Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Bubba, couple of questions:

1) your chart says, "Tradestation chart" but the symbol is wrong for it to be TS. It should be ESH09, not ES H9. Only reason I'm asking is to figure out what sort of charting you're using. Would that be Multicharts, perchance? Just curoius.

2) I've got a Gartley indicator on my Tradestation chart, and it's not picking up the Gartley that you're showing. I think that point C is too low for a traditional Gartley...but then again I'm no expert. BTW, I'm counting my points the "traditional" way for Gartleys (X-A-B-C-D). The attachment to this post shows the Inputs for my Gartley. Does yours look anything at all like this?

 

I just realized that my post is doubly off topic. Oh well. I won't make a habit of it.

Tasuki

5aa70eb27f909_GartleyInputs.png.bcad27eb3eea2529563b96796997b62d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasuki - i use tradestation 2000i. the symbol is the proper setting for my setup with IB data feed. that's the difference.

 

i suspect our gartley indicator is the same. here's my parameters. i'm even worse on these than i am w/ WWs. :)

parameters.png.f7503fecc0c217e6c80d5f393e34394b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are @YM Wolfe Waves (Not perfect but potential WW).. The first Chart (12.40p) I traded today (not because of WWs) but I watched it unfold in RT. I like certain aspects of WW and its predictability so far....

 

Regards,

Suri

WW_Feb180918.gif.b4749aea4bea37af1646cf5ecc13a9cb.gif

YM_WW_Feb1809.gif.855107ad08cc9c2dd4706e4e4b83e222.gif

Edited by suriNotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's what i think is a pretty classic WW.. but again, take it w/ a grain of salt :)

 

nice descending wedge w/ well proportioned swings.

 

(now, i better get out my "Trade Chart Patterns Like a Pro" and study that ABC.)

 

/just noticed i labeled point 3 as "2".. gawd, sry

NQ4600v.png.9c2739e04c10a2a6be75274dda5c434e.png

Edited by bubba

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's the follow up on last nights ww. text-book example maybe? maybe one of the seasoned WW'ers will comment..

 

/fixed the labels too

target.png.d6ff7bc0cf9bd89f6f5d6fbf06657382.png

Edited by bubba

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bubba,

 

Here is @ES X5 Pattern formation...

 

Usually in X5 patterns, the retracement of "B" gives a clue of what type of Pattern it may be forming. There are other rules it may have to form. But when "B" is retraced beyond 61.8% (Gartley), it may be suggesting a potential Butterfly or Crab pattern.

 

In this chart, B is 71%, suggesting may be a Butterfly (near 127% to 684) or Crab (near 162% to 614).

 

BTW, thanks for your kind comments about my book.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

noticed this pattern when i got home this evening. i haven't seen 1 of these on the daily before. anyone considering buying this low? i don't know about this 1

:confused:

 

(not that i KNOW about any of them of course)

suriStrings3.gif.3172dff6d12098572cb4adff6c85a89f.gif

Edited by suriNotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gold's Wolfe Wave with ABC Bullish Pattern Update...

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

Here is Gold's Wolfe Wave pattern to watch...

 

First Chart from Jan. 24th, 2009.

Second chart is an Update on Feb. 10th, 2009.

 

Regards,

Suri

GOLD_WW_ABC_Feb2009.gif.308f9f083ced39bf48b4c1f53c76b756.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi bubba,

 

Here is @ES X5 Pattern formation...

 

Usually in X5 patterns, the retracement of "B" gives a clue of what type of Pattern it may be forming. There are other rules it may have to form. But when "B" is retraced beyond 61.8% (Gartley), it may be suggesting a potential Butterfly or Crab pattern.

 

In this chart, B is 71%, suggesting may be a Butterfly (near 127% to 684) or Crab (near 162% to 614).

 

BTW, thanks for your kind comments about my book.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

thanks for the chart and explanation Suri.. very helpful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suri -

WW works best in choppy sideways markets - not trending. The run from 4 to 5 was too long. The move from 4-5 should be short and violent - scaring out the people who bought at pt. 4.

