Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Last one worked PERFECTLY. Lots of these showing up recently....

And here's another one....

 

That's SPY on a half hour chart , sort of an ugly format - sorry...

5aa70efa1a90b_ScreenHunter_01Jul_0810_16.thumb.gif.e2ea7ef7eb400ae932f054aed4db3f39.gif

Edited by waveslider
symbol info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can say is, wow - -that is one of the nicest ones I have ever seen.

 

This one is perfect because it fails above the range (marked with horiz. white lines) and below the range.

 

#2 point gave people plenty of time to get long.

 

#4 to #5 was steep and dramatic, beginning with a gap and hardly looking back.

5aa70f0021233_ScreenHunter_01Jul_1613_11.thumb.jpg.3ad3a5ea6fd7880719c68d662760bf93.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go again -

 

Ever since the market has made this steep move up with no pullbacks, I have been suspicious. Direct sustained moves through resistance are usually a run on stops engineered to create fear. This move has fear written all over it.

 

Fear is what creates a perfect 4-5 move in a wolfe wave, so here we go.

 

Daily charts of $spx.x and FDX.

 

The S&P point #1 starts at the 50% level of a range.

 

The other chart I have here is for Fedex, what is interesting is that it has the same WW pattern, but if you run an Andrews pitchfork on the pattern, the centerline runs perfectly with the WW line. I shorted a little today.

5aa70f0aa9460_ScreenHunter_03Jul_3019_39.thumb.gif.70eef9036dc520fcc1561c77f37d8310.gif

5aa70f0ab55b8_ScreenHunter_02Jul_3019_28.thumb.jpg.37616da36aaac084341e015f44fa1754.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suri,

I agree with your broadening top situation.

If you look at the chart I posted, the #1 point is further back.

So point 4 is slightly below point #1.

Having a hard time believing in the rally, internals and volume have just been horrible, so that leaves just short covering powering this one.

The only standout is the nasdaq, which is powering along well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am bit puzzled... I thought I posted this chart in the morning

along with my previous post and now I do not see :(

 

Anyway, Here is the Broadening Pattern targets if it materializes.

Broadening Patterns are rare but reliable.

 

Some exhaustion rally may still push SPX a bit higher.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12635&stc=1&d=1249258338

Broadening_Flat_SPX2.gif.875af637f0a41f1463887c3201e70088.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

traderdan,

Compare the first and second charts you posted. The second one was just about perfect, but the first one wasn't 100% Wolfe-like, so to speak. Note that pivot 1 in the second chart was right in the middle of the range, and that pivot 2 dipped to new lows, scaring the pants off retail traders (that's what pivot 2 is spoze to do). The first chart lacked those salient features. It still might work out, of course. Just thought I'd point out those details for everyone's edification.

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you're saying. The first one didn't work out in this case.

 

traderdan,

Compare the first and second charts you posted. The second one was just about perfect, but the first one wasn't 100% Wolfe-like, so to speak. Note that pivot 1 in the second chart was right in the middle of the range, and that pivot 2 dipped to new lows, scaring the pants off retail traders (that's what pivot 2 is spoze to do). The first chart lacked those salient features. It still might work out, of course. Just thought I'd point out those details for everyone's edification.

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is it a valid wolfe wave pattern?

 

Simple answer: No. this is a rolling chop, not a Wolfe Wave. Look at previous examples and read my psychological description in earlier posts of this thread to understand the WW.

Tasuki

Edited by Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also studying Wolfe Wave. From what has just recently been explained to me, points 1-3 and points 2-4 must converge to be a valid Wolfe Wave pattern. I have not seen those converging elements in most of the charts posted on this thread. Waveslider, Suri....thoughts?

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=16870&stc=1&d=1261883188

5aa70f8a50642_wolfewaveuj.thumb.gif.eb089ba68c84cdba3c2d588d766c82fb.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct that the pattern should converge. Also, the lesson I have learned that is most valuable is that volatility should be high, and the move to point five should be a very fast move.

The chart you posted (don't know what to call you with that user name!) seems to be grinding higher, I doubt it's a WW, though your point one and two look excellent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Waveslider. I came across a site called TheHarmonicTrader...I downloaded his free PDF and was wondering if you had seen his work. Think I will check out Suri's book also.. I am not constantly profitable yet due to MM and RR skills. I like the idea of these patterns (not wolfe wave) being formed by the FIB ratios. Thanks again for you input.

 

Don't worry about the Hesychast thing....you can call me Ron. Peace be unto you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
I am not constantly profitable yet due to MM and RR skills.

 

What is MM and RR? By the way there is no safer way to pick tops and bottoms than Wolfe. And by the way not all Wolfes must have converging lines to be valid. 100% of my trades are Wolfes with 1/4 having diverging lines. Just my 2 cents.

 

Study Wolfe and nothing else. My today's trade enclosed. Moderate $734 per lot during a two hour morning trade. There are about 10 - 12 such trades during week.

 

Regards

WW1.thumb.png.71abd015195b4a68ddab11d1bfabd26e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.