s new "Futures Scalps" thread very interest

 

I cann't speak English very well. Sorry

 

Code Convert to the Tradestation Indicators(FXST3CCI.cs,T3.cs) difficult for me.

 

if possible, Post for the Tradestation Indicators code(FXST3CCI,T3)

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Chimp`s new "Futures Scalps" thread very interest

 

I cann't speak English very well. Sorry

 

Code Convert to the Tradestation Indicators(FXST3CCI.cs,T3.cs) difficult for me.

 

if possible, Post for the Tradestation Indicators code(FXST3CCI,T3)

 

Thank you.

 

No problem Kinglim, here you go:

 

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

ps. if you need any other codes for Walter's threads, just give me a shout.

CCI_T3_SMOOTHED.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray,

 

Is it possible to code BOP for TradeStation?

 

Thanks,

 

Jim

 

Here you go Jim, I've read that they are a couple of variations to the BOP, so not sure which is correct. I think Unicorn mentioned Volume being in the calculation.

 

The code I've attached is based on this :

 

BOP = (Close - Open) / ( High - Low);

 

If anyone thinks this is incorrect, please let me know so I can amend it.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

BALANCEOFPOWER.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank Blu-Ray

good work. :)

 

i'm some confused

 

FXST3CCI indicator show 1)Blue line and 2)Yellow line

 

TL posting CCiT3Smooth indicator maybe Blue line indicator

Yellow line indicator unknown indicator. :confused:

 

thanks

0.PNG.d973cd22178d56ac1e1096ea168e12dc.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thank Blu-Ray

good work. :)

 

i'm some confused

 

FXST3CCI indicator show 1)Blue line and 2)Yellow line

 

TL posting CCiT3Smooth indicator maybe Blue line indicator

Yellow line indicator unknown indicator. :confused:

 

thanks

 

Kinglim

 

The yellow line is a signal line based on a simple moving average of the cci.

 

I've recoded it for you so you can download it again.

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

FXST3CCI.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu-Ray,

 

Thanks for your quick response to my BOP request. It seems to react differently from the MT4 version.

 

When I compare the TS version (using multicharts and ES) with The MT4 version on a 1 min. scale, there is quite a bit of difference. I am anything but a programmer but I suspect that volume may have something to do with BOP. Volume my be somewhat of a problem with Forex but should not be with futures contracts.

 

Thanks again for anything you may be able to do.

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray,

 

Thanks for your quick response to my BOP request. It seems to react differently from the MT4 version.

 

When I compare the TS version (using multicharts and ES) with The MT4 version on a 1 min. scale, there is quite a bit of difference. I am anything but a programmer but I suspect that volume may have something to do with BOP. Volume my be somewhat of a problem with Forex but should not be with futures contracts.

 

Thanks again for anything you may be able to do.

 

Jim

 

Jim

 

Leave it with me and I'll take a look at it, if possible could you post a chart of your MT4 with ES on it, so I can compare and fix it.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank Blu-Ray

wow~good work. :applaud::applaud::applaud::applaud:

 

it was a huge help to me.

 

you are very kind and good.

Once again, Thank you very much for all your helping.

 

Kinglim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray,

 

I think I have the screen shot attached. Let me know if it is clear enough.

 

Thanks again,

 

Jim

 

Jim

 

I've coded it up exactly the same as the version igorad posted earlier. I've only got forex data on my MT4, so I've compared it live against the EURJPY yesterday. It was close but would vary, probably because the forex data is coming from different sources.

 

However, I compared the ES on my TS charts to the chart you posted and it's way off. Unfortunately I can't explain it, I would guess it has something to do with the different platforms in which they handle the data, I know MT4 has repainting problems with some indicators, whether this is the case, I'm unsure. The code itself is straight forward so I think it must be down to the platforms.

 

Anyway, give it a try for yourself.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4236&stc=1&d=1196170630

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

BOP_V2.ELD

eurjpy.png.acbd62bfc776769537a3d579d2a0f99c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blu-Ray

 

Thanks again for this indicator. I have run the new version through some forex charts and it seems to work pretty well as a divergence indicator, but it really seems to fall down on ES.

 

I think you are right about the platforms. I generally use Multicharts with Tradestation data. I put BOP_v2 on both charts and they are different, even though they are using the exact same data.:confused:

 

Still looking for a divergence indicator for ES on tradestation. If you have any ideas, please let the world know. I love Walters set up on MT4 and NT, for both the Icon and the divergence, but there are so many limitations on these charts. I am used to looking at volume charts for futures. Not available on MT4 and NT will only let you import 1 minute historical data from Tradestation.:crap:

 

Anyway, thank you...thank you....thank you.....for your contributions. I continue to look forward to your posts.:)

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blu-Ray

 

Thanks again for this indicator. I have run the new version through some forex charts and it seems to work pretty well as a divergence indicator, but it really seems to fall down on ES.

 

I think you are right about the platforms. I generally use Multicharts with Tradestation data. I put BOP_v2 on both charts and they are different, even though they are using the exact same data.:confused:

 

Still looking for a divergence indicator for ES on tradestation. If you have any ideas, please let the world know. I love Walters set up on MT4 and NT, for both the Icon and the divergence, but there are so many limitations on these charts. I am used to looking at volume charts for futures. Not available on MT4 and NT will only let you import 1 minute historical data from Tradestation.:crap:

 

Anyway, thank you...thank you....thank you.....for your contributions. I continue to look forward to your posts.:)

 

Jim

 

 

Thanks Jim

 

With regards to a divergence indicator, I've been using the LBR 3/10 Oscillator, it seem to work okay, but with every indicator it's never going to be perfect, I don't trade the ES but I know Dogpile uses it and he trades the ES.

 

Give it a try, I think in the end, it all comes down to what your comfortable with.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4243&stc=1&d=1196204647

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

LBR_3_10_OSC.ELD

es.thumb.png.2476e5b4f08d56d85186687ed70e561f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

I've been a recent 'lurker' here over the last few weeks.

Re-discovered TL after Sparrow posted the Fantail VMA on

the Ninja Support board.

 

I'm just blown away by the community spirit here.

 

I'd like to make my own small contribution.

There was a small bug in the ADXVMA version posted to TL.

This bug would cause the indicator to plot very different values when used in a Ninja Strategy.

Thanks Josh and Sparrow, this is now fixed.

 

I've posed the fixed version below.

ADXVMAv3.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a small bug in the ADXVMA version posted to TL.

This bug would cause the indicator to plot very different values when used in a Ninja Strategy.

 

Zoltran;

 

please explain what the very small bug was; i.e. post the couple of lines with the code that had the bug

and the correct version of the same lines of code .

 

Thanks.

cheers.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.