Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Yeah volume and breadth are super weak too.

 

Any way you look at it, that top yellow line you've got will play into this market importantly, its been touched 4 times.

 

It wouldn't be surprising to see this pattern actually work out..

 

Here price just closed the critical gap down from January 14 where EVERYBODY who holds positions over night got slammed.

 

I bet it doesn't happen till monday or tuesday. If friday turns out to be a small range doji type day, get ready..!

Edited by waveslider
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
here's an indicator i found recently on the ftp.tradestation site. it plots triangles. while not true WWs, they can be similar..

 

 

bubba, thanks, looks interesting. Two questions:

1) What's the code?

2) What's the ftp.tradestation site? Never heard of it! (How do you get to it?)

 

Thanks, Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A double bullish pattern occuring in the daily chart of GLD, the gold ETF, with a caveat emptor in it's fundamentals. The blue formation is a bullish Gartley pattern and the bullish Wolfe wave is in green. Sometimes the technical patterns look much better than the fundamentals. If this was crude oil or it's ETF, one would probably jump all over it, but fundamentally, gold may be in a slide or trade sideways for a while, basically because there may simply be a lack of world wide demand for it. Unlike crude, the annual demand for gold is only about $14 billion, while the annual supply/recycling of gold is about $77 billion. The Asian middle class demand for gold may also be waning - it is hard to buy a lot of gold if you are struggling to pay for increasing prices in food.

We may not see another peak this year, 2008, in gold as we saw in mid march unless we see another Bear Stearns like financial event again.

5aa70e5f712a2_GLDgartleyWw2008-05-11_233910.gif.d985c5d2e9286b678ea4f04ac52b20ac.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i noticed this one when i was reviewing Friday's charts. longer term, but i like the looks of it...

 

let me ask you guys, on the wolfewave.com site, the term 'dominant wave' is mentioned. would that be a longer term ww, maybe like this one?

2987tES.png.d9456b47f4e6a8d66604608b0ec8aded.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The one you posted is not a true WW, but it does work.

 

Of course it's not a true WW. It's not posted by Bill Wolfe or one of his privately-taught students.

 

Ok, sorry to butt in on this thread. The above is obviously said tongue-in-cheek. I went to his website. Talk about sales pitch. Oh, my!!

 

Unless you take his $3000 course, you won't be able to draw a WW correctly. He says 99.99 percent of the "secrets" are held back until you take the course.

 

Anyway, I hope you guys are making money trading today.

 

Regards,

Bert

 

edit: btw, waveslider, thanks for starting this thread. Intriguing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Bubba that one you posted is working out fine, looks like it will hit target tomorrow morning. Wouldn't be surprised if that was the end of the up move though, there is quite a bit of resistance building above, not to mention the parallel channel line (parallel to your 1-3 line).

 

dunzmatr: scale shouldn't matter too much unless you are looking at higher timeframes.

 

Bert: welcome. bill wolfe's course is of course over priced. I have heard that there are a few nuances from people who have paid. I doubt it's worth it. No system will replace the hard learned lessons of actual trading and learning money management.

 

They're fun to try and find though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yup - of course it was well on the way when i posted it. i didn't notice it until after point 5.( but o well-J.O.B).) i suppose the question about 'dominant wave' is a proprietary deal huh? i have been seeing some succesful ww's on higher TF lately. what i have difficulty with is deciding on an entry point with the pattern. (esp with higher TFs) i suppose there are zillions of different methods. i need to figure out a simple approach. i always feel the urge to pick the extreme H/L.. i'll keep working on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dominant wave is just the largest wave in action in the pattern.

 

Trying to pick tops and bottoms is a tough disease, I get infected too - - its got to be a psychological thing about wanting to prove how smart you are.

 

Entry points? Personally I think just about anything will work, but the risk management has to be tight, that's the most important thing.

 

The one you pointed out just played out this a.m., bubba. Nailed it to the cent. I think that channel was additional pressure as I mentioned. Also interesting that both points 2 and 5 happened within the range, at the extremes. Probably reinforced the pattern. I haven't looked at the volume of it, but maybe there's something there too..

MyScreenHunter.thumb.jpg.621df343f2feeed98a6f6a23844de8c7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting, waveslider. The attached chart has a similar pattern vis a vis point 1, and a few other things going for it, most notably point 2, but a few marks against it too, especially that poor show for a point 5. Still, it did work out, which counts for something.

 

Hi,

 

I'm only at post 80 in this thread, but just wanted to thank waveslider and Taz and all other contributors. I am really enjoying this thread.

 

Taz, it's SO helpful to me when the comments are typed in on the chart, like in the chart below, which you posted. Thanks.

 

Regards,

Bert

attachment.php?attachmentid=4078&d=1195194003

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

After reading this post i learned and try to itendetify WW Pattern and here is compx chart 20min. Just learning purpose only. Let me know please my thinking is right or wrong.

Thx

mkp14

ww.thumb.png.5892c9f6db2b84437f10f3746381f4c5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dominant wave is just the largest wave in action in the pattern.

 

Trying to pick tops and bottoms is a tough disease, I get infected too - - its got to be a psychological thing about wanting to prove how smart you are.

 

Entry points? Personally I think just about anything will work, but the risk management has to be tight, that's the most important thing.

 

The one you pointed out just played out this a.m., bubba. Nailed it to the cent. I think that channel was additional pressure as I mentioned. Also interesting that both points 2 and 5 happened within the range, at the extremes. Probably reinforced the pattern. I haven't looked at the volume of it, but maybe there's something there too..

thanks ws.. good points.

here's a screen i found when i got home this evening. an oddity, at least in my experience. 2 gartleys - but 1 at the finish of the larger - and both appear to be completing at the same time. just thought it was interesting. and, to make it on topic - many (most?) times a gartley will have a ww as well.

NQ_GartleyII.thumb.png.01b736748da54841eb5c63f62db53f6d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to blow the bubble guys but WWaves is worthless just as Elliott waves.

I coded every parameter and expert advisors to automate this strategy over years of data and it fails miserably.

The market is ALIVE you cannot impose "waves" and counts, IT DOES NOT WORK consistantly.

But it "looks" great after the fact...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry to blow the bubble guys but WWaves is worthless just as Elliott waves.

I coded every parameter and expert advisors to automate this strategy over years of data and it fails miserably.

The market is ALIVE you cannot impose "waves" and counts, IT DOES NOT WORK consistantly.

But it "looks" great after the fact...

 

Actually I would be really surprised if you can get good results with back-testing of any of the patterns, which does not mean they can't be used as good tools by a discretionary trader. A lot has to do with the CONTEXT in which they are being used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.