 

This is a chart of SPY 20 min.

 

There is a potential WW forming that could work nicely. Note pt 2 is a major high. Lots of overlap in the waves which means range. The move to pt. 5 is beginning rapidly, will momentum continue tomorrow morning?

 

The danger in this trade is the higher time frame - this is the top of a huge range, and a large channel. The peak last week formed at a perfect timing pt - (see the conversation on Andrews pitchfork where we marked the recent top).

 

If last weeks peak was the top, then the next andrews line points steeply down.

 

In the case of WW, the higher time frame always overrules. This one you have to be careful on and watch closely as the purple 1-3 line is broken.

5aa70ec7f02db_ScreenHunter_02Apr_2214_55.thumb.gif.0d160830b95a2fedf9684257110e7cc3.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wave slider i want to thank you for this great thread

 

here i m posting two WW of same security of different time frame in all the criteria both look good but in opposite nature

what is your view about the same i will update as they unfolds

 

first one is 15-min & second 5-min

 

if something like this happened which you prefer

I am daytrader i like WW because of its high RRR(risk reward ratio)

5aa70ec8066cd_nifty15-min.JPG.f2689b295ab6e5a92bccfe3d246d5972.JPG

5aa70ec80a11d_nifty5-min.JPG.a786cc47fb18e50de12d47c6146c8aa5.JPG

Edited by taq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad this thread got this pattern in my head - did anyone else catch this classic one today in ES?

It was good for about 6 points, just picture perfect trade.

 

Taq-

 

look for ranging situations. The 1-3 lines you draw are very steep.

 

Also use the pivot low/high instead of vaguely drawing through bars. It is important to realize why the pattern is working and see the psychology of the crowd.

 

I don't think those patterns you sent are valid. Study the pattern I have here...

5aa70ec82e178_ScreenHunter_02Apr_2317_32.thumb.gif.ee7d54e2e429626587d7d5fd4e793a51.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also the updated chart of NIFTY (NSE India) Index future

 

we are strugling to cross point 2

let us see how it unfolds

5aa70ec848087_nifty15-min24-04.JPG.3b4632638dd02e42d339a66c32fcc84f.JPG

Edited by taq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suri,

I think you're still missing the psychology of the WW. I think I've gone over some of this somewhere in a previous post on this thread, but a brief example---point #2 is supposed to the lowest low or highest high for quite some time---it's a "fear-factor" pivot that drives traders to unwillingly get out of their positions at exactly the wrong moment.

Whenever I'm looking for a WW, pivot #2 is the "sore thumb" I look for--it sticks out as plain as day. I don't see that "sore thumb" look in the potential WW you have shown for the ES.

Hope this helps,

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with you Tasuki, these are not wolfe waves. The reason for the pattern's success is the psychology, as you stated. There has to be strong participation "washing" people out and getting them positioned on the wrong side of the mkt.

Pt. #2 (bearish scenario) should look to bulls like a bottom. Pt.#4 should look like a higher low potentially giving a confirmation of a bottom.

Then it all falls apart and the wolves take over (supposedly).

 

Most important is that this pattern happens in a ranging situation- a trend on a higher time frame negates the pattern....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tasuki and Waveslider,

 

I agree with both of you... I was bit doubtful of WW and need to know

lot more about WWs. But I also had other reasons to trade this pattern.

Perhaps this could be a variation of a Broadening Pattern??

 

See how overall the pattern resulted. I will post few other pics and

how the setup was anticipated. I did have help from

ABC Bearish/H&S Setups (from previous posts) also.

 

Thanks for your insights.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11384&stc=1&d=1245106255

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11385&stc=1&d=1245106255

ES_WW_Trades.gif.23a54978f15cb676404d0ad1ee274dfc.gif

TrendAnticiaption.gif.3dabe3af6739387f2bcb895afb35237e.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